Connect with us

California

Gavin Newsom wants nations to exempt California goods from tariffs. That’s unlikely, experts say

Published

on

Gavin Newsom wants nations to exempt California goods from tariffs. That’s unlikely, experts say


As President Donald Trump blasts American allies and adversaries alike for “unfair trade” and sets steep tariffs, California Governor Gavin Newsom has a different message for the nations of the world.

“Donald Trump’s tariffs do not represent all Americans,” the Democrat said in a video posted on social media last week, as the stock market took a nosedive and investors coped with steep losses. “Our state of mind is around supporting stable trading relationships around the globe.”

The governor took a step further last week when he asked nations to exempt California-made products from retaliatory tariffs, which have already been announced by China and Canada, two of the state’s top trading partners.

Newsom then directed his administration, including an international trade and affairs team housed in the Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development, to seek out “new opportunities to expand trade” such as “strategic partnerships” to blunt the rising prices and supply-chain disruptions that he and many economists expect from Trump’s “America first” approach to trade.

Advertisement

Sean Randolph, senior director of the Bay Area Council Economic Institute, a San Francisco think tank, said Newsom is right to take that approach for California, a state heavily reliant on international trade.

“Other countries do have a friend in California,” he said.

But as a mere governor, Newsom doesn’t have the power to make trade pacts or set tariffs, which are “the heart of the issue,” Randolph and other experts said. The governor can partner with nations to promote tourism and education and forge closer personal ties with leaders overseas, but trade policy is solely the territory of the federal government.

“What he can actually do, I think, is pretty limited,” Randolph said.

Randolph, who was California’s top trade official in the 1990s, isn’t alone in bracing for inflation and disruptions as Trump’s tariffs set in. According to Newsom’s office, the import taxes will “have an outsized impact on California businesses.”

Advertisement

The Golden state is the top importer of foreign goods in the U.S., $491.5 billion worth, chiefly for computer and electronic products, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce. California exports totaled $183 billion last year, second to Texas’ $455 billion, with most goods destined for Mexico, Canada and China as well as other Asian markets. California shipped nearly $50 billion worth of computers and electronics, its top export, last year, the commerce agency’s data shows.

California has close trade ties with Mexico, and two-way trade reached $98 billion last year, according to the Commerce department. Mexico is a major source of agricultural products such as avocados and berries to California residents. It’s also common for goods like cars to flow back-and-forth repeatedly between Southern California and Mexico during production, Randolph said.

On Friday, a week since Newson first made his overtures to foreign nations, a spokesperson did not respond when asked if the governor’s office had made progress toward tariff carve-outs or partnerships with other nations.

Advertisement

Nor did a representative of the governor’s economic development office provide more detail about the kind of strategic partnerships that staff are now pursuing with international diplomats behind the scenes, or how those might soothe economic pain.

“The administration is actively engaging with our international partners and exploring opportunities to strengthen our shared economic interests,” Newsom spokesperson Tara Gallegos said in an email.

In public appearances and statements, Newsom is quick to remind audiences that California’s roughly $4.1 trillion economy is the largest in the nation and a powerhouse for tech, agriculture and manufacturing.

Even so, as a governor, Newsom can’t sign a binding trade pact with any foreign nation, per the U.S. Constitution, said Maurice Obstfeld, a fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington D.C. and an economics professor at at UC Berkeley. The Commerce Clause grants Congress power “to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States.”

Despite his overtures, Newsom’s hands are tied on trade, he said.

Advertisement

“No country makes trade agreements with subnational regions,” Obstfeld said in an email. “The U.S. federal government has not made California a free-trade enclave.”

He called Newsom’s proclamations “grandstanding without substance.”

California is already in dozens of partnerships with foreign nations from China and Mexico to Armenia in the last decade. Many are agreements to coordinate on climate action. These partnerships can be useful, but they don’t carry the weight of law, said Russell Hancock, president of Joint Venture Silicon Valley, a Bay Area think tank.

Nonetheless, Hancock applauded Newsom for reaching out to trade partners.

Advertisement

“Good for him, he’s making a play,” he said. “And let’s be real, he’s also positioning himself. But that’s how you do things.”

Newsom has tried to toe the line between appeasing Trump and standing apart since the Republican took office in January. The Marin County Democrat is also famously ambitious and is widely rumored to be planning a run for president in 2028.

Some of these partnerships focus on trade, including a 2019 agreement with the Mexican Ministry of Economy in 2019 “to expand trade and investment cooperation.”

But going beyond a loose agreement and actually exempting California products from tariffs, as Newsom has pleaded, is probably riskier for countries, experts said. China, for instance, is now facing total import taxes of 145%, the Trump administration said Thursday, and has responded in kind with its own steep tariffs on U.S. products.

Granting California a carve-out would probably draw the ire of Trump — risking even bigger import taxes — Obstfeld said.

Advertisement

“What would they even gain? Other than drawing enmity and higher tariffs from the president,” he said.

Gallegos, the spokesperson for Newsom, did not comment on this critique when asked to respond.

Economists nationally are expecting Trump’s tariffs to drive up prices on everything from homes, cars, iPhones, running shoes and coffee. With the import taxes, Trump is intending to reverse a 50-year trend of American companies off-shoring manufacturing overseas and bring more factories back home.

Beyond the tough tariffs on Chinese imports, which are critical to the U.S. tech and clean energy sectors as well as a slew of others, the Trump administration imposed a blanket 10% tariff on most nations. Trump said he rolled back even stricter tariffs this week because of stock market turmoil and anxiety.

His administration also set a 25% tariff on imported car parts — hitting the U.S. auto industry that depends on a deeply integrated supply chain with other nations — as well as steel and aluminum. Canada and Mexico are also subject to a new tariff on goods imported outside of the scope of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, signed by Trump in his first term, which replaced the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) that eliminated tariffs on most goods in 1994.

Advertisement

In response, Canada has set a 25% tax on American cars and trucks. Mexican officials have said they do not want to set tariffs in retaliation but may do so.

The Bay Area Council institute’s Randolph said it’ll take a few months at the soonest for the full effects of Trump’s toughened trade policies to materialize. But one thing looks clear already.

“We’re all going to live with higher prices,” he said.

Originally Published:



Source link

Advertisement

California

Amazon halts high-speed e-bike sales in California following fatal crashes

Published

on

Amazon halts high-speed e-bike sales in California following fatal crashes


Orange County’s top prosecutor said Amazon has agreed to stop California sales of certain e-bikes that can go faster than state speed limits following a series of fatal collisions.

The announcement, first reported by KCRA, comes on the heels of an April consumer alert by California Attorney General Rob Bonta that highlighted a rise in deaths related to e-bike and motorcycle crashes.

“We are seeing a surge of safety incidents on our sidewalks, parks, and streets,” Bonta said in a statement. “To ride a motorcycle or moped, you need to have the appropriate driver’s license and comply with rules of the road.”

Bonta’s alert stated that pedal-assisted e-bikes cannot exceed 28 mph. Throttle-assisted e-bikes are limited to 20 mph.

Advertisement

Amazon had continued to sell e-bikes with speeds over 40 mph. Amazon did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Electric bikes and motorcycles have become increasingly popular in the last few years, particularly among teens. But the surge has been shadowed by a spate of deadly crashes.

Orange County Dist. Atty. Todd Spitzer has charged at least three parents with allowing their children to ride electric motorcycles illegally, calling the vehicles a “loaded weapon.”

Spitzer noted in a post on X that Amazon said it removed e-bikes advertised with speeds over 40 miles per hour after KCRA contacted the company.

“The company said it has removed the examples provided and is investigating compliance for similar products,” Spitzer wrote.

Advertisement

That includes an Orange County mother, who faces an involuntary manslaughter charge after her son allegedly struck an 81-year-old man with an electric motorcycle. The 14-year-old boy had been doing wheelies on an e-motorcycle

A 13-year-old boy on an e-bike in Garden Grove died earlier this week after veering into the center median and hurtling onto the roadway. The boy was traveling at around 35 mph on a black E Ride Pro electric motorcycle, authorities said.

Amazon’s new sales limits come as the Los Angeles City Council pushes to keep electric bikes of off most city recreational trails, arguing they are a threat to hikers. E-bikes would still be allowed on designated bikeways, such as along the L.A. River.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

After exile, California tribes could help run their ancestral redwoods again

Published

on

After exile, California tribes could help run their ancestral redwoods again


Daniel Felix, 10, looks out from atop a gargantuan stump of an old-growth redwood on his tribe’s ancestral land. Once, this forest on California’s North Coast was replete with the ancient behemoths that can live beyond 2,000 years.

Only a fraction are left now, depleted by a logging company before the state acquired the forest in the 1940s.

This is unique public land, Jackson Demonstration State Forest, spanning 50,000 acres. Trees are plentiful here, but they might not live a millennium. California’s 14 demonstration forests are required to produce and sell timber to show — or “demonstrate” — sustainable practices. Money from logging — roughly $8.5 million a year — pays for management of the forests by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, or Cal Fire.

Daniel’s tribe, the Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians, has pushed to rein in the cutting — spearheaded by his late great-grandmother, Priscilla Hunter. They’re part of a diverse coalition that includes environmental activists, local politicians and other tribes.

Advertisement

Now they may finally get their wish. Assemblymember Chris Rogers (D-Santa Rosa) has introduced a bill that would nix the forests’ logging mandate, instead prioritizing values such as carbon storage, wildfire resilience and biodiversity.

The bill represents the latest chapter in a region legendary for fierce battles over logging, and it marks an uncommon alliance between tribes and the environmental movement.

Under Assembly Bill 2494, there could still be logging, but it would have to support those new principles, and the forests would be funded differently.

And it proposes another significant change. It would pave the way for giving tribes a say in managing the lands for the first time since they were forcibly evicted more than a century ago, and for integrating Indigenous knowledge — like cultural burning — into the forests.

“It’s what we dreamed of,” said Polly Girvin, Hunter’s former partner and a retired lawyer focused on Native American issues. “And to have it come true? I’m used to movements that sometimes take 30 years in Indian Country to get to the justice you’re seeking.”

Advertisement

Kids play in the stump of an ancient redwood during a potluck held after the spirit run in Jackson Demonstration State Forest last month.

(Paul Kuroda / For The Times)

Some backers say the bill offers a new economic path forward for communities behind the so-called redwood curtain. With the decline of logging and cannabis, they see tourism driven by ultramarathons, mushroom foraging and other outdoor activities as a financial savior.

“If we had an increase of 10% of visitors coming to our county because of recreational opportunities, that would more than surpass all of the timber tax in our county,” Mendocino County Supervisor Ted Williams said, projecting an increase in money from a lodging tax.

Advertisement

But the push to reshape forest management is fiercely opposed by loggers and mill owners, who say their work is sustainable and provides blue-collar jobs in a region where they’ve dwindled. Already California imports most of its wood from Oregon, Washington and Canada.

“California has the most rules and regulations of anywhere in the world so all they’re doing is exporting the environmental impact to somewhere else, still using the product,” said Myles Anderson, owner of a logging company in Fort Bragg founded by his grandfather. “It’s pretty disgusting, really.”

Anderson believes the bill will greatly reduce logging, even stop it altogether. In his office, with photos of him and his father at a logging site decades ago, he points out it’s sponsored by the Environmental Protection Information Center. Why else would they and other environmental groups “support it if they didn’t see the same thing that I’m seeing?”

Tribal runners in Jackson Demonstration State Forest.

Last month, activists who have sought to rein in logging at Jackson held their first major gathering in about four years, galvanized by the bill that they see as a significant step in the right direction.

(Paul Kuroda / For The Times)

Advertisement

A new but old fight

About five years ago, community members caught wind of plans to chop down towering redwoods within Jackson, near the coastal town of Caspar. Priscilla Hunter would come out to the forest “and could hear them crying — it was our ancestors,” said her daughter Melinda Hunter, the tribe’s vice chairwoman. “Then she had to protect [the trees].”

Environmental activists and Native Americans, not historically allies in the region, joined forces to fight it. “Forest defenders” camped out high in the canopy and blocked logging equipment with their bodies. Some were arrested.

The uprising harked back to the 1980s and 1990s, when iconic environmentalist Judi Bari led Earth First! campaigns against logging in the region. Many of the old tree sitters — white-haired and brimming with stories of Bari — have come out of the woodwork for the latest battle.

For them, it was a win. Cal Fire paused new timber sales and, citing public safety, halted some that were underway — including one expected to generate millions of dollars for Myles Anderson’s logging company.

“We were left with nothing,” Anderson said.

Advertisement

Then, last year, Cal Fire approved the first harvest plan since that hiatus. It riled up the sizable, ecologically minded community.

Jessica Curl, 47, remembers growing up nearby “in a terrain of trunks” as trucks carried out logs. Now the redwoods are regrowing, “gorgeous” and gobbling carbon, she said.

“We’re so lucky to live in an area where we have this amazing climate-change mitigation tool, that if we would just leave it alone would do this amazing work that we’re trying to think of all these cool, inventive things to do.”

Isidro Chavez receives burning sage after a run in Jackson Demonstration State Forest.

Isidro Chavez receives burning sage, or smudging, after a run in Jackson Demonstration State Forest. Smudging is a ritual used to cleanse spaces and individuals of negative energy, promote calm and improve mood.

(Paul Kuroda / For The Times)

Advertisement

Tears of grief, resolve

A group of “spirit runners” — a Native American tradition of bringing prayer — sprinted through the heart of Jackson forest as rain poured through the canopy. The mid-April event marked activists’ first major gathering since protests wound down in 2022.

Attendees gathered in a circle to wait for them. Misty Cook, of the Sherwood Valley Band of Pomo Indians, read a statement as eyes misted all around:

“All the living things around us, they miss us. They miss the language. They miss our touch, our hands, touching all of the things — the water, the plants. They miss the songs. They miss the beat of our footsteps and our voices, and they miss the children’s laughter and play, which was so important. They want us to gather them, to use them and to share them. Otherwise they will get sick and possibly die.”

Cal Fire launched a tribal advisory council to bring Indigenous perspective into Jackson. But some local tribes say it’s not enough because they lack decision-making power.

When the runners arrived, the circle absorbed them. Then they continued on to the site of a controversial proposed harvest, Camp Eight. They wrapped a bandana that belonged to Priscilla Hunter around a small tree — a quiet, somber act where she took her last stand. Runners took turns embracing the trunk.

Advertisement

Redwoods at the Capitol

In March, Rogers’ bill cleared a committee and is now in the Assembly Appropriations Committee’s suspense file. A hearing is set for Thursday.

Funding is a major point of contention. Environmentalists say funding these forests with timber operations incentivizes cutting bigger trees. Cal Fire maintains decisions are driven by forest health, not industry demand.

AB 2494 would fund the forests through a tax on lumber and engineered wood products. The shift could create “[o]ngoing state costs and cost pressures of an unknown but potentially significant amount, possibly in the low millions of dollars annually,” according to a legislative analysis.

The California Forestry Assn., a timber industry trade group, says the idea is a nonstarter.

Cal Fire declined to comment on pending legislation but Kevin Conway, the agency’s staff chief for resource protection and improvement, said its nearly 80-year history managing Jackson reflects “care and attention.” Since the state acquired the forest, “we have more trees on the landscape, more habitat and those trees are trending larger,” he said.

Advertisement

For the tribes who have rallied and prayed, a burning question is whether the land will again reflect their vision, or remain shaped by decisions made by others.

Buffie Campbell, executive director of the InterTribal Sinkyone Wilderness Council — co-founded by Priscilla Hunter and one of the groups supporting the bill — said young people wouldn’t be able to fathom the significance of the legislation passing. Maybe that’s a good thing.

“Maybe they don’t need to know about all the fighting that we have to do before they get to go out and enjoy and be tribal guardians stewarding their land.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

Two GOP candidates for California governor participate in Bakersfield forum

Published

on

Two GOP candidates for California governor participate in Bakersfield forum


Two Republican candidates seeking California’s top office were back on the campaign trail and made a stop in Bakersfield on Saturday.

The California Young Republicans and Kern County Young Republicans co-hosted a forum featuring Chad Bianco and Steve Hilton. The event follows two gubernatorial debates last month in which both candidates appeared alongside several Democrats.

The forum happened on Saturday afternoon at the Liberty Center on California Ave.

Comment with Bubbles
Advertisement

BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT

The forum came as mail voting is underway ahead of California’s June 2 primary, where the top two vote-getters will advance to the November general election regardless of party.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending