California
An uphill battle as Southern California cities try to combat illegal Fourth of July fireworks
As the Fourth of July looms each year, Southern California’s police and fire agencies battle a predictable crime: illegal fireworks that will be set off for hours on end, rattling neighborhoods and lighting up the sky. The dangerous effects of the illicit devices are just as predictable, among them injuries, fires, dense smoke and emotional trauma to veterans and others suffering from post-traumatic stress.
To try to get people to stop buying and setting off the illegal devices — from bottle rockets and firecrackers to mortars and aerial shells — local officials for weeks have sent emails, posted on social media and held press conferences, warning of the dangers and cautioning that using them could lead to citations and hefty fines.
On the streets of cities across the region on the Fourth of July, law enforcement will use various strategies to combat the use of such fireworks, with fines and other penalties used as a deterrent. Yet most local officials agree that enforcement is labor-intensive and solving the problem is tricky.
ALSO SEE: July 4th fireworks: New rules, where to watch and tips in Southern California
“It’s an all hands on deck day for us,” said Huntington Beach police Lt. Thoby Archer said. “We’re stretched thin like every coastal city is.”
Every single Huntington Beach police officer will work on the Fourth of July. according to city officials, when calls for service are expected to dramatically rise
Last year, Huntington Beach dispatchers received more than 700 fireworks-related calls, said Jessica Cuchilla, spokeswoman for the police department. That was an increase of about 250 calls from 2022. To combat the increase, the city, like others, has a phone app to report illegal fireworks activity.
The department also has mapped out neighborhoods and addresses that previously have been a problem in an effort to step up patrols in that area. Letters to residents in those neighborhoods were sent prior to the holiday to warn them of the consequences for illegal fireworks activity, Archer said.
Fourth of July house parties increased in the city after the COVID pandemic, which has led to increased firework activity in neighborhoods, the lieutenant said. Any response to a fireworks-related call requires multiple officers.
“Any time someone is going in to potentially cite someone at a party, there’s usually a number of inebriated individuals,” Archer said. “It’s a crowd mentality, so that requires four or more officers to go to a party like that. It’s a huge drain of resources.”
The city’s Fire Department also was preparing by putting together pairs of paramedics to respond to calls. The department was also expecting about double the calls for service, Fire Chief Darrin Witt said.
“Fortunately, we haven’t had large fires, but we have had over the last couple of years some that have turned into full blown residential fires,” Witt said.
Orange County Sheriff Don Barnes, at a press conference in late June, said his department receives a 200 percent increase in 911 calls on the Fourth of July alone, “especially when it gets to the sundown hours when fireworks start to detonate.”
Huntington Beach first responders are not alone.
In Riverside, city officials team up to form task forces, which head out to patrol the city, said Riverside City Councilman Jim Perry. Those five to seven task force teams include one police officer and one firefighter or one code enforcement officer.
“That’s their sole responsibility,” Perry said. “The exception to that would be if the officer is the closest unit to an emergency call.”
Agencies in Corona operate the same way sending out similarly assembled task force teams to patrol the city and issue citations, said Cindi Schmitz, a spokeswoman for the city.
“You can imagine, with over 300 calls just on the evening of the Fourth, that both dispatch and first responders are inundated,” Schmitz said.
San Bernardino city police have officers from its Specialized Enforcement Bureau on firework enforcement units and they start their work several weeks in advance of the holiday, looking for those who sell illegal fireworks, including through social media, in order to prevent them from reaching neighborhoods, Capt. Nelson Carrington said. The units also hand out administrative penalties or criminal citations on the Fourth of July.
“We want to be proactive and prevent injuries,” the captain said. “And there have been fires going on. With high temperatures and dry terrain, the last thing we need is a firework landing in that terrain.”
For most cities, the fine for an illegal fireworks citation is $1,000, but in some cities, the fines increase for repeat violators, or officials have increased the base amounts. In 2021, the Corona City Council voted to increase the fine to up to $5,000 for an illegal fireworks violation.
In Murrieta and Pasadena, that amount could run as high as $50,000, officials said.
The fines from those citations go into the general fund of the city’s budget, officials from Riverside and Huntington Beach said.
But enforcement isn’t as easy as it may seem. In order to hand out a citation, a police officer, arson investigator or code enforcement officer has to personally see someone lighting the explosive, officials said.
In addition, if the culprit does not live at the home where the firework was lit, the homeowner could receive a citation for allowing the activity to take place on property, officials said.
To help, many cities allow residents to report illegal firework activity through apps, websites and phone numbers.
Still, those reports don’t always lead to punishments.
“Many times, by the time officers get there a person has lit the firework and has already gone into their home,” Cuchilla, the Huntington Beach police spokeswoman, said.
“You can see an aerial firework going off a couple blocks away and by the time you get there you’re unable to determine who lit the firework,” said Carrington with San Bernardino police.
Riverside has seen a decrease in the number of citations issued over the past three years. Police handed out 144 citations, with $144,000 in fines, in 2019 and 108 citations in 2020, according to the Riverside City Fire Department. Those totals dropped significantly in 2021, to 31 citations and down to 28 in 2023. Officer Ryan Railsback, spokesman for the city’s police department, said staffing levels went down after the COVID pandemic, meaning less enforcement.
Pasadena also saw significant decreases starting in 2021, going from 64 citations in 2020 to 23 the following year, according to data provided by the city. Lisa Derderian, a city spokeswoman, said “enforcement actions were significantly increased” in 2021 and “the effectiveness of this enforcement is evident in the decline in calls for service and subsequent citations issued.”
The department handed out nine citations in 2022, but went back up to 23 in 2023. The agency did not have estimates on the amount of fines it handed out.
In 2022, Corona doled out $33,000 in fines, more than double the year prior, city data provided by Schmitz showed. However, in 2023, the total decreased dramatically to $5,500 worth of fines.
“We continue with the same approach, but fine-tune and build on what is working,” Schmitz said, adding that the city provides education to the community before the holiday and uses the task force approach for enforcement on the holiday.
However, unlike some other cities, Schmitz said the department has not gleaned any trends in regards to fireworks enforcement from their data, though she did say calls for service are slowly decreasing year over, partly due to the increase in fines and pre-holiday communication, including social media posts and door hangers. The city received 478 calls for service regarding fireworks from July 2 to July 4 last year.
The city also runs a parade, festival and a fireworks show, she said.
“The important takeaway here is that these unnecessary calls for service, since fireworks are illegal in the City of Corona, are taking resources away from our community,” Schmitz said.
Police also try to get illegal fireworks before they hit the streets.
In the last few weeks, San Bernardino police have seized 12,000 pounds of illegal fireworks, Carrington said.
During a press conference last week, Barnes said Orange County deputies had seized more than $10,000 worth of illegal fireworks in contract cities and that the department anticipated seizing an additional $5,000 worth before the holiday.
“That is an increase,” Barnes said in comparison to last year. “It could lead to more opportunities for mishaps and injuries. Any illegal firework we confiscate has the potential for a $1,000 fine, not to mention the liability that would be incurred if you injure somebody or damage a home.”
In Riverside, a 23-year-old man was arrested in late June after officers seized more than 1,000 pounds of illegal fireworks and 100 homemade destructive devices from his home, officials said. A Riverside bomb squad received a tip that the man was selling fireworks from his Clifton Boulevard home before investigators found the fireworks on a covered patio.
And in Gardena, in what is considered the largest fireworks seizure in state history, officers found 75 tons of illegal fireworks in a warehouse in the 17000 block of Vermont Avenue in late June and needed help from several other agencies, including those from Riverside and San Bernardino counties, to transport the haul to a facility where they could be disposed of safely.
“The objective of our fireworks plan is to improve the quality of life for the residents in the city of Gardena, namely our seniors, our veterans and our pets to ensure community safety,” Gardena police spokesman Lt. Christopher Cuff told reporters on June 26.
California
California just handed oil companies billions in free pollution permits
By Alejandro Lazo, CalMatters
This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.
California air regulators on Friday approved a contentious overhaul of the state’s carbon market, creating a program that could steer billions of dollars in free pollution permits to oil refineries and other major polluters over the objections of environmental groups, key lawmakers and three of the board’s own members.
Ten members of the California Air Resources Board voted to adopt the changes to its cap-and-invest program after two days of lengthy hearings, including a full day dedicated to hundreds of public comments.
The overhaul followed intensive lobbying by the oil industry as well as pressure from Gov. Gavin Newsom’s administration to help keep refineries operating in the state amid rising gas prices.
The approval sets up a potential budget fight in Sacramento. The Legislative Analyst’s Office projects that quarterly auction revenue for state climate programs will drop from roughly $4 billion a year to about $2 billion under the new overhaul.
Such a shortfall would effectively zero out programs lawmakers spent last year fighting to fund: affordable housing, public transit, drinking water in low-income communities and pollution monitoring in California’s most polluted neighborhoods.
The governor’s office praised the measure as a compromise that balanced economic uncertainty with the state’s climate goals. Refinery closures and the Iran-Israel war have driven average California gas prices above $6 a gallon.
Newsom, in a statement, used the moment to draw a contrast with President Donald Trump.
“While Trump sows ongoing chaos and uncertainty, California is staying focused by protecting our economy, safeguarding public health, and doubling down on the clean energy future all Californians deserve,” he said.
Environmentalists warned the changes to the program amount to a giveaway to the fossil fuel industry that weakens California’s only program setting a firm cap on greenhouse gas emissions.
Katelyn Roedner Sutter, California senior director for the Environmental Defense Fund, called the decision “deeply misguided” for prioritizing polluters over communities.
“Newsom’s air regulators are handing billions to oil executives at the expense of our climate, health, and affordability for working families in a rushed process that has shortchanged meaningful public participation,” said Bahram Fazeli, policy director at Communities for a Better Environment.
How the program works — and what changes
California’s 13-year-old carbon market forces major polluters to buy permits while the state lowers the overall cap each year. Friday’s vote will reduce those permits – and creates a new subsidy program carved out of the market.
The program, which may still see changes, could make available a new pool of free pollution permits available to industry valued at as much as $4 billion. Companies that pledge to invest in clean energy and efficiency may qualify for the permits in exchange for investments in clean energy.
The pool will be capped at 118.3 million permits — the same number the air board has said must come off the market for California to hit its 2030 climate target. Environmentalists say the proposal risks wiping out those reductions.
Half are reserved for the fossil fuel sector. A recent Berkeley analysis, by the chair of an independent committee that oversees the carbon market, found refineries could end up with more free permits than they need to cover their emissions.
The air board has defended the design. Officials say the credits will go only to companies undertaking decarbonization projects, will be limited and temporary and can be clawed back if companies misuse them. The plan, they say, is meant to keep California refineries operating at a time of mounting closures and global market pressure. According to air regulators, the amended program will spur clean-energy investment as Trump cuts federal support.
This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.
California
Man charged with murder, kidnapping their 5-year-old child before fleeing to Mexico
A 40-year-old Los Angeles man was charged with murder after allegedly killing his girlfriend and kidnapping their young child before fleeing to Mexico, according to authorities.
Ruben Fregosojuarez has been charged one count of murder and one misdemeanor count of child abuse under circumstance or conditions other than great bodily injury or death, according to a Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office news release. Authorities first identified him as Ruben Fregoso but Los Angeles County prosecutors listed him as Ruben Fregosojuarez.
On Monday around 12:39 p.m., the Los Angeles Police Department conducted a welfare check in the 2600 block of South Alsace Avenue in West Adams, police said in a news release.
Officers found a woman dead inside the home “as a result of violence” and the woman’s daughter missing, police said. On Monday night, the California Highway Patrol issued an Amber Alert for the child, Daleza.
Photos obtained by NBC4 appear to show Fregosojuarez in a parking garage in San Ysidro with the girl on Sunday. The California Highway Patrol has listed her age as 4 years old but Los Angeles police say the girl is 5. She is also described as the suspect’s daughter.
The alert said that the girl was last seen with Fregosojuarez, who allegedly abducted her in a 2019 Land Rover Discovery, on Sunday at about 4 a.m.
The CHP posted in an update that the vehicle was found but that the child and man were still missing. The girl is described as 3 feet tall, 45 pounds, and having black hair and brown eyes.
California
23andMe Sued by California Over Massive 2023 Data Breach
California’s attorney general is suing the consumer genetics testing company formerly known as 23andMe, alleging the company failed to protect customers’ sensitive personal information in a massive 2023 data breach that exposed the ancestry and genetic data of nearly 7 million people.
Attorney General Rob Bonta filed the lawsuit on Thursday in San Francisco Superior Court against Chrome Holding Co., formerly known as 23andMe, accusing the company of failing to properly investigate or respond to numerous warnings that its systems had been compromised. The company’s mail-in self-testing kits became synonymous with DNA testing before it filed for bankruptcy in 2025.
In 2023, cybercriminals breached 23andMe’s systems by using a “credential-stuffing attack,” which involves bombarding online accounts with huge sets of user names and passwords stolen in previous unrelated attacks. Over a period of months, the intruders were able to make off with the personal data of more than 6.9 million people.
“23andMe’s security measures were so lax that the threat actor was able to operate undetected within 23andMe’s systems for over five months, and remarkably, 23andMe only began investigating after the threat actor offered the stolen user data for sale on the dark web and reached out to 23andMe to demand a ransom,” Bonta’s office said in the complaint.
The San Francisco-based company, which allowed people to submit genetic materials and get a snapshot of their ancestry, revealed in October 2023 that hackers had accessed customer information in the prolonged data breach that targeted customers with Chinese or Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry. The stolen data of more than 1 million Asian-Pacific Islander and Ashkenazi Jewish users was later posted for sale on the dark web.
“The sale of this data on the dark web took place amidst a period of mounting anti-Asian American and Pacific Islander and antisemitic hate and violence,” Bonta said in a press release. “This is disturbing and incredibly dangerous.”
A January 2024 lawsuit accused the company of not doing enough to protect its customers and not notifying certain customers that their data had been targeted specifically. It later settled the lawsuit for $30 million.
23andMe representatives didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
At its peak, 23andMe became the best-known name in the emerging area of DNA self-testing, with users paying upwards of $99 for kits that gave them insights into their genetic makeup, potential relatives and ancestry. But the company’s momentum slowed down in recent years after its $3.5 billion public offering in 2021.
Last July, TTAM Research Institute, a nonprofit led by Anne Wojcicki, 23andMe’s cofounder and former CEO, acquired 23andMe’s assets for $305 million.
-
New Mexico3 minutes agoPatrick Brenner: New Mexico can’t afford permitting paralysis | Carlsbad Current Argus
-
North Carolina6 minutes agoNorth Carolina felon gets 22 years for 15 guns, fentanyl pills, meth and cocaine
-
North Dakota11 minutes agoHow popular is mail-in and absentee voting in North Dakota?
-
Ohio18 minutes ago
Ohio voters literally can’t believe our eyes. Danger of AI ads not overblown | Letters
-
Oklahoma21 minutes agoOklahoma’s dramatic literacy goals now up to elementary schools to implement
-
Oregon26 minutes ago
Oregon Lottery Mega Millions, Pick 4 results for May 29
-
Pennsylvania33 minutes agoCheers to summer: Try these Western Pennsylvania beers that pair perfectly with warm weather
-
Rhode Island36 minutes agoR.I. House Finance budget phases in millionaires tax over three years – The Boston Globe