Connect with us

California

A true California hot spot: fire ants invade town loved by celebrities

Published

on

A true California hot spot: fire ants invade town loved by celebrities


A swank town in California’s central coast where celebrities from Oprah Winfrey to Prince Harry have bought properties, has become a hot spot for another reason: an active infestation of red imported fire ants.

The Santa Barbara county agricultural commissioner’s office is addressing an active infestation of these ants in Montecito, California, according to a statement issued last week.

This infestation likely originated from ant-infested nursery stock shipped from Riverside county in September 2023, according to officials.

“This is the only known infestation in the county,” according to the statement.

Advertisement

Staff from the commissioner’s office, along with the California department of food and agriculture, the University of California Cooperative Extension, and Riverside county agricultural commissioner’s office, are conducting regular property surveys.

Red imported fire ants, native to South America, have established themselves in parts of southern California, particularly in Los Angeles, Orange, and Riverside counties, according to researchers at the University of California, Riverside.

The first recorded sighting in California was in 1984. Since then, there have been periodic outbreaks in several counties.

Stings from these ants are painful and can cause pustules that may scar if infected, and a small percentage of the human population is allergic to these stings. Newborn livestock and poultry are also vulnerable to attacks.

These ants can clog irrigation lines, short-circuit electrical systems and displace native wildlife, including young birds and lizards. Their stinging behavior is also hazardous to fieldworkers and poses a significant risk to agriculture by feeding on various hosts, particularly turf.

Advertisement

The ants, mainly originating from Argentina and Brazil, pose a significant threat to California’s agricultural economy because they require quarantine of nursery products to prevent spreading through potting soil. In Texas, for example, over $1.1bn is spent each year on pesticides for fire ant control and $872m of those funds is used to control the ants from infesting lawns in urban areas.

No fire ants-related quarantines were in place in Santa Barbara amid the infestation.

Nursery products ranked second in value in the county’s agricultural economy, below strawberries, in the 2023 Santa Barbara County Crop and Livestock Report at $122,301,000.

Residents were encouraged to contact the Santa Barbara county agricultural commissioner’s office if they detected these ants or bring a sample to their offices.

“There are native fire ants and Argentine ants that are not hazardous and the quickest way to distinguish RIFA from other ants are their aggressive behavior, not color or size,” the county of Santa Barbara said in a Facebook post.

Advertisement

Montecito, located about 80 miles west of Los Angeles, is known for its celebrity and affluent community. Current and former residents include Ariana Grande, Adam Levine, Rob Lowe and others.



Source link

California

Prospect Rundown: California Collegiate League Showcase Rewind • D1Baseball

Published

on

Prospect Rundown: California Collegiate League Showcase Rewind • D1Baseball


Easton Elliot is safe on a steal of second in the California Collegiate League Showcase Game.

Summer Baseball

COMPTON, Calif. — The California Collegiate League Showcase game is in the books and once again it was a great platform to highlight some of the better off-the-beaten-path players in college baseball. The game itself saw the South squad race out to an early lead with a run in the first inning and two runs in the second on the way to a 7-2 win over the North squad. 

If you’re interested, here is how the linescore looked at the end of the game… 

Advertisement

North – 000 010 010 – 2  4  0

South – 120 004 000 – 7 […]



Source link

Continue Reading

California

The best water rides in Southern California, ranked by splash factor

Published

on

The best water rides in Southern California, ranked by splash factor


Robotic dinosaurs. Mechanical miners. Unpredictable chaos. Our local water rides offer the promise of getting wet with a dash of surprise and excitement.

Home to four world-class theme or amusement parks, the Southland isn’t lacking in inventive ways to get soaked. Some of these rides are exquisitely designed, emphasizing show scenes and story rather than simply pummeling us with water. Others aim to do exactly that.

The Big Wet Guide to Water

In L.A., water rules everything around us. Drink up, cool off and dive into our stories about hydrating and recreating in the city.

Advertisement

Getting waterlogged, after all, is part of our history. In 1900, Los Angeles was home to one of the first major American takes on a water ride, Shoot the Chutes at Chutes Park in Historic South-Central. Rising 75 feet, it utilized flat-bottomed boats and a cable to take passengers up an incline.

Today, our water rides are more advanced and just may be among the best in the country. We’ve ridden them all, and did so without ponchos, to grade them based on wetness. Five droplets means you’ll get doused; one droplet is more akin to a light sprinkle.

Missing from this list is Disneyland’s Splash Mountain, which is being refashioned into Tiana’s Bayou Adventure, a “Princess and the Frog”-themed ride that is due to open later this year. We’ll be there when it opens. In the meantime, here’s a ranking of what you can ride now.

Audio-animatronic pirates on the Pirates of the Caribbean ride in a jail cell trying to lure a dog holding the key.

(Charles Sykes / Invision / AP)

Advertisement

Pirates of the Caribbean

One realistic illustrated water drop

Disneyland’s 1967 boat ride is a leisurely jaunt through a town in the process of being ransacked by inept (read: mostly drunk) pirates. Yet there are two early drops — one moderate and one relatively small. Depending on the weight of the boat or the height of the water, expect to get lightly splashed. Because this is primarily a slow-moving family attraction, the water can either be an unexpected delight or an intrusion. But with reliably brisk air conditioning and a 15-minute-plus length, chances are you’ll dry off by the ride’s conclusion. More important, you’ll have experienced one of the most vital attractions at Disneyland, as its abstract approach to narrative set the template for the modern theme park ride.

Waterworld show at Universal Studios featuring a man on skis being pulled by a jetski.

(Myung J. Chun / Los Angeles Times)

Waterworld

One realistic illustrated water drop

OK, perhaps it’s odd to include a theme park show on a list of water rides. But Universal Studios’ stunt-focused spectacle is centered entirely on water, so it made the cut. Additionally, the large arena that houses the show contains a rather large splash zone, meaning anyone sitting in that particular section of the bleachers will get wet. The show is essentially a love letter to action-driven movie illusions, and a real hoot. Some moments never cease to surprise, such as a full-scale seaplane being jettisoned into the pond. And yes, a splash ensues. Those sitting in the wet sector will get sprayed with a decent amount of water, but if that’s not your thing it’s clearly marked and easy to avoid.

A roller coaster's track runs through water

(Todd Martens / Los Angeles Times)

Jet Stream

Two realistic illustrated water drops

Magic Mountain’s vintage take on a log flume attraction is no-frills — our boats go up a lift, enter a brisk current and then speed down a hill. Oddly, the back seat of the boat has a tendency to get a bit wetter than the front, perhaps because the boats have a propensity to glide when they hit the man-made pond. Still, this can be an essential ride at Magic Mountain, especially in the summer when the Valencia park is often scorching hot. Jet Stream arrived at Magic Mountain in 1972, and though it features no elaborate themes or scenery, the final splash is still an unique sensation, as the boats tend to hop and slightly accelerate upon landing.

Advertisement
The log flume drop of Timber Mountain Log Ride at Knott's Berry Farm.

Timber Mountain Log Ride

Three realistic illustrated water drops

This 1969 Knott’s Berry Farm attraction is one of the most important log fumes ever created. At the time of its opening, it was a relatively new attraction; the first proper implementation of the ride format opened in 1963 at Six Flags Over Texas. Knott’s, however, gave the ride, one that moves in its flume at a relatively brisk pace, a narrative about turn-of-the-century loggers, showing the world that thrill rides could carry a story. There are a couple of mini drops, but the grand finale is about a 40-foot decline. At times I’ve walked away relatively unscathed. Other times, I’ve been soaked from the waist down.

Animatronic bears loom over theme park-goers on a boat traveling among rocks and rapids

(Sean Teegarden / Knott’s Berry Farm)

Calico River Rapids

Three realistic illustrated water drops

As far as river rapid rides go, I’ve never gotten drenched on this Knott’s Berry Farm attraction. Without a major drop or a rough, fast-moving current, Calico River Rapids has always been to me more about the threat of getting soaked. That’s not to say one should expect a dry experience. (Not at all. You will get wet.) Just that this rapids attraction can be conquered without a poncho. That means as we spin among its current, we can take in the vignettes that are scattered among its rocky banks. My favorite: a young bear engaged in a whack-a-mole-like game with a flock of prairie dogs. But also be on the lookout for a pesky woodpecker.

Jurassic Park water ride boat rushes through water, causing a big splash.

(Myung J. Chun / Los Angeles Times)

Jurassic World

Three realistic illustrated water drops

Universal Studios revamped this ride in 2019 so it aligns with the most recent crop of “Jurassic World” films rather than the initial “Jurassic Park.” In doing so, designers upped its water content. We begin by gliding into a mock aquarium with a shark-eating mosasaurus looking hungrily at us tourists. Expect to be hit with water from above when the dino is shown making a leap out of the tank. But this ride is all about building tension as it leads us to an 84-foot drop. You‘ll want to linger on the top of the hill to marvel at the giant dinosaur battle with a T. Rex that unfolds there. But down you go, and when you reach the bottom it’s likely that a sizable wave will find its way onto your lap.

Advertisement
People on a raft in a California Adventure water ride bumping against a rock with rapid waters all around them

Grizzly River Run

Four realistic illustrated water drops

Disney’s take on the whitewater rafting ride is robust, coming in at about seven minutes. It begins calmly, as you drift and turn around an old mining town, before the ride truly gets thrilling — and full of water. But what ultimately sets the ride apart is the overall design, which, in a relatively confined space, manages to re-create the feeling of being in a national park. The landscape is calming, but the second half of the ride is hectic, as Grizzly River Run gradually ramps up its pace and the amount of water you take on, eventually culminating with a drop that will bring even more water sloshing into the raft.

A boat full of people floats in a rocky channel amid rapids at a theme park

(Six Flags Magic Mountain)

Roaring Rapids

Five realistic illustrated water drops

Magic Mountain’s Roaring Rapids was instrumental in the development of the whitewater rafting-type ride, as this is the first constructed in the Western U.S. But that also means it runs a little rough, which, in this case, results in riders getting absolutely drenched. As on all rapids rides, the turbulent river, buoyed by narrow chutes, moves in an unpredictable fashion. Expect about four big crushes of water to leap into the raft, and those waves will be massive — there’s no buildup, no pacing and no underlying storyline. To ride Roaring Rapids is to sign up for a soaking.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

Ballot measure to build billionaire-funded city in California withdrawn

Published

on

Ballot measure to build billionaire-funded city in California withdrawn


The company behind the highly criticized “California Forever” project, a plan backed by Silicon Valley billionaires to build a green city for up to 400,000 people on California farmland, withdrew the ballot measure for the election in November, according to a letter released Monday.

The decision followed a discussion between Mitch Mashburn, chair of the board of supervisors in Solano county, and Jan Sramek, a former Goldman Sachs trader and chief executive of California Forever.

The company will instead seek approval through the county’s standard processes and proceed through the usual county process for negotiating and executing a development agreement.

“I think it signals Jan Sramek’s understanding that while the need for more affordable housing and good paying jobs has merit, the timing has been unrealistic,” said Mashburn.

Advertisement

Solano county supervisors were scheduled to vote on whether to approve California Forever’s plan to rezone 17,500 acres of farmland near Fairfield for the city or let voters decide in November.

The move to withdraw the measure comes a week after a report by Solano county stated that the proposed city would likely cost the county billions of dollars, create substantial financial deficits, reduce agricultural production, harm climate resilience and potentially threaten local water supplies.

Sramek said California Forever would work with the county on the environmental report and development agreement over the next two years, aiming for approval from county supervisors in 2026.

“We take our time to make informed decisions that are best for the current generation and future generations,” said Mashburn. “We want to make sure that everyone has the opportunity to be heard and get all the information they need before voting on a General Plan change of this size.”

California Forever, which spent more than $800m buying in excess of 60,000 acres of mostly agricultural land, had released its own study claiming the new city would generate billions in economic activity and tens of thousands of jobs. Their marketing materials depicted a Mediterranean-style community with walkable neighborhoods and a mix of businesses.

Advertisement

The proposal, funded by billionaire venture capitalists Marc Andreessen, Michael Moritz, Reid Hoffman, a LinkedIn co-founder, and businesswoman Laurene Powell Jobs, has faced controversy since Flannery Associates, its real estate arm, sued holdout landowners for $510m, accusing them of conspiring to inflate prices.

Controversy over the secretive approach also had residents skeptical from the beginning. Silicon Valley elites had been quietly buying northern California farmland to develop a 27-square-mile plot between Travis Air Force Base and Rio Vista, currently zoned for agriculture.

“We believe that Solano county has the opportunity to forge a new path towards the California Dream for this generation and generations to come,” said Sramek. “We also believe that we must move forward with urgency – because delays are not just a statistic.”

The county’s report estimated that infrastructure such as roads, schools and parks for the project would cost taxpayers $6.4bn for the first phase and nearly $50bn to complete the new city.

On Monday, Mashburn said that a vote without this type of environmental report “politicized the project and forced the community to take sides.”

Advertisement

A poll conducted by Impact Research in July said 65% of Solano county voters “support bringing more good paying jobs, affordable homes, and clean energy to East Solano”.

Sramek emphasized the importance of regaining California’s historic promise of optimism and opportunity, which he says has waned in recent decades due to stagnation in development. More than half of respondents also agreed that the development project was moving too fast and preferred an environmental report.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending