Connect with us

Arizona

Scottsdale political signs spark claims of election interference

Published

on

Scottsdale political signs spark claims of election interference


SCOTTSDALE, AZ (AZFamily) — Supporters of some conservative school board candidates in Scottsdale claim their opponents got an unfair advantage because of a change in the city’s enforcement posture on political street signs.

Arizona has strict laws governing political signage in the public right of way, including criminal penalties for people who improperly remove or deface signs.

When the slate of Democratic candidates for Scottsdale Unified School Board started placing their signs around July 22, their opponents thought it was a clear breach of the rules.

“It has to be an equal playing field,” said Jill Dunican, a Scottsdale resident who supports the Republican slate.

Advertisement

Dunican and other supporters of the Republican slate felt the Democratic signs were displayed too early, before a 71-day window established by state law.

They filed complaints, and a city code enforcement officer initially suggested the signs were in violation.

Documents provided to Arizona’s Family show the city responded by removing one sign on July 23.

The following day, code enforcement said it received guidance from the legal department that the signs should be allowed to stay.

“You’re caught off guard and the other team is getting visibility and name recognition,” Dunican said. “Allowing teams to operate under different rules is clearly election interference.”

Advertisement

Democratic candidates Mike Sharkey, Donna Lewis, and Matt Pittinsky did not respond to an email Monday seeking comment.

Based on the city’s interpretation of state law, the Democrats placed their signs within the legal window.

Arizona law lets people place political street signs 71 days before a primary election, as long the signs meet certain requirements and are for candidates “running for public office.” That means candidates could start placing signs on May 20.

However, the Scottsdale school board race is unusual.

The race only appears on the general election ballot in November, not the July primary, causing confusion about when the 71-day window begins.

Advertisement

The conservative candidates—Gretchen Jacobs, Jeanne Beasley, and Drew Hassler—planned their signage strategy to coincide with a start date of Aug. 26.

Dunican said the city’s longstanding interpretation of the signage law was that the window started 71 days before the election a candidate appeared in.

An email from a Scottsdale Code Enforcement officer provided to Arizona’s Family cites Aug. 26 as the start date for candidates in the Nov. 5 election.

However, within two days of that email, records show code enforcement officers received new guidance from the city’s legal department.

State law “provides a single period during which election signs are legal: from 71 days before the primary election to 15 days after the general election. State law on this subject does not currently provide separate periods for primary and general elections, only that single span,” Kelly Corsette, communications and public affairs director for the City of Scottsdale, said in a statement to Arizona’s Family.

Advertisement

Corsette did not respond to questions about whether the city reinterpreted the signage law or if the communication from Code Enforcement was based on an error or outdated information.

“In attempting to be responsive to resident complaints, staff initially acted based on the city’s sign ordinance, however, during an election, state law supersedes Scottsdale’s local sign regulations, and the city must follow the State law,” Corsette said.

Dunican and other supporters of the conservative slate believe the Democrats were “tipped off” by someone in the city about the change in enforcement posture.

According to documents, the city sent a guidance email to candidates for mayor and city council on May 16, informing them the signage window opened on May 20.

It’s not clear if that email was shared with candidates for the school board.

Advertisement

The change in enforcement posture on political signs forced the conservative candidates to move up their timeline and rapidly find a designer and printer, Dunican said.

Jacobs, Beasley, and Hassler started placing their large street signs Tuesday night, two weeks behind the other candidates, she said.

“They lost visibility that they’re now desperately trying to catch up,” Dunican said. “The city of Scottsdale most certainly committed election interference.”

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.

Advertisement



Source link

Arizona

Arizona tackling heat mitigation, could their efforts translate to Nevada

Published

on

Arizona tackling heat mitigation, could their efforts translate to Nevada


Reno and Las Vegas are the two fastest-warming cities in the entire country.

Tonight we take a look at what neighboring Arizona is doing to address similar heat challenges, and whether those steps can work in Nevada.

Las Vegas has several areas called urban heat islands, which are hotter than the surrounding areas because of less vegetation, such as trees, and more concrete development.

Residents in East Las Vegas, one of the areas considered an urban heat island, say they’re not surprised that temperatures continue to rise, especially in their part of town.

Advertisement

“Definitely, when you go more to outskirts, there’s definitely more shade, more trees everywhere, but more in the center of town it’s very much less,” said Anthony Flores.

He believes there could be more relief from the heat.

“More water accessibility, more shade overall,” said Flores, whose line of work causes him to be outside every day. “I usually drink over two gallons of water a day just to keep not getting heat stroke.”

Charlie Ponce agrees with him.

“Definitely more trees that are useful, not like palm trees or anything like that. Parks that have like the water parks in them,” said Ponce. “Yeah, splash pads.”

Advertisement

Valley cities and Clark County have implemented steps like having cooling stations and tree-planting campaigns to help address heat challenges.

Phoenix and other parts of Arizona are also experiencing extreme heat every summer, as well as drought issues.

UNLV Public Policy Professor Dr. Ben Leffel says there are steps in the neighboring state that can be useful here in Nevada, where temperatures historically continue to be on the rise.

“For example, Phoenix has an ordinance that says that tenants must have rooms that are coolable to at least 86 degrees Fahrenheit,” said Dr. Leffel. “And that’s then also that first responders are equipped with chilled IV therapy and cold water immersion and things like that.”

News 3 spoke with heat mitigation and management experts in Arizona to see what they believe has been working for them.

Advertisement

One thing they mentioned was that Arizona has the first state-level chief heat officer.

“We have much better and much more accurate numbers now about who’s actually getting sick and who’s dying from heat-related deaths, and what the causes and kind of contributing factors are. So, if you don’t track something, you can’t understand what’s going on with it,” said Dr. Ladd Keith, Heat Resilience Initiative Director at the University of Arizona.

Ponce thinks it would help in Las Vegas.

“Like, let them know to tell the public like, hey, in these areas it’s getting out of hand, and this is what we can do as a community, or just have someone like regulated or watch over it,” she said.

And the city of Phoenix also has an entire heat office, something that can be beneficial on a local level, like being able to coordinate between different groups like homeless outreach, the hospitals, etcetera.

Advertisement

“Statewide coordination of cooling centers, lessons learned that are shared across different working groups, and so just a lot of cooperation that really creates a lot of efficiency too, and so I think that’s an important thing to note, is there is a cost to this, but the efforts are saving lives, and I think it’s making government more efficient,” said Keith.

Amy Scoville-Weaver, the Healthy Cities Program Director in Arizona for The Nature Conservancy, says the Phoenix Metro has done well with increasing vegetation, including in areas where there’s drought.

“So we’re looking at supporting and planting hardy trees, drought-tolerant trees, trees that are already designed, designed to live and thrive in water-scarce environments,” said Scoville-Weaver.

She says they also look at improving infrastructure to support it.

“So when it does rain, the water doesn’t just go down asphalt, get polluted, and go through a storm drain; rather, that water is being diverted to vegetation that needs it,” said Scoville-Weaver.

Advertisement

Leffel says another thing to keep in mind is heat safety can also come from indoor policies.

“For example, Phoenix has an ordinance that says that tenants must have rooms that are coolable to at least 86 degrees Fahrenheit,” he said.

A new Nevada law that went into effect last week requires larger jurisdictions to come up with heat mitigation plans.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Arizona

Arizona Cardinals’ Jordan Burch takes lessons from rookie year

Published

on

Arizona Cardinals’ Jordan Burch takes lessons from rookie year


play

Last year in early July, Cardinals edge rusher Jordan Burch was a rookie third-round draft pick out of Oregon who was looking forward to his first NFL training camp and eventual first season.

That rookie year is behind him now, and Burch has identified what he needs to improve on heading into his second season. He said he now knows what to expect and look for, and after talking with outside linebackers coach Matt Feeney, Burch built an offseason plan with which he was comfortable.

Advertisement

“I don’t think anything was like a surprise,” Burch said on Thursday, July 9, at the Cardinals’ Tempe headquarters. “I kind of know what to prep for, so this offseason I can look at my old plays, and then I can call my coach and tell him, from last year to this year, what does he want to see on the field.”

Burch seeks to improve his pass rush. He played in all 17 games last season and had five solo tackles with a sack, and also broke up three passes.

Much of his position was dropping into pass coverage, so Burch looks to recognize pass catchers’ routes better in 2026. He gets help from veteran Josh Sweat, who is there to answer questions about the position they share.

“Every week, every game going against somebody good,” Burch said about takeaways from last season. “The talent of the quarterbacks. We’re playing the Rams, how quickly they get the ball out.”

Advertisement

Burch looks forward to building a stronger bond with his teammates, having invited some of them for dinner or to watch TV. He said he was happy with his progress as a player throughout last season.

The Cardinals open training camp Wednesday, July 22, at State Farm Stadium. It’s a week earlier than most teams because Arizona plays the Carolina Panthers in the Aug. 6 Hall of Fame Game in Canton, Ohio.

Cardinals legend Larry Fitzgerald will be among those inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame Aug. 8.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Arizona

Arizona is among the worst states to move to, study says. Here’s why

Published

on

Arizona is among the worst states to move to, study says. Here’s why


A new study has ranked Arizona as one of the worst states to move to for two years in a row, largely due to what it calls a poor quality of life.

The study conducted by Consumer Affairs analyzed the best states to move to in the United States, putting Arizona at the bottom of the list.

Before Arizonans get too defensive about the Grand Canyon State, Consumer Affairs used factors such as affordability, safety, economic strength and education to measure each state, leaving out factors like entertainment, retirement benefits and other considerations that may be important to people living here.

Advertisement

Popular states such as California and New York also landed at the bottom of the list due to their lack of affordability, even though they both have some of the best health care and education in the nation, Consumer Affairs noted.

Here’s why the study says you shouldn’t move to Arizona. Do you agree?

Why you shouldn’t move to Arizona

Arizona ranked No. 10 out of the worst states to move to, scoring especially poorly in quality of life.

Quality of life was measured by the state’s Social Progress Index, average air quality, weather, environmental protection and number of national parks. Due to Arizona’s extreme summers and Phoenix’s consistently poor air quality, it’s easy to see why Arizona ranked No. 44 in quality of life out of 50 states, even though the Grand Canyon is one of the most popular national parks in the nation.

Advertisement

However, Arizona also ranked poorly in other categories, sitting at No. 42 in health care and education, No. 41 in safety and No. 34 in affordability out of 50 states.

There was one category Arizona did impressively well in, ranking No. 5 in economic strength even as one of the youngest states in the country. Still, Arizona’s economic power wasn’t enough to boost its ranking.

Top 10 worst states to move to

Arizona wasn’t alone; some of the biggest states in the country were also considered the worst states to move to in 2026.

  1. New Mexico
  2. Louisiana
  3. California
  4. Arkansas
  5. Oklahoma
  6. Nevada
  7. Alaska
  8. Mississippi
  9. Oregon
  10. Arizona

Top 10 best states to move to

  1. Utah
  2. New Hampshire
  3. Idaho
  4. Minnesota
  5. Massachusetts
  6. Maine
  7. North Dakota
  8. Pennsylvania
  9. Iowa
  10. South Dakota



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending