Arizona
ASU football expert previews the Territorial Cup against Arizona, makes a score prediction
It’s the only game that really counts. No matter how good or bad—in this case, pretty terrible—the season has been, beating ASU is always No. 1 on the list of goals for Arizona.
And now comes that time, with an added bonus: No. 14 ASU (9-2, 7-2 Big 12) comes to Tucson on Saturday needing a win (and some help) to make the conference title game after being picked to finish last in the league back in July. The Sun Devils have more than doubled their win total from a year ago, while Arizona (4-7, 2-6) can do no better than half its 2023 win tally.
To better understand the Sun Devils, we reached out to Hod Rabino, publisher of DevilsDigest, for some insight, as well as a score prediction. Below are his feisty answers to our apathetic questions:
AZ Desert Swarm: ASU was picked to finish last in the Big 12 but enters the Territorial Cup alive to make the conference title game. What were the biggest keys to this unexpected turnaround?
Hod Rabino: “I know that establishing a team culture might sound like a bad football cliche, but that’s exactly what has helped Kenny Dillingham turn this program around so quickly. Even people outside of ASU know how badly this program was run before Dillingham arrived, and just changing the whole mindset of the team was a necessity, not a luxury. I would also say that because this coaching staff does an outstanding job in talent evaluation, having them rebuild the team in a transfer portal era was an absolute godsend, especially when there were no limitations on how many players could be added in a given year. When you have a massive roster turnover, this is an element that helped the Sun Devils quite a bit. You can objectively say that in the last two years, there have been many more bullseyes than misses when it comes to the addition of newcomers. Ultimately, no matter how good of a coach you are, you’re only as good as the caliber of players at your disposal, and Arizona State has done very well in that regard.”
Sam Leavitt has only thrown five interceptions in 265 attempts, a year after four ASU quarterbacks (and a running back and a tight end) combined to throw 14 picks. What has enabled Leavitt to avoid mistakes?
“It goes without saying that ball security is an aspect that’s important to every team, but I also feel that some teams might emphasize this more than others, and ASU definitely falls into that category. Then you also have the angle that because he’s a young quarterback, the coaches are careful not to put too much on his plate, and really, with an outstanding ground attack, there really is no reason to overextend any quarterback playing on this year’s team.
“There’s also something to be said about Leavitt being mature beyond his years for a redshirt freshman. Even though he has a very fiery personality, he is still humble enough to be a true student of the game and do all the so-called work when nobody’s watching work in order to better himself. Lastly, the fact that not only Dillingham but also offensive coordinator Marcus Arroyo has a proven track record of developing quarterbacks has only helped Leavitt with his overall play. When we talk about hitting the bullseye ASU recorded in the transfer portal, he is probably the biggest example of that.”
Cam Skattebo has been a beast for the Sun Devils with 14 rushing TDs and two receiving scores. What are his best attributes, and is there anything he can’t do?
“Somebody put it best that Skattebo is the type of running back that would do well decades ago when players were leather helmets and no face masks. In other words, he is as old school as old school comes, runs violently with a punishing style, always looking for contact. And that’s a style of running that is becoming less common in college football. In 2023, when this ASU offense was struggling quite a bit, he still was the brightest spot on that unit. And for someone who came last year out of the FCS ranks I think that was greatly important for his confidence because he came in with even a better mindset into the season, reshapped his body and was driven even more to succeed knowing that the coaching staff was going to put even more responsibilities on the shoulders.
“He’s definitely a very well-rounded player who does a great job in blitz pickups and is an exceptional receiver out of the backfield. It’s hard to say what his weaknesses are, but if there are any shortcomings to his game, the coaching staff is savvy enough to mask those and not ask him to try and execute assignments where he may have difficulties in doing so. Even in very average seasons or worse, ASU has had a great track record of running backs for the last six years, with all of them on NFL rosters this season, and he still may be the best one of them all.”
Jordyn Tyson has had a breakout season at receiver, with 67 catches for 958 yards and nine TDs. What has made him the No. 1 option in the passing game, and who else could have a big day in Tucson?
“Tyson is a type of wide receiver who is just very versatile; he can line up in all the wide receiver roles and still excel no matter what assignment is given to him. He’s very sure-handed and may not have blazing speed, but he is still quick and agile enough to separate himself from defenders. He is very savvy, which allows him to make plays in tight quarters. The chemistry that he and Leavitt have is truly special, and those two have been dialed in for the last few weeks, producing big plays with regularity.
“Tight end Chamon Metayer and Xavier Guillory have been the other aerial targets for Arizona State, although not putting up the numbers that Tyson has registered. At running back, Kyson Brown has been number two in the pecking order. Much has been said that aside from Skattebo and Tyson, not many other skilled players on offense have been able to make their mark. I’ll be curious to see if that may take place this Saturday because it would make the offense that much more potent.”
Who are the defensive players that Arizona has to be most concerned with?
“Arizona State has put up modest numbers when it comes to pass rush, but its best player in that department is defensive end Clayton Smith. CJ Fite, on the interior of the defensive line, has been one of the primary run stoppers. At linebacker, Keyshaun Elliott has been the leader, especially against the run, while fellow linebacker Jordan Crook is a shiftier player who does a great job in coverage and disrupting the opponent’s passing game.
“At nickel back, Shamari Simmons, who was slated to start at safety but, because of injuries and departures, was moved over to this new role, has played exceptionally well and is a more physical presence in a position where you normally would see a smaller defensive back. Both cornerbacks Javan Robinson and Keith Abney II have really been coming into their own the last few weeks, and needless to say, they will have to play very well against a dangerous Arizona passing offense.”
Kenny Dillingham has managed to turn around ASU in just two seasons, a year quicker than Jedd Fisch did at Arizona, but that may also make him a hot commodity when the coaching carousel starts up. What are the chances Dillingham might look to leave for a bigger job, and how much would ASU be willing to pay to keep him?
“I know that in college football, you never say never, but I just can’t see Dillingham leaving his alma mater anytime soon. This is his dream job, he grew up here in the Valley, and he did not come to take this job and use it as a stepping stone. He worked hard and succeeded in getting both of his coordinators significant pay raises and longer contracts, and that’s not something that you bother to do if you know that you’re not going to be here next year. I don’t know if anybody can etch in stone whether he’s going to retire here, especially when he’s only 34 years old, but for more than the foreseeable future, I would totally expect him to stay in Tempe.”
Prediction time. Does Arizona play spoiler, while retaining the Cup for a third straight year, or does ASU continue its magical season and get its first rivalry win since 2021? Give us a score prediction.
“It goes without saying that this is a tough game to predict, and even though all Arizona has to play for is being the spoiler to ASU’s path to the Big 12 title game, that is more than enough motivation for the Wildcats. At the same time, it’s not only the fact that the Sun Devils want to keep this magical season going and play in Dallas a week from Saturday, but they obviously have revenge on their mind after being trounced in Tempe last year.
“This is a very different ASU team on many levels from the squad that Arizona beat the last two years, and this is also a Sun Devil team that has rose to the occasion when they had to as demonstrated in their wins over Kansas State and BYU. It will be anything but an easy affair for Arizona State and anybody who watched their games or even just looked at the box score knows that the vast majority of their wins have been dramatic and take you on a roller coaster ride. And on Saturday, it won’t be any different. I am picking Arizona State to win 31-26.”
Arizona
11 illegal Indian national truck drivers arrested at Arizona border last month
Eleven illegal Indian national truck drivers were arrested at the Arizona border in the month of February.
The Yuma Sector Border Patrol arrested 11 total Indian national truck drivers in Yuma, Arizona in February 2026.
According to a Facebook post by the Yuma Sector Border Patrol, all 11 truck drivers held commercial drivers licenses from the states of Florida, New York, Pennsylvania, Indiana, and California. All were “found to be present in the United States illegally.”
“Border Patrol remains committed to upholding immigration laws and protecting our communities,” the post continued.
Arizona
Arizona Independent Party to appeal ruling erasing name
Ballot processing at Maricopa County Tabulation and Election Center
Election workers process ballots at the Maricopa County Tabulation and Election Center on Nov. 6, 2024, in Phoenix.
The Arizona Independent Party will appeal a court ruling that invalidated its name, guaranteeing more legal limbo and possibly a new chapter of confusion in the effort to give unaffiliated voters a viable third-party option at the ballot box.
Party chair Paul Johnson confirmed he would appeal the ruling from Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Greg Como, which forces the party to revert to its prior name: the No Labels Party. The ruling ordered elections officials in Arizona to follow suit.
The decision was a high-profile loss for Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, who Como said had permitted a “bait and switch” on voters by allowing the name change.
“We were given due process, the judge did a fair job,” Johnson said. “I don’t agree with his final position, but I like the way our country works in terms of the rule of the law.”
“I don’t feel discouraged at all,” Johnson said, adding that an appeal could proceed in federal court and raise claims of First and Fourteenth Amendment violations.
It is unclear how the judge’s order, if it stands, could impact candidates who submitted signatures to qualify for the ballot under the Arizona Independent Party label.
“The commission’s position has been that this would cause confusion,” said Tom Collins, executive director of the Clean Elections Commission, which was part of the case. “This is an example of that confusion.”
The number of signatures required to make the ballot is a percentage of registered voters for each party, but unaffiliated candidates had to collect roughly six times as many as Republican or Democratic candidates. Running with the Arizona Independent Party meant only 1,771 signatures were needed.
Como’s order was signed March 19 but made public on March 25, after a March 23 deadline for candidates to file signatures to make the ballot.
“Unfortunately due to the court order, this question is left unaddressed,” said Calli Jones, a spokesperson for Fontes. “This question will be left to the challenge process or other court proceedings.”
Clarity could come through any lawsuits filed challenging Arizona Independent Party candidates’ signatures. No such challenges had been filed as of March 25, and the deadline is April 6.
What’s preventing ‘Arizona Nazi Party’ or the ‘Arizona Anarchists’?
Last October, Fontes agreed to change the name of the No Labels Party to the Arizona Independent Party, saying to do so was not explicitly prohibited in law. The change was done at the request of Johnson, a former Phoenix mayor and advocate for open primaries. To Johnson, the party is something of a can’t-beat-them-join-them way to put independent candidates on an even playing field with those from the two major parties.
The name change quickly led to a trio of lawsuits filed by the state’s voter education agency, the Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission, and the Arizona Republican Party and Arizona Democratic Party. Those cases were merged into one, which ultimately led to the March ruling.
The commission and political parties argued the name change would create confusion for voters and election officials in terms of distinguishing when someone wanted to be part of the new party versus and independent voter in a colloquial sense, which means not registering with any party. Fontes did not dispute there could be confusion.
State law does not directly address when a political party wants to change its name, but Como said that request should follow the process for creating a new party. That includes gathering signatures from supportive voters. Como has been on the bench since 2015.
Como raised concerns of transparency, noting that voters who registered for the old party may not support the new party name. He said a party could gather support with an “innocuous sounding name,” then change it entirely. Como offered a grave example.
“Would the same 41,000 people who signed petitions to recognize the No Labels Party have signed to support the ‘Arizona Nazi Party’ or the ‘Arizona Anarchists’?” he wrote.
His ruling is guided by and affirms Arizona court precedent that statewide elected officials’ powers are only those that are given explicitly to them in statute or the constitution.
Legal challenges needed to bring clarity
Jones, Fontes’ spokesperson, said the office had no power to address whether signatures were valid, because the office presumes “anyone who met the requirements at the time of filing their signatures are valid candidates.” Fontes, a Democrat seeking reelection this year, said he would not appeal the ruling given the “fast approach of the election and the challenging job election administrators have before them.”
He also stood by his decision, but said the court ruled with voters. “Both approaches, being reasonable, the Court entered an order with a lean towards the voters, not the party leaders,” Fontes said.
Como did not find Fontes’ approach was reasonable, saying it was beyond Fontes’ authority.
“The judge noted that even Fontes admitted this issue would cause confusion for the voters, but Fontes disregarded that concern and the obvious truth, and proceeded to allow them to continue the charade,” Arizona Republic Party Chair Sergio Arellano said, responding to the ruling.
That Fontes will not appeal was welcome, because “he has already cost taxpayers too much money” and “further eroded trust in our election officials at a time when that trust is already at an all-time low,” Arellano said.
Eleven candidates are running for office with the Arizona Independent Party name, or whatever it turns out to be. That includes candidates for Congress, governor and state Legislature. Hugh Lytle, the party’s preferred candidate for governor, said in a statement the ruling proves “how far the political parties will go to protect their grip on power.”
Lytle is among the candidates who could face a challenge to his just over 6,000 signatures. Of those, just 132 were gathered via the state’s online system, which requires verification before signing. The remaining could be more vulnerable to objections.
Ultimately, Lytle said, the judge’s ruling wouldn’t change much.
“We are on the ballot,” he said.
Reach reporter Stacey Barchenger at stacey.barchenger@arizonarepublic.com or 480-416-5669.
Arizona
Arizona Senate committee passes three bills aimed at reforming the Department of Child Safety
A state Senate committee passed three bills Wednesday morning aimed at reforming the Arizona Department of Child Safety.
The bills are part of a search for solutions following the murders of three girls known to Arizona’s child welfare system in 2025.
One of the bills strengthens the rules to place children with relatives or other adults they know. HB2035 would make kinship care presumptive and require a written explanation if a different placement were made.
Another bill, HB4004, encourages DCS to investigate new reports of child abuse, even if caseworkers had designated a “protective parent” who would shield the child from harm.
The third bill, HB2611, aims to improve the conditions of group homes. This includes improved building security, allowing foster children to participate in enrichment activities and live free from bullying, and randomly drug testing group home workers.
Hayden L’Heureux, who lived in foster group homes, spoke about the conditions youth face.
“For many foster youth group homes are not experienced as places of healing but as places of punishment or setback,” L’Heureux said.
Angelina Trammell also lived in foster group homes and shared her experience.
“I’ve been through things no child should ever have to go through in the hardest part. A lot of it could’ve been prevented,” Trammell said.
All three bills have already passed the state House and will move forward for consideration by the full Senate.
This story was reported on-air by a journalist and has been converted to this platform with the assistance of AI. Our editorial team verifies all reporting on all platforms for fairness and accuracy.
-
Detroit, MI1 week agoDrummer Brian Pastoria, longtime Detroit music advocate, dies at 68
-
Science1 week agoHow a Melting Glacier in Antarctica Could Affect Tens of Millions Around the Globe
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago‘Youth’ Twitter review: Ken Karunaas impresses audiences; Suraj Venjaramoodu adds charm; music wins praise | – The Times of India
-
Science1 week agoI had to man up and get a mammogram
-
Sports6 days agoIOC addresses execution of 19-year-old Iranian wrestler Saleh Mohammadi
-
New Mexico4 days agoClovis shooting leaves one dead, four injured
-
Texas7 days agoHow to buy Houston vs. Texas A&M 2026 March Madness tickets
-
Tennessee3 days agoTennessee Police Investigating Alleged Assault Involving ‘Reacher’ Star Alan Ritchson