Connect with us

Arizona

Arizona executes two inmates in less than a month

Published

on

Arizona executes two inmates in less than a month


The second man in a month was executed in Arizona this week. Frank Atwood, 66, who was convicted for the killing of 8-year previous Vicki Lynne Hoskinson in 1984, was put to demise by deadly injection at 10:16 a.m. on Wednesday, June 8 on the Arizona State Jail Complicated in Florence.  

Frank Atwood

Atwood’s legal professionals had tried to overturn his demise sentence, arguing that that they had found an FBI memo indicating that an nameless caller had described seeing Hoskinson in a automotive not related to Atwood. Atwood’s protection was heard by the Supreme Courtroom Wednesday morning, which rejected his closing protection and cleared the way in which for his execution to progress. 

The state killing of Atwood adopted by lower than 4 weeks the execution of Clarence Dixon, additionally 66, on Could 11, each of which come eight years after a federal decide issued a state large keep following the botched 2014 execution of Jason Wooden. 

Wooden was given a cocktail of experimental medication in 15 separate injections which took two hours to take impact. Reviews from witnesses of the execution indicated that he repeatedly snorted and gasped 600 instances earlier than he died, prompting outrage over the cruelty of his execution. 

Advertisement

Native reporting signifies that jail employees had been unable to find a vein to inject the deadly dose, and finally injected Atwood in his proper hand at his personal request. Atwood’s execution reportedly went “easily” in line with KOLD-TV’s Bud Foster, who mentioned that the execution “was most likely essentially the most peaceable of any of the executions that I witnessed prior to now.” 

KOLD-TV was one among three Tucson space information organizations allowed to witness the execution. The Related Press, which has a protracted historical past of witnessing executions, requested permission to ship a journalist however was denied. 

The execution earlier than Atwood’s was additionally fraught and almost botched. Dixon was executed regardless of being blind, identified with schizophrenia, and a member of the Navajo Nation, which strongly opposes the demise penalty for cultural and spiritual causes. 

On account of Dixon’s psychological sickness, his protection argued that he couldn’t correctly perceive the rational for his execution and due to this fact couldn’t be legally put to demise. A psychiatrist who interviewed Dixon a number of instances testified that he believed he was being executed as a part of a authorities conspiracy, not for the homicide and rape costs that he had been convicted of. The court docket, nonetheless, dominated in opposition to Dixon, arguing that he was not mentally impaired sufficient to advantage staying his execution. 

Dixon’s protection continued to argue in opposition to his execution, and on April 8 filed a movement once more arguing that he was not mentally competent sufficient to be executed. Arizona Lawyer Common Mark Brnovich urged the court docket to not even maintain a listening to, arguing that it might delay Dixon’s execution, basically claiming that it’s extra essential for the state to kill a person than to find out whether it is authorized to take action. 

Witnesses reported that Dixon struggled in ache for 25 minutes because the jail employees didn’t insert the IV into his left arm. Ultimately, the executioners injected his proper arm and made an incision in his groin the place they inserted a further deadly injection. Paul Davenport, a media witness for the Related Press, famous that “I did see what seemed to be some slicing into the groin, they did must wipe up a good quantity of blood.” 

Advertisement

These latest executions have sparked concern amongst opponents of the demise penalty, with Amnesty Worldwide specifically noting that Arizona at the moment has 111 inmates on demise row, 22 of whom have exhausted all of their appeals. Dan Peitzmeyer, the demise penalty abolition coordinator for Amnesty Worldwide, described the executions as having “opened the flood gates” for an escalation in Arizona’s executions. 

The deaths of Dixon and Atwood carry Arizona’s whole executions as much as 39 since 1992, when the state moved to deadly injections from the earlier technique of demise by gasoline chamber. Since Atwood had been convicted earlier than 1992, he was given the selection of which technique of execution he most well-liked. 

Arizona’s system for making use of deadly injections has been fraught with failures and questionable legality. Not solely was Wooden executed with an experimental cocktail of medicine, however the state of Arizona has been caught a number of instances utilizing unlawful medication. In 2011, the Division of Justice discovered that Arizona’s provide of sodium thiopental was imported illegally. And in 2015, the state of Arizona was caught trying to illegally import deadly injection medication from India, which had been confiscated by FDA officers in Phoenix. 

In 1999, Arizona executed German citizen Walter LaGrand by gasoline chamber. Two years later, the Worldwide Courtroom of Justice dominated that Arizona has violated the Vienna Conference by failing to tell LaGrand of his proper to hunt help from the German Consulate. A 12 months later, the US Supreme Courtroom dominated that Arizona’s total system for demise penalty sentencing unconstitutional within the case Ring v. Arizona, which dominated Arizona was violating defendant’s Sixth Modification rights by entrusting a decide with the authority to seek out details ample to impose the demise penalty with out the enter of a jury.

It was reported by the Guardian final 12 months that the state is reopening its gasoline chamber and making ready to make use of Zykon-B, the identical chemical utilized by the Nazis within the Holocaust on the Auschwitz and Majdanek focus camps. The state had bought a block of potassium cyanide in December 2020 together with two different elements, sodium hydroxide pellets and sulfuric acid for just a few thousand {dollars}.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Arizona

Meet 9 Arizona hip-hop artists anointed as essential by Bandcamp

Published

on

Meet 9 Arizona hip-hop artists anointed as essential by Bandcamp


play

The music streaming platform Bandcamp has posted a story headlined “Desert Heat: Diving Into the Arizona Hip-Hop Scene.”

Advertisement

It begins with a shout-out to two local hip-hop veterans.

“The Copper State’s never really had a national breakout star,” Dash Lewis writes, “though Shug, an emcee signed to Def Jam in the 1990s, and Willie Northpole, who signed with Disturbing Tha Peace in 2007, both came close.”

The writer says Murkemz, “a charismatic young rapper from Phoenix with a dazzling smile and an animated voice, currently seems poised to garner a mainstream audience, thanks to the virality of his recent track ‘We Outside’ and an impressive appearance on Sway’s Universe.”

The story notes that Injury Reserve and Mega Ran have both amassed “substantial underground followings and positive critical reception, frequently packing mid-size venues around the country.”

For those tapped into Arizona hip-hop, Lewis argues, there’s “plenty of reason to be proud and passionate.”

Advertisement

The story then goes on to shine a spotlight on nine Arizona records well worth tracking down.

Lando Chill & The Lasso, ‘ma​̄​ya​̄​. maia. Mayu’

Lando Chill & The Lasso’s second collaboration is hailed as “a beguiling slab of hip-hop, psych-funk and R&B,” “an excellent example of the spacious ‘Arizona sound’” and “an effortlessly listenable, rapturous EP that seeps through the speakers like an essential oil diffuser, offering a pleasant, exceptionally vibey 20 minutes.”

Psypiritual & Apetight, ‘Free God’

The writer explains that “Free God” is, in part, the result of the producer coming back from a trip to Japan with an array of obscure Japanese funk, jazz and pop records, which he “chopped, looped and warped” into “a trove of woozy, heat-dizzy beats” in Phoenix, sending the results to Tucson rapper Psypiritual.

“The resulting record,” Lewis writes, “is beautiful — breezy, bright, and as gently psychedelic as an Arizona sunrise” with lyrics that “examine heady topics like self-doubt, often disappearing into billowing clouds of weed smoke to escape the day-to-day challenges of existence.”

Advertisement

REY & DVOID, ‘Chipped Painted Pictures’

This one is hailed as “a great entry point to the highly talented, dizzyingly prolific TWELVOTWO collective,” “a real sonic feast” and “a deeply rewarding album” whose “trippy, three-dimensional beats are thick and drone-y, slowly uncurling like a snake on a warm rock, while REY raps in dense, elastic paragraphs.”  

Injury Reserve, ‘Floss’

This entry begins with “No list of Arizona hip-hop albums is complete without at least one Injury Reserve record,” which is true. He chose “Floss,” Lewis writes, because it’s such a perfect introduction for the uninitiated, one that “perfectly showcases a group in the midst of a transformation, moving away from the Neptunes-indebted club bangers they started with to a more jittery punk energy, foreshadowing the all-out destruction they’d achieve with 2021’s ‘By The Time I Get To Phoenix.’”

RiTchie, ‘Triple Digits’

RiTchie with a T of Injury Reserve recorded “Triple Digits” as a solo record after the untimely death of Steppa J. Groggs while the future of the group was still uncertain. Lewis calls it “delightfully weird” while noting that “instead of the airiness present in so much Arizona rap, ‘Triple Digits’ is soupy, every sound slowly melting under the punishing desert sun.”

He also writes of RiTchie rapping with “a desperate, exasperated groan, as if the oasis within view keeps moving back a few feet.”

Advertisement

Halal Boys, ‘Black Blues Brothers’

Halal Boys’ second album, Lewis writes, “might be one of the oddest, funnest entries on this list,” noting that “the duo favors simple, hypnotic production untethered to a genre, but it all works — the bubbly synth-bap of ‘2 Days Before Juneteenth’ sits comfortably next to the churning flute trap of ‘FatLips.’”

Maze Overlay, ‘AZTECAZ’

Lewis calls this one “a shining star” in the north Phoenix rapper’s “vast body of work” spanning nearly two decades. He also says the record “leans into the trudging boom bap commonly associated with the Umbrella Collective and the Lynn, Massachusetts, scene (Maze frequently works with members of both), but with an Arizonan aesthetic.”

It’s also what Lewis describes as “a celebration of Arizona, packed with references to desert ecology, vision quests to the vortexes in Sedona and the cleansing rains of monsoon season.”

Grim Moses, ‘Skeletor’

Lewis writes that “much like frequent collaborator Maze Overlay, Grim Moses traffics in cerebral street rap… spitting hard-nosed raps over dusty, greyscale beats” while “rapping in a cold monotone that feels like holding eye contact for too long.” The album’s “heavy vibe,” he writes, “sounds almost post-apocalyptic, recasting the arid Sonoran Desert as a frozen tundra.”

Cash Lanksy, ‘Man of the House’

This Tucson rapper’s debut was singled out as “a grown, soulful take on the Arizona sound, much more indebted to the region’s reverence for lowrider oldies” with songs that “seem built for when the car show or park hang winds down, when brown liquor splashes into cups and lawn chairs sag with the weight of years.” It’s a “meditation on aging,” Lewis writes, “reaching back into his memories to assess the arc of his life so far” at times while offering “a stark take on existentialism, acknowledging that each choice one makes is a fork in the road.”

Advertisement

Ed has covered pop music for The Republic since 2007, reviewing festivals and concerts, interviewing legends, covering the local scene and more. He did the same in Pittsburgh for more than a decade. Follow him on X and Instagram @edmasley and on Facebook as Ed Masley. Email him at ed.masley@arizonarepublic.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

Kennedy Jr. withdraws from Arizona ballot as questions swirl around a possible alliance with Trump

Published

on

Kennedy Jr. withdraws from Arizona ballot as questions swirl around a possible alliance with Trump


Robert F. Kennedy Jr. withdrew from the ballot in Arizona late Thursday, a day before he and Donald Trump were set to appear miles apart in the Phoenix area as speculation grows that Kennedy could drop his independent presidential bid and endorse the Republican nominee.

Kennedy is scheduled to speak in Phoenix at 11 p.m. Pacific time “about the present historical moment and his path forward,” according to his campaign. Hours later, Trump will hold a rally in neighboring Glendale.

Trump, campaigning Thursday in southern Arizona at the U.S.-Mexico border, said that “no plans have been made” for Kennedy to appear with him Friday. But he noted they would be in the Phoenix area at the same time.

Advertisement

On Thursday evening, Trump’s campaign made an unusual announcement, teasing that he would be joined by “a special guest” at his Glendale event.

Hours later when he called into Fox News Channel after the Democratic National Convention wrapped, Trump said of Kennedy, “I have no idea if he’s going to endorse me.”

But, after noting that they were going to be in the same state, added, “It’s possible we will be meeting tomorrow and we’ll be discussing it.”

Representatives for Trump’s campaign did not respond to messages about whether Kennedy would be the guest, and the Kennedy campaign did not immediately return a message seeking comment if he would be joining Trump.

Kennedy’s Arizona withdrawal, confirmed by a spokesperson for the secretary of state, came less than a week after Kennedy submitted well more than the required number of signatures to appear on the ballot. His critics raised questions about the validity of some of the signatures after a pro-Kennedy super PAC was heavily involved in his effort to collect them, potentially running afoul of rules against coordination between candidates and independent political groups.

Advertisement

But Thursday, Kennedy, his running mate, Nicole Shanahan, and all of their electors submitted notarized letters dated that day withdrawing from the Arizona ballot.

A year ago, some would have thought it inconceivable that Kennedy — a member of the most storied family in Democratic politics — would work with Trump to keep a Democrat out of the White House. Even in recent months, Kennedy has accused Trump of betraying his followers, while Trump has criticized Kennedy as “the most radical left candidate in the race.”

But the two campaigns have ramped up their compliments of each other and engaged in behind-the-scenes discussions in recent weeks, according to those familiar with the efforts. Both campaigns have spent months accusing Democrats of “weaponizing” the legal system for their own benefit. And both have hinted publicly that they could be open to joining forces, with the shared goal of limiting the election chances of Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris.

Last month, during the Republican National Convention, Kennedy’s son posted and then quickly deleted a video showing a phone call between Kennedy and Trump, in which the former president appeared to try to talk Kennedy into siding with him.

Talks between the two camps have continued, with close Trump allies quietly lobbying Kennedy to drop out of the race and support the Republican nominee, according to a person familiar with the efforts who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations.

Advertisement

Trump told CNN on Tuesday that he would “love” an endorsement from Kennedy, whom he called a “brilliant guy.” He also said he would “certainly” be open to Kennedy playing a role in a prospective Trump administration if Kennedy drops out and endorses him.

Shanahan also openly suggested on a podcast this week that the campaign might “walk away right now and join forces with Donald Trump.” While she clarified that she was not personally in talks with Trump, she entertained the idea that Kennedy could join Trump’s administration as secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services.

“I think that Bobby in a role like that would be excellent,” Shanahan said. “I fully support it. I have high hopes.”

Kennedy, a son of former Atty. Gen. Robert F. Kennedy and a nephew of former President John F. Kennedy, hasn’t disclosed the reason for his Friday news conference, but it comes as his campaign’s momentum has slipped.

Kennedy Jr. entered the 2024 presidential race as a Democrat but left the party last fall to run as an independent. He built an unusually strong base for an indepdendent bid, fueled in part by anti-establishment voters and vaccine skeptics who have followed his anti-vaccine work — often propagating debunked theories— since the COVID-19 pandemic. But he has since faced strained campaign finances and mounting legal challenges, including a recent ruling from a New York judge that he should not appear on the ballot in that state because he listed a “sham” address on nominating petitions.

Advertisement

Recent polls put his support in the mid-single digits. And it’s unclear if he’d get even that in a general election, since third-party or independent candidates frequently don’t live up to their poll numbers when voters cast their ballots.

There’s some evidence that Kennedy’s staying in the race would hurt Trump more than Harris. According to a July AP-NORC poll, Republicans were significantly more likely than Democrats to have a favorable view of Kennedy. And those with a positive impression of Kennedy were significantly more likely to also have a favorable view of Trump (52%) than Harris (37%).

In an interview with MSNBC at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago on Thursday, Harris communications director Michael Tyler said her campaign welcomes Kennedy voters should the independent candidate drop out.

For voters who see Trump as a threat, who are looking for a new way forward, or who want “government to get the hell out of the way of their own personal decisions, there’s a home for you in Kamala Harris’ campaign,” Tyler said.

For Trump, Friday will mark the end of a week’s worth of battleground state visits in which he has sought to draw attention away from Democrats’ celebration of Harris’ presidential nomination in Chicago.

Advertisement

He traveled to Pennsylvania, Michigan, North Carolina and Arizona’s U.S.-Mexico border for events billed as focusing on the economy, crime and safety, national security and the border. He will close out the week Friday with stops in Las Vegas and Glendale, Ariz.

Cooper and Swenson write for the Associated Press. AP writers Jill Colvin in New York, Michelle L. Price in Phoenix, Meg Kinnard in Chicago and Linley Sanders in Washington contributed to this report.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Arizona

US Supreme Court rejects Republican push to block some Arizona voters

Published

on

US Supreme Court rejects Republican push to block some Arizona voters


The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a Republican push that could have blocked more than 41,000 Arizona voters from casting ballots for president in the state that President Joe Biden, a Democrat, won by fewer than 11,000 votes four years ago.

But in a 5-4 order, the court allowed some enforcement of regulations barring people from voting if they don’t provide proof of citizenship when they register.

The justices acted on an emergency appeal filed by state and national Republicans that sought to give full effect to voting measures enacted in 2022 following Biden’s narrow win over Republican Donald Trump.

Advertisement

The court did not detail its reasoning in a brief order. Conservative Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch would have allowed the law to be fully enforced, while Justice Amy Coney Barrett would have joined with the court’s three liberals in fully rejecting the push, the order states.

The legal fight will continue in lower courts.

The court’s action came after a lower court blocked a requirement that called for state voter registration forms to be rejected if they are not accompanied by documents proving U.S. citizenship. A second measure, also not in effect, would have prohibited voting in presidential elections or by mail if registrants don’t prove they are U.S. citizens. Federal law requires voters to swear they are U.S. citizens under penalty of perjury but does not require proof of citizenship either to vote in federal elections in person or cast ballots by mail.

The measures were passed on party-line votes and signed into law by then-Gov. Doug Ducey, a Republican, amid a wave of proposals that Republicans introduced around the country after Biden’s 2020 victory over Trump, including in Arizona.

For state and local elections, voters must provide proof of citizenship when they register or have it on file with the state. Since that isn’t a requirement for federal elections for Congress or president, tens of thousands of voters who haven’t provided proof of citizenship are registered only for federal elections.

Advertisement

There were 41,352 of those voters registered as of August 9 in Arizona, said Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, a Democrat.

Fontes warned in a court filing that an order in favor of the state and national Republicans this close to the November election “will create chaos and confusion.”

The voters most affected would include military service members, students and Native Americans, Fontes said. About 27% of those voters are registered Democrats and 15% are Republicans. More than half, 54%, are registered independents, according to state data.

Voting rights groups and the Biden administration had sued over the Arizona laws.

Federal-only voters have been a subject of political wrangling since the Supreme Court ruled in 2013 that Arizona cannot require documentary proof of citizenship for people to vote in national elections. The state responded by creating two classes of voters: those who can vote in all races and those who can vote only in federal elections.

Advertisement

One of the new laws sought to further divide voters, allowing votes in congressional elections without proof of citizenship, but denying the vote in presidential contests.

The 2022 law has drawn fierce opposition from voting rights advocates, who described the statute as an attempt to get the issue back in front of the now more-conservative Supreme Court.

Proponents say the measure is about eliminating opportunities for fraud. There is no evidence that the existence of federal-only voters has allowed noncitizens to illegally vote, but Republicans have nonetheless worked aggressively to restrict federal-only voting.

The Legislature’s own lawyers had said much of the measure was unconstitutional, directly contradicted the earlier Supreme Court decision and was likely to be thrown out in court.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending