Connect with us

Alaska

Proposal to enshrine Permanent Fund dividend in Alaska Constitution fails to clear House

Published

on

Proposal to enshrine Permanent Fund dividend in Alaska Constitution fails to clear House


JUNEAU — A proposal to enshrine the Permanent Fund dividend in the Alaska Constitution failed to be approved by the House on Thursday.

House Joint Resolution 7 would pay out whatever dividend was set in state law. The 1982 dividend formula still exists in state law, but it has not been followed by the Legislature since 2016. That statute would dictate that Alaskans receive a dividend this year of roughly $3,400. But such a payment would require spending over $1 billion more than the state has in revenue.

Two-thirds of the House and Senate need to vote in support of a constitutional amendment to put it before voters.

Advertisement

The amendment, proposed by Nikiski Republican Rep. Ben Carpenter, failed on a 22-18 vote. It needed 27 votes to advance to the Senate.

Members of the Legislature have long advocated for a comprehensive fiscal plan that could include a new dividend formula, a spending cap, budget reductions and new sources of state revenue.

Carpenter said enshrining the dividend formula in the constitution would compel legislators to enact a fiscal plan to balance revenues and expenditures.

“This is the first step,” he said, adding, “What it does do is something very simple. It just says, ‘We’re going to follow the law.’”

Supporters said that legislators should put the proposal before Alaska voters and trust them to decide whether it should be approved.

Advertisement

Opponents of the measure said enshrining the dividend in the constitution would lead to a fiscal crisis and not necessarily compel any further action to reform the statute governing the annual dividend size, or other elements of a fiscal plan.

“Those who are tempted to vote for this need to ask themselves: Do the supporters of this proposal genuinely in their hearts and in their souls intend to renegotiate and reform the formula?” Rep. Andy Josephson, an Anchorage Democrat, said in a floor speech.

But even if lawmakers were successful in reforming the dividend formula, Josephson said that Gov. Mike Dunleavy — who has supported large dividend payouts during his tenure — would be unlikely to sign a bill changing the formula.

“I think that those who support this proposal are morally obligated … to be the leaders to fix the dividend,” said Josephson. “They cannot say, ‘Well, jeez, you know, someone else will do it.’”

[Alaska House passes operating budget with dividend around $2,300, extra school funding]

Advertisement

Dunleavy has repeatedly used his veto pen to nix pieces of legislation. He has shown openness to reforming the dividend formula, and in 2021 proposed a plan that would change the dividend formula, reserving half the Permanent Fund earnings draw for state services. Without additional revenue sources, that plan would still leave the state with hundreds of millions of dollars in annual deficits.

Jeff Turner, a spokesman for the governor’s office, said Dunleavy has repeatedly said that the first step in a fiscal plan is to resolve the dividend formula.

The Senate has favored a statute that would reserve three-quarters of annual Permanent Fund earnings to pay for state services, which itself could become unaffordable without new revenue, according to some projections, but neither the House nor the governor have signaled support for that idea.

Josephson said that the only way to afford the annual dividends as they’re currently written into statute without triggering a fiscal crisis would be to impose a billion-dollar sales or income tax. Alaska is the only state that has neither a statewide sales tax nor a statewide income tax.

Carpenter’s constitutional amendment proposal advanced to the House floor in February. For almost two months, it had not come up for a final vote or floor debates.

Advertisement

After marathon floor sessions to debate and pass the operating budget, several legislators said they were surprised the dividend amendment was brought up for a vote Thursday. The debates spanned over three interrupted hours. There were long breaks, and unusual procedural motions to advance other fiscal plan bills from legislative committees.

House members voted 37-3 to advance Senate Bill 107 from the Finance Committee. That would change the dividend formula to the 75-25 model. If that formula was followed this year, the PFD would be around $1,360.

In a brief interview after the floor session ended, Carpenter said he was not surprised by the outcome. But, he said that he thought there would be more votes in support of the amendment.

”It was pretty clear over the last couple of weeks that people were not confident that components of a fiscal plan were actually going to move,” he said. But, he added, there could still be time this legislative session to vote on the amendment again.

• • •

Advertisement

How they voted:

Rep. Jamie Allard, R-Eagle River (Y)

Rep. Jennie Armstrong, D-Anchorage (N)

Rep. Thomas Baker, R-Kotzebue (Y)

Rep. Ben Carpenter, R-Nikiski (Y)

Rep. Ashley Carrick, D-Fairbanks (N)

Advertisement

Rep. Julie Coulombe, R-Anchorage (Y)

Rep. Mike Cronk, R-Tok (Y)

Rep. Maxine Dibert, D-Fairbanks (N)

Rep. David Eastman, R-Wasilla (Y)

Rep. Bryce Edgmon, I-Dillingham (N)

Advertisement

Rep. Zack Fields, D-Anchorage (N)

Rep. Neal Foster, D-Nome (Y)

Rep. Alyse Galvin, I-Anchorage (N)

Rep. Andrew Gray, D-Anchorage (N)

Rep. Cliff Groh, D-Anchorage (N)

Advertisement

Rep. Sara Hannan, D-Juneau (N)

Rep. Rebecca Himschoot, I-Sitka (N)

Rep. Craig Johnson, R-Anchorage (Y)

Rep. DeLena Johnson, R-Palmer (Y)

Rep. Andy Josephson, D-Anchorage (N)

Advertisement

Rep. Kevin McCabe, R-Big Lake (Y)

Rep. CJ McCormick, D-Bethel (N)

Rep. Tom McKay, R-Anchorage (Y)

Rep. Donna Mears, D-Anchorage (N)

Rep. Genevieve Mina, D-Anchorage (N)

Advertisement

Rep. Dan Ortiz, I-Ketchikan (N)

Rep. Mike Prax, R-North Pole (Y)

Rep. George Rauscher, R-Sutton (Y)

Rep. Justin Ruffridge, R-Soldotna (Y)

Rep. Dan Saddler, R-Eagle River (Y)

Advertisement

Rep. Calvin Schrage, I-Anchorage (N)

Rep. Laddie Shaw, R-Anchorage (Y)

Rep. Will Stapp, R-Fairbanks (Y)

Rep. Andi Story, D-Juneau (N)

Rep. Louise Stutes, R-Kodiak (N)

Advertisement

Rep. Jesse Sumner, R-Wasilla (Y)

Rep. Cathy Tilton, R-Wasilla (Y)

Rep. Frank Tomaszewski, R-Fairbanks (Y)

Rep. Sarah Vance, R-Homer (Y)

Rep. Stanley Wright, R-Anchorage (Y)

Advertisement

• • •

Sean Maguire reported from Juneau and Iris Samuels from Anchorage.





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Dozens of vehicle accidents reported, Anchorage after-school activities canceled, as snowfall buries Southcentral Alaska

Published

on

Dozens of vehicle accidents reported, Anchorage after-school activities canceled, as snowfall buries Southcentral Alaska


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Up to a foot of snow has fallen in areas across Southcentral as of Tuesday, with more expected into Wednesday morning.

All sports and after-school activities — except high school basketball and hockey activities — were canceled Tuesday for the Anchorage School District. The decision was made to allow crews to clear school parking lots and manage traffic for snow removal, district officials said.

“These efforts are critical to ensuring schools can safely remain open [Wednesday],” ASD said in a statement.

The Anchorage Police Department’s accident count for the past two days shows there have been 55 car accidents since Monday, as of 9:45 a.m. Tuesday. In addition, there have been 86 vehicles in distress reported by the department.

Advertisement
Snow measuring up to 17 inches deep in Anchorage, Alaska, on Jan. 6, 2026.(Alaska’s News Source)

The snowfall — which has brought up to 13 inches along areas of Turnagain Arm and 12 inches in Wasilla — is expected to continue Tuesday, according to latest forecast models. Numerous winter weather alerts are in effect, and inland areas of Southcentral could see winds up to 25 mph, with coastal areas potentially seeing winds over 45 mph.

Up to a foot or more of snow has fallen across Southcentral Alaska, with more snow expected...
Up to a foot or more of snow has fallen across Southcentral Alaska, with more snow expected through the day.(Alaska’s News Source)

Some areas of Southcentral could see more than 20 inches of snowfall by Wednesday, with the Anchorage and Eagle River Hillsides, as well as the foothills of the Talkeetna Mountain, among the areas seeing the most snowfall.

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Yundt Served: Formal Charges Submitted to Alaska Republican Party, Asks for Party Sanction and Censure of Senator Rob Yundt

Published

on

Yundt Served: Formal Charges Submitted to Alaska Republican Party, Asks for Party Sanction and Censure of Senator Rob Yundt


Sen. Rob Yundt

On January 3, 2026, Districts 27 and 28 of the Alaska Republican Party received formal charges against Senator Rob Yundt pursuant to Article VII of the Alaska Republican Party Rules.

According to the Alaska Republican Party Rules: “Any candidate or elected official may be sanctioned or censured for any of the following
reasons:
(a) Failure to follow the Party Platform.
(b) Engagement in any activities prohibited by or contrary to these rules or RNC Rules.
(c) Failure to carry out or perform the duties of their office.
(d) Engaging in prohibited discrimination.
(e) Forming a majority caucus in which non-Republicans are at least 1/3 or more of the
coalition.
(f) Engaging in other activities that may be reasonably assessed as bringing dishonor to
the ARP, such as commission of a serious crime.”

Advertisement

Party Rules require the signatures of at least 3 registered Republican constituents for official charges to be filed. The formal charges were signed by registered Republican voters and District N constitutions Jerad McClure, Thomas W. Oels, Janice M. Norman, and Manda Gershon.

Yundt is charged with “failure to adhere and uphold the Alaska Republican Party Platform” and “engaging in conduct contrary to the principles and priorities of the Alaska Republican Party Rules.” The constituents request: “Senator Rob Yundt be provided proper notice of the charges and a full and fair opportunity to respond; and that, upon a finding by the required two-thirds (2/3) vote of the District Committees that the charges are valid, the Committees impose the maximum sanctions authorized under Article VII.”

If the Party finds Yundt guilty of the charges, Yundt may be disciplined with formal censure by the Alaska Republican Party, declaration of ineligibility for Party endorsement, withdrawal of political support, prohibition from participating in certain Party activities, and official and public declaration that Yundt’s conduct and voting record contradict the Party’s values and priorities.

Reasons for the charges are based on Yundt’s active support of House Bill 57, Senate Bill 113, and Senate Bill 92. Constituents who filed the charges argue that HB 57 opposes the Alaska Republican Party Platform by “expanding government surveillance and dramatically increasing education spending;” that SB 113 opposes the Party’s Platform by “impos[ing] new tax burdens on Alaskan consumers and small businesses;” and that SB 92 opposes the Party by “proposing a targeted 9.2% tax on major private-sector energy producer supplying natural gas to Southcentral Alaska.” Although the filed charges state that SB 92 proposes a 9.2% tax, the bill actually proposes a 9.4% tax on income from oil and gas production and transportation.

Many Alaskan conservatives have expressed frustration with Senator Yundt’s legislative decisions. Some, like Marcy Sowers, consider Yundt more like “a tax-loving social justice warrior” than a conservative.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Pilot of Alaska flight that lost door plug over Portland sues Boeing, claims company blamed him

Published

on

Pilot of Alaska flight that lost door plug over Portland sues Boeing, claims company blamed him


The Alaska Airlines captain who piloted the Boeing 737 Max that lost a door plug over Portland two years ago is suing the plane’s manufacturer, alleging that the company has tried to shift blame to him to shield its own negligence.

The $10 million suit — filed in Multnomah County Circuit Court on Tuesday on behalf of captain Brandon Fisher — stems from the dramatic Jan. 5, 2024 mid-air depressurization of Flight 1282, when a door plug in the 26th row flew off six minutes after take off, creating a 2-by-4-foot hole in the plane that forced Fisher and co-pilot Emily Wiprud to perform an emergency landing back at PDX.

None of the 171 passengers or six crew members on board was seriously injured, but some aviation medical experts said that the consequences could have been “catastrophic” had the incident happened at a higher altitude.

Leani Benitez-Cardona, NTSB aerospace engineer, and Matthew Fox, NTSB chief technical advisor for materials, unpacking the door plug Sunday from Alaska Airlines flight 1282, a Boeing 737-9 MAX, in the materials laboratory at NTSB headquarters in Washington, D.C.NTSB

Fisher’s lawsuit is the latest in a series filed against Boeing, including dozens from Flight 1282 passengers. It also names Spirit AeroSystems, a subcontractor that worked on the plane.

Advertisement

The lawsuit blames the incident on quality control issues with the door plug. It argues that Boeing caught five misinstalled rivets in the panel, and that Spirit employees painted over the rivets instead of reinstalling them correctly. Boeing inspectors caught the discrepancy again, the complaint alleges, but when employees finally reopened the panel to fix the rivets, they didn’t reattach four bolts that secured the door panel.

The complaint’s allegations that Boeing employees failed to secure the bolts is in line with a National Transportation Safety Board investigation that came to the conclusion that the bolts hadn’t been replaced.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending