Connect with us

Alaska

Judicial selection and retention process on trial in Alaska

Published

on

Judicial selection and retention process on trial in Alaska


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Judges play a essential function in court docket procedures, just like umpires in baseball. Each judges and umpires attempt to own related traits — impartiality, competency, and a willingness to make robust calls in entrance of an viewers.

In some states, judges run full of life campaigns, hand out bumper stickers, and host rallies to win their seat. However not in Alaska.

Alaska has a seven-member Judicial Council that accepts functions each time a emptiness for a judgeship seems. Every candidate undergoes an intensive overview of their private {and professional} job historical past to evaluate their aptitude for a place on the bench. After interviews with the candidate, public testimony, and a full evaluation of them, the seven members of the council vote.

The council votes — with the Chief Justice abstaining until there’s a tie — and probably the most extremely certified candidates are forwarded to the governor. The governor makes the ultimate appointment.

Advertisement

Outgoing Chief Justice of the Alaska Supreme Courtroom and chair of the Judicial Council Daniel Winfree says that piles of paper for one choose hopeful will be inches thick, and lots of of pages lengthy.

The council members don’t at all times agree, however Winfree thinks that’s a function of the inclusive course of.

“The fantastic thing about it’s, is that when you may have six folks all trying on the identical factor, and also you’re working collaboratively, you see a whole image.”

However the council’s work isn’t completed. After a few years on the bench, they overview judges once more to evaluate in the event that they should retain their judgeship. The council repeats a lot of the preliminary choice course of to discern new details about how a person is doing in the course of the first few years on the job. The council then makes a public advice supporting both the discharge or retention of a specific choose. Nonetheless, the general public in the end makes the ultimate determination on the poll field.

The Judicial Council is there each step of the way in which by a choose’s profession.

Advertisement

“The council’s function is to have a look at all people who’s up for retention, and do a really related sort of investigation into how they’ve achieved during the last time period, in order that the council could make a advice to the voters whether or not to retain or non-retain this explicit choose,” Winfree mentioned.

Richard Payne is an legal professional at Denali Legislation Group and mentioned that over the course of his 25-year-long profession practising regulation in Alaska, he feels assured concerning the judicial choice course of.

“Our system insulates judges, from pressures which can be prevalent outdoors of the state,” Payne mentioned. “They don’t have to fret about hanging indicators. They don’t have to fret about enjoying to the bulk. They’ll do what they suppose is true. And I believe they do.”

Winfree agrees that Alaskans are fortunate to have this course of carved into the Structure.

“There are Supreme Courtroom judges in states — for instance, Minnesota involves my thoughts — the place they’ve to boost $10 million to run to be a Supreme Courtroom justice,” Winfree mentioned.

Advertisement

He desires voters to suppose laborious about the place marketing campaign cash comes from.

“It’s laborious for me to say that that doesn’t have an effect on their decision-making. I hope it doesn’t,” Winfree mentioned.

Alaska’s system gained’t change any time quickly. The one probability to reform the Alaska Structure was this 12 months’s election, and Poll Measure 1 didn’t move. The failure of Poll Measure 1 is disappointing to some. A minority motion questions whether or not the method is as apolitical because it seems at a look.

Former Fairbanks Senator John Coghill suggests there’s extra to the story.

“We’ve got averted the political noise as a result of the election is now by appointment,” Coghill mentioned. “However what that does is it takes it and places it sort of behind a veil.”

Advertisement

Coghill eschews outright condemnation of the system’s integrity. However, the method noblesse apart, he says, “That doesn’t imply there’s not politics concerned.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

BOGO marketing opportunity available on Alaska's No. 1 podcast — The Must Read Alaska Show

Published

on

BOGO marketing opportunity available on Alaska's No. 1 podcast — The Must Read Alaska Show


The Must Read Alaska Show podcast is the top-rated podcast in Alaska, according to Feedspot, one of the most-relied-on rating services.

Host John Quick has reached thousands of Alaskans with more than 400 podcast episodes, and has guests ranging from presidents of countries to Alaska entrepreneurs.

In one recent episode, Quick interviews the man who was the communications director for the Trump campaign in 2020: Tim Murtaugh, author of a new book, “Swing Hard, in Case You Hit It.“

Your company, agency, or campaign can be part of the fun and great MRAK energy with sponsorship of the show, receiving recognition at the beginning and end of each episode, as well as in the show summary on this website.

Advertisement

Quick is offering a BOGO – Buy one, get one month free of sponsorship, to the next entity that signs up. Here are the sponsorship details.

Feedspot ratings for Alaska podcasts are at this link.



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

After the Alaska House worked past midnight, some wonder: does the legislative session deadline matter?

Published

on

After the Alaska House worked past midnight, some wonder: does the legislative session deadline matter?


As the dust settled after the last frantic 24 hours of the legislative session that concluded early Thursday, some lawmakers wondered if their final votes could lead to a constitutional challenge.

Driven by a looming deadline and a pileup of bills over the past two years, lawmakers passed more than 40 measures in the final hours of the session. Five of them passed the House after midnight in the early hours of Thursday morning, despite a constitutional requirement that the Legislature conclude its work at the end of the 121st day of the session, which was Wednesday.

The Senate adjourned its session shortly before midnight on Wednesday, but the House adjourned after 1 a.m. on Thursday, not before voting on several measures.

Advertisement

At 12:01 a.m., the House voted on House bill 29, prohibiting insurance companies from discriminating against elected officials.

At 12:03 a.m., members passed House Bill 189, allowing employees to begin serving alcohol at 18, instead of 21.

At 12:08 a.m., they passed House Bill 122, allowing the Alaska Railroad Corp. to replace its terminal facility in Seward.

At 12:12 a.m. they passed House Bill 203, allowing private employers to use an electronic payroll system.

At 12:14 a.m., they voted on House Bill 19, related to commercial boat registration.

Advertisement

When House minority members then proceeded to bring a controversial election bill to a vote, several House Republicans — who had voted for some of the other post-midnight bills — said that lawmakers were violating the state constitution and were required to adjourn, or else risk a legal challenge to the legislation they adopt.

Shortly after 1 a.m., Rep. Kevin McCabe, a Big Lake Republican who sponsored House Bill 29, called the past-midnight legislating “among the most disrespectful and terrible things I have ever seen done to our constitution and to the state of Alaska residents.”

[A look at some of the bills that failed to pass the Alaska Legislature this year]

In the Senate, President Gary Stevens, R-Kodiak, and Majority Leader Cathy Giessel, R-Anchorage, both said that based on past experience, legislation passed after midnight would be upheld.

“The courts do not overturn the Legislature if we go over,” said Stevens, who has served in the Legislature for over 20 years.

Advertisement

But Senate Rules Chair Bill Wielechowski, D-Anchorage, an attorney who has served in the Legislature for over a decade, said Friday that “it’s going to be close.”

“I think there’s a pretty fair chance that anything passed after midnight is unconstitutional,” he said, adding that “the whole world could see it was after midnight.”

Wielechowski said the Alaska Department of Law will review the legislation “and make the call on it.”

Asked Friday, Department of Law spokesperson Patty Sullivan said the department is “reviewing all legislation that was passed by the Legislature and that will be presented to the governor for consideration.”

“Any legal issues we identify during that process will be provided to our client — the governor,” said Sullivan.

Advertisement

If Gov. Mike Dunleavy allowed the bills to become law, they could remain in effect “until somebody challenges it,” Wielechowski said. Dunleavy could also decide to veto the legislation.

Typically, to challenge statutes in court, plaintiffs must have been harmed by the legal violation. Wielechowski said that in this case, “arguably anybody in the state would have standing, because you’re alleging a violation of the constitution, and arguably, the whole state is impacted.”

“The constitution is pretty clear — but I don’t know — a court could find some creative way of extending it,” said Wielechowski.

A 1989 Alaska Supreme Court case related to legislators’ decision to blow past a midnight deadline resulted in a finding that the 120-day session deadline translated into a 121-day session, because the first day was of the session was not included in the count.

The single-subject rule

The Legislature adopted more than 40 bills in the last days of the session, but that number isn’t a true reflection of the number of policy proposals adopted by lawmakers — or the crush of work they handled in the final day of the session.

Advertisement

“When you factor the bill and ideas that were put into other bills, then it’s a substantially higher number probably — probably at least twice that,” said Wielechowski.

The end of the session was replete with what is commonly referred to as “bill stuffing” — the practice of amending one bill to include an additional bill inside it.

A bill to revamp Alaska’s workers’ compensation program was amended to include within it a 10-year extension of a senior benefits program that provides a small monthly stipend to around 9,000 low-income elderly Alaskans.

A measure meant to make it easier for out-of-state and retired teachers to work in Alaska schools was amended to include a $5,000 bonus for every teacher who has earned a national board certification.

A bill relating to the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation’s mortgage loans was amended to include within it a so-called “green bank” to offer loans for renewable energy projects.

Advertisement

A bill expanding Medicaid payment eligibility was amended to include within it a change to the method for determining eligibility for Alaska’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

A bill extending boards and commissions was amended to include within it a measure to offer child care tax credits, and another meant to limit the number of hunting guides in some parts of the state.

“There’s probably 20 bills here on the floor tonight that have multiple bills packed into bills — small and large — and I don’t think it’s a cause for concern,” Sen. Scott Kawasaki, a Fairbanks Democrat, said on Wednesday, speaking about a bill regulating students’ hunting and fishing licenses that was amended to include a provision related to pet ownership. That bill ultimately failed to pass.

Under the state constitution, bills must be confined “to one subject.” But most lawmakers took in stride the efforts to stack some bills into others in the final hours of the session.

Wielechowski said the single subject rule is one of the most “hotly contested, under the radar” issues lawmakers face near the end of the session.

Advertisement

Nonpartisan legislative attorneys have given lawmakers guidance that the rule is “generally pretty broadly interpreted,” Wielechowski said.

But a memo from legislative attorneys prepared earlier this month warned that a bill extending the big game commercial services board, the board of massage therapists, the marijuana control board and the Alaska Commission on Aging, “may violate the constitutional provision that limits bills to one subject.”

“I cannot identify a single subject that would unite all these subjects in a way that would likely withstand a challenge,” wrote attorney Allison Radford in the memo, which was requested by House Rules Chair Craig Johnson, R-Anchorage.

“Failure to comply with the single subject requirement could jeopardize the entire underlying bill, if the bill is challenged,” Radford added.

Johnson was responsible for the change that placed several board and commission extensions in a single measure, Senate Bill 189. He did not respond Friday to an interview request.

Advertisement

Rep. Zack Fields, an Anchorage Democrat who sits on the Rules Committee, said he was not concerned about the legal opinion.

“To be honest, I didn’t care because I don’t think that extending boards and commissions hurts anyone, and therefore, no one would litigate,” Fields said on Friday.

Fields on Wednesday proposed an amendment to Senate Bill 189 to include inside it a child care tax credit proposal authored by Rep. Julie Coulombe, R-Anchorage. Fields said the child care tax credit could fit into the bill because, like some of the commissions it extends, child care relates to the broad subject of “health.”

“Frankly, I don’t think anyone is going to litigate about child care. Who is harmed by that? Literally no one,” said Fields.

Wielechowski said Alaska courts in the past have taken a “pretty expansive definition of what the single subject is.”

Advertisement

Fields said many bills adopted by lawmakers cause legislative attorneys to point out potential questions related to the single subject rule, “and no one cares because they shouldn’t.”

“I don’t think single-subject is actually an issue that matters,” said Fields.

• • •





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Alaska’s Class of 2024 offers insight into what’s next

Published

on

Alaska’s Class of 2024 offers insight into what’s next


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – It’s graduation season across Alaska, and thousands of students are getting their diplomas and preparing for big changes in their lives.

It’s a time filled with excitement, but also a lot of unknowns, both for high school and college grads.

Students like Leni Sjostrom from Service High School is one graduate who has a lot of questions on her mind.

“Am I going to be able to adjust well? How am I going to pay for college? Is my passion going to grow? Am I going to think differently once I’m done with college?” Sjostrom asked.

Advertisement

With so many questions, it can be hard to find answers, especially when so much is expected of these new graduates.

Service High School grad Phoenix Perkins said he’s learned to take life as it comes.

“I don’t think you ever make it, you just always like, have fun along the way kind of, and you can enjoy certain parts a lot,” Perkins said.

Saumani Atiifale, a football player from Bettye Davis East High, expressed his feelings on how he feels in the moment as he prepares for life after graduation.

“I feel like I’m not ready, but I feel like when you don’t feel like you’re ready, you just have to, you just … gotta go,” Atiifale said. “I just want to take the risk right now, before it’s too late.”

Advertisement

As Alaska graduates its students, it’s time for them to find their own answers, knowing as they enter this next phase in their lives, it’s okay not to know what’s next.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending