Connect with us

Alaska

Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children’s Bill of Rights Advances to Alaska Senate

Published

on

Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children’s Bill of Rights Advances to Alaska Senate


JUNEAU, Alaska — House Bill 39, known as the Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children’s Bill of Rights, by Rep. Jamie Allard, R-Eagle River, passed the House of Representatives in a 40-0 vote Tuesday.

The legislation addresses language acquisition, parental choice and appropriate accommodation in public schools. Parents select the most suitable method of communication for their child whether that’s American Sign Language (ASL), spoken English with support or another modality. School districts would be required to deliver educational services using the parent’s chosen method.

“Deaf children are born with the same ability to acquire language as their hearing peers,” Rep. Allard said. “They have the right and capacity to be educated, graduate from high school, obtain further education and pursue meaningful careers.”

Central to HB 39 is the recognition that communication and language acquisition must be treated as a priority to prevent the devastating effects of inadequate access in the classroom, which can result in missed information during lectures and discussions, lower academic achievement and delayed language development.

Advertisement

Under the proposed law, children who are deaf or hard of hearing would have the right to accommodation and full access to academic instruction, school services and extracurricular activities in their primary language. This ensures that they can fully benefit from all school programs and participate meaningfully in education and society.

Recognizing Alaska’s unique rural geography, HB 39 acknowledges that some deaf or hard of hearing students may require residential services as part of their educational program to receive appropriate support.

Key provisions of House Bill 39 include:

* The right to an individualized education program (IEP) tailored to the child’s needs.

* Parental choice in determining the most appropriate method of communication.

Advertisement

* Identification of the child’s primary language in the IEP.

* Consideration of the prognosis for hearing loss.

* Instruction provided in the child’s primary language.

* Provision of necessary assistive devices, services and qualified personnel.

* Appropriate and timely assessments conducted in the child’s primary language.

Advertisement

Twenty states have already enacted similar Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children’s Bills of Rights, setting a strong precedent for protecting the educational rights of these students.

“HB 39 ensures that no child in Alaska is left behind due to barriers in communication,” Rep. Allard said. “By centering parental choice and language access, we are affirming the fundamental rights of deaf and hard of hearing children to thrive academically and socially.”

The federal law – Individuals with Disabilities Education Act – does not adequately address parental rights. HB 39 fills the gap.

Click here to watch Rep. Allard’s floor speech.

 

Advertisement



Source link

Alaska

Alaska Supreme Court to take up case on Dan J. Sullivan, decision expected by Tuesday

Published

on

Alaska Supreme Court to take up case on Dan J. Sullivan, decision expected by Tuesday


JUNEAU, Alaska (KTUU) – The Supreme Court of Alaska will be taking up the case of the State of Alaska, Division of Elections v. Daniel J. Sullivan, Jr.

The oral arguments will be held Monday at 10 a.m. via Zoom, according to an order and opening notice.

The document also specifies that a decision is expected to be made before noon on Tuesday.

According to documents from the Division of Elections, the state must start printing ballots at noon on the same day.

Advertisement

This comes after an Anchorage Superior Court Judge ordered Dan J. Sullivan on to the ballot Friday.

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com

Copyright 2026 KTUU. All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Mat-Su Initial Attack Responding to Fire in Flat Lake

Published

on

Mat-Su Initial Attack Responding to Fire in Flat Lake


An engine and firefighters from the Division of Forestry & Fire Protection’s Mat-Su Area are responding to a fire near Flat Lake.

A caller reported a fire on an island in Flat Lake, with 2 foot flame lengths and structures near by.

The engine crew responding will be shuttled by boat to the fire. The fire is currently reported as .1 acre, creeping and smoldering.

Advertisement

Additional updates will be shared as they become available.

‹ Pioneer Peak Hotshots, Gannett Glacier Crew Join Fight Against 2 Fires Near Ruby

Categories: Active Wildland Fire

Tags: #FireYear2026 #2026AKFIRESEASON, 2026 Alaska Fire Season



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Opinion: Alaska’s $10,000 question: Leave or stay?

Published

on

Opinion: Alaska’s ,000 question: Leave or stay?


A new home under construction in Potter Valley in Anchorage. (Loren Holmes / ADN)

This June, two very different offers reach Alaska families, and both amount to the same thing: $10,000. The difference is everything.

Bill Walker, running for governor, would hand every eligible Alaskan a one-time $10,000 check and then end the Permanent Fund dividend for good. Ask one question: Where does his $10,000 come from?

It comes from the Permanent Fund, the people’s own money and the savings Alaskans built for their children. Walker would spend that endowment once to pay Alaskans to give up the yearly dividend forever.

Think about what that does. It cancels the annual check that gives a family a reason to keep an Alaska address and replaces it with a single payout. You hand people their own savings, call it a gift and cut the tie that held them here in the same motion. It is the oldest mistake in governing money: raid what you have saved to buy a moment’s applause and call the spending generosity.

Advertisement

A plan that spends the people’s savings to send the people away is not bold. It is foolish.

Now consider the other $10,000. Through Alaska Housing Finance Corp., the state offers families up to $10,000 to build a new, energy-efficient home. AHFC raids nothing. It earns its own way. Over the years, it has returned more than $2 billion to the state treasury, and it spends some of that income the way any good business does: to win a customer.

Here, the customer is an Alaskan who wants to own a home, put down roots and stay.

That is the oldest sound move in business: Invest a little of what you earn to bring in someone who stays. The homeowner remains, the community gains a family and the corporation keeps earning. The money spent comes back. A plan that puts earnings to work to bring people home is not charity. It is clever.

Same amount. Opposite source. Opposite wisdom. One spends savings; the other spends earnings. One pays Alaskans to leave; the other pays them to stay. One empties the state; the other fills it.

Advertisement

This Homeownership Month, the choice is the size of a single check, and the whole question is where the check comes from and what it asks of you. Ten thousand dollars of your own fund, to wave you goodbye. Or $10,000, earned and reinvested, to help you stay and build.

Evan Swensen is the publisher of Publication Consultants in Anchorage and the author of “What’s the Money For: A Permanent Fund Mortgage Proposal.”

• • •

The Anchorage Daily News welcomes a broad range of viewpoints. To submit a piece for consideration, email commentary(at)adn.com. Send submissions shorter than 200 words to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Read our full guidelines for letters and commentaries here.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending