Connect with us

Alaska

Could Alaska be the final destination for Japan’s carbon pollution? • Alaska Beacon

Published

on

Could Alaska be the final destination for Japan’s carbon pollution? • Alaska Beacon


For decades, Alaska shipped liquefied natural gas to Japan, which burned the fuel to generate power — and also generated ample climate-warming carbon emissions.

Now, the Biden administration wants to study whether those Japanese emissions could be captured, liquefied and shipped back to Alaska. There, they’d be injected and locked away underground in Cook Inlet, just west of Anchorage, to help stem the warming of the climate.

Officials from the U.S. Department of Energy announced Tuesday at an Anchorage workshop that they’re starting a formal study of the concept, building on Japan-U.S. cooperative agreements announced by the White House last month.

“Even as the decline of natural gas in the Cook Inlet heralds the end of a previous and impressive energy area in this region, awareness and interest is growing here in the region’s potential to become a storehouse for capturing carbon emissions — both domestically and internationally,” said Brad Crabtree, assistant secretary for the Department of Energy’s Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management.

Advertisement

Crabtree spoke Tuesday to an audience at Anchorage’s Sheraton hotel that, in addition to Alaska policymakers and fossil fuel executives, included some 15 representatives of Japan’s energy industries and government. 

The Department of Energy’s new study is a reflection of the growing interest in injecting and storing climate-warming carbon pollution in underground reservoirs in Alaska — a trend amplified, in part, by provisions in President Joe Biden’s signature climate law to incentivize greater use of the technology.

Alaska lawmakers are currently debating a bill sponsored by GOP Gov. Mike Dunleavy that would establish a legal system for carbon injection and storage. And one Japanese company recently hired an Alaska-based lobbyist, at $7,500 a month, to track carbon-related policy developments in the state.

Many climate advocates are skeptical of carbon storage’s potential to meaningfully reduce global warming, saying it’s expensive, unproven on a large scale and enables continued dependence on fossil fuels. 

But Crabtree, in an interview after his announcement, said that certain substantial sources of carbon pollution aren’t tied to fossil fuel combustion. Cement manufacturing, he noted, generates emissions not just from burning fuels but from a specific chemical process that converts limestone into lime.

Advertisement

“I don’t see this as enabling oil and gas at all,” he said. “I see this as enabling the transformation of our energy industrial economy to be fully decarbonized.”

Brad Crabtree (Photo by Nathaniel Herz/Northern Journal)

Alaska, however, has to overcome a significant obstacle in order to participate in the carbon storage industry, according to Crabtree: While it has “enormous” storage potential in the form of depleted oil and gas reservoirs, it produces relatively low quantities of emissions from its few major power plants and industrial facilities.

That’s where Japan, and possibly South Korea, come in. 

Japan is the world’s fifth-highest energy consumer, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s most recent statistics. But while Japan has committed to being carbon neutral by 2050, it has limited capacity to deposit emissions underground, as well as risks to the integrity of storage from earthquakes, Crabtree said.

Advertisement

Japanese businesses have already signed study agreements with international partners to explore the idea of shipping carbon to Malaysia and Indonesia and storing it there. Now, Crabtree’s office will examine whether the same idea is possible in the U.S., with a focus on Alaska.

An official from a Japanese company following those developments, who requested anonymity because of their political sensitivity, described the interest from his country as “very, very early.”

“It’s a tool that’s being evaluated,” the official said. “The economics are painfully expensive.”

Oil companies have long injected carbon into their reservoirs to help extract more petroleum. But the federal government has licensed very few projects solely dedicated to storing carbon to keep it out of the atmosphere. 

As of September, the Environmental Protection Agency had issued just two permits that have led to projects, both in Illinois, according to E&E News.

Advertisement

Enhanced tax credits for CO2 storage in Biden’s climate law have boosted industry interest in new projects, but there’s now a major permitting backlog at the EPA. And because the tax credit only applies to carbon captured in the U.S., Japanese emissions shipped to Alaska wouldn’t qualify, Crabtree said.

The energy department’s study, with help from a newly hired contractor, will examine whether the cross-border carbon shipment concept makes technical and economic sense — and what costs and prices for capture and storage would allow such projects to move forward. 

One idea is that if Alaska can produce climate-friendly fuels, like hydrogen, to ship to Asia, the same tankers could return to the state carrying carbon emissions.

“We create this value chain of, potentially, exporting energy to Japan and backhauling carbon dioxide, which we then sequester in our rocks,” said John Boyle, Alaska’s commissioner of natural resources.

Studying the technical feasibility should be just the first step, said Kelsey Schober, director of government affairs at Alaska’s branch of the Nature Conservancy, which recently published a study on carbon capture and storage in the state.

Advertisement

“It can’t be the only step. We also have to ask: What are the impacts? Who’s going to feel those impacts the most? Have they been consulted about these projects?” she said.

From an environmental perspective, Schober added, the potential benefits of carbon capture and storage depend on where the pollution is coming from. It’s more valuable, she said, if it’s being used for industries — like cement manufacturing or steelmaking — that are difficult to decarbonize.

“We have to think about prioritizing avoiding and reducing direct emissions — not just using CCUS technologies as a way to bail out existing emission levels,” she said, using an acronym for carbon capture and underground storage.

Nathaniel Herz welcomes tips at [email protected] or (907) 793-0312. This article was originally published in Northern Journal, a newsletter from Herz. Subscribe at this link.

Advertisement

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX



Source link

Alaska

Senate committee strips homeschool funding overhaul from education bill, adds one-time ‘energy relief’ funding

Published

on

Senate committee strips homeschool funding overhaul from education bill, adds one-time ‘energy relief’ funding


Sen. Löki Tobin, D-Anchorage, talks with colleagues on the Senate floor on Jan. 22, 2025. (Marc Lester / ADN)

JUNEAU — The Alaska Senate Education Committee on Monday replaced a school funding bill introduced in March with a new version that strips out a controversial overhaul of publicly funded homeschooling programs.

The new version instead would require more legislative oversight over Alaska’s correspondence education programs, and removes additional correspondence funding in favor of broader one-time education funding measures.

The bill now includes a $58 million one-time school energy relief payment to offset high fuel prices, and a bump to student transportation funding. It still includes incentive grants for districts where students improve reading proficiency under the Alaska Reads Act.

Sen. Löki Tobin, an Anchorage Democrat and chair of the Senate Education Committee that sponsored the bill, said that removing the most controversial parts of the bill — how correspondence programs are funded — makes the bill more straightforward.

Advertisement

“I think the part that was most infuriating was the mis- and disinformation that was promulgated by certain entities that the outreach we received would talk to components or pieces that weren’t in the legislation at all, or the legislation didn’t do what they were claiming it did,” she said in an interview Tuesday.

She said the “deep trove of mal-information” created a response and pushback she “was unwilling to continue to bear.”

The bill originally sought to funnel funding for homeschoolers through the school districts in which they reside, potentially with significant impacts to large correspondence programs that are administered by rural school districts. That funding change came alongside a 10% increase in per-student funding for correspondence students overall. Both of those elements are removed from the new version of the bill.

There are over 30 correspondence programs enrolling more than 24,000 students across Alaska, as of last year. More than half of those students were enrolled in correspondence programs administered by districts outside of the district where they reside.

That includes programs like IDEA, run by the Galena City School District, the state’s largest correspondence program. IDEA serves over 7,000 students statewide.

Advertisement

Superintendents and families of correspondence students pushed back against the original bill, saying that it represented an existential threat to correspondence programs. The bill received hundreds of letters and public testimony opposing the changes to correspondence funding.

The new version of the bill removes some of the bill’s most controversial aspects.

Jason Johnson, the superintendent of the Galena City School District, sent an email to IDEA families prior to the bill’s first hearing urging them to contact their representatives to oppose the bill and asserting that under the bill as written, correspondence programs would receive zero state funding.

Tobin said in an interview in March following the influx of opposition that the bill would not have diverted all state funding away from correspondence programs.

Johnson said as of Tuesday morning, he had not yet reviewed the new version of the bill.

Advertisement

Homeschool reporting requirements

The new version of the bill requires that Alaska school districts provide an annual report to the Legislature with details on the correspondence programs they operate, including how much money the district provides to students in the programs, how many students are in the programs, where those students live, what the allotments are used for, and more.

The new reporting requirements mirror those included in a 2024 bill that called for a one-time report to the Legislature on correspondence allotment spending.

At the time, state spending on homeschooled students was scrutinized following litigation challenging a practice by some Alaska families — including that of former Attorney General Treg Taylor — to subsidize tuition in private Christian schools using public correspondence school allotments.

Tobin said last year that the 2024 report revealed there is “just a lot we don’t know about how public dollars are being used.”

A much larger percentage of students in non-correspondence schools take AK STAR state standardized tests compared to those in correspondence programs. Correspondence programs often see lower graduation rates than standard public schools in Alaska.

Advertisement

Families whose students are enrolled in IDEA, for example, receive an allotment of $2,700 per student per year, according to IDEA’s website. There is little clarity or government oversight on how that money can be spent. A pending lawsuit will answer whether or not correspondence allotments can cover the cost of tuition at a private school.

Tobin says these discrepancies and outstanding questions call for more state oversight on correspondence programs.

“We’re asking for all that information because it’s difficult, as we’ve learned, to create good public policy that helps support our correspondence students, if we don’t have the information that is needed to inform how that policy is created,” Tobin said.

Education funding prospects

The committee substitute to the Senate bill also cuts the $125 increase to the state’s annual per-student formula funding, intended as inflation-proofing in the bill’s original version, which would have raised the Base Student Allocation from $6,660 to roughly $6,785.

Tobin said removing the increase to annual per-student funding in favor of a one-time payment is more politically feasible in the Legislature this session.

Advertisement

“Whether it’s inflationary or it’s additional funds for this year, there is a disinterest in increasing the Base Student Allocation this cycle, and so we’re trying to figure out other ways that we can target funding and support students and communities and schools,” Tobin said Tuesday. It is unlikely that the Legislature can muster the votes needed to override a governor’s veto of additional education funding, she said.

Tobin also said she thinks one-time funding is more likely to get the governor’s signature. The Legislature narrowly voted last session to override Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s veto of an increase in the Base Student Allocation.

But Alaska’s public schools still say they don’t have the money they need, with districts such as the Anchorage School District voting to close schools and reducing staff positions and programs to mitigate severe deficits.

The latest version of the Senate bill is in conflict with a spending plan adopted by the House this week.

The House operating budget calls for adding $147 million in one-time funding for K-12 school operations along with nearly $11 million in new funding for student transportation. The House figure, majority members say, is needed to make up for years of inflation.

Advertisement

That funding in the operating budget was included to guarantee some additional education funding this year. During debates on the House floor, members of the Republican minority repeatedly spoke out against one-time spending on education, including arguments that they wanted a more specific plan for how the funds would be used and that it could lead districts to expect funding to continue at that level in future years.

The Senate bill proposes to increase student transportation funding by roughly $15 million, distribute just under $59 million in energy relief payments to K-12 schools, and spend around $22 million on incentive payments for reading improvement.

All told, the Senate proposal calls for close to $100 million in new education spending, far below the amount identified by the House.

Daily News reporter Iris Samuels contributed to this report.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Alaska AG Enters Into $800K Settlement With Car Dealer Group (via Passle)

Published

on

Alaska AG Enters Into 0K Settlement With Car Dealer Group (via Passle)


Last month, Alaska Attorney General Stephen J. Cox announced that his office entered into a settlement with a group of Swickard car dealerships, resolving false advertising allegations against the dealers.  As part of the settlement, the dealers agree to pay a civil penalty of $800,000.  

The Alaska AG alleged that the dealers engaged in bait and switch advertising by promoting vehicles that were not actually available for purchase in order to draw customers to its lots.  The AG also alleged that the dealers refused to honor advertised prices, requiring customers to purchase expensive dealer add-ons.  

In announcing the settlement, Cox said, “Car dealers don’t get to advertise one price and charge another—or advertise cars that aren’t really there.  That’s a bait-and-switch, and it’s unlawful. Alaskans already face higher costs than most—this settlement holds Swickard accountable and reinforces that the price you see should be the price you pay.”

Interestingly, the consent decree includes a provision that says that if the dealers engage “in a reckless violation or persistent violations” of Alaska’s consumer protection laws in the future, the court may impose an additional penalty of up to $200,000. 

Advertisement

This enforcement action is yet another example of the heightened scrutiny that car dealer advertising is under right now.  Earlier this month, the Federal Trade Commission settled a similar action.  And, in March, the FTC sent warning letters to nearly 100 car dealers. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Palmer high school robotics team makes Alaska history with regional win

Published

on

Palmer high school robotics team makes Alaska history with regional win


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Palmer’s Colony High School Northern Knights Robotics won the First Robotics Competition (FRC) regional championship on April 4, becoming the first team from Alaska to win the title.

The Northern Knights’ business manager, sophomore Carter Fickes, said that the FRC is one of the most prestigious robotics competitions in the world.

“The game elements are a lot bigger,” he said.

“There’s a lot of more coding challenges as well, because you have what is called an autonomous period where your robot’s running strictly on code, and then you have a teleop period where it’s driver controlled.”

Advertisement

According to Fickes, the regional competition in Minneapolis saw the team paired with and against groups from Minnesota, Illinois, the Czech Republic, Japan, and China.

Teams were required to make “alliances” with each other, before competing together in the quarterfinals.

“Being collaborative with other teams and being open to their strategy is great.” he said.

“We were telling them our main marketing strategy was ‘we’re flexible, and if you want us to do something, we can do it.’”

Fickes told Alaska’s News Source that the competition required teams to program and direct their robots to shoot balls towards targets in order to score points.

Advertisement

The Northern Knights programmed their 85-pound robot to focus on defense, blocking shots from the opposing team.

“Our alliance partners had semi-automatic turrets that could shoot like hundreds of balls in a minute,” he said.

“We were blocking the other robots from getting on the other side and scoring fuel.”

Fickes said this was the first year that their team was selected to be a part of an alliance.

After the quarterfinals, the Northern Knights went on to dominate the rest of the competition.

Advertisement

“We were untouched,” he said.

“We were outscoring them by 200 points, and then the finals matches, I think it ended up being like 400 to 200 or 300.”

By winning both the finals match, as well as the Rookie Team of the Year award, the Northern Knights earned themselves a ticket to the FRC Worlds Competition in Texas beginning on April 29.

“Our mentality is kind of like, ‘we’ve made it this far, so why not try our best?’” he said.

“If we don’t win the whole competition, it’s not the end of the world. A team from Alaska has never done this before, and if we like our goal is to win and to qualify and do good.”

Advertisement

Unlike many other robotics teams across the country, Ficker said the Northern Knights are entirely funded through private donations.

“We built our robot in our team captain’s basement. He let us use his house, and we spent hours upon hours upon hours in his basement building and testing.”

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending