Connect with us

Alaska

Alaska Supreme Court explains ruling that says ranked choice voting, open primaries are constitutional

Published

on

Alaska Supreme Court explains ruling that says ranked choice voting, open primaries are constitutional


The Alaska Supreme Court docket issued a full opinion Friday explaining why it upheld the state’s new ranked alternative voting and open major system as constitutional in January.

The 5 justices issued a quick order on the time in favor of the brand new system that was narrowly accepted by voters in a 2020 poll measure. It was issued shortly to verify to the Alaska Division of Elections that the brand new voting system could be used this 12 months.

Alaska is the second state after Maine to implement ranked alternative voting, during which voters are requested to rank 4 candidates — and a write-in possibility — so as of choice. And it’s the first state to couple that with an open major system.

Advertisement

Republican Kenneth Jacobus, a longtime Alaska legal professional, appeared on behalf of himself, Libertarian legislative candidate Scott Kohlhaas and Bob Fowl, head of the Alaskan Independence Social gathering, to problem the brand new system.

Former Alaska Lt. Gov. Mead Treadwell and former state Rep. Dick Randolph every submitted paperwork in assist of Jacobus. They argued ranked alternative voting violated a constitutional provision that “the candidate receiving the best variety of votes shall be governor,” partly as a result of after a number of rounds of counting, the winner might not have gotten probably the most first-choice votes.

The justices rejected their arguments. The ranked-choice tabulation course of is used if no candidate will get greater than half the first-choice votes. In that state of affairs, the last-place candidate is then eradicated and their votes are redistributed to the opposite candidates based mostly on their supporters’ second-choice votes. That course of is repeated till one candidate has a transparent majority.

Of their 57-page opinion, the justices stated that the tabulation course of would nonetheless end in a gubernatorial candidate profitable with the best variety of votes — except within the unlikely results of a tie — and that “there is no such thing as a query {that a} ranked-choice vote is a single vote.”

Additionally they rejected arguments that an open major burdens political events’ proper to decide on their very own candidates. As a substitute, it merely narrows the sector of candidates by permitting the highest 4 vote-getters, no matter social gathering, to advance to the final election, they stated.

Advertisement

Candidates for lieutenant governor and governor now run as a joint ticket. The plaintiffs argued that violates the structure’s requirement that the lieutenant governor be elected in “the identical method” because the governor, which means voters ought to get to solid a poll for them individually within the major. However that was additionally rejected, with the justices writing that voters would nonetheless have their say on candidates for lieutenant governor by way of the nonpartisan major course of.

Jacobus argued political events could be weakened as a result of candidates can seem on the poll with their social gathering registration, which might suggest that they had been endorsed by the social gathering. The court docket stated directions on the poll made clear {that a} candidate’s affiliation doesn’t essentially equal an endorsement, and Alaskans would have sufficient widespread sense to inform the distinction.

Political observers have famous that reasonable candidates appear to have benefited from the brand new open major system utilized in August, which allowed voters of any political persuasion to solid a poll for any candidate they needed. U.S. Rep. Mary Peltola, a reasonable Democrat, additionally received the particular U.S. Home race — Alaska’s first election to make use of ranked alternative voting — defeating two Republicans, former Gov. Sarah Palin and businessman Nick Begich III.

Since then, a number of Republican legislative candidates have spoken publicly in opposition to the brand new ranked alternative voting system through the lead-up to this 12 months’s election. They’ve pledged to attempt to repeal it if they’re elected.

Lots of of 1000’s of {dollars} in Outdoors cash has been donated to impartial expenditure teams, Alaska’s model of tremendous PACs, to spice up legislative candidates who’re seen as supportive of the brand new voting system, open primaries and automated voter registration. Impartial former Gov. Invoice Walker has acquired funding from the identical sources.

Advertisement

Gov. Mike Dunleavy indicated his private opposition to ranked alternative voting at a gubernatorial discussion board earlier within the month. He sidestepped that query throughout a televised debate Wednesday, however stated voters had supported the system and that wanted to be revered.

“And we’ll do an analysis after that,” he stated concerning the Nov. 8 normal election. “And we’ll see how this new voting course of works.”

Former Kenai Peninsula Borough Mayor Charlie Pierce, a second Republican candidate for governor, spoke in opposition to the brand new voting system throughout Wednesday’s debate, whereas Walker and Democratic former state legislator Les Gara spoke in assist of it.

• • •





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

OPINION: CDQ program and pollock fishery are essential to Western Alaska

Published

on

OPINION: CDQ program and pollock fishery are essential to Western Alaska


By Eric Deakin, Ragnar Alstrom and Michael Link

Updated: 1 hour ago Published: 1 hour ago

We work every day to support Alaska’s rural communities through the Community Development Quota (CDQ) program and have seen firsthand the lifeline the program provides to our state’s most isolated and economically vulnerable areas.

Advertisement

This program is one of the most successful social justice programs in the United States, giving rural, coastal communities a stake in the success of the Bering Sea fisheries, and transferring these benefits into community investments. Our fisheries participation provides $80 million to $100 million of programs, wages and benefits into Western Alaska annually, and the full economic reach of the CDQ program is substantially larger when accounting for jobs and support services statewide.

In some communities, CDQs are the largest and only private-sector employer; the only market for small-boat fishermen; the only nonfederal funding available for critical infrastructure projects; and an essential program provider for local subsistence and commercial fishing access. There is no replacement for the CDQ program, and harm to it would come at a severe cost. As one resident framed it, CDQ is to Western Alaska communities, what oil is to Alaska.

Consistent with their statutory mandate, CDQ groups have increased their fisheries investments, and their 65 member communities are now major players in the Bering Sea. The foundation of the program is the Bering Sea pollock fishery, 30% of which is owned by CDQ groups. We invest in pollock because it remains one of the most sustainably managed fisheries in the world, backed by rigorous science, with independent observers on every vessel, ensuring that bycatch is carefully monitored and minimized.

We also invest in pollock because the industry is committed to constantly improving and responding to new challenges. We understand the impact that salmon collapses are having on culture and food security in Western Alaska communities. Working with industry partners, we have reduced chinook bycatch to historically low levels and achieved more than an 80% reduction in chum bycatch over the past three years. This is a clear demonstration that CDQ groups and industry are taking the dire salmon situation seriously, despite science that shows bycatch reductions will have very minimal, if any, positive impact on subsistence access.

The effects of recent warm summers on the Bering Sea ecosystem have been well documented by science. This has caused some species to prosper, like sablefish and Bristol Bay sockeye salmon, while others have been negatively impacted, including several species of crab and salmon. Adding to these challenges is the unregulated and growing hatchery production of chum salmon in Russia and Asia, which is competing for limited resources in the Bering Sea, and increasing management challenges.

Advertisement

Attributing the current salmon crises to this fishery is misguided and could cause unnecessary harm to CDQ communities. Without the pollock fishery, we would see dramatic increases in the cost of food, fuel and other goods that are shipped to rural Alaska. We would also see the collapse of the CDQ program and all that it provides, including a wide array of projects and jobs that help keep families fed and children in school.

The challenges Alaska faces are significant, and to address them we need to collectively work together to mitigate the impacts of warming oceans on our fisheries, build resiliency in our communities and fishery management, and continue to improve practices to minimize fishing impacts. We must also recognize the vital need for the types of community investments and job opportunities that the CDQ program creates for Western Alaska and ensure these benefits are considered when talking about the Bering Sea pollock fishery.

Eric Deakin is chief executive officer of the Coastal Villages Region Fund.

Ragnar Alstrom is executive director of the Yukon Delta Fisheries Development Association.

Michael Link is president and CEO of Bristol Bay Economic Development Corp.

Advertisement

The views expressed here are the writer’s and are not necessarily endorsed by the Anchorage Daily News, which welcomes a broad range of viewpoints. To submit a piece for consideration, email commentary(at)adn.com. Send submissions shorter than 200 words to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Read our full guidelines for letters and commentaries here.





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

‘Drag racing for dogs:’ Anchorage canines gather for the ‘Great Alaska Barkout’

Published

on

‘Drag racing for dogs:’ Anchorage canines gather for the ‘Great Alaska Barkout’


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Alaska’s first “flyball” league held its annual “Great Alaska Barkout Flyball Tournament” on Saturday in midtown at Alyeska Canine Trainers.

Flyball is a fast-paced sport in which relay teams of four dogs and their handlers compete to cross the finish line first while carrying a tennis ball launched from a spring loaded box. Saturday’s tournament was one of several throughout the year held by “Dogs Gone Wild,” which started in 2004 as Alaska’s first flyball league.

“We have here in Alaska, we’ve got, I think it’s about 6 tournaments per year,” said competitor and handler Maija Doggett. “So you know every other month or so there will be a tournament hosted. Most of them are hosted right here at Alyeska Canine Trainers.”

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

State of Alaska will defend its right to facilitate oil and gas development

Published

on

State of Alaska will defend its right to facilitate oil and gas development


Last week, Superior Court Judge Andrew Guidi indicated he will rule that Alaska does not have authority to permit access across its lands to facilitate oil and gas development on the North Slope.

The Alaska Dept. of Natural Resources plans to fight and appeal any final adverse ruling that undermines the state’s constitutional interests in resource development.

The Department of Natural Resources has issued a permit allowing Oil Search Alaska (OSA) to cross the Kuparuk River Unit, operated by Conoco Phillips Alaska, to develop the Pikka Unit. As described in the State’s brief to the court, “the denial of such access implicates the delay of development of millions of barrels of oil and billions of dollars of public revenues.”

Advertisement

“The State of Alaska has a constitutional obligation to maximize the development of our resources,” DNR Commissioner John Boyle said on Nov. 22. “We have to confirm with the Supreme Court that we have the authority to permit access for all developers to ensure we can meet this obligation.”

Once the Superior Court issues the final judgement, Alaska will be able to file its appeal. This is expected to occur in the coming weeks.

Click here to support the Alaska Watchman.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending