Alaska
Alaska LNG Secures Preliminary Gas Supply Agreement
Alaska Gasline Development Corp. (AGDC) has signed a preliminary agreement to source gas from Pantheon Resources PLC for Alaska LNG, a federally authorized project to export up to 20 million metric tons of liquefied natural gas (LNG) per year.
The so-called gas sales precedent agreement (GSPA) contains main terms that would be contained in a future binding GSA between AGDC and London-based Pantheon, including the supply of up to 500 million cubic feet per day (MMcfpd) to the liquefaction project for an extendable 20 years.
The GSPA also set the maximum base price for the feed gas at $1 per million British thermal unit in 2024 dollars, AGDC and Pantheon said in a joint statement. The GSPA was signed between AGDC subsidiary 8 Star Alaska LLC and Pantheon subsidiary Great Bear Pantheon LLC.
In Alaska, Pantheon plans to develop two field discoveries, Ahpun and Kodiak, which sit onshore state land in the North Slope. Kodiak has been independently certified to contain 5.4 trillion cubic feet of gas and 1.2 billion barrels of marketable liquids, in the best-estimate scenario for contingent recoverable resources, according to a Pantheon statement April 9. Pantheon is still working on a resource estimate for Ahpun.
The signing of a GSA in the future is conditional on Pantheon reaching affirmative final investment decisions (FID) on these upstream projects, as well as AGDC making an FID for Alaska LNG. AGDC plans to reach an FID mid-2025. Pantheon also needs permits and regulatory approvals to deliver gas for Alaska LNG.
Alaska LNG, which received export authorization from the Energy Department last year, is pursuing a phased development to make it attractive to investors. The GSPA is part of phase one.
“Phase 1 of Alaska LNG does not involve construction of an LNG plant, and as a result has a materially lower capex requirement and construction timeframe, allowing gas transportation as early as 2029”, the joint statement said.
AGDC president Frank Richards commented, “This agreement solidifies the commercial foundation needed for the Phase 1 portion of Alaska LNG and provides enough pipeline-ready natural gas, at beneficial consumer rates, to resolve Southcentral Alaska’s looming energy shortage as soon as 2029”.
“Phasing Alaska LNG by leading with the construction of the pipeline will make Alaska LNG’s export components more attractive to LNG developers and investors, and this agreement will help unlock the project’s substantial economic, environmental, and energy security benefits for international markets as well as for Alaska”, Richards added.
AGDC is in talks with potential partners for the construction of the 807-mile pipeline from the North Slope to Southcentral Alaska. Alaska LNG is planned to deliver up to 3.3 billion cubic feet of gas per day from the North Slope to overseas markets, according to AGDC.
“AGDC is continuing advanced discussions with an established North American pipeline developer and Alaska utilities to complete the commercial structure that will make a natural gas pipeline from the North Slope to Southcentral Alaska possible and further enhance the prospects for the overall Alaska LNG export project”, AGDC spokesperson Tim Fitzpatrick told Rigzone.
Gas Price Adjustment
To lessen the upstream cost burden on Pantheon, the GSPA allows the base price of the gas that Pantheon would supply Alaska LNG to be reduced if state authorities lower financing repayment costs “and/or enable other commercial opportunities”, the joint statement said.
“Furthermore, securing financing for Phase 1 of Alaska LNG could potentially increase commercial alignment for the complete project and thus potentially provide additional demand for Pantheon’s associated natural gas above the initial 500 mmcfd plateau”, the statement added.
“The GSPA potentially opens up additional funding pathways for the Alaska LNG Project and the Ahpun field development activities. This may relieve Pantheon of the need for equity dilution following FID, in line with the Company’s guidance to secure the path of least value dilution for existing shareholders”.
Court Battle
While the GSPA marked a milestone, a suit has been filed by environmental watchdogs, taking issue with the route of the pipeline.
The Center for Biological Diversity and Sierra Club on May 30 sued federal fisheries authorities alleging that their biological opinions had failed to fully examine the harms posed by Alaska LNG to wildlife species.
The petition for review filed before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit seeks to throw out the opinions of the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries). The opinions issued by the fisheries authorities “violate the Endangered Species Act by not fully examining and mitigating the project’s harms to polar bears, Cook Inlet beluga whales and North Pacific right whales”, the plaintiffs said in a joint statement.
“The pipeline would connect drilling operations on the North Slope to an export terminal on Cook Inlet and bring tanker ships through the habitat of endangered Cook Inlet beluga whales and North Pacific right whales”, the Center for Biological Diversity and Sierra Club said in their statement. “The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission estimates the project would increase large vessel traffic in the inlet by up to nearly 75 percent.
“Cook Inlet beluga whales are critically endangered. The population has declined more than 75 percent since 1970, and scientists believe their recovery is hindered by noise pollution and the cumulative harm of multiple, human-caused stressors.
“The eastern North Pacific right whale population ranges from the Bering Sea to Baja California and is down to only about 30 individuals. With few reproducing females, the population is at extreme risk of imminent extinction”.
Named as defendants are the FWS; Interior Secretary Deb Haaland, whose department oversees the FWS; NOAA Fisheries; and Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo, whose department oversees NOAA Fisheries.
AGDC rejected the suit’s claims. “Alaska LNG has withstood intensive environmental scrutiny by two successive administrations because of its obvious and abundant benefits, which include reducing global emissions by up to 2.3 billion tons, strengthening allied energy security, and finally ending longstanding air quality problems plaguing Interior Alaska villages and communities”, Fitzpatrick said in a statement to Rigzone.
The Interior Department and the FWS declined to comment. NOAA Fisheries said it could not comment on litigations.
To contact the author, email jov.onsat@rigzone.com
Alaska
Alaska Sees Coldest December In Years | Weather.com
2 Feet Of Snow Traps Drivers In Michigan
Do you think that Alaska is cold during winter? Of course it is! However, the type of cold the state is experiencing right now if unprecedented. How about having consecutive days of temperatures colder than 40 degrees below zero!
This is true for much of the Alaskan interior, particularly near Fairbanks and in between the Alaska and Brooks mountain ranges.
Over the last four days in Fairbanks, temperatures have struggled to reach 40 degrees below zero, with organizers in Fairbanks even postponing their annual New Year’s Eve fireworks show due to the extreme cold.

The temperature in the final few minutes of 2025 in Fairbanks was 43 degrees below zero.
In other words, conditions are unbearably and dangerously cold, even by local standards in Central Alaska.
In Chicken, Alaska, located near the Canadian Border, temperatures dropped as low as 62 degrees below zero! Numerous other locations in the eastern Alaskan Interior have seen temperatures between 50 and 60 degrees below zero.
On top of bringing dangerously cold minimum temperatures, this most recent cold snap has also been more prolonged than usual.
Temperatures in much of Alaska have been largely colder than usual since roughly December 5th, 2025
Some regions in eastern Alaska and the neighboring Yukon Territory in Canada have seen combined December temperatures up to 30 degrees below the climatological average.
For reference, the average December temperature in Fairbanks from 1904 to 2025 is 22 degrees below zero with much of central Alaska having similarly cold December temperatures on average. The city has seen a temperature departure of 18.5 degrees below average for December 2025, ranking as the 8th coldest December on record.
This means that much of east-central Alaska has been stuck between 40 and 50 degrees below for nearly an entire month!
While many factors affect the severity of winters in Alaska, one notable statistic is the unusually high snowfall in portions of Alaska this past December. Fairbanks saw more than double its usual snowfall for the month of December.
Juneau, Alaska’s capital, located in far-southeast Alaska, has seen nearly its entire annual snowfall in December alone, at over 80 inches.
Snowfall promotes cold temperatures by reflecting light from the sun back to space. In Alaska, there is already very little sunlight during the winter due to its positioning on and near the Arctic Circle.
What little sunlight snow-covered portions of Alaska have seen has been quickly reflected back to space by the unusually heavy snowpack.
In Central Alaska, located between the Alaska and Brooks ranges, the heavy snowpack, lack of sunlight, and lack of transport of air from warmer locations have led to the development of an arctic high pressure system, leading to stable conditions and light winds. These conditions cause the land to rapidly lose heat, becoming even colder. With this arctic high pressure is in place, central Alaska has remained cold. However, a slight breakdown in the strength of the high will allow temperatures to warm somewhat (see forecast for next 3 days below).

Fortunately, this pattern will break down as we approach mid-January. A more active storm track from the Pacific is poised to bring wetter and warmer conditions to portions of Alaska, especially towards the middle to second half of the month. While this wetter pattern means snow for most, temperatures will improve, being far more bearable than the current temperatures in the 40 to 50 degree below zero range.
Hayden Marshall is a meteorologist intern and First-Year-Master’s Student at the Georgia Institute of Technology. He has been following weather content over the past three years as a Storm Spotter and weather enthusiast. He can be found on Instagram and Linkedin.
Alaska
Alaska’s delegation responds to situation in Venezuela
ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Officials say Venezuela’s president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife are in New York Saturday night after they were captured in a U.S. military operation that came amid strikes in the country’s capital.
Alaska’s delegation has responded to the situation.
Senator Dan Sullivan commented on the situation saying, “In the aftermath of last night’s remarkable operation, America and the world are safer.”
He continued, saying in-part, “Maduro was an illegitimate, indicted dictator who has been leading a vicious, violent narco-terrorist enterprise in our Hemisphere that was responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans. He will now face American justice. The interim Venezuelan government must now decide that it is in their country’s and people’s interest to cooperate with the United States and reject Maduro’s legacy of violence and narco-terrorism.”
Senator Lisa Murkowski said the U.S. does not recognize Maduro as the legitimate leader of Venezuela.
She said in-part, “While I am hopeful that this morning’s actions have made the world a safer place, the manner in which the United States conducts military operations, as well as the authority under which these operations take place, is important. When the Senate returns to Washington next week, Congress has been informed that we will receive additional briefings from the administration on the scope, objectives, and legal basis for these operations.”
Representative Nick Begich posted his statement on Facebook. He called the situation a “lawful arrest” and said it was “a powerful and flawless execution of American power and capability.”
Begich continued, saying in-part, “Stability and accountability in the Western Hemisphere are core U.S. national interests. For far too long, criminal networks operating in our own hemisphere have exploited weak governance and corruption. The result has been poisoned streets, overwhelmed borders, and countless American lives lost to fentanyl and other illicit drugs.”
See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com
Copyright 2026 KTUU. All rights reserved.
Alaska
Opinion: Before Alaska becomes an AI data farm, be sure to read the fine print
Artificial intelligence is driving a revolution in the economy and culture of the United States and other countries. Alaska is being pitched as the next frontier for one of the most energy-intensive industries: data centers, with their primary purpose of advancing AI, socially disruptive to a degree as yet unknown.
Gov. Mike Dunleavy, the state’s biggest promoter, has invited more than a dozen high-tech firms, including affiliates of Microsoft, Facebook and Amazon, to establish “data farms” in Alaska. He has personally toured executives around potential sites in the Anchorage and Fairbanks areas. The Alaska Legislature has been a bit more circumspect, though its House Concurrent Resolution 3 (HCR 3) states that “the development and use of artificial intelligence and the establishment of data centers in the state could stimulate economic growth, create job opportunities and position the state as a leader in technological innovation.” True, however, the resolution makes no mention of drawbacks stemming from data center development.
The Northern Alaska Environmental Center (NAEC), based in Fairbanks, is examining the known and potential benefits, costs and risks of data center growth in the state. It urges a well-informed, unhurried, transparent and cautious approach.
First, though, what are data centers? They are facilities that house the servers, storage, networking and other computing infrastructure needed to support AI and other digital services, along with their associated electrical and cooling infrastructure.
Generally speaking, there are two categories of data centers. One is the massive hyperscale facility, typically operating at multi-megawatt scale and designed to scale much higher. An example is the proposed Far North Digital (FND) Prudhoe Bay Data Center. It would start with a capacity of 120 megawatts with “significant expansion potential.” Natural gas would power it.
The other kind is the micro or microgrid data center. A good example is Cordova’s Greensparc Corp/Cordova Electric Cooperative 150-kilowatt facility. It is powered by 100% renewable energy from the nearby hydroelectric plant. We concur with the University of Alaska Fairbanks’ Alaska Center for Energy and Power (ACEP) analysis that contends that such smaller and sustainable data centers, sometimes integrated into existing microgrids, are more feasible for Alaska, particularly in underserved or remote communities.
The main problem with data centers is their high to huge energy demands, especially hyperscale ones that can consume as much electricity as 100,000 homes. Cooling can account for about 40% of a facility’s energy use, though it varies. While Alaska’s cold climate is an environmental advantage, reducing the need for energy-intensive mechanical cooling systems, cooling still requires a lot of water. The NAEC advocates that any new data centers be required to minimize use and thermal pollution of waters and reuse waste heat for local heating.
The Railbelt grid already faces constraints and expensive upgrade needs. The NAEC believes that if new data centers are developed, regulatory safeguards must be in place to ensure they do not exacerbate grid shortages and raise household electricity costs.
Most electricity powering data centers still comes from fossil fuels, even as operators sign renewable contracts and add clean generation. Building fossil fuel-powered data centers would lock in high-emissions infrastructure for decades, contradicting global decarbonization efforts. NAEC suggests that any new data center be required to build or contract for an equivalent amount of clean energy generation (wind, solar, hydro or geothermal) to match its consumption.
There are many other concerns that need to be addressed when considering data centers and AI development. One is the problem of electronic waste, or e-waste. Needed upgrades to data centers result in e-waste, which contains hazardous materials. Given Alaska’s remote potential sites and limited recycling infrastructure, the cost of appropriately dealing with e-waste should be factored into data center decisions.
In their haste to recruit data centers, several states have granted substantial tax abatements and subsidies, often with limited public benefit. Alaska must learn from the mistakes made elsewhere. Before considering approval of any new data centers, legislation should be in place that ensures that the corporations that will profit do not get discounted power rates or tax breaks and pass additional costs to ratepayers, including costs for needed upgrades.
Yes, data centers provide some much-needed diversification to Alaska’s economy, but not much. They are highly capital intensive and employ many in the construction phase, but few for operation. Companies should be required to train and hire local residents to the degree practical.
Then there is the profound but scarcely recognized issue that transcends energy, economics and the environment. Data centers expand the compute available for increasingly capable AI systems. Some researchers and industry leaders argue this could accelerate progress toward AI that matches or exceeds human capabilities, along with new risks. Ultimately, the greatest cost of data centers and AI may be the changes wrought to our humanity and society, for which we are woefully unprepared.
Roger Kaye is a freelance writer based in Fairbanks and the author of “Last Great Wilderness: The Campaign to Establish the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.” He sits on the Issues Committee of the Northern Alaska Environmental Center.
• • •
The Anchorage Daily News welcomes a broad range of viewpoints. To submit a piece for consideration, email commentary(at)adn.com. Send submissions shorter than 200 words to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Read our full guidelines for letters and commentaries here.
-
World1 week agoHamas builds new terror regime in Gaza, recruiting teens amid problematic election
-
Indianapolis, IN1 week agoIndianapolis Colts playoffs: Updated elimination scenario, AFC standings, playoff picture for Week 17
-
Business1 week agoGoogle is at last letting users swap out embarrassing Gmail addresses without losing their data
-
Southeast1 week agoTwo attorneys vanish during Florida fishing trip as ‘heartbroken’ wife pleads for help finding them
-
Politics1 week agoMost shocking examples of Chinese espionage uncovered by the US this year: ‘Just the tip of the iceberg’
-
News1 week agoRoads could remain slick, icy Saturday morning in Philadelphia area, tracking another storm on the way
-
World1 week agoPodcast: The 2025 EU-US relationship explained simply
-
News1 week agoMarijuana rescheduling would bring some immediate changes, but others will take time