Alaska
Alaska city begins demolishing abandoned houses
By Alex DeMarban
Anchorage Daily News
ANCHORAGE, Alaska — The city of Anchorage is tearing down abandoned houses that have become neighborhood eyesores and can attract criminal activity.
Officials with the first-ever program say it’s starting small, but they’re looking to expand it.
The goal is cleaning up neighborhoods and making lots available for new housing to alleviate the city’s severe housing crunch, they say.
The Development Services department, working with other city entities, plans to tear down 10 houses under the program, said Kenny Friendly, a spokesperson for Public Works.
The department is using $500,000 in pandemic funding from the 2021 American Rescue Plan, he said.
The property owners have agreed to the demolitions, he said. The removal of the run-down property benefits them, he said.
Go/no-go decisions are often the toughest for ICs managing expanding incident types
Four houses have already been removed, including two in Mountain View, and one each in Fairview and Abbott Loop.
The targeted houses are a stain on the neighborhood, residents say.
They also drain city resources, requiring constant attention through the year to keep them boarded up after people break-in, said Scott Campbell, chief inspector for Development Services. People sometimes move in illegally, litter the yard with waste, start fires or do drugs there, he said. The activity can lead to responses from police and fire departments.
“They’re a hazard,” he said.
The units to be torn down are just some of the 174 properties on the city’s vacant and abandoned building registry, which includes about 25 commercial properties, Friendly said.
Six houses remain to be torn down under the program — two in Spenard, two in Mountain View, one in the Abbott Loop area and one in the Huffman/O’Malley area.
Nearby residents have been ecstatic to see the houses removed, Friendly said.
Jorge Colocho lives in Mountain View near a crumbling house on Hoyt Street.
Built in 1950, the house looks like it was once well-groomed. But it’s now covered with plywood and overgrown with weeds. The roof is falling in, and the exterior walls are ripped open. Someone spray-painted “STAY OUT” across the front.
The abandoned house is a problem, attracting squatters and other criminal activity, Colocho said Thursday.
Chief Michael O’Brian describes the biggest risk management issues facing the fire service – and where progress can be made
On nearby Lane Street, the charred remains of an abandoned house have already been demolished under the program.
Last spring, a man pointed a gun at other people in the house and barricaded himself inside to evade police, city officials said. He also started a fire, engulfing the house in flames before police arrested him, they said. Fire crews responded and neighbors evacuated their houses.
Krista Chapman, a nearby resident, walked past the empty lot Thursday.
She’s glad the house is gone, she said.
“It was an eyesore,” she said. “A lot of people threw trash there.”
A boarded-up turquoise house in Fairview was recently demolished as part of the program, along Ingra Street near 13th Avenue.
Anchorage Assembly member George Martinez was there.
The house had been abandoned for years, he said. The yard was piled high with debris like old appliances, furniture, car and bike parts. Two junk cars also occupied the lot.
“The house was ripped and shredded internally, the structure was on a property with all sorts of trash,” Martinez said. “It was horrible, incredibly stinky, and the amount of rodents that ran out of the property was terrifying.”
There’s now an empty lot that could support multiple housing units, he said.
“The opportunity here is that we eliminate blight, reset a property and hopefully get it back on the market,” Martinez said.
The city is taking steps to ensure the program can continue, Martinez said.
Maximize CRR efforts by working with local agencies and tapping into federal resources
Mike Robbins, head of the Anchorage Community Development Authority, is applying for federal funds to do that. The entity would purchase vacant and abandoned properties and prepare them for redevelopment, he said.
James Thornton, president of the Fairview Community Council, said there are several abandoned and boarded-up properties in the neighborhood near downtown.
The Fairview council would like to see them gone, he said.
The dilapidated buildings hurt the quality of life and property values in the neighborhood, he said.
“When you see these abandoned, boarded-up houses, it makes the community feel like it’s not a good place to be, like it’s forgotten about and left behind,” he said. “And that’s not the way we feel about Fairview.”
Friendly said the demolitions can cost $20,000 to $50,000. The removal of hazardous materials can increase costs.
The property owners benefit, he said.
They often live out-of-state, but still pay taxes on the property.
The properties are listed on the city’s vacant and abandoned registry, which requires costly annual payments over time.
The demolition allows the property owners to “wash their hands of issues they deal with year after year,” he said.
They’re left with a cleared lot that they can sell, with utilities already in place for development, he said.
Some of the property owners under the program are selling their cleared lots to the city, he said.
“This is a huge win for the community, Public Works, the assembly and the administration as we take these steps to make Anchorage a better place,” Friendly said.
(c)2024 the Alaska Dispatch News (Anchorage, Alaska)
Visit the Alaska Dispatch News (Anchorage, Alaska) at www.adn.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Gardner firefighters held training on water supply, relay pumping and attack hoselines
FDNY
A gas explosion in Brooklyn rattled an East Flatbush neighborhood and sent four people to the hospital
A Lexington lieutenant has been suspended and directed to take additional training after a disciplinary hearing
Alaska
Man with same name as Alaska Sen. Dan Sullivan can appear on GOP primary ballot, state’s Supreme Court rules
The battle of the Dan Sullivans is on.
The Alaska Supreme Court ruled Monday that a man with the same name as Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan can challenge the sitting lawmaker in the state’s GOP Senate primary in August. The high court upheld a ruling from a lower court judge that cleared the way for Daniel J. Sullivan to appear on the primary ballot, reversing a decision by state officials earlier this month that he was ineligible because he was allegedly trying to confuse voters.
The state Supreme Court directed Alaska’s Division of Elections to decide how Daniel J. Sullivan should be listed on the ballot “within the confines of existing Alaska ballot design law.”
The conflict is taking place in one of the country’s most closely watched Senate elections. The sitting Sen. Sullivan is running for a third term, but former Democratic Rep. Mary Peltola is vying to challenge him, setting up what could be an unusually competitive race in a deep-red state that hasn’t elected a Democrat to the Senate in almost 20 years.
The senator has called his same-name competitor a “sham candidate” and accused him of trying to trick voters and help Democrats flip the seat. Daniel J. Sullivan — a retired teacher and former U.S. Forest Service employee from Petersburg, Alaska — has denied those allegations and insisted he is both qualified and genuinely interested in running for Senate.
About two weeks ago, the Alaska Division of Elections determined that the challenger Sullivan could not appear on the ballot, arguing his paperwork “was not filed in order to declare an actual good-faith candidacy, but was instead filed with a purpose to confuse or mislead.”
In a letter to the candidate, Director Carol Beecher pointed to the fact that Daniel J. Sullivan had initially requested to appear on the ballot as “Dan Sullivan,” the same name format as the senator. She also wrote that he hadn’t previously been affiliated with the state Republican Party, had a website design that “appears to be deliberate[ly]” similar to the senator’s campaign site and had worked with a political consultant with links to Democratic candidates.
Daniel J. Sullivan asked a state court to reverse the decision. On Friday, Judge Thomas Matthews ruled in his favor, finding the non-senator Sullivan met the requirements to run for U.S. Senate and the state didn’t have the authority to exclude him based on “good faith.”
“The court does not minimize the Division’s concern that voters should not be misled,” the judge wrote. But he added that “Alaska election law gives the Division tools to address that concern,” including regulating how candidates appear on the ballot.
With ballots set to be printed this week, the issue was appealed to the Alaska Supreme Court on an expedited basis, with both sides filing court papers over the weekend.
The state Division of Elections asked the high court to overturn Matthews’ ruling, arguing it would “leave Alaska constitutionally required to permit bad-faith ballot access.” The agency said it reached its conclusion about Daniel J. Sullivan after it received a complaint from the National Republican Senatorial Committee “credibly alleging” he was seeking to “cause voter confusion” and made a “bewildering” request to appear on the ballot with the senator’s middle initial.
If Daniel J. Sullivan is permitted to remain on the ballot, the state asked the Alaska Supreme Court to allow it to print his full name and list his party affiliation as “nonpartisan” to “ensure voters are not forced to guess between two nearly identical names.”
The Alaska Republican Party and several GOP-led states filed amicus briefs siding with Alaska.
Daniel J. Sullivan’s lawyers, meanwhile, argued the state “lacked any basis in Alaska law to exclude Mr. Sullivan from the ballot” and didn’t have the power to look into his “private motivations.” They wrote that state law doesn’t give officials the power to keep qualified candidates off the ballot due to potential confusion.
“[All] that Mr. Sullivan asks here is to be listed on the ballot, and the Division is obviously empowered to do so in a non-confusing manner,” his lawyers wrote.
Following oral arguments, the high court sided with Daniel J. Sullivan in a two-page order late Monday, and said it would issue a fuller opinion at a later date.
Jeffrey Robinson, an attorney for Daniel J. Sullivan, told CBS News his legal team is “grateful” for the Alaska Supreme Court’s decision to “affirm Judge Matthews’ well-reasoned, thorough order vacating the Division’s unlawful decision to exclude Mr. Sullivan as a candidate.”
“We expect that the Division will act in full compliance with existing Alaska ballot design law in its preparation of the ballots,” Robinson said in an email.
The senator’s campaign spokesperson, Nate Adams, said: “We’re disappointed in the court’s decision because as the sham candidate Dan J. Sullivan’s lawyers made clear in their legal arguments, the only reason he is running is to deceive voters and manipulate Alaska’s election system.”
“However, we are encouraged by the fact that the Director of the Division of Elections will be able to use her expertise to differentiate between the Petersburg fraud and the incumbent — Senator Dan Sullivan — to the benefit of Alaska voters,” Adams said.
The first Jesuit missionaries in Alaska sailed up the Yukon River in 1887. By the turn of the 20th century, the religious order of the Catholic Church had as many as 50 Jesuits in the state.
Now, only two remain. And by the end of June, there will be none.
The Jesuits’ nearly 140 years in the state was honored at an event at Bethel’s Immaculate Conception Church on June 16. A procession of priests wearing long white gowns with red hems walked down the aisle to open the event. The Bishop of the Diocese of Fairbanks, Stephen Maekawa, thumped the ground with a shimmering silver staff known as a clozier as he approached the altar.
“My brothers and sisters, we gather together to celebrate this wonderful and blessed occasion to acknowledge the love of God and the work of God through the 139 year mission of the Society of Jesus of the Jesuit fathers,” Maekawa said to open the event.
A traditional Catholic mass followed, with readings in both English and Yup’ik. During the sermon, Maekawa acknowledged the vastness of the Fairbanks diocese, and the tremendous amount of work done by the Jesuits to establish it.
“All of the 46 churches of the Diocese of Fairbanks that we currently have were established by either the Jesuit fathers or by direction of a Jesuit bishop,” Maekawa said. “We have a long history of the Society of Jesus’ presence and ministry here in all of Alaska.”
The Jesuits are an order within the Catholic Church, akin to the Dominicans or Franciscans. They have a reputation for taking on some of the Catholic Church’s most remote assignments.
That missionary spirit brought the Jesuits to the Yukon River in 1887, where they built churches, schools, and ministries. Without their work, Catholicism may not have taken root in huge swaths of Alaska, particularly among Alaska Native communities.
But the Jesuits leave a complicated legacy. Their methods of converting Native people to the religion, particularly in the first half of the 20th century, created generational traumas still felt to this day.
Fr. Sean Carroll is the provincial of the Jesuits West Province, which oversees Alaska and nine other states.
“Thank you for all that you have taught us about who Jesus is and how to love and serve Him wholeheartedly,” Carroll said. “I also thank you for your patience with us. For there have been times when we have sinned and when we have hurt you.”
Missionaries, including the Jesuits, forcefully converted and assimilated Alaska Native people into Western culture and religion. Students at Jesuit-run boarding schools were forced to abandon their Native languages and physically punished when caught speaking languages other than English. Native dancing and drumming were also banned.
The Jesuits West Province maintains a list of 150 Jesuits with credible claims of sexual abuse against minors or vulnerable adults. A quarter of the accused Jesuits served in Alaska at some point in time.
“I ask for your forgiveness for all that we have done that was not rooted in Christ and love for Him, and for when we did not value your culture nor recognize the presence of God in you,” Carroll said.
Carroll gave the order to withdraw from the state last spring. A big issue was the recruitment of Jesuits willing to travel and serve in remote villages. He told the congregation that the Jesuits’ work would continue, just without a permanent presence.
Fr. Rich Magner is one of the two remaining Jesuit priests in Alaska. His last day serving Chevak, Hooper Bay, and Scammon Bay is June 30.
“We all always knew coming in, or should have known, that we’re not going to be here forever. It’s going to be mission accomplished at some point,” Magner said. “And then we hand it off to the diocese that we’ve helped create, and so that’s a good feeling.”
Magner’s next stop is a Clinical Pastoral Education residency in Tacoma, Washington.
The other remaining priest, Fr. Tom Provinsal, first came to Alaska in 1968 to teach. A fond memory, he said, was meeting Elders that practiced traditional subsistence lifestyles.
“Some of the grandmothers, their fingers were just all bent with arthritis and stuff like that, you know, their whole lives they’ve been working out in the cold and the wet, doing food, sewing, all that kind of stuff,” Provinsal said. “I’d say I just feel very privileged to have come when I did come and to see that.”
Provinsal returned in 1975 as a priest and has served in the region ever since. After moving away, he plans to take a five month sabbatical. What happens next, he said, is in God’s hands.
Two lines formed in the aisle for communion at the end of the mass. After taking communion, Bethel’s Parish Administrator Susan Murphy gave a final thank you.
“It’s difficult to say goodbye to people who have been a part of our lives for so long,” Murphy said. “We know that you have done what was yours to do, and have taught us to do what is ours to do. We are grateful.”
Dominic Hunt, a Yup’ik deacon that flew in from Emmonak for the event, led the congregation through a final prayer.
“Bless them with your wisdom, that they may be a word of hope, a world in need. We ask this through Christ, our Lord. Amen,” Hunt said.
About 70 people posed for a photo on the altar – priests, deacons, parishioners, Elders and children — many of them smiling, some standing quietly.
The photo doesn’t tell the whole story. But it’s a moment when gratitude, grief, and memory all shared the same room.
JUNEAU, Alaska (KTUU) – The Supreme Court of Alaska will be taking up the case of the State of Alaska, Division of Elections v. Daniel J. Sullivan, Jr.
The oral arguments will be held Monday at 10 a.m. via Zoom, according to an order and opening notice.
The document also specifies that a decision is expected to be made before noon on Tuesday.
According to documents from the Division of Elections, the state must start printing ballots at noon on the same day.
This comes after an Anchorage Superior Court Judge ordered Dan J. Sullivan on to the ballot Friday.
See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com
Copyright 2026 KTUU. All rights reserved.
-
Dallas, TX2 minutes agoPreston Hollow residents oppose proposed $800 million mixed-use development in Dallas, survey reveals
-
Miami, FL7 minutes agoBradley Beal to Miami Heat rumors draw skepticism
-
Boston, MA14 minutes agoBoston Pops surprise travelers at Logan Airport with July 4th preview performance
-
Denver, CO16 minutes agoDenver Broncos Crack Top 10 in NFL Uniform Rankings
-
Seattle, WA22 minutes agoPHOTOS: Visiting all 12 stops during this year’s West Seattle Garden Tour
-
Milwaukee, WI32 minutes agoMilwaukee Barbecue: A Legacy of Smoke
-
Atlanta, GA37 minutes agoGeorgia Haitian communities face sudden July 27 deportation deadline
-
Minneapolis, MN44 minutes agoBroken A/C leaves 75-year-old cancer patient sweltering at north Minneapolis apartments
