Connect with us

Technology

Trump’s surgeon general nominee is running the wellness grifter playbook perfectly

Published

on

Trump’s surgeon general nominee is running the wellness grifter playbook perfectly

This is Optimizer, a weekly newsletter sent every Friday from Verge senior reviewer Victoria Song that dissects and discusses the latest gizmos and potions that swear they’re going to change your life. We’ll be taking a break next week and will back March 20th. Opt in for Optimizer here.

On the surface, the wellness to MAHA pipeline can appear baffling. How does one get from wanting to be healthy to eschewing vaccines, drinking raw milk, and opting for beef tallow over sunscreen? The simple answer would be: widespread misinformation on online platforms, particularly from influencers.

I’d argue the real answer is slightly more nuanced — and something that I’ve been ruminating over since last week’s confirmation hearing for Casey Means.

Means is President Trump’s controversial nominee for surgeon general, a role often described as the “nation’s doctor.” It entails being America’s foremost spokesperson on public health, as well as educating the public using the best scientific information available. You’re probably most familiar with the surgeon general’s warning on cigarette packs and alcohol labels.

Some of the backlash is because Means currently doesn’t hold an active medical license, is not currently practicing, and never finished her surgical residency — all of which are generally considered prerequisites for the post. She’s primarily known for being a wellness influencer with, as many of her detractors point out, dubious beliefs and inconsistent record of disclosing financial relationships with brands. For example, Trump’s former Surgeon General Jerome Adams has penned an opinion piece directly criticizing her stance on vaccines and history as a tech entrepreneur who recommends supplements. As the cofounder of Levels, a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) startup that’s aimed toward non-diabetics, Means has frequently used her platform to promote CGM use. That’s not inherently bad, but there’s a lack of evidence for its use in non-diabetic populations. There’s also no consensus among experts on how to interpret CGM data in non-diabetics. Aside from a lack of qualifications, Means’ influencer background presents several ethical red flags.

Advertisement

Means tempered her beliefs during her confirmation hearing, despite having previously challenged vaccines, railed against birth control, and endorsed raw milk. I could probably write a separate Optimizer about each of those stances. But what I want to focus on here is the wellness to MAHA pipeline. Not only is it wildly profitable, but it’s got a very specific playbook.

Step one: establish credibility with selective science

If there’s one thing wellness influencers do well, it’s mixing actual science-based facts with emotional truths to lead their audience to potentially misleading conclusions. This is the most important part of any wellness influencer’s game.

Take Means’ book Good Energy, a New York Times bestseller cowritten with her brother Calley Means. The latter is a key figure in the MAHA movement, and serves as a senior adviser to RFK Jr. The book’s primary thesis is that metabolic dysfunction is at the root of every ailment you can think of, from acne to cancer. The front half of the book cites many true things about metabolism. For example, it goes into how mitochondria — the ol’ “powerhouse of the cell” — turns nutrients into cellular energy. She explains in digestible terms how mitochondria produce ATP, what ATP is used for in various bodily processes, and then goes into how certain factors of modern life may lead to “mitochondrial dysfunction.” She also goes into concepts like insulin resistance — when your body, over time, gets less responsive to the hormone leading to a less efficient use of blood sugar — and how it is heavily tied to conditions like diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. If you remember high school biology, or even searched these basic claims on Google, much of the information passes the smell check.

Good Energy is full of basic health facts placed next to less proven theories. Sen. Susan Collins questioned Means on passages in the book relating to psychedelic use during her confirmation hearing.
Getty Images
Advertisement

Throughout the book, Means also dispenses some solid, common-sense health advice. Things like sleeping eight hours a day, exercising, and opting for whole, unprocessed foods whenever possible. At the end of each chapter, Means includes a link to her references. Combined with Casey Means’ background as a graduate from Stanford School of Medicine, this can easily give the impression of a well-researched book by an expert with ample scientific backing.

The problem is those facts are interspersed with less convincing assertions, which all get tied together in service of questionable or misleading conclusions. For example, the book’s premise is that metabolic issues are often the culprit behind many ailments. That means, so long as you practice “good energy” habits that keep your mitochondria functioning, you can prevent cancer and a long list of other illnesses. The reality is scientists find combating mitochondrial dysfunction extremely challenging.

Here’s another example: erectile dysfunction. According to Means, erectile dysfunction is “generally rooted in metabolic disease, with reduced blood flow to the capillaries and nerves of the penis being a key factor, driven by the impact of insulin resistance on forming arterial blockages (called atherosclerosis) and blood vessel dilation.” She quotes another doctor, Sara Gottfried, as saying that erectile dysfunction is a “neon sign” for metabolic disorders. In the scientific references for the chapter, Means quotes her own blog for Levels on the subject as well as some other studies supporting some of the claims.

It is true that metabolic issues can lead to erectile dysfunction. But there are many other causes too. Many a standup comedian has opined about how performance anxiety, stress, or even too much alcohol can impact sexual performance on a given night. Certain medications or conditions like Parkinson’s disease can also contribute to it. Meanwhile, Gottfried is another doctor/wellness influencer who practices functional medicine like Means. Functional medicine is a controversial healthcare approach that attempts to take a holistic look at treatment, focusing on the root cause of a health problem instead of managing symptoms. There’s nothing inherently wrong with that, and some medical institutions like Cleveland Clinic have come to embrace it in recent years. But its critics have accused functional medicine of being a thinly disguised type of alternative medicine that depends on unnecessary blood testing, restrictive diets, and a ton of expensive supplements.

Excerpt from Good Energy reading: “My mom’s doctor insisted on a cesarean birth due to my size. But because I didn’t pass through her vaginal canal, I didn’t ingest the organisms from her microbiome that would have helped seed mine. Breastfeeding is more challenging for mothers after c-section and my mother couldn’t breastfeed. she was also told not to lift more than ten pounds while her C-section scar healed, and I was nearly”

An excerpt from Good Energy. I was not kidding about the vaginal organisms thing.
Screenshot: Good Energy, Casey Means

This is a lot of nuance that could easily fly over a reader’s head if they’re not familiar with the subjects at hand. There are some scientific truths in the mix, which give credence to other suspicious assertions that Means will make down the line.

Advertisement

By the end of the book, you might not blink twice that oral antibiotics, birth control, ibuprofen, fluoride toothpaste, scented candles, and perfume are listed as toxins. You might even find yourself at a dinner party, sharing a “factoid” that C-sections are suboptimal for a baby’s gut microbiome, because the infant doesn’t get the chance to ingest the mother’s vaginal organisms. (The truth is more nuanced). Heck, you might just heed Means’ advice and rehome your pet if they keep interrupting your sleep by daring to sleep on the bed. All of that is “bad energy.”

Step two: cast doubt on institutions

In her book and across her platforms, Means has touted the same origin story. After becoming disillusioned with the medical establishment, Means left to find a better way. To tell that story, she uses powerful anecdotes of her mother’s frustrating experience with the traditional medical establishment — as well as her own experiences as a surgical resident.

Means then pairs those emotional stories with other truths. Like the fact that pharmaceutical companies are greedy and do lobby legislators in Washington. Doctors have said they feel pressured to “overtreat” patients due to a number of factors, including financial incentives. From there, she makes the assertion that conventional medicine might be alright for treating acute ailments (e.g., saving your life after a car accident), but you should ignore doctors for chronic illnesses. Chapter three of Means’ book Good Energy is literally titled “Trust yourself, not your doctor.”

This is a potent narrative. Nevermind that Means hedges in her book, saying that she “deeply respects doctors.” The seed of doubt has been planted. It’s not a huge logical leap to This is the secret the establishment is not telling you. Or, You don’t need all those medications because the real profit is in keeping you sick. It’s right there on Means’ website. In a section detailing her controversies, Means asserts that she’s considered controversial because in part “she criticizes ‘sick care’ medicine for profiting from disease management, calls for reform of the Farm Bill, pharmaceutical incentives, food culture, and industrial agriculture.” Here, she’s painted herself as a warrior for health, someone who challenges the status quo because she couldn’t bring herself to participate in the system.

Advertisement

The Los Angeles Times reported on apparent holes in Means’ origin story, including that her former department chair said she quit her residency because of anxiety, not a disillusionment with the system.

But again, this requires the average person to dig deep on their own. All the influencer has to do is present themselves as a more genuine truthteller, exhort you to “do your own research” from links they provide, and offer up a product that will empower you to “take your health into your own hands” — a narrative RFK Jr. has used as well.

Conveniently, there’s an easy built-in counter for anyone who tries to refute these claims with information from reputable institutions: They are corrupt and lying to you.

Step three: offer ‘simple’ solutions that lead to profit

At this point, Means has established that she does research (even if the conclusions are at times questionable) and has a medical background. She’s consistently messaged that medical institutions aren’t trustworthy. The last step is to tell her audience she has the real answer to why everyone is sick (metabolic dysfunction) and how to fix it (several products).

Advertisement

As a wellness influencer, Means sells a lot of things. First and foremost, her philosophy of “good energy” and metabolic health, which has spawned a book and newsletter, complete with affiliate links for the “clean” products and supplements she recommends. In one of her “Good Energy” newsletters, Means recommends blood tests from Function Health — a standard part of her methodology — plus supplements like WeNatal and ENERGYBits, a form of spirulina algae and chlorella. (Nevermind that ENERGYBits was eviscerated on both Shark Tank and by the American Council of Science and Health as allegedly citing junk science and misleading product marketing. Studies have also not conclusively found health benefits to spirulina supplements.)

Another screenshot of an excerpt from Good Energy reading: “Depression, anxiety, acne, infertility, insomnia, heart disease, erectile dysfunction, type 2 diabetes, Alzheimer’s disease, cancer, and most other conditions that torture and shorten our lives are actually rooted in the same thing. And the ability to prevent and reverse these conditions—and feel incredibly today—is under your control and simpler than you think.”

And there’s the playbook’s final sales pitch. This passage comes directly from the Good Energy book.
Screenshot: Good Energy, Casey Means

Means has financial relationships with all three brands, including newsletter sponsorships and partnerships fees. It’s expected that influencers are usually selling something, but the problem is there were no disclosures for any of those three brands in that newsletter.

That’s not an outlier either. While reading the Good Energy book, the only brand relationship I saw Means disclose was that she cofounded Levels. Once in the text itself, and once in the acknowledgements. Conversely, she recommended Function Health three times in the book and not once does she disclose that she’s an investor. Other brands she promotes but doesn’t disclose relationships to in the book include, once again, WeNatal and Daily Harvest, a health food delivery service.

Energybits cofounder on SharkTank standing next to a table displaying the supplement.

ENERGYBits, an algae supplement that Means partners with and promotes, was roasted on Shark Tank for misleading marketing.
Michael Desmond/Disney General Entertainment Content via Getty Images

An Associated Press investigation claimed that while Means did disclose newsletter sponsors, she failed to disclose affiliate links in a buying guide on her site. Meanwhile, Public Citizen, a nonprofit consumer advocacy organization, wrote a letter to the FTC calling on the agency to investigate Means for allegedly failing to follow advertising disclosure standards. The nonprofit found that, with regard to affiliate links, Means neglected to disclose financial relationships 56 percent of the time.

The problem with wellness trends

Advertisement

It’s not guaranteed that Means will become surgeon general, but you can already see the impact of this common influencer playbook shifting public health. This strategy is why gray market peptides are popular. It’s why you see people starting to doubt vaccines and other medical treatments with decades of evidence.

It has an impact on health tech too. It’s why we’re starting to see gadgets that seem to spring directly from wellness trends. Hormone balancing and inflammation are two dubious wellness trends that are likely why I saw so many urine, blood, and saliva testing kits pop up at CES. Metabolism and nutrition are two areas where wearable and fitness tech makers are diving into with AI coaches.

The scariest thing about Casey Means and other wellness influencers is that some of what they say is true. They are rightfully honing in on genuine frustrations people have with our broken healthcare system and the overwhelming amount of contradictory information online. But where science says “the truth is complicated,” wellness influencers propose a simple solution: All you have to do is take out your wallet.

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

Technology

Elon Musk’s worst enemy in court is Elon Musk

Published

on

Elon Musk’s worst enemy in court is Elon Musk

About five hours into Elon Musk’s testimony, I typed the following sentence into my notes: “I have never been more sympathetic to Sam Altman in my life.”

Musk’s direct testimony was an improvement over yesterday — even if his lawyer kept asking leading questions to cue him in how to answer. But that memory was immediately obliterated by an absolutely miserable cross-examination. For hours, Musk refused to answer yes or no questions with yes or no, occasionally “forgot” things he’d testified to in the morning, and scolded defense lawyer William Savitt. I watched a few jury members glance at each other. During one testy exchange, one woman was rubbing her head. Me too, babe.

Even the judge, who at times prompted Musk to answer “yes” or “no,” was having a bad time. “He was at times difficult,” said Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers after Musk after the jury left the room. (At one point, when she’d cut off his argumentative answer, she got the biggest laugh of the day.) “Part of management from my perspective is just to get through testimony.”

“I don’t yell at people,” Musk said

Musk spent a lot of yesterday painting this heroic picture of himself, and this morning, near the end of his direct examination, said, “I don’t lose my temper,” and “I don’t yell at people.” He said he might have called someone a “jackass,” but only in the spirit of saying something like, “don’t be a jackass.”

Advertisement

Immediately afterward, Savitt baited him into being petty, irritating, and generally hard to deal with. At one point, we all watched Musk lose his temper. He spent hours quibbling over simple questions. Again and again, Savitt referred back to Musk’s deposition, where he’d answered questions slightly differently, calling Musk’s accounts into question. Even if the average juror didn’t think he was lying, he was certainly inconsistent.

Savitt’s cross-examination left the distinct impression that Musk quit his quarterly payments to OpenAI because he wasn’t going to get full control of the company, then tried to kneecap it and fold it into Tesla. Initially, Musk wanted four board seats and 51 percent of the shares. The other co-founders would get three seats, together, to be voted on by shareholders (including other employees). Though Musk said that the eventual plan was to expand to 12 seats, it was obvious that Musk had full control on the initial board of seven.

When Musk didn’t get what he wanted, he pulled the plug on his funding commitment and hired Andrej Karpathy, OpenAI’s second-best engineer, to Tesla in 2017. Despite his fiduciary duty to OpenAI as a board member, he did not try to get Karpathy to stay at OpenAI when he said he heard Karpathy wanted to leave. (“I think people should have a right to work where they want to work,” Musk said on the stand.)

“In my and Andrej’s opinion, Tesla is the only path that could even hope to hold a candle to Google.”

By 2018, Musk was saying that OpenAI had no path forward with its current structure, declaring it was on “a path of certain failure” in emails to Ilya Sutskever and Greg Brockman. His proposed solution was to merge Tesla and OpenAI. “In my and Andrej’s opinion, Tesla is the only path that could even hope to hold a candle to Google,” Musk said. The plan never came to fruition, and Musk resigned from OpenAI’s board that year.

Advertisement

As early as 2016, Musk had his own concerns about OpenAI as a non-profit. In an email to a colleague at Neuralink, he wrote “Deepmind is moving very fast. I am concerned that OpenAI is not on a path to catch up. Setting it up as non-profit might, in hindsight, have been the wrong move. Sense of urgency is not as high.”

Asked about this, Musk said he was just speculating. Savitt said, “Those are your words, yes or no?”

“You mostly do unfair questions.”

Musk replied, “This is a hypothetical.”

Savitt said, “So you thought it might have been a wrong move? That’s what you said?”

Advertisement

Getting Musk to put any of that on the record was intensely difficult. He refused repeatedly to answer questions like whether he knew cutting off OpenAI donations would create financial pressure, or whether he’d asked Karpathy to stay at OpenAI. He accused Savitt of asking questions that were “designed to trick me,” and we got multiple versions of this:

Musk: You mostly do unfair questions

Savitt: I am trying to put the questions as fairly as I can. I am doing my best.

Musk: That’s not true.

Musk was trying to make this as painful as possible for Savitt, but he also made it as painful as possible for everyone else, including the jury. Watching him simply refuse to answer questions during cross he’d easily answered during direct was annoying. Watching him refuse to admit he understood the nature of linear time — and therefore the fact that he was still a director of OpenAI’s board before he resigned in 2018 — was infuriating. It made him look dishonest.

“I’d lost trust in Altman and I was concerned they were really trying to steal the charity.”

Advertisement

Musk’s basic, oft-repeated story during this week’s testimony has been that OpenAI is “stealing a charity” and “looting a non-profit.” He maintains that he was all right with some limited for-profit activity, but not anything that would overshadow OpenAI’s nonprofit work and constitute “the tail wagging the dog” — another phrase he reached for, over and over, like a security blanket. In direct testimony, he painted himself as a trusting “fool” who had believed the wily promises of Sam Altman and his cohort: “I gave them $38 million of essentially free funding, which they used to create an $800 billion for-profit company,” he lamented. His own lawyer’s questioning wrapped up with Musk being purportedly blindsided by a multibillion-dollar deal with Microsoft.

“I’d lost trust in Altman and I was concerned they were really trying to steal the charity,” Musk said. “It turned out to be true.”

“I said I didn’t look closely! I read the headline!”

On cross examination, Musk would barely even explain how much he bothered to learn about OpenAI’s operations before suing over them a few years later. When OpenAI proposed a for-profit arm around 2018, he got an email outlining the proposed corporate structure. On the stand, he said he’d only read the very first section of it,, which said that contributors should consider the investments as donations that may have no return. “I read the highlighted box with ‘important warning,’” Musk said.

Savitt asked Musk if he’d raised any objection to the structure then, when he’d received the documents. Musk said that he didn’t read beyond that first box.

Advertisement

Musk: I didn’t read the fine print.. We’re going into the fine print of this document.

Savitt: It’s a four-page document.

Musk then said he hadn’t read beyond taking this in the “spirit of a donation.” And then we got the deposition, where Musk said, “I don’t think I read this term sheet… I’m not sure I actually read this term sheet… I did not closely look at this term sheet.” Savitt pointed out that nowhere in the deposition did Musk say he’d read the first paragraph and Musk, raising his voice and effectively undermining his claims from the morning that he doesn’t lose his temper (lol) or yell at people (lmao), said, “I said I didn’t look closely! I read the headline!”

Imagine having to deal with this man as your cofounder. I think I would sooner open a vein.

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

Continue Reading

Technology

Amtrak data breach exposes millions of customer records

Published

on

Amtrak data breach exposes millions of customer records

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Booking a train ticket is usually something most people don’t think twice about. Now it could come with real privacy risks after a reported data exposure tied to Amtrak.

A newly surfaced dataset linked to the company has appeared on Have I Been Pwned, a widely used site that tracks and verifies data breaches, suggesting customer information may now be circulating online. The company has not confirmed the full scope, but the situation is already drawing attention from security researchers.

For travelers, the bigger issue isn’t just what was taken. It is how that data can be used next.

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report

Advertisement
  • Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
  • For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
  • Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.

149 MILLION PASSWORDS EXPOSED IN MASSIVE CREDENTIAL LEAK

An alleged Amtrak data exposure may have affected millions of accounts, with researchers warning the leaked records could fuel convincing phishing attacks. (Pixelfit/Getty Images)

What we know about the Amtrak data breach

The breach was added to Have I Been Pwned on April 17, 2026, after a dataset attributed to Amtrak appeared online. According to that listing, the dataset includes more than 2.1 million unique accounts.

The exposed information listed by Have I Been Pwned includes email addresses, names, physical addresses and customer support records.

Separate reports suggest the total number of records could be significantly higher, with some estimates reaching up to 9.4 million, though that figure has not been confirmed by Amtrak.

Support interactions can reveal travel habits, preferences and past issues. That gives attackers more context to work with.

Advertisement

How the Amtrak data breach likely happened

The group linked to the attack, ShinyHunters, has a pattern. They often target cloud-based customer systems, especially platforms like Salesforce.

These systems store huge amounts of customer data in one place. That makes them efficient for businesses and valuable for attackers.

Attacks like this often involve exploiting access to cloud-based customer relationship management (CRM) environments rather than breaching internal networks directly.

In many cases, the breach does not require breaking into a company’s internal network. Instead, attackers exploit weak access controls, misconfigured settings or compromised credentials tied to cloud services.

Once inside, they can extract large datasets quickly and demand payment before releasing the data publicly.

Advertisement

Why the Amtrak data breach is different

Not all data breaches carry the same level of risk. This one stands out because of the type of information involved.

Basic contact details can already be used for spam. Add customer service history, and the situation changes. Attackers can reference real interactions to make their messages feel legitimate.

You might get an email that mentions a past trip, a refund request or a delayed train. It looks familiar. That is what makes it dangerous.

These tailored phishing attempts are far more convincing than generic scams.

HOW SCAMMERS BUILD A PROFILE ON YOU USING DATA BROKERS

Advertisement

Travelers are being urged to stay alert after a reported Amtrak data exposure linked to millions of accounts surfaced online. (martin-dm/Getty Images)

What the Amtrak data breach means for you

If your data is part of this breach, the immediate risk isn’t someone logging into your account. The bigger concern is impersonation.

Attackers can use your information to build trust quickly. They may pose as Amtrak support, a travel partner or even a financial institution tied to a booking.

That increases the chance you click a link, share more details or approve a transaction without realizing what is happening.

Even if you have never had an issue before, this kind of exposure changes your risk profile.

Advertisement

We reached out to Amtrak for comment, but did not hear back before our deadline.

Why do companies keep facing this problem?

This breach highlights a larger issue with how companies manage data today. Many rely heavily on cloud platforms to store and organize customer information. These tools are efficient, but they also concentrate risk in one place.

A single misconfiguration or compromised login can open the door to millions of records.

As more businesses move to software-as-a-service (SaaS) platforms, attackers are following. The pattern is becoming more common, not less. 

How to check if your passwords were stolen

To see if your email was affected, visit Have I Been Pwned at haveibeenpwned.com. It is the first and official source for this newly added dataset.

Advertisement
  • Enter your email address to find out if your information appears in the leak.
  • When done, come back here for Step 1 below.

INSURANCE DATA BREACH EXPOSES SENSITIVE INFO OF 1.6 MILLION PEOPLE 

Customer data linked to Amtrak has reportedly surfaced online, exposing contact details and support records that could be used in fraud schemes. (iStock)

Ways to stay safe after a data breach

If your data may be part of this breach, a few smart moves now can lower your risk and help you stay ahead of scams that often follow.

1) Use strong, unique passwords for every account

If you reuse passwords, this is the moment to change that. A single leaked password can unlock multiple accounts. Use a password manager to generate and store complex passwords so you are not relying on memory or repeating the same login. Start with your email account first, since it can be used to reset passwords across many of your other accounts. Check out the best expert-reviewed password managers of 2026 at CyberGuy.com.

2) Turn on two-factor authentication

Two-factor authentication (2FA) adds a second layer of protection. Even if someone gets your password, they still need a code from your phone or app. Focus on email, banking and travel accounts first since those are common targets after breaches.

3) Watch for highly targeted phishing attempts

Be extra cautious with emails or messages that reference past trips or support requests. That level of detail can make scams feel real. Avoid clicking links or downloading attachments unless you are certain of the source. When in doubt, go directly to the company’s official website.

Advertisement

4) Monitor your financial and account activity

Check your bank accounts and credit cards regularly for unusual charges. Look for login alerts or password reset notifications you did not request. The faster you catch something, the easier it is to contain.

5) Use strong antivirus software on your devices

Strong antivirus software does more than scan for viruses. It can block malicious links, detect suspicious downloads and stop phishing attempts before they reach you. Keeping your devices protected adds an important layer between you and attackers trying to exploit stolen data. Get my picks for the best 2026 antivirus protection winners for your Windows, Mac, Android and iOS devices at CyberGuy.com.

6) Remove your personal data from broker sites

Data brokers collect and sell your personal information, which increases your exposure after a breach. A data removal service can help reduce how much of your information is circulating online and make it harder for scammers to build detailed profiles about you. Check out my top picks for data removal services and get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already out on the web by visiting CyberGuy.com.

Get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already out on the web: CyberGuy.com/FreeScan

7) Use identity monitoring for early alerts

An identity monitoring service can track your personal information across databases and alert you to suspicious activity. That includes new accounts opened in your name or signs that your data is being misused. See my tips and best picks on Best Identity Theft Protection at CyberGuy.com

Advertisement

8) Freeze your credit for added protection

A credit freeze prevents anyone from opening new accounts in your name without your approval. It is one of the most effective ways to stop identity theft after a breach. You can place a freeze for free with the major credit bureaus and lift it anytime when needed.

Kurt’s key takeaways

The Amtrak breach is still unfolding, and key details remain unclear. What is clear is the direction these attacks are heading. They are becoming more targeted, more personal and harder to spot. For consumers, that means staying alert even when something looks familiar. For companies, it means tightening controls around the systems that hold the most sensitive data. You do not need to panic, but you do need to pay attention.

With breaches like this happening again and again, are companies doing enough to protect your personal information? Let us know by writing to us at CyberGuy.com.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report

Advertisement
  • Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
  • For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
  • Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.

Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

Technology

The best deals we found during Amazon’s Gaming Week

Published

on

The best deals we found during Amazon’s Gaming Week

Amazon’s annual Gaming Week is bringing discounts on video games, accessories, and PC components through May 4th. This event is smaller than Amazon’s other sales, but there are some genuinely good deals. This year, we’ve found deals on popular titles like Elden Ring Nightreign, plus rare discounts on the Nex Playground console and on top-notch Nintendo Switch 2 controllers like the EasySMX S10. We’ve also found discounts on an assortment of laptops, monitors, and other gaming gear, some of which are happening at Amazon and other retailers, too.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending