Connect with us

Sports

A new group is buying up minor league baseball teams at a feverish pace. What's the end game?

Published

on

A new group is buying up minor league baseball teams at a feverish pace. What's the end game?

WAPPINGERS FALLS, N.Y. — The artificial turf at Heritage Financial Park is new. So is the right-field wall that opens wide enough for an 18-wheeler to haul concert equipment onto the field. The party deck is sponsored by a brewery that’s 10 miles away, giant windows have been installed around the corporate event space overlooking left field, and the renovated home clubhouse, where the Hudson Valley Renegades dress before games, has two indoor batting cages flanked by state-of-the-art data and motion-capture technology.

This is Class-A baseball in 2024. Quirky and local, but also big business that’s booming. Minor-league attendance is up and approaching pre-pandemic levels, new ballparks are being built, and existing franchises are selling at what are believed to be record prices. These are not the wooden bleachers and potholed infields of old.

At the center of this transformation is Diamond Baseball Holdings, a three-year-old company that owns more than a quarter of all minor league clubs. From a ground-up franchise in Spartanburg, S.C., to long-established clubs in Louisville, Ky., and Lansing, Mich., to their most recent purchase of the Harrisburg Senators in Pennsylvania, Diamond Baseball Holdings (DBH) now owns 32 of 120 affiliates, and its founders said they are still “aggressively in acquisition mode.”

“We are agnostic to geography. We are agnostic to club affiliation,” executive chairman Pat Battle said. “If you’re one of the 120, we are interested.”

The DBH portfolio has grown at a rate, and to a size, that would have been impossible five years ago. It is a byproduct of Major League Baseball’s 2020 takeover of the minor leagues, which yanked affiliated baseball out of more than 40 communities and shifted minor league control to the MLB office. Commissioner Rob Manfred’s “One Baseball” initiative seeks to put every aspect of the game under one umbrella — that of the major league team owners — from Yankee Stadium to the Little League World Series, and all things in between.

Advertisement

In the middle of that plan is DBH, co-founded by former college sports licensing executive Battle and longtime minor league owner Peter Freund, and financially backed by private equity investment firm Silver Lake.

“We felt like, man, if we have Major League Baseball aligned with minor league baseball really for the first time ever, this could be an unbelievably exciting time to do it,” CEO Freund said.

Beyond its ownership role, DBH has a strategic partnership with MLB to help negotiate national sponsorships and branding opportunities on behalf of all minor league franchises, and it also plays a role in consumer product licensing for all 120 teams.

Major League Baseball declined to speak on the record about DBH, and some minor league owners did as well, noting that both Freund and Battle are close with Manfred. The owners who did agree to talk about DBH said it has paid good prices for teams and seems to run them well — it’s largely retained local staff and invested in communities. Yet there are concerns about its outsized influence in a rapidly evolving industry, and whether minor league baseball — long considered a hyper-local, mom-and-pop enterprise — can thrive within a massive corporate structure.

“They think they can be a little more efficient, and maybe they can,” one former owner said. “But, again, MiLB is very local. You kind of need the people you need there to sell and all the stuff that has to be done on the ground. They can’t do that corporately.”

Advertisement

There is also some worry that given DBH’s size and reach it could impact MLB’s decision-making in the future, especially as some minor league owners fear that further contraction of teams and even greater MLB control could be in the works.

“On the one hand it is tremendously beneficial that DBH has a say because MLB can’t come in and push 120 teams around,” said one longtime minor league owner who, like some peers interviewed for this story, was granted anonymity so that he could speak freely. “However, the biggest fear that we have is that as we approach the next (minor-league contract) in several years, DBH has such influence, and the teams themselves are just a small part of DBH/Silver Lake’s overall involvement, that it’s conceivable MLB could hurt the minor-league teams to the benefit of other areas.”

From a suite overlooking the renovations at Heritage Financial Park, Freund and Battle insist those concerns are unfounded.

“Whether you’re a DBH team or not, we’re all in this together. And we do believe a rising tide lifts all boats. If a non-DBH team has success, it’s great for minor league baseball, and we celebrate that,” Battle said.


Locations and Major League affiliations for minor league teams owned by Diamond Baseball Holdings.

For more than two decades, Battle built the Collegiate Licensing Company with his father, Bill Battle. CLC acquired the licensing rights to more than 200 universities, conferences and bowls before, in 2007, being acquired by IMG to form IMG College. Battle served as that company’s senior corporate vice president and chief executive for three years.

Advertisement

College sports are big business, but their epicenters are not New York and Chicago. They’re in Ann Arbor, Mich., Boulder, Colo., and Tuscaloosa, Ala.

“I think MLB sees in us people who really understand Scranton and Des Moines,” Battle said. “They’re not the 30 major markets, but they’re real markets, and very important communities in this country.”

Battle briefly held an ownership stake in the Augusta GreenJackets and said he was “reading with interest” in 2020 as Major League Baseball took over the minor leagues and introduced a significantly different Player Development League (PDL) structure. Affiliates signed 10-year PDL contracts. Higher and often expensive facility standards were put in place. Affiliations shuffled and levels changed. Short-season leagues were eliminated. Three previously independent teams became affiliates, and 43 minor teams lost affiliation (many of them because their facilities were deemed insufficient). Minor-league operations moved out of the MiLB office in St. Petersburg, Fla., and into MLB’s headquarters in New York.

It was a radical, and hostile, takeover in the eyes of many.

While some owners felt a rug pulled out from under them, Battle saw a platform being raised. Many minor-league teams had long ago stopped being mom-and-pop operations. Now with Major League Baseball pushing to further modernize the business model and doing more to promote its prospects — among the new facility requirements was the ability to stream in high definition — Battle recognized an opportunity.

Advertisement

When Battle approached the league office, MLB not only offered reassurance he was reading the tea leaves correctly, the league connected him with a willing partner who had deep baseball connections.

“They saw it as a significant investment in minor league baseball,” Battle said. “It’s exactly what they were looking to do themselves, and within a week or two, I received a call from the commissioner’s office saying you need to meet Peter.”

As a longtime minor-league owner of the Memphis Redbirds, Charleston RiverDogs and Williamsport Crosscutters, Freund was an insider. He was friends with the other owners, familiar with the league office, and had been working with the commissioner’s office to enact the restructuring.

“This was (MLB’s) opportunity to really take this thing and bring it up to the next level,” Freund said.

In October 2021, Diamond Baseball Holdings was born — Battle came up with the name, a reference to a diamond in the rough — and in December 2021, backed by their Silver Lake capital, DBH announced an initial acquisition of 10 minor league teams. It added 11 more between December 2022 and June 2023, and three in the past few weeks.

Advertisement

Peter Freund, left, and Pat Battle started DBH in 2021 and they now own 32 minor league baseball teams. (Courtesy DBH)

“If you had asked me in 2019 if this scenario was even possible, I would have said you’re crazy,” said longtime Iowa Cubs general manager Sam Bernabe, whose franchise was among the first DBH bought. “Nobody would have that kind of interest in that.”

Under the old structure, various minor leagues existed as independent entities. Each worked with Major League Baseball, and no one was allowed to own multiple teams in a single league. MLB’s takeover eliminated that rule — because those leagues began to exist in name only — which cleared the path for DBH and its deep pockets.

MLB’s takeover coincided with the COVID-19 pandemic, which wiped out the 2020 minor league season. Even the franchises that survived contraction faced lost revenue and massive uncertainty. Some owners saw DBH as a lifeline.

“They just came in and offered a lot more than we were (expecting) to get, honestly,” said a former owner who sold to DBH.

Other owners shared DBH’s optimism and refused to sell, believing they too could capitalize on this bright new future.

Advertisement

“We’re all making money,” said Larry Botel, who has an ownership stake in three minor league teams. “We’re all taking advantage of what MLB is offering us.”

DBH developed a reputation for buying teams at the high end of perceived value. Even if that had not been the case, it would have been difficult for DBH to swoop in and undercut vulnerable owners, as every sale has to be approved by the league office and pass inspection by an executive board made up of four Major League owners, four minor league owners and an independent ninth party. DBH does not have a seat on the board.

DBH acknowledged some skepticism around minor league baseball when it began buying teams, but Freund and Battle believe they’ve won over most owners.

“There were a lot of teams running their business like it’s 1975,” one current minor league owner said. “My hope is that (DBH’s) expertise in sales and marketing will elevate all the teams.”

DBH owns 20 teams at the Triple-A or Double-A level. It owns all four Atlanta Braves affiliates, three from the Boston Red Sox, and one or two from roughly two-thirds of all major league clubs. Two player development executives for MLB clubs with affiliates under the DBH banner described DBH as knowledgeable and easy to work with. “Very organized, very professional, asked all the right questions,” one said.

Advertisement

Not every minor league franchise sold in the past three years has wound up in the DBH portfolio. The Sacramento River Cats — Triple-A affiliate of the San Francisco Giants and one of minor league baseball’s most valuable franchises — sold in 2022 to the group that owns the NBA’s Sacramento Kings. The Goldklang Group, which has long-standing connections with Freund, sold two of its franchises to DBH but held onto another. Chuck Greenberg, who owns three minor league franchises, has kept those.

“There’s a lot of positive energy around MiLB right now that would have been difficult to foresee just a few years ago,” Greenberg said.


After taking over a team, the DBH playbook typically involves minimal surface-level changes (except in cases like Hudson Valley, where Heritage Financial Park needed significant renovation to meet the new facility standards). When DBH recently purchased the Winston-Salem Dash and Inland Empire 66ers, each news release stated that all existing staff would remain with the teams. That’s been the norm. DBH has never replaced a general manager upon acquisition. Two of its teams have rebranded — each one dropping the name of its major league affiliate in favor of something more local — and DBH announced plans to relocate two franchises: the Down East Wood Ducks will play out the 2024 season in Kinston, N.C., and then uproot to Spartanburg, S.C. The Mississippi Braves will move in 2025 to Columbus, Ga.

DBH said community connection is one of the first things it considers when evaluating a potential purchase, but it’s also crucial that facilities have a path to PDL compliance. Kinston’s Grainger Stadium is one of the oldest in the country, and Freund said DBH felt it would be nearly impossible to modernize that facility, so the company bought the team intending to build a new ballpark in downtown Spartanburg.

Tyson Jeffers, the incoming general manager in Spartanburg, transferred from the DBH-owned Hudson Valley franchise and has done everything from setting up a post office box to making connections with community leaders. Jeffers has more than a decade of minor league experience, and the difference with DBH, he said, is that everything moves faster.

Advertisement

“And a lot of that has to do with financials,” he said.

According to Freund, DBH has purchased 12 new video boards in the past year. They’ve bought in bulk everything from stadium lights to grounds crew tractors. When the Memphis Redbirds’ playing field fell into disrepair last season, DBH brought grounds crew members from its Springfield, Mo., and Des Moines, Iowa, affiliates to help fix it.

“You can standardize virtually every aspect of the business and still maintain that hyper-local (element),” Battle said.

Standardization and hyper-local should conflict, but DBH aims to standardize under the hood while keeping the surface-level idiosyncrasies that make minor league baseball unique. Diamond can slather the same nacho cheese across 30 franchises but still carve out space for Rendezvous BBQ in Memphis, Tenn., to provide the nachos at AutoZone Park. Same for Paul Cerda’s churros in San Jose and the Table Talk Pies in Worcester, Mass.

“It’s endless what you can do from an economy and a scale standpoint,” Freund said.

Advertisement

DBH is also working to finalize a strategic merchandising partnership with Fanatics, which DBH said will improve in-house retail service for select clubs by adding variety and improving the ability to replenish stock.

DBH does not own any of its ballparks. A vast majority of minor league teams play in community-owned stadiums and lease the venues. Many teams pay a flat fee to operate the stadium year-round. A minor league season guarantees no more than 75 home games, leaving at least 290 open dates. “The non-baseball might be our biggest opportunity to activate these ballparks,” Freund said.


The growth and reach of DBH has some people in minor league baseball pondering the amount of power one ownership group should hold in this evolving landscape. DBH came into existence not only with private equity money, but with a “strategic partnership with MLB for commercial rights.” The league has other people working on national sponsorships for minor league baseball, but DBH has a contract to do that as well (the group signed Oatly as the Official Oat Milk of Minor League Baseball). DBH also has a contract to help grow the licensing program and overall consumer products business across all 120 teams.

“From a national sponsorship and a national consumer products perspective, we definitely wear an MiLB hat,” Battle said. “And then as we conduct our business on ticketing, merchandising, locally at our venues, we’re wearing a DBH hat. We don’t see that as conflicted in any way.”

Other minor league owners expressed little concern about DBH filling national roles because, they figure, someone is going to be paid to find and maximize those opportunities, and DBH seems to be good at it. There’s little sense that national rights are going to be the primary driver of financial success, anyway.

Advertisement

“Maybe there’s an extra 10 to 20 percent revenue that will come out of this more nationalized, institutional type of approach,” Botel said. “But if you ignore the local, you’re gonna lose money. You’re gonna get creamed.”

DBH said it largely agrees with that notion. “Community is really critical for us,” Freund said.

But what does Major League Baseball consider critical?

The current PDL contracts expire after the 2030 season. Some minor-league owners expressed concern that, in seven years, MLB could further contract the minor leagues, removing the affiliation of another 30 teams — leaving three levels per Major League organization — and again raising the standards so that smaller operators will have a harder time meeting the requirements.

“We’re worried about getting squeezed out,” one minor league owner said.

Advertisement

DBH said it doesn’t expect or even want further contraction — the Williamsport Crosscutters, which Freund owns, were among the teams to lose affiliation in 2020. Contraction might also be more difficult now that minor league players are members of the powerful MLB Players Association, which will surely fight against the loss of hundreds of jobs.

There is also the question of what Silver Lake, the private equity money behind DBH, hopes to gain from all of this.

“Private equity is probably bad for everything except for the people that they’re buying things from, and I have a larger concern for baseball elsewhere,” one owner said. “But I think (Battle) is better at what he’s trying to do for minor league baseball than anybody.”

Some in baseball speculated early on that DBH/Silver Lake were gathering teams to bundle and re-sell as a package. A spokesperson for the private equity firm called DBH a “compelling opportunity” and said: “Silver Lake’s investments are commitments to long-term partnerships, and we are supportive of DBH’s continued work to nurture the evolution of minor league baseball while celebrating the unique culture and feel of each club.”

Freund and Battle said they’ve never discussed selling. “There’s just too much ahead to even think about that,” Freund said.

Advertisement

Any sale of the DBH portfolio would have to be approved by Major League Baseball, and few in minor league baseball think DBH is acting without a general understanding of what MLB might do.

Said one former owner who sold his franchise to DBH. “Nobody else would be doing this if they didn’t have some understanding of what Manfred wanted, or at the very least, his blessing.”

— Additional reporting by The Athletic’s C. Trent Rosecrans.

You can buy tickets to every MLB game here.

(Illustration: John Bradford / The Athletic. Photos: Nic Antaya / Getty; Rich Schultz, Zachary Roy, Rich Schultz / The Boston Globe)

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Sports

Novak Djokovic beats Carlos Alcaraz at Australian Open in display of physical and tactical fortitude

Published

on

Novak Djokovic beats Carlos Alcaraz at Australian Open in display of physical and tactical fortitude

Relive how Novak Djokovic won the Australian Open quarterfinal

MELBOURNE, Australia — Novak Djokovic beat Carlos Alcaraz 4-6, 6-4, 6-3, 6-4 in the Australian Open quarterfinals at Melbourne Park on Tuesday night.

The No. 7 seed prevailed over the No. 3 seed in a fever-dream of an encounter, defined by a Djokovic injury, his tactical shift as it healed, and Alcaraz’s endless and ultimately fruitless search for a spark.

After three hours and 37 minutes, Djokovic moves on to the semifinals, where he will play No. 2 seed Alexander Zverev.

The Athletic’s tennis writers, Charlie Eccleshare and Matt Futterman, analyze the match against Alcaraz and what it means for the tournament, and for tennis.

Advertisement

A ninth game of Alcaraz genius and Djokovic injury

Alcaraz had started the match looking nervous, and struggling to find his range. He was making errors on the first shot after both his first and second serves, and when Djokovic held serve for 4-3, it felt like he just needed to raise his intensity to steal the first set.

Instead, Alcaraz held for 4-4 before Djokovic suffered a triple whammy in the ninth game. Having chased down a drop shot to go up 15-0, he appeared to hurt himself, wincing and moving gingerly afterwards. Then the thing happened that every Alcaraz opponent dreads: he hit a highlight-reel shot. After an outrageous forehand pass up the line, the Spaniard cupped his hand to his ear and suddenly looked visibly lighter. The third blow felt inevitable for Djokovic, and sure enough a wide forehand conceded the break of serve that was coming and gave Alcaraz the chance to serve out the set.


Novak Djokovic injured his left leg in the first set of the match, in the same game that Carlos Alcaraz seized the decisive break. (Clive Brunskill / Getty Images)

Djokovic was forced to leave the court for a medical timeout; a couple of minutes after returning, he was a set down. In what felt like the blink of an eye, he was suddenly having to play catchup against a player who had only lost one Grand Slam match from a set up. And that was at the Australian Open four years ago, in what was his first-ever major.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Inside Novak Djokovic’s recovery – accepting outsiders, hyperbaric chambers, Jelena’s worries

Matt Futterman, Charlie Eccleshare, James Hansen

Advertisement

Djokovic plays Alcaraz tennis, against Alcaraz

There wasn’t any chance that Djokovic was going to go away after picking up that injury. He came out for the second set a completely different player than the one who started the match.

In the first set, he was all about conservatism, turning points into physical contests and allowing Alcaraz to make errors, as he did in the first 12 games of both sets in their gold medal match at the Paris Olympics back in August.

That was no longer a possibility once he was playing with an injury. So Djokovic morphed into a first-strike player, just as he did in the tiebreaks of that Olympic final. He went hunting for every serve, ripping from the baseline at his first chance, even serving and sneaking into the net whenever he could to finish the point quickly. Points soon started ending after three or four shots.


Djokovic turned Alcaraz’s own style against him to win the second set. (Martin Keep / AFP via Getty Images)

Facing his own gifts being turned against him, Alcaraz was caught off-guard and lost his serve in the second game of the second set, as Djokovic whaled away on two forehand returns to get a break point, then won the game on the next one. After that, it became a test of whether this strategy could keep Djokovic in the match long enough to draw even, which would give him time for some combination of adrenaline and medication to kick in. Playing a hyper-aggressive brand of tennis for three sets would be nigh impossible, especially against the master of the art.

It worked even better than he could have hoped. Not only did he steal the set he usually loses while buying time, but when the pain in his leg began to ease, he was able to catch Alcaraz off-guard and keep him guessing about which Djokovic he was going to be facing from one point to the next.

Advertisement
go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner are redrawing the tennis court

Matt Futterman


How two players used to playing with house money dealt with being the gambler

At the 2024 Laver Cup in Berlin, The Athletic watched a match with eight-time Grand Slam champion Andre Agassi. When analyzing the encounter unfolding in front of him, Agassi kept returning to the idea that tennis players are always seeking to keep the odds of winning in their favor. The best players become like the house at a casino, and turn their opponents into gamblers who start with things stacked against them.

Throughout his career, Djokovic has been the ultimate in applying this logic, the epitome of ‘the house always wins’. His opponents might hit the flashier shots, but ultimately they end up losing the match, because whatever they are doing proves unsustainable.

Against Alcaraz, at this tournament and previously in last year’s Wimbledon final, it’s been a surreal experience to see Djokovic thrust into the gambler role, desperately hoping his number might come up. Injuries have played a part in this on both occasions, but it’s also a reality of his now being 37 years old: not everything can be played on your terms.

Advertisement

Alcaraz struggled to play on his terms after the fourth set. (Icon Sportswire / Getty Images)

What made the dynamic more interesting was that Alcaraz too was having to alter the way he normally becomes the house. His instinct is to be the protagonist and get on the front foot, even though he is also a great defender. He trusts that his brilliance will be enough to ultimately overwhelm his opponent, because it almost always is.

Djokovic’s approach Tuesday took him out of his comfort zone, and in the second set he appeared unsure as to what his best route to victory was. He was celebrating hanging in points and drawing errors, rather than whipping up the crowd after hitting a winner that had got them off their feet.

His head looked scrambled and, having been dicing with danger in several service games, Alcaraz was broken to love and Djokovic levelled the match.

By the start of the third set, Djokovic was moving more freely, which gave him the option to play both sides of the equation: house and gambler. He could drag Alcaraz into rallies and bait him into coughing up a spinny shorter ball, or blast off early. This noticeably flummoxed Alcaraz, who seemed confused about his route to victory. He never entered full highlight-reel mode; his serve, with a new, more fluid motion, couldn’t get him cheap points as it did earlier in the tournament.

By allaying his instincts and playing more conservatively, he became the gambler, as so many of Djokovic’s opponents have fooled themselves into doing in the past. This was different — Alcaraz was, at times, playing three different versions of Djokovic at once — but he couldn’t reverse the trend.

Advertisement
go-deeper

GO DEEPER

How to watch tennis with Andre Agassi – Poker analogies, meat, potatoes and intimacy

Charlie Eccleshare


Alcaraz’s search for a spark

All night long, it seemed like Alcaraz was a spark away from finding himself. Especially in the third set, when he was behind from the start and digging to come back. He went a break down, but got back on serve in the seventh game.

This was it… wasn’t it?

It was more like the opposite of that.

Advertisement

Alcaraz then committed three successive errors, on a volley, a forehand and a backhand. Djokovic, sensing his opponent had zero shot tolerance, went to work. He sucked Alcaraz into a 22-shot rally, then finished it with a looping forehand winner into the Spaniard’s backhand corner, not dissimilar to the one Alexei Popyrin hit against Djokovic at the U.S. Open last summer to send the crowd on Arthur Ashe into raptures and put the Serbian on notice that he was going home.


Alcaraz was frequently frustrated by tiny margins of error that accumulated throughout. (Hannah Peters / Getty Images)

After nearly two hours of deadening the stadium to keep the vibes low and Alcaraz disengaged, he put his hand to his ear and revved up the noise.

Then Djokovic fell 0-30 down as he served for the set. Could this be the Alcaraz spark? Nope. Two more errors from him drew Djokovic even. Time to test the shot tolerance again. A 17-shot rally this time, ending with Alcaraz whacking a running forehand into the net.

Rattled, and a point away from going down two sets to one, Alcaraz let Djokovic twist him this way and that and even baulked on an easy overhead before missing a backhand volley that he shouldn’t have had to hit.

Two games, 10 points, about eight minutes of play.

Advertisement

Script flipped.

Matt Futterman, Charlie Eccleshare, James Hansen


The 33-shot footnote in tennis history

In what was a weird match in so many ways, there was at least an exciting finale.

Alcaraz seemed to belatedly realize his only route back into this quarterfinal was to get the atmosphere going. He had searched for that spark all night, and finally got the chance in the fourth set.

When he won a 33-shot rally to save a break point that would have left him 5-2 down and out of the match, the Rod Laver Arena finally fizzed with energy. Djokovic raged, well aware of how significant the moment could be, with both players bent double at the side of the court. Alcaraz was smiling and laughing. Djokovic was fuming.

Advertisement

It felt like the turning point that Alcaraz has shown the tennis world so many times in his career, when he creates a highlight and then rolls downhill. Suddenly he was grinning again, sprinting around the court, almost enjoying himself.

When he held two break points in the next game, the comeback very briefly felt like it might be on.

But back came Djokovic, fending them both off before holding serve. Two games later, he served out the match to render that 33-shot rally ultimately irrelevant.

Charlie Eccleshare


What did Djokovic say after the match?

“I just wish that this match was the final,” Djokovic said in his on-court interview. “One of the most epic matches I’ve played on this court — on any court.”

Advertisement

“When the medications start to release, I’ll see what the reality is tomorrow morning. Right now. I’ll just try to be in the moment and enjoy this victory,” he said of his injury.


What did Alcaraz say after the match?

“We push each other to the limit,” he said. “I think we’ve played great points, great rallies. It was really tight in the third, the fourth set.

“I’m just lucky to live this experience. I’m 21 years old. From these matches, I’m getting so much experience about how to deal with everything. I’m not going to hide.

“I’ve done great things in tennis already, but playing against one of the best in the history of our sport, these kind of matches help me a lot in the future to be better.”


Recommended reading

(Top photo: Fred Lee / Getty Images)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Lions losing Ben Johnson to rival Bears is big 'body blow,' Super Bowl champion says

Published

on

Lions losing Ben Johnson to rival Bears is big 'body blow,' Super Bowl champion says

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

Former Detroit Lions offensive coordinator Ben Johnson left the team to take the Chicago Bears’ head coaching job Monday.

Super Bowl champion Lomas Brown talked about what Lions fans are going through losing their top coordinator after a crushing playoff loss during a recent appearance on OutKick’s “Don’t @ Me with Dan Dakich.”

Advertisement

“I know it’s another body blow. You know that old game, body blow, body blow. … That was a big one yesterday,” Brown said. “All of them on talk radio, that was the subject yesterday, Ben Johnson leaving. Oh my god, you got so many fans upset at Ben about taking the Chicago job. I think it’s more, not him leaving, but more of the job that he is accepting because of how bitter rivals we are with Chicago.

Detroit Lions offensive coordinator Ben Johnson before a game against the Chicago Bears at Soldier Field. (Daniel Barte/IImagn Images)

“Now, we got to face him twice a year. That just made the division even harder with Ben Johnson going in there. And a lot of sentiment before he took the job was that Ben wouldn’t take that job because he knew he would have to go up against his good friend Dan Campbell twice a year. But he took it. A lot of people not happy with it around here.”

The No. 1-seeded Lions were upset by the No. 6-seeded Washington Commanders, 45-31, Saturday.

Advertisement

Brown said losing Johnson, especially to a division rival, and potentially other top assistants make the loss to the Commanders hurt that much more. 

LIONS’ DAN CAMPBELL CONFIDENT TEAM’S SUPER BOWL WINDOW REMAINS OPEN AFTER DISASTROUS LOSS TO COMMANDERS

Ben Johnson calls play from sheet

Detroit Lions offensive coordinator Ben Johnson watches a play against the Chicago Bears during the first half at Soldier Field in Chicago Dec. 22, 2024. (Imagn)

“A lot of people not happy with it around here, and I think that it’s, again, I just think a lot of that’s from the results of the game, and just everything that’s going on the last few days around here. It’s culminating with Ben Johnson taking the job and, d—, we’re going to lose other assistants,” Brown said. 

“I mean Aaron Glenn, you talk about maybe (offensive line coach) Hank Fraley. It’s other assistants that we’re going to lose off this team. That’s why this was the year for us to get it done.”

Glenn was scheduled to interview with the New York Jets for the second time for their head coaching position Tuesday, according to NFL Network. 

Advertisement

Tuesday’s interview will be the first in-person meeting between the Jets and Glenn. 

Lomas Brown speaks

Lions legend Lomas Brown speaks during a Ring of Honor induction ceremony at halftime of a game between Detroit Lions and Las Vegas Raiders at Ford Field in Detroit Oct. 30, 2023. (Imagn)

Fraley is being interviewed for the Seattle Seahawks’ offensive coordinator position Tuesday, according to ESPN. It will be Fraley’s second interview with the team and their first in-person interview. 

Brown spent 18 seasons in the NFL and was with the Lions for 11 of them. Brown was a star left tackle and made the Pro Bowl seven consecutive seasons from 1990-1996. 

Brown won a Super Bowl in his final season with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers in 2002. 

Advertisement

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Continue Reading

Sports

Lakers get back on track against woeful Washington

Published

on

Lakers get back on track against woeful Washington

Two days after the Lakers were saying it almost never would be easy, almost never came to town.

The Washington Wizards, who have won a league-low six times, were the cure for the Lakers after a loss Sunday to the Clippers exposed a number of their weaknesses. The postgame morale was low, LeBron James and JJ Redick openly discussing how their roster wouldn’t be able to organically improve an already narrow margin for error.

But with the midway point of the season here Tuesday, the Lakers played the one team in the NBA bad enough to make anyone — even the Lakers — feel like they’ve got it figured out.

The Lakers did the right things consistently over four quarters, barely being threatened before winning 111-88 in a game they desperately had to have before hosting Boston on Thursday night.

“It just starts with a very professional approach from our team,” Redick said. “That was one of our more complete games, regardless of what time of season it was or who the opponent was. Like, we just, we had a really professional approach.”

Advertisement

The Wizards (6-36), in the early stages of a rebuild with eyes on the top of the NBA draft, haven’t won since Jan. 1. Kyle Kuzma and Jordan Poole are their best offensive options and backup center Jonas Valanciunas and forward Corey Kispert their only other veterans, Washington fully committed to the future.

Compared to the Lakers (23-18), whose eyes are squarely on the present, that made Tuesday predictably one-sided — though the Lakers still needed to execute.

Anthony Davis had 29 points and 16 rebounds while bullying rookie Alex Sarr. James, fresh from watching his beloved Ohio State win the college football national championship Monday in Atlanta, had his ninth triple-double of the season with 21 points, 13 assists and 10 rebounds. Austin Reaves, despite a four-for-15 shooting night, still finished with 16 points and eight assists, and Dorian Finney-Smith had 16 points off the bench in just 22 minutes.

The Lakers did it by attacking the paint and finding the open player, the team scoring on more than a handful of lobs.

“It’s… just being ready to make the passes on time, on target,” James said. “And when we do that, we look pretty good.”

Advertisement

The biggest highlight came when Reaves found James for a lob off an offensive rebound, with the 40-year-old Lakers star dunking on Valanciunas.

Austin Reaves drives to the basket against Washington’s Bob Carrington in the first quarter.

(Wally Skalij / Los Angeles Times)

“I got hype. Screaming so loud, I almost passed out,” Davis said. “I mean, it wasn’t one of his best ones, but I’ve seen better. But it was a good one.”

Advertisement

The Lakers held Washington to 35.8% shooting from the field and 25.6% from three and limited the Wizards to 11 points in the fourth quarter.

“We went out, we had a game plan, we executed that,” James said. “I thought defensively, we were great. We were in tune with what they wanted to do, what they tried to do. And offensively, we shared the ball, limited our turnovers. We were really good.”

Continue Reading

Trending