Connect with us

Southeast

Jonathan Turley reacts to 'seismic' dismissal of Trump classified documents case: 'Huge win'

Published

on

Constitutional law expert Jonathan Turley joined “America’s Newsroom” Monday after a judge in Florida dismissed the case against former President Trump’s handling of classified documents.

TRUMP VIP RALLY ATTENDEE SHARES WHAT HE EXPERIENCED DURING THE ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT

JONATHAN TURLEY: This is a seismic decision because the immunity decision that was issued by the Supreme Court was the second of a 1-2 punch for Jack Smith. Previously, the court had reversed an obstruction charge that impacted Trump as well. And so those two cases here ripped the wings off his case. So we were all looking to see how Jack Smith would handle it in D.C. He had a very motivated and favorable judge, Judge Chutkan. And she has really been an ideal choice for Jack Smith. So the assumption was that Judge Chutkan would do her level best to keep that case going even after these hits. Few people expected the Florida case to be the one that disassembled first. Well, what Judge Cannon is saying here is essentially, look, there’s this weird anomaly in the Constitution, we have a process of which U.S. attorneys are nominated, and they are then confirmed by the Senate. And yet the attorney general can just go on to any street in D.C. and pick any person and make them a special counsel with greater authority than the U.S. attorney. And that’s what she’s trying to get at here, saying, where is the footprint for this in the Constitution? Where is the authority to create Jack Smith within the first three articles of the Constitution? So it’s a huge win for Trump. Other courts have really dismissed this claim with very little briefing. And so this will create a conflict. There are good arguments on both sides here. But, you couldn’t have more favorable news for Donald Trump because I’ve said it from the beginning, the Florida case was by far the greatest threat to Donald Trump. The New York case, the Manhattan case, in my view, has layers of reversible error. It’s going to be in the courts for a while I think. Judge Merchan did a particularly poor job in that case, and I don’t even see the viable crime in that case. But putting that aside, Florida was the greatest challenge.

Trump had faced charges stemming from special counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into his possession of classified materials at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence. He pleaded not guilty to all 37 felony counts from Smith’s probe, including willful retention of national defense information, conspiracy to obstruct justice and false statements.

“Former President Trump’s Motion to Dismiss Indictment Based on the Unlawful Appointment and Funding of Special Counsel Jack Smith is GRANTED in accordance with this Order,” U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon wrote in a Monday ruling. “The Superseding Indictment is DISMISSED because Special Counsel Smith’s appointment violates the Appointments Clause of the United States Constitution.”

Advertisement

Fox News’ Greg Norman contributed to this report

Read the full article from Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Southeast

Trump's classified docs case dismissal is a rebuke of Biden's out-of-control DOJ

Published

on

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

It never made sense or seemed right.  With the wave of a wand, a private citizen was granted unlimited power to prosecute a former president of the United States.  

Advertisement

In a tectonic opinion issued Monday, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon ruled that the appointment of special counsel Jack Smith was unconstitutional.  As a consequence, she correctly dismissed the Florida criminal indictment of Donald Trump over his handling of classified documents.

Smith and the Department of Justice (DOJ) will likely file an immediate appeal to a higher court.  But Cannon’s well-reasoned 93-page opinion establishes a clarifying record of sound legal judgment that will be difficult to overcome.  At some point, the U.S. Supreme Court may be forced to intervene.       

JUDGE DISMISSES TRUMP’S FLORIDA CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS CASE

At the heart of the federal judge’s decision is the Appointments Clause of the Constitution which provides the exclusive means for selecting all “Officers of the United States.”  They must be appointed by the president and confirmed by the senate.  Smith failed both requirements.  

Instead, he was anointed special counsel by Attorney General Merrick Garland on November 18, 2022, without legitimate statutory authority.  His unilateral act commandeered the legislative right of Congress that animates and preserves our revered separation of powers.

Advertisement

Cannon concluded, “The Framers gave Congress a pivotal role in the appointment of principal and inferior officers.  That role cannot be usurped by the Executive Branch or diffused elsewhere —whether in this case or in another case, whether in times of heightened national need or not.” (Opinion, page 91)  

TALE OF TWO CONVENTIONS: GOP UNITED BEHIND TRUMP WHILE DEMS IN DISARRAY

In two seminal cases, the U.S. Supreme Court emphasized that the Appointments Clause is “more than a matter of ‘etiquette or protocol’; it is among the significant structural safeguards of the constitutional scheme.” (Edmond v. United States, 520 U.S. 651; Buckley vs. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1)

In naming Smith to his almighty position, Garland relied mainly on internal regulations devised by the DOJ that deliberately circumvented Congress.  Tradition and “historical practice,” he argued, justified his maneuver.  

However, that was a clever misrepresentation of inconsistent history.  While it is true that other special counsels have operated without specific legislative consent —Patrick Fitzgerald, Robert Mueller, John Durham, David Weiss, and Robert Hur— all of them had been presidentially appointed and Senate approved in prior positions as officers of the United States.  Smith never was.

Advertisement

Belatedly, and in opposition to Trump’s motion to dismiss the case against him, Garland and Smith cited a handful of statutes that purported to rationalize the appointment.  But Judge Cannon methodically disassembled them as wholly inapplicable to a special counsel who was given nearly unfettered authority to do as he pleases.      

CLASSIFIED DOCS CASE DISMISSAL MEANS ‘GREATEST’ LEGAL ‘THREAT’ TO TRUMP IS ‘GONE’: EXPERTS

What concerned Cannon was how Garland’s selection of Smith “imposed almost no supervision or direction over the special counsel and gave him broad power to render final decisions on behalf of the United States.” (Opinion, page 72)   

How is it possible that an attorney general could vest in a private citizen the immense and unchecked power of a U.S. Attorney when, in fact, Smith is not and never was?  His role is not to assist an approved U.S. Attorney but replace one entirely.  

By evading constitutional restrictions, Garland single-handedly stripped Congress of its vital role of Senate approval.  Judge Aileen Cannon remedied this mistake.  In doing so, she built on the compelling contentions of two former Attorneys General, Edwin Meese and Michael Mukasey, who filed an amicus (“friend of the court”) brief.  Their persuasive arguments can be seen writ large throughout the opinion.  

Advertisement

Cannon also expressed alarm at the $12 million already spent by Smith and where exactly the money came from.  The expenses were not doled out by Congress, which means that both Garland and the special counsel violated the Appropriations Clause of the Constitution in much the same way that his assignation was unlawful abuse of the Appointments Clause.   

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

If the decision dismissing the prosecution of Trump ever reaches the nation’s highest court, it will meet at least one justice who had already questioned the legitimacy of the special counsel.  Justice Clarence Thomas expressed serious misgivings during the recent presidential immunity case.  Indeed, Cannon cited it in her lengthy opinion. 

Regardless, the current ruling makes it effectively impossible for Smith’s Florida classified documents case from reaching trial before the presidential election in November or even the inauguration should Trump prevail at the ballot box.  

Federal Judge Aileen Cannon. (US Courts) (US Courts )

Advertisement

The judge did not address the merits of the indictment, which had troubling aspects of prosecutorial overreach in the stacking of charges that seemed weaker by the dozen. 

Cannon’s ruling is not binding on the federal judge in Smith’s other case against Trump in Washington, D.C. over alleged election-interference.  But that prosecution is already stalled by the two recent Supreme Court decisions over the immunity issue and the improper use of an obstruction statute.  

Nevertheless, Justice Thomas’ observation that Smith is acting without authority may breathe new life into Trump’s long-term defense in the January 6th case against him.

The erosion of Jack Smith’s misbegotten prosecutions represents an important course correction in the increasingly abusive tactics employed by President Joe Biden’s Justice Department and his sycophantic attorney general.  These cases, as well as those brought by local district attorneys in New York and Georgia, were always politically driven and legally anemic persecutions designed to delegitimize Trump’s electoral chances.  

Advertisement

They have boomeranged spectacularly.

It is a reminder of what the English philosopher and jurist, Jeremy Bentham, once said, “It is never the law itself that is in the wrong; it is always some wicked interpreter of the law that has corrupted and abused it.” 

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM GREGG JARRETT

Read the full article from Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Southeast

North Carolina election board defers certifying RFK Jr, Cornel West: report

Published

on

An elections board in North Carolina has once again deferred granting certification to Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Cornel West, citing concerns over how their nominating signatures were obtained.

Members of the North Carolina State Board of Elections claimed at a Tuesday hearing that during several probing phone calls to voters registered with the two candidates’ parties, some signers did not know they had been nominating Kennedy or West.

Board personnel reached out to 26 voters who signed petitions for Kennedy’s We The People party and 66 who signed for West’s Justice for All party. It is not clear how many of those contacted are alleged to have been confused about the purpose of their signatures.

RFK JR DENOUNCES ‘SPOILER’ LABEL, REJECTS DEM PARTY LOYALTY CONCERNS: ‘I’M TRYING TO HURT BOTH’ CANDIDATES

Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. speaks during a voter rally at The Hangar at Stanley Marketplace in Aurora, Colorado. (Helen H. Richardson/The Denver Post)

Advertisement

General counsel Lindsey Wakely said 12 signers of the Justice for All petition did not remember signing the petition.

Every individual contacted from the We the People party petition reportedly remembered signing their name, according to local outlet Port City Daily.

State election officials previously confirmed that the We the People party submitted more than the 13,865 valid signatures necessary to register as a political party ahead of the 2024 election. The Justice for All party similarly turned in more than the minimum number of signatures necessary.

DEM CAMPAIGN CALL REVEALS PANIC MODE OVER RFK JR.’S WHITE HOUSE BID, SCRAMBLE TO SAVE BIDEN RE-ELECTION HOPES

Cornel West

Presidential candidate Dr. Cornel West is seen speaking to the press following a rally in Harlem, New York City. (Selcuk Acar/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Debate has erupted in the state over whether opposition to Kennedy and West’s names on the ballot is based on legitimate ethical concerns or political gamesmanship to protect President Biden from third party candidates.

Advertisement

Republican member of the election board Kevin Lewis reportedly expressed frustration with the continued obstacles to Kennedy and West, questioning the motives of his Democrat colleagues.

“You know how I voted the last time and I hope fellow board members will do the right thing and approve these partners today,” Lewis said, according to Port City News.

trump and biden

President Biden and former President Trump participate in the CNN Presidential Debate in Atlanta. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Kennedy has repeatedly denied accusations that he is running as a spoiler against Biden, claiming that he is “trying to hurt both” the president and his opponent, former President Trump.

Advertisement

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading

Southeast

375-pound great-grandfather sea turtle released back into Florida ocean after rehab

Published

on

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

A sea turtle has been sent back into the ocean off the coast of Florida after recovering from some serious wounds. 

Bubba is a 375-pound loggerhead sea turtle who was found by biologists with Inwater Research in St. Lucie County, Florida, on April 10.

Advertisement

Biologists noticed the large animal had injuries on both of his front flippers, so they stepped in to help. 

TEXAS AQUARIUM RESCUING COLD-STUNNED TURTLES AMID HISTORIC CHILLY WEATHER

After using a crane to pull him out of the water and into the back of a pickup truck, Bubba was brought to the Brevard Zoo Sea Turtle Healing Center in Melbourne, Florida, the center told Fox News Digital. 

At the rehabilitation center, it took seven volunteers to lift Bubba’s large presence out of the truck and into the facility. 

Bubba was rehabilitated in Florida after being found with injured flippers and more.  (Brevard Zoo)

Advertisement

A preliminary exam confirmed that Bubba’s front flippers were injured, likely due to an attack, and that he needed treatment as soon as possible. 

SEA TURTLE WITH NET AROUND ITS NECK IS RESCUED BY SPEEDBOAT TOUR GUIDE IN HEROIC MOMENT

He also had an intense infestation of marine leeches, which caused the sea turtle to become anemic, according to the Brevard Zoo. 

Sea turtle rehabilitation

Bubba spent three months at the Brevard Zoo Sea Turtle Healing Center.  (Brevard Zoo)

Although Bubba was Brevard Zoo’s first adult male loggerhead patient, they determined he was anywhere between 60 and 75 years old — and likely a great-grandfather. 

‘COLD-STUNNED’ SEA TURTLES RESCUED IN GEORGIA DUE TO ‘UNUSUAL EXTREME COLD WEATHER’

Advertisement

A spokesperson for the Brevard Zoo told Fox News Digital that Bubba went through an intense rehabilitation process. 

“In addition to receiving antibiotics and good nutrition, 375-pound Bubba received regular wound cleanings along with cold laser therapy on his front flippers,” the spokesperson said. 

Bubba release into the ocean

Brevard Zoo said that over 300 people showed up to see Bubba’s triumphant return to the ocean.  (Brevard Zoo)

“Our Healing Center team’s goal is to release all our sea turtle patients back to the ocean, which was especially important for Bubba, who is a breeding male.”

After three months of rehabilitation, Bubba finally returned to the water on Wednesday, July 10, with 300 bystanders cheering him on. 

Advertisement

“Being able to share what the Brevard Zoo’s Sea Turtle Healing Center does with the community is a blessing.”

Brevard Zoo’s Sea Turtle Healing Center manager Shanon Gann told Fox News Digital this might have been their best-attended release ever. 

Bubba going back into the ocean

Bubba was released back into the water in St. Lucie County, Florida, on July 10. Some 300 bystanders cheered him on.  (Brevard Zoo)

“Being able to share what the Brevard Zoo’s Sea Turtle Healing Center does with the community is a blessing,” she said. 

She added, “Releasing Bubba was extra special because we know he is a reproductive male, and we are currently in nesting season.”

Advertisement
Turtle release

A 375-pound sea turtle was released back into the ocean after his rehab.  (Brevard Zoo)

Gann said the zoo’s veterinary staff are on call 12 hours a day, 365 days a year to “assist sick and injured sea turtles,” and that she was excited to see so many people show up for Bubba’s release. 

For more Lifestyle articles, visit www.foxnews/lifestyle

The Brevard Zoo opened its gates to the public in March 1994.

Since then, it’s had a mission of caring for animals, connecting visitors with the natural world, educating diverse audiences, inspiring the community and achieving conservation results, the zoo said. 

Read the full article from Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending