Connect with us

West Virginia

Group coming to West Virginia gently suggests considering a change in hunting ammo – WV MetroNews

Published

on

Group coming to West Virginia gently suggests considering a change in hunting ammo – WV MetroNews


CHARLESTON, W.Va. — The adage about teaching an old dog new tricks can often apply to old hunters too. Sometimes we become so set in our ways, the thought of change disrupts our entire approach. But one organization has dedicated itself to using gentle persuasion to get hunters and sportsmen to at least consider rotating away from traditional lead ammunition for hunting season.

The North American Non-Lead Partnership is a non-profit group which travels the country helping explain the conservation motive behind their suggestion.

“We know that lead hunting ammunition has been around for a long time and one thing we’ve realized is whenever that lead bullet hits an animal while hunting, it fragments. Those fragments, a lot of times, get fed upon by scavenger birds or other wildlife that are feeding on gut piles,” said Adam Miller with the organization during a recent appearance on West Virginia Outdoors.

A ballistics comparison of a 30-06, 180 grain Federal Trophy Copper on the left vs 30-06 180 grain Nosler partition (lead) on the right

Advertisement

When those lead fragments wind up in the food change of vultures, eagles, or other scavengers they can cause lead positioning and a host of detrimental effects on the birds and much of the ecosystem. Some have previously advocated for forcing the change through legislation or ballot initiatives. Miller and his organization believe the carrot is a much better way to persuade sportsmen than the stick.

“Hunting is part of people’s heritage and the way we work with people is getting them to make a choice to preserve that heritage, rather than lead ammunition bans or ballot box initiatives,” he explained.

Testing has proven the lead fragmentation to be fact and not theory. Miller uses seminars across the country to lay out his presentation for influential members of the hunting public to help them understand the facts and to suggest alternatives to lead. The most widely accepted choice is copper. The effort to shift away from high powered lead rifle ammo is comparable to the transition made from lead to steel or other non-toxic shot for waterfowl hunting.

“Just like when that change happened for waterfowl hunting, people had to learn to use different ammo because it performs differently,” he explained. “Copper ammo is less dense than lead. So if you have a 30-caliber bullet that’s lead and a 30-caliber bullet that’s copper and they’re the same grain, it’s going to be a longer bullet for your copper load.”

Miller travels the nation demonstrating the performance of copper vs lead. He’ll conduct such a seminar for a select group of DNR and Sportsmen’s leaders this weekend in West Virginia.

Advertisement

“Sometimes you have to change the ammunition you’re using to make sure it performs just as well, if not better, than what you traditionally use,” he explained.

Miller said typically they recommend sizing down from lead ammo by 15 to 20 percent in grain weight when transitioning to copper.

“That makes for similar aerodynamics so it has similar performance. So, there is a learning curve to it,” said Miller.

The other big consideration hunters will raise about a change is the cost of copper ammo vs. lead. Miller had researched those possibilities as well. He acknowledged in some parts of the country copper ammo might be harder to find. He also advised sportsmen would need to read labels and packaging carefully to make sure they selected the correct material. However, it’s becoming more common to find lead as the push to make the transition grows.

As for the price, Miller said it is comparable depending on what brand and quality of ammo you select. You’ll be hard pressed to find copper ammo at the same price as the base lead ammunition. However, he suggested if you go up in quality the price tended to level out.

Advertisement

“I don’t think you’ll be able to find a copper bullet that would compare to your Remington “Core-Lokt” which has been around for years. But when it comes to premium hunting ammunition like a Nosler Partitioned lead bullet, they’re actually comparable in price,” he said.



Source link

West Virginia

As expected, buck harvest down significantly for 2025 – WV MetroNews

Published

on

As expected, buck harvest down significantly for 2025 – WV MetroNews


CHARLESTON, W.Va. — West Virginia deer hunters killed 33,775 bucks during the recently completed two week buck firearms season.

According to information released Tuesday by the West Virginia Division of Natural Resources, Greenbrier County was the top county in the state for bucks in 2025 with 1,730 killed during the gun season. Second was Preston County with 1,349, Randolph County 1,198, Hardy County 1,165 and Pendleton at 1,135. The rest of the top ten counties in order were Pocahontas, Monroe, Grant, Fayette, and Hampshire Counties.’

Click here to see county-by-county buck firearms season harvests for the last five seasons.

As predicted by the DNR prior to the season, the total harvest was 18.5 percent below 2024. All of the DNR’s districts registered a decrease in harvest, with the exception of District 4 which experienced a 7.5 percent increase compared to last year. The DNR predicted the lower harvest because of a major abundance of mast in the state. The conditions were such that deer didn’t have to travel far to find adequate food and therefore were not as exposed to hunters.

Advertisement

The agency acknowledged several counties along the Ohio River and central West Virginia experienced an outbreak of hemorrhagic disease in the early fall which also impacted hunter success especially in western counties of the state.

Several deer hunting opportunities remain for 2025. The state’s archery and crossbow season runs through Dec. 31, the traditional Class N/NN antlerless deer season will be open in select areas on public and private land Dec. 11-14 and Dec. 28-31, the muzzleloader deer season will be open Dec. 15-21 and the youth, Class Q and Class XS season for antlerless deer will be open Dec. 26-27 in any county with a firearms deer season.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

West Virginia

West Virginia American Water proposes $46 million rate hike affecting 172,000 customers

Published

on

West Virginia American Water proposes  million rate hike affecting 172,000 customers


A possible utility rate hike is being discussed for West Virginia American Water customers. It would affect 172,000 customers in 22 counties.

On Monday night, at a public hearing, only two people spoke out sharing their thoughts on the proposed hike.

“I’m here to ask the PSC to finally, once and for all, take care of the consumers of water by making sure the water company follows industry standards and international code,” WVAW customer, Howard Swint said.

According to a press release from West Virginia American Water, the new rates would be implemented in two steps with the first step of a $11 increase per month going into effect on March 1st, 2026.

Advertisement

The second step establishes final rates would be a $5 increase becoming effective on March 1st, 2027. Those numbers being based on the bill of an average residential customer.

“The system we’re hoping to get a hearing on today is terribly antiquated and it also has a lot of other shortcomings that cheat the water rate consumers by virtue of the fact that they’re putting band-aids on a system that should really be replaced. Now that’s going to require money, I understand that” Swint said.

In total, water rates would see a $46 million increase, and sewer rates would see a $1.4 million increase. According to the company, these increases would go towards making further improvements to their infrastructure.

“In downtown Charleston, last year it was flooded. We pay for that as consumers. We have to pay for that. It’s a system that’s antiquated that has to be fixed. So that requires money to bring it up to international code and industry standards. It’s something we all will pay less in the future for by virtue of having a system that’s reliable,” Swint said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

West Virginia

Governor says it is not appropriate to ask specifics of National Guard readiness with weapons – WV MetroNews

Published

on

Governor says it is not appropriate to ask specifics of National Guard readiness with weapons – WV MetroNews


West Virginia’s governor says it is inappropriate to ask questions about whether members of the National Guard patrolling Washington, D.C., are prepared to quickly and efficiently respond with firearms in case of attack.

Gov. Patrick Morrisey

“I can assure folks that the people that we send in — anytime you’re sending anyone potentially in harm’s way, you want to make sure that they’re fully prepared, they’re very well trained,” Morrisey said on MetroNews Midday.

In response to a question about Guard members’ readiness to defend themselves, he continued, “I can assure people that they are.”

More detail about defensive readiness than that, the governor went on to say, should be off limits to the public.

Advertisement

West Virginia National Guard members Sarah Beckstrom, 20, and Andrew Wolfe, 24, were shot Nov. 26 at the corner of 17th and I Streets NW. Beckstrom died on Thanksgiving Day, and Wolfe continues to recover from serious injuries.

A major with the National Guard who was nearby shot the suspect with his service weapon as the attacker was trying to reload his own gun, investigators said.

Authorities have said the suspect in the shooting, Rahmanullah Lakanwal, came around a corner, raised his gun and fired at Guardsmen who were gathered at the location near a Metro stop. He has been formally charged with murder.

Lakanwal, 29, drove from his home in the state of Washington. He had previously worked with CIA-backed counterterrorism units in Afghanistan known as Zero Units. He had a Special Immigrant Visa because of that work but apparently had significant struggles adjusting to life in the United States.

Advertisement

“This is a tragedy that resulted from an ambush. It was nothing to do with their readiness posture. So specialist Beckstrom was attacked from behind at point blank range by a member of a CIA backed paramilitary unit, you know, a terrorist. So this was really important,” Morrisey said on MetroNews Midday.

Warnings of possible danger

At least two memos introduced into evidence by attorneys representing the Trump administration in a federal court case challenging the presence of the National Guard in the nation’s capital make reference to potential danger for operations under Joint Task Force-D.C.

“JTC-DC service members may expect a heightened threat environment while supporting the “Make DC Safe and Beautiful” mission within the NCR,” according to an August advisory memo filed in the federal court case and referring to activity in the national capital region.

“Threat/nefarious actors engaging in grievance based violence and those inspired by foreign terrorist organizations may view the MDCSB mission as a target of opportunity. Additionally, civilian populations with varying political views may attempt to engage with JTF-DC SMs.”

Advertisement

On August 23, the commanding general of the D.C. National Guard gave an order allowing members supporting the mission in the district to carry their service-issued weapons after careful consideration of the security environment. Guard members on the mission were to carry M17 pistols, intended for personal protection.

In early December, after the shootings, the Pentagon reiterated The Pentagon that every National Guard member deployed in Washington D.C., would now be armed with live weapons.

An overriding question has been readiness to engage — whether the service weapons and ammunition were in position to be used quickly in case of attack.

COMMENTARY by T.J. MEADOWS: Did We Fail Our Guardsmen?

On statewide radio, the governor said the specifics of Guard’s access to weapons is not for the public to know.

Advertisement

“You know, it’s absolutely wrong to try to publicize everyone’s weapons readiness, sensitive operational information, if it could endanger the Guardsmen who are working in D.C. I think they are irresponsible questions, to be blunt. We have to protect our people,” Morrisey said.

“I don’t know why people would want to have everything about ‘This is exactly the operational information you need when you’re out in the field’ and you could subject our Guardsmen to harm. That’s outrageous, and I’m not going to do it.”

D.C. mission continues, and so do questions

On August 11, President Donald Trump declared a “crime emergency” for the District of Columbia, and just a few days later Governor Morrisey deployed 300 to 400 members of the West Virginia National Guard for support.

That developed as, on August 12, Leland Blanchard, interim commanding general of the D.C. National Guard, sent an email to James Seward, adjutant general of the West Virginia National Guard.

Advertisement

“Was told by SECARMY’s office that your governor has been in contact with SECARMY and may be willing to support ongoing operations in DC,” Blanchard wrote in an email that later appeared among the filings in the federal court case.

Blanchard went on to say work was still ongoing to determine tasks, “but wondering if you have some insights on number of personnel you might have to put against this mission once we get there.”

Seward responded to say, depending on orders and funding, that West Virginia could provide an estimated 500 to 600 Guard members. “Please let us know what we can do to help.”

The president’s emergency declaration, which placed the Metropolitan Police Department under federal direction, expired after 30 days, Sept. 10, but the National Guard presence continued.

About 2,000 members of the National Guard, overall, have been deployed to Washington, D.C., to patrol on the National Mall, in Metro public transportation stations and across D.C. neighborhoods.

Advertisement

Last month, the West Virginia National Guard announced participation in patrols in Washington, D.C., would continue until the end of the year. However, the mission was being scaled back.

About 160 West Virginia National Guard volunteers were approved to remain in D.C. All personnel not continuing as part of the D.C. Safe and Beautiful mission returned to West Virginia.

COMMENTARY by HOPPY KERCHEVAL: Governor Morrisey and the National Guard in D.C.

State Adjutant General Jim Seward

In a Dec. 1 press conference with the governor, Major General Seward of the West Virginia National Guard, said members “are trained professionals; they are deputized U.S. marshals in the district. When they’re on patrol they’re armed, and they are trained.”

That press conference included a question from MetroNews about what precautions or self-defense National Guard members were prepared to use as they were deployed to the city where crime emergency conditions were described as the basis from the outset.

The response was in general terms.

Advertisement

“These are people that are trained, and they have knowledge of the situation they’re going into. These are the same people going to all corners of the globe. They’re trained in terms of difficult circumstances,” Morrisey said, concluding “We believe they have the background and training to go in to Washington, D.C., to carry out the mission.”

The West Virginia National Guard specified in an August statement that members were providing support in “areas of sustainment, logistics, administration, public affairs and Joint Staff augmentation.

“Security missions include static and roving presence patrols.” That meant standing or walking in high-traffic areas and at Metro public transit stations along with assistance to U.S. Park Police.

The Democratic caucus in the state Legislature has formally requested an oversight hearing during January interim meetings to examine the circumstances surrounding the deployment of West Virginia National Guard members to Washington, D.C.

The proposed hearing would require testimony from leaders of the West Virginia National Guard and representatives from the Office of the Governor. Democrats say it is a necessary step to ensure future deployments are made lawfully, purposefully and with appropriate safeguards.

Advertisement
John Williams

“Our Guard members serve with honor. We owe them answers,” said Delegate John Williams, D- Monongalia.

“This tragedy demands a clear and factual review so that lessons are learned and protections strengthened moving forward.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending