Connect with us

Washington, D.C

Washington D.C. Has a Key Opportunity to End Female Genital Mutilation, Protecting Thousands  – Equality Now

Published

on

Washington D.C. Has a Key Opportunity to End Female Genital Mutilation, Protecting Thousands  – Equality Now


By Anastasia Law, Program Officer for North America, Equality Now

Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) is a serious violation of the rights of women and girls, yet this issue has long been ignored in the United States capital, Washington D.C.(District of Columbia). Currently, there is no specific law against FGM in the D.C. But this could soon change when The Female Genital Mutilation Prohibition Act of 2023, passed by the Council of the District of Columbia, is signed into law in the coming days. The Bill seeks to prevent FGM within Washington D.C. by holding those who knowingly perform or consent to FGM on any individual accountable. 

FGM persists in Washington D.C. 

According to 2013 estimates by the Population Reference Bureau, 51,411 women and girls have undergone or are at risk of FGM in Washington D.C. This staggering figure, based solely on reported FGM prevalence data in diaspora communities, is over a decade old, further highlighting the urgent need for updated statistics and action. 

Although awareness of FGM often centers on immigrant communities, this narrative overlooks its occurrence in other groups, including in Christian communities within the U.S.

Advertisement

FGM has lifelong impacts on women and girls 

FGM is internationally recognized as a serious human rights violation, constituting torture and an extreme form of discrimination against women and girls, which involves the partial or total removal of, or other injury to, external female genitalia for non-medical reasons. It is important to note, however, that FGM should not be conflated with gender-affirming care. 

FGM can cause a range of immediate and long-term health problems, including hemorrhaging, chronic infections, infertility, childbirth complications, emotional trauma, and sexual dysfunction. In some instances, FGM can result in death and is linked to higher rates of maternal and infant mortality.

At least 513,000 women and girls are estimated to have undergone or be at risk of FGM in the US, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

Washington D.C. primed to protect its women and girls  

The Female Genital Mutilation Prohibition Act of 2023, known to legislators as B25-0247, was first introduced in 2023. This legislation seeks to: 

  • Prohibit “any procedure performed for non-medical purposes that involves partial or total removal of, or other injury to, the external female genitalia
  • Enact criminal penalties against those who perform FGM and who facilitate the act, including parents or guardians who consent to it
  • Penalize “vacation cutting,” the term for taking individuals out of Washington D.C. for the purpose of undergoing FGM
  • Provide survivors the right to pursue civil remedies
  • Explicitly exclude gender-affirming care from its scope

In addition to addressing the act of FGM itself, the bill emphasizes education and community outreach—essential components for the sustainable implementation and eradication of this harmful practice.

Limits to the federal law against FGM

Performing FGM in the US or taking a girl out of the country for the purpose of being cut is a federal crime. However, this alone is not enough to protect women and girls in every state. Legislation outlawing FGM at the state level is crucial because states have a significantly greater capacity than federal authorities to directly assist women and girls. 

Advertisement

State laws govern local police, healthcare, and social services, the criminal justice system, and schools. These laws enable local governments to raise awareness about FGM within local communities, provide direct support to survivors and those at risk, and investigate and prosecute cases with greater efficiency.

Recognizing these gaps, Equality Now, the US End FGM/C Network, and partners highlighted these concerns in a 2023 submission to the United Nations Human Rights Committee, The submission highlighted the US’s failure to protect women and girls within its borders from FGM and other human rights violations.

The Committee subsequently recommended the US government ensure effective implementation of its federal law- the Stop FGM Act of 2022 (also known as Strengthening the Opposition to Female Genital Mutilation Act of 2020) – and encouraged states to pass comprehensive legislation that prohibits all forms of FGM. This underscores the need for robust, state-level legal frameworks that can address the issue at its roots while supporting survivors on a local level.

Washington D.C. must join other states to protect the human rights of its residents

On December 15, 2024, B25-0247 – Female Genital Mutilation Prohibition Act of 2023, is expected to be enacted into law, representing a crucial opportunity to protect the human rights of women and girls in Washington D.C.  and setting a powerful example for other states, particularly neighboring Maryland and Virginia, where gaps in legislation remain. 

The Bill’s provisions on “vacation cutting”–traveling abroad to perform FGM/–offer a model for future laws and provide an opportunity for other states to use the bill’s language to strengthen existing FGM law. The bill’s application to adults as well as minors, its explicit distinction between gender-affirming care and FGM, and its emphasis on survivor-centered remedies reflect best practices in addressing this human rights violation.

Advertisement

Addressing the legal, social, and educational dimensions of FGM, will help to ensure that future generations are free from this harmful practice. It is imperative that the remaining 8 states and jurisdictions in the US without laws prohibiting FGM follow suit, affirming a collective commitment to the human rights of women and girls in the US. As this bill becomes law, we are hopeful that it inspires continued action and implementation to combat and eradicate FGM for all. 





Source link

Washington, D.C

Several options at play as DC leaders consider transit for new Commanders stadium

Published

on

Several options at play as DC leaders consider transit for new Commanders stadium


D.C. council members and transportation leaders met for hours on Wednesday to figure out the best way to get people in and out of the new Commanders stadium.

Planning starts:

Advertisement

We’re just about 14 months away from the start of construction, but the conversation about transportation is well underway. 

Leaders repeatedly made it clear that this transportation plan isn’t just for Commanders’ fans on eight or nine Sundays — it’s for the people who live in these neighborhoods surrounding the stadium 365 days a year.

“Even folks who were opposed to the stadium early on, they know its coming so they want it to be successful,” D.C. Councilmember and Chair of the Transportation Committee Charles Allen said. 

Advertisement

He says success means a smooth ride for fans and everyday residents. 

“It’s not having tens of thousands of people driving cars here. It’s thinking about transportation. Get people on Metro,” Allen said. 

Advertisement

“I can imagine there’s going be a lot of cars and people trying to park so being able to alleviate that is going to be a benefit to the community,” resident Olo Olakanmi told FOX 5. 

Big picture view:

The D.C. Council hearing saw representatives from the D.C. Department of Transportation, WMATA and the Commanders, as well as ANC commissioners in neighboring communities.

Advertisement

Allen emphasized that this is more than just a stadium — they’re also planning 6,000 to 8,000 new homes, 20,000 people living in a brand-new neighborhood.

As of now, there are two parking garages planned for the Commanders Stadium, expected to hold about 6,000 vehicles. But when it comes to transit, there are several possibilities at play.

Advertisement

Dig deeper:

Metro would need major upgrades to use the Stadium Armory stop — likely including adding an entrance, elevator and expanding the mezzanine.

A new Metro stop could end up costing hundreds of millions of dollars and take years to build.

Advertisement

WMATA is getting $2 million from the District for planning. General Manager Randy Clarke said that the goal is to have 40% of game day traffic come from public transit.

But that could also include bus rapid transit lines moving people from Union Station to the stadium along the H Street corridor.

Advertisement

“I have confidence we’re all going to work together and everyone has the same goal here — to make this the best possible urban sports facility and mixed-used development in the country,” Clarke said. 

The plan right now is to have shovels in the ground by March 2027 and construction complete by May 2030.

“We want to make this the most transit friendly stadium but also make sure all modes of transportation are optimized for folks to get there,” DDOT Director Sharon Kershbaum said. 

Advertisement

So, a lot of these transit decisions need to be made fairly quickly.

Washington CommandersWashington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityNewsWashington, D.C.TransportationTop Stories



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

Federal court says troops can stay in D.C., and hints at prolonged deployment

Published

on

Federal court says troops can stay in D.C., and hints at prolonged deployment


Members of the National Guard patrol along Constitution Ave. on December 01, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Heather Diehl/Getty Images North America


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Heather Diehl/Getty Images North America

National Guard troops can remain in Washington, D.C. while a panel of judges examines whether the deployment ordered by President Trump is legal, according to a Federal Appeals Court for Washington, D.C. ruling.

More than 2,000 troops have been deployed in the city since August, both from the District and at least 11 Republican-led states. Hundreds more were added after a targeted attack on National Guard troops killed one and wounded another last month, both of whom were from West Virginia.

Advertisement

The decision Wednesday upends a lower court order that troops be removed from the city.

President Trump’s deployment in Washington is the most robust long-running operation so far, in what has become a pattern of military deployments to help with policing in Democratic-led cities around the country.

Several other smaller deployments are tied up in legal battles — including Trump’s deployment to Chicago which is at the Supreme Court awaiting an emergency decision.

In today’s ruling the judges wrote that Washington, D.C.’s unique federal status allows President Trump to largely control the deployment of troops in the city. They also said the Trump administration is likely to win the overall case, which would see the deployment remain until at least the end of February 2026.

But the judges also raised serious doubts about the lawfulness of deployments of other cities. In particular, the deployment of out-of-state Guard to another state without the consent of that state’s governor — as the administration has tried to do in both Oregon and Illinois.

Advertisement

The opinion called such a move “constitutionally troubling to our federal system of government.”

Troops have left Los Angeles

Today’s decision comes days after a different federal appeals court ruled that troops had to leave Los Angeles on Monday.

The Ninth Circuit ruled late Friday night to uphold a ruling by a federal judge in California to end Trump’s deployment. Trump seized control of the California National Guard in June amid protests in the city and sent more than 4,000 troops there, against Gov. Gavin Newsom’s wishes.

That number had since dropped to around 100, but the administration had sought to extend the federalization of the state’s Guard several times, most recently until February, saying it was still necessary.

Advertisement

The decision from the Ninth Circuit effectively blocked the administration from using those remaining National Guard troops in Los Angeles — but it did not force control of the troops to return to the state, leaving them under federal control for now.

All troops have left their stations in the city, according to two sources familiar with the matter who are not authorized to talk publicly. A military official who was not authorized to discuss details of a deployment publicly told NPR that the troops have been moved to a military facility in the area and are conducting training exercises.

NPR’s Tom Bowman contributed to this report from Washington.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

DC leaders considering transit options for new RFK Stadium

Published

on

DC leaders considering transit options for new RFK Stadium


The Commanders are set to build a new stadium in D.C., and the debate over how fans will get to and from games is happening right now. On Wednesday, city leaders will join Metro and the Washington Commanders to talk stadium transit.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending