Washington, D.C
Seized, subverted, shuttered: a year in Trump’s assault on the Kennedy Center
The Brentano String Quartet had finished their performance when a special guest dropped in backstage: the US supreme court justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. “We thanked her for everything she had done for our country,” recalls violinist Mark Steinberg. “It was a nice moment.”
The year was 2016 and the place was the John F Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington. Fast forward a decade and old certainties have been shaken: Ginsburg is dead, Donald Trump is president and the Kennedy Center has become a case study in how a seemingly solid American institution can quickly unravel.
The Brentano String Quartet were due to perform there last week but cancelled their show, citing Trump’s hostile takeover of the complex. Steinberg explained: “I would have felt ashamed to walk out on stage there. I can’t quite bring myself to go into the building at this point.
“It would be such a luxury to make art in a vacuum and that’s what I yearn for but that’s not possible right now. Had we appeared there, in my eyes, that would be a way of condoning everything that’s happening and I couldn’t stomach that.”
As the US national capital Washington is first and foremost a politics town, forever in New York’s shadow as a hub of arts and culture. In a 1961 speech Kennedy observed: “Somebody once said that Washington was a city of northern charm and southern efficiency.”
But his predecessor, the Republican president Dwight Eisenhower, backed a bill from the Democratic-led Congress calling for a “national culture center”. It was later designated as a living memorial to Kennedy, a Democrat, after his assassination in 1963.
Construction began in 1965 and the centre formally opened in 1971 on the banks of the Potomac River with a premiere of Leonard Bernstein’s Mass. Over the decades it hosted a festival of Stephen Sondheim musicals, presented staged readings of all 10 plays in August Wilson’s American Century Cycle and staged Wagner’s Ring Cycle of operas. There was ballet, children’s theatre, comedy, contemporary dance, hip-hop, jazz, international festivals and educational programmes.
During Trump’s first term, he ignored the proudly non-partisan complex and did not attend the annual Kennedy Center Honors. But, as in so many other ways, his second term is very different. His takeover of the centre began, perhaps inevitably, with a Truth Social post one year ago, on 7 February 2025.
Trump wrote that he was immediately terminating “multiple individuals” from the center’s board of trustees “who do not share our vision for a Golden Age in Arts and Culture”. He said he would soon announce a new board, “with an amazing Chairman, DONALD J. TRUMP!”
He also criticised the centre’s past programming. “Just last year, the Kennedy Center featured Drag Shows specifically targeting our youth – THIS WILL STOP. The Kennedy Center is an American Jewel, and must reflect the brightest STARS on its stage from all across our Nation. For the Kennedy Center, THE BEST IS YET TO COME!”
The post sent shock waves through the Kennedy Center’s staff. One, who did not wish to be named, recalled: “There was a little bit of confusion at first because there was a Truth Social post about it and we as staff members weren’t sure what that meant. Then it became very clear within days what was going to happen.”
Trump claimed the centre’s finances were in a parlous state, a notion strongly rejected by its management. He fired the centre’s president, Deborah Rutter, and installed Ric Grenell, a former US ambassador to Germany with no prior experience in arts administration.
The ex-employee added: “Deborah, to her credit, once she was let go, gathered the entire staff and reminded us of how special the work that we did was and President Kennedy’s values, his ideals, and why that was important to our work.
“That stood in deep contrast to me with what happened after the takeover as in my entire time there post-takeover Grenell never once met with the entire staff. You could sense a depression within the building.”
In March the centre dissolved its social impact initiative, which had been created in 2020 to promote anti-racism and community outreach, affecting 10 staff. Speaking to the Guardian last year, Marc Bamuthi Joseph, who had been vice-president of social impact, said: “It wasn’t shocking but it was still seismic.
“We had probably known that this was going to come eventually and I would describe the atmosphere within the building for social impact in particular as morally untenable, so we were prepared. But even outside of that preparation, we thought that we would have an opportunity to create a transition plan.”
Joseph expressed sympathy for those left behind, under frequent attack from Trump for being too “woke”. He said: “It’s difficult to make the business of art happen when such a viable community of arts producers have been publicly chastised and vilified by the highest office in the world and so what’s left are people that are trying to do their jobs, how ever skilled, within that environment and that’s a hard thing to do.
“If the president of the United States declared war on soil, the folks at the Department of Agriculture would have a difficult time talking to farmers. In this case the president of the United States has said the soil is bad but I want you to grow something out of concrete.”
The 100ft-high complex – which features a concert hall, opera house and theatre, along with a lecture hall, meeting spaces and new extension – soon came to resemble a marble mausoleum. Artists ranging from the actor Issa Rae to the composer Philip Glass cancelled performances. When shows did go ahead, social media filled with photos of rows of empty seats as audiences voted with their feet.
Mark Rosenman, 82, a retired social activist academic, cancelled his subscription after three decades along with his membership. He explained: “It was clear what he was trying to do, which was to impose his taste and his vision and his unconstrained faith in his ability to know what was right in every case, including the smallest architectural detail. That can be described as nothing other than megalomania.”
Trump ploughed on regardless, inserting himself as the host of a Kennedy Center Honors ceremony that included the Rocky and Rambo actor Sylvester Stallone and Phantom of the Opera singer Michael Crawford, leading to a sharp drop in TV ratings. The new board suddenly announced that the building would be renamed the “Trump Kennedy Center” and, before Congress could object, Trump’s name had been added to the exterior wall.
Last month the 70-year-old Washington National Opera (WNO) announced it was leaving the centre, which had been its home since 1971, drawing luminaries such as Ginsburg and fellow justice Antonin Scalia. Next year it will perform at four different venues and mount a world premiere.
Timothy O’Leary, general director of the WNO, said via Zoom: “We were always, in recent history, producing in multiple different venues that all happened to be in the same building. Now we’re transforming ourselves into a company that produces in multiple different venues and we have a chance to be present for the whole Washington DC greater metropolitan area. That kind of resilience and ‘go on with the show mentality’ has defined us.”
On 29 January the Kennedy Center hosted the world premiere of Melania, a documentary about the first lady, with the Trumps in attendance. But three days later, Trump again used Truth Social to announce he is closing the facility for two years for a thorough renovation. “I have determined that the fastest way to bring The Trump Kennedy Center to the highest level of Success, Beauty, and Grandeur, is to cease Entertainment Operations for an approximately two year period of time,” he wrote.
The president later sought to offer reassurance that he would not be ripping the building down and estimated the construction work would cost “probably around $200m” but did not say where the funding would come from. Critics, however, suspected this was a fig leaf to avoid the embarrassment of diminishing shows and dwindling audiences.
In just a year, they said, Trump had sent one of America’s great cultural institutions into a death spiral.
That is a bitter pill for Bob McDonald, a singer and actor who first went to the Kennedy Center as a boy and has performed on nearly every stage there. He said: “I know every nook and cranny of that place. I don’t mean to sound overly dramatic but I consider the Kennedy Center to be a part of the family and it feels like I’ve lost somebody in my family.
“Having grown up here, it’s the one place where you could escape the politics. Why does this suddenly change when it’s worked for over 50 years? It’s one of the gems of Washington and I’m heartbroken at recent developments.”
It is also personal for Michael Kaiser, who preceded Rutter as president from 2001 to 2014. Ginsburg officiated at the nuptials of him and his husband at the Kennedy Center in 2013. But since Trump’s takeover, he has stayed away.
Kaiser said: “The Kennedy Center had always been a non-partisan institution. We didn’t talk politics. We didn’t evaluate performers based on their backgrounds or political beliefs and we were there to serve the nation and the region.
“It was upsetting to see different kinds of standards being applied, to see the place apply a philosophy, if you will, to fire board members, remove staff, and the result has been fairly predictable. Many people who cared about the Kennedy Center stopped caring and that’s not affordable for a not-for-profit cultural organisation.”
Trump’s decision to close the centre for two years could destroy support networks that took decades to assemble. Kaiser, a cultural consultant, added: “It’s very scary. I approach it as an arts manager and I know that cultural organisations in this country and abroad rely upon a family of people who care about them.
“They buy tickets, they give money, they generally support the organisation and I know that, when you close a venture for two years, much of that family wanders off and starts doing other things. Even if one day this all turns around, you don’t recreate that family of supporters overnight, particularly those who don’t live in the region.”
Similarly, there are fears that institutional knowledge and expertise will be lost. Charlotte Canning, a drama professor at the University of Texas at Austin, said: “Across the country, people in the biz respected the folks who worked there because that was how it should be done. So the question is, will they be able to restore that?
“That took decades to build. That wasn’t just overnight, the excellence of those people like who work backstage, who work in the offices, who work in the different scene shops, costume shops, prop shops, lighting shops. All those people are some of the best in the business. How do you rebuild that?”
Indeed, the Kennedy Center is now a symbol of how, after just a year in office, Trump has laid waste to institutions that seemed impregnable.
Canning reflected: “It’s always easy to destroy something. That can be done in seconds. It is very difficult to build something good that works, that serves, and the Kennedy Center is going to be a great case in point. It’s destroyed to serve vanity, maybe, but the vision, the expertise, the history – it feels to me like it’s gone.”
Washington, D.C
Sherry Abedi has been appointed as General Manager at LINE DC
Washington, D.C
‘We did not have the votes:’ DC Council does not take up expanded summer curfew
WASHINGTON (7News) — Tuesday was the last day the D.C. Council could vote to enact an expanded curfew in time for summer.
7News learned it never even made it on the agenda for a discussion and went to council members to find out why.
For the next two months, it’ll be up to the mayor to declare a curfew until the permanent version kicks in. There is already a city curfew. The curfew that has been up for debate for more than a year is the expanded version of the curfew. The expanded version allows the Metropolitan Police Department to create zones where teens 17 and under cannot gather in groups of nine or more.
RELATED | DC curfews pushed large groups into local neighborhoods, some residents say
Mayor Muriel Bowser currently has her own curfew order in place, which ends Saturday. The mayor can continue issuing an order. Councilmembers against the expanded curfew said that’s why it doesn’t need to come from the council.
In a video posted two weeks ago, D.C Council public safety chair Brooke Pinto said she wanted her councilmembers to vote to fill the gap today. 7News asked her why she never presented it to the council.
“Unfortunately, in working with my colleagues over the last several weeks, we did not have the votes,” said Pinto. “We have to have enough votes to pass the law and make sure that we didn’t have a gap.”
Bowser, in a letter to council Tuesday, said councilmembers Trayon White, Robert White, Zachary Parker, Brianne Nadeau and Janese Lewis-George are “blocking the will of the public and majority of council.”
7News spoke to three of the members she called out about the mayor’s pushback.
“I reject the rhetoric and the political games that are being played, and I’m wanting for us to get to the bottom of how do we stop the teen takeovers and the delinquent behavior we’ve been seeing,” Parker said.
“I stand by my belief that a curfew policy is a failed policy, kind of smoke and mirrors, and what we really needed is investments in our young people, so I’m pretty firm on that,” Nadeau said.
“We have to choose our tools and the time we use those tools. I’ve supported the curfew in the past, but I think with the current surge of more federal troops that have been impending, we’re putting our youth in even more danger by extending that work. I know the executive has put in an emergency executive order that will fill the gap. I hope that comes alongside extended hours, I’ve funded at DPR, extended weekends, and opening more safe spaces for youth here in the city. And that’s the solution that we do agree on,” Lewis-George said.
The mayor has not confirmed if she’ll issue another order, but it is on the table.
Washington, D.C
Memorial to honor journalists like Don Bolles, killed in pursuit of truth
Whispers, mysteries still hang in air 50 years after Bolles’ murder
Arizona Republic reporter Don Bolles died on June 13, 1976, 50 years ago. There are still mysteries surrounding his death from a car bombing.
A memorial designed to pay tribute to journalists who have died in pursuit of a story — including Arizona Republic reporter Don Bolles, who had a bomb explode under his car 50 years ago — will soon have a home on the National Mall in Washington, DC.
The Fallen Journalists Memorial, set to open in June 2028, won’t include individual names of journalists. A rule says that unless Congress makes an exception, a memorial wall can only include a group whose last member died more more than a quarter century prior.
And the number of journalists who die in pursuit of truth continues to grow every year.
The foundation creating the memorial has featured journalists on its website. Included in the first round of those showcased is Bolles.
Bolles was a reporter with The Arizona Republic who investigated the mafia, land fraud and political corruption. He was killed in June 1976 by a bomb planted under his Datsun at a midtown Phoenix hotel, an incident that shocked the nation and shook the journalism community.
Barbara Cochran, president of the Fallen Journalists Memorial Foundation, said the aim was to remind people of the work done by journalists like Bolles.
“They go as eyewitnesses. They document,” she said. “They dig deep and come up with information that people don’t have time to do on their own.”
Bolles’ legacy was not just forged by his death, Cochran said, but the work his death inspired.
Scores of reporters from around the country descended on Phoenix to continue investigating political corruption as Bolles had.
That collective action sent a message.
“Even if you kill the journalist, you won’t kill the story,” Cochran said. “Don Bolles was really the symbol of that.”
The memorial will honor journalists who, like Bolles, were targeted for their reporting, Cochran said. It would also honor those who died in pursuit of a story.
That’s the story of at least five more Arizona journalists.
In 1985, Republic reporter Charles Thornton was killed in Afghanistan, which at the time was invaded by the Soviet Union. Thornton was a health reporter and took the trip to cover a clinic set up by Americans looking to save the lives of people injured in the war by bombs and chemical weapons.
Thornton knew the risks of traveling to a war zone. But said he thought it was worth it to bring the story of the injuries suffered by the Afghan rebels to Republic readers.
In 2007, two news helicopters collided while covering a police chase in midtown Phoenix. The helicopters, one from Channel 3, KTVK-TV, and one from Channel 15, KNXV-TV, each carried a cameraman and a pilot. All four men died when the helicopters crashed onto Steele Indian School Park.
Bolles will be the only Arizona reporter among the first to be honored as part of the new National Mall memorial project.
The physical memorial in Washington will be made up of glass rectangles.
On one end of the plaza, they will be laid in an abstract design. The glass rectangles could serve as benches on the plaza.
As visitors walk to the other end, the glass rectangles begin stacking. Visitors will then enter a circle formed by more glass rectangles.
On the ground in the center of the circle will be the words of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Reporter writes ‘the book I wanted to read’ on slain journalist Don Bolles
Axios reporter Jeremy Duda discusses “Murder in the Fourth State,” a book on the murder of The Arizona Republic’s Don Bolles, who died after a car bombing in 1976.
Arizona effort to create a Don Bolles memorial stalls at state Capitol
The DC memorial was introduced in Congress in 2019. It passed both the House and Senate unanimously in 2020 and was signed into law in December 2020 by President Donald Trump.
In contrast, a push to create a memorial for Bolles on the grounds of the state Capitol was proposed at the Arizona Legislature each of the past few years. But every attempt has stalled.
The bill passed the Arizona House unanimously this year. It was bottled up in the state Senate, as has happened since it was first introduced in 2023.
The Bolles memorial bill was assigned to the Senate Government Committee, chaired by state Sen. Jake Hoffman, R-Queen Creek. He did not give the bill a hearing, just as he had declined to do in the previous two sessions.
Hoffman, who has done contract work for the conservative groups Turning Point USA and Turning Point Action, has had an antagonistic relationship with the mainstream press and The Republic.
Rep. Selina Bliss, R-Prescott, the sponsor of the measure, said she is not sure exactly why Hoffman hasn’t given the bill a hearing. She expected it would easily pass if it made it to the state Senate floor.
“I can’t get into the minds of others,” she said, “why they choose to hear or don’t hear a bill.”
Bliss said she recognized the passion that Bolles had for journalism.
“It’s like a line of duty death, if you will,” she said. “People are killed in action doing what they do.”
Bliss said she was a teenager in Prescott at the time of the Bolles bombing. She remembers the experience as searing.
“It shook everyone so dramatically,” she said.
Bliss said she might expand the bill next session to include all fallen Arizona journalists, in hopes of getting it out of the logjam in the Senate.
Tim Eigo, president of the Arizona chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists, has testified at the Arizona Legislature in support of the bill to allow a Bolles memorial.
Eigo said it was unfortunate that the bill was caught up in the swirl of current political feelings about journalism.
“I think people can get confused about whether dogged coverage is also advocacy. It’s not,” he said. “Some people get confused by that. So, they hesitate to honor a remarkable journalist like Don Bolles because there are other journalists they don’t like.”
Commemorating reporters who were targeted specifically because of their work like Bolles sends a signal, Eigo said.
“When we are honoring their accomplishments and commitment,” he said, “we are also defeating those who feel they can commit crimes against the press with impunity. … We are speaking truth to that cynical power.”
Shooting that killed journalists in Maryland inspired push for memorial
The idea for the DC memorial came after the June 2018 mass shooting at the Capital Gazette newsroom in Annapolis, Maryland. Five people were killed in the incident, four of them journalists.
The convicted gunman had filed a defamation suit against the newspaper after it reported on his legal troubles. He reportedly sent letters threatening to attack the newspaper’s journalists before he stormed the newsroom with a shotgun.
Retired U.S. Congressman David Dreier sat on the board of Tribune Publishing, the corporate owner of the sister newspapers, The Capital and the Maryland Gazette. Dreier, a Republican from California, worried that by 2019 the memory of the shooting was already fading.
He wanted a public memorial on the National Mall. The idea gained urgency, Cochran said, when the Newseum announced in 2019 that it was closing. That museum had an exhibition honoring slain journalists. Its centerpiece was the blown-out car from the 1976 Bolles bombing.
“There is nothing in Washington that talks about the sacrifices of journalists or that talks about the First Amendment, which is such a unique contribution to freedom and free expression for people everywhere,” Cochran said.
The location cited for it is a triangular plot of land about three blocks from the U.S. Capitol. The site, about a quarter-acre, was formed by the intersection of Independence Avenue and Maryland Avenue, which runs on a diagonal to the U.S. Capitol.
“The site has a clear view of the Capitol Dome,” Cochran said. “It’s a connection to journalism and a symbol of democracy. It reinforces the idea that journalism is a pilar of democracy.”
The memorial will not carry the names of any of the fallen journalists.
Cochran said a federal regulation governing memorials on the National Mall has a rule about those being honored in a group needing to have been deceased for more than 25 years.
“This is a memorial for which there would never be an end time,” she said.
Threats to press freedom are on the rise across the globe
The anniversary of Bolles’ death and the memorial underway come as journalists around the world face increased threats.
Reporters Without Borders, a global nonprofit advocating for independent journalism, has tracked press freedom around the world since 2002. The organization scores countries based on how free journalists are to report, evaluating the legal, political, economic and cultural constraints. It also looks at journalists’ safety working in the countries.
The organization’s 2026 World Press Freedom Index returned the lowest average score among all countries in 25 years.
The United States ranked as the 64th freest country in the world, dropping seven places from its ranking in 2025. The organization cited Trump’s continued attacks on journalists who cover him, as well as his administration’s pressure on networks and news outlets as part of the ranking.
Trump has made attacking the press and sowing distrust in traditional news media a hallmark of his agenda since his first run for higher office in 2015. He has threatened to ease libel laws to make it easier to sue news outlets.
Trump himself sued the CBS and ABC networks based on their journalists’ work. The networks settled despite legal experts saying the cases were weak.
U.S. presidents have long had an antogonistic relationship with the press.
George Washington, the first president of the United States, referred to journalists as “infamous scribblers.” Vice President Spiro Agnew called the press “nattering naybobs of negativism.” President Barack Obama used the Espionage Act to plug what he perceived were leaks from his administration to the press, according to the Cato Institute.
The Freedom of the Press Foundation, a nonprofit news advocacy group, has tracked more than 2,500 anti-press incidents in the United States since 2017, with nearly 1,400 assaults making up the majority. The tracker records non-physically violent threats, too, such as subpoenas and legal interventions, or chilling statements.
The Committee to Protect Journalists has recorded 17 journalists and reporters killed in the United States since 1992.
In Arizona, 28 anti-press incidents were recorded since 2017, including arresting reporters and denying them access to government events.
The Arizona incidents over the past decade include an interview subject who pushed and shoved an Arizona Republic reporter before stealing her cell phone during the interview, the detention by Phoenix police of a Wall Street Journal reporter who was talking to customers outside a bank, and the detention of an Arizona Republic photographer who was covering protests outside the state Capitol in 2024.
Taylor Seely is a First Amendment Reporting Fellow at The Arizona Republic / azcentral.com. Do you have a story about the government infringing on your First Amendment rights? Reach her at tseely@arizonarepublic.com or by phone at 480-476-6116.
Reach Richard Ruelas at richard.ruelas@arizonarepublic.com or at 602-444-8473.
-
Lifestyle26 minutes agoWe’re having a main character summer. Are you? : It’s Been a Minute
-
Technology34 minutes agoMicrosoft AI chief Mustafa Suleyman says there are three labs that matter — and he wants Microsoft to be the fourth.
-
World41 minutes agoUS ally Kuwait condemns ‘brutal and ongoing Iranian attacks’ after airport was hit
-
Politics44 minutes agoSpencer Pratt surges to runoff in LA mayor’s race after angry voters send message to Karen Bass
-
Health49 minutes agoOne extra serving of processed meat a day linked to higher cancer risk
-
Sports56 minutes agoAJ Brown trade outcome: Dianna Russini paid a heavy price while Mike Vrabel emerged unscathed
-
Technology59 minutes agoCould your Samsung phone replace your passport?
-
Business1 hour agoRent-hike ban to protect fire victims ends despite gouging concerns