Connect with us

Washington, D.C

Opinion | Secure D.C. is just a start. Here’s how to make D.C. safe and vibrant.

Published

on

Opinion | Secure D.C. is just a start. Here’s how to make D.C. safe and vibrant.


Regarding the April 4 package of letters “What would make D.C. feel safe? These 12 Washington-area residents have ideas.”

After the deadliest year in decades, the D.C. Council, the mayor and, most importantly, our communities have come together to take definitive legislative action to drive down crime and violence in Washington. We are already seeing a marked improvement in public safety, with violent crime now down 22 percent compared with this time last year.

But we’re not done listening, and we’re not done finding ways to fulfill government’s greatest responsibility: to provide for the safety and well-being of all our residents.

Both the public safety emergency legislation I introduced and shepherded to passage last summer and the Secure D.C. omnibus I introduced and passed into law this year were shaped by residents’ concerns.

Advertisement

I’ve met with thousands of D.C. residents, held hearings on more than a dozen pieces of legislation I introduced and moved forward, conducted public safety walks in all eight wards to hear neighborhood-specific needs and feedback, and discussed needs identified by community organizations. I’ve collaborated with the attorney general’s office, U.S. attorney’s office and our D.C. courts and met with local and federal leaders across the District and country to determine the efficacy of a wide range of potential initiatives.

I heard the same message in living rooms, at houses of worship, on sidewalks and inside community centers. Everyone demanded safety and action. Collectively, we all wanted to send a clear message that we cannot, and will not, tolerate the gun violence or crime trends that have been devastating our communities. And we knew we needed a dynamic and multifaceted response to address all the factors that make residents feel unsafe.

That’s why Secure D.C. includes initiatives to prevent crime and end cycles of violence by investing in our public spaces and creating job training programs to support citizens returning from incarceration; to ensure accountability for violent crime and gun violence by strengthening charges for carjacking and firearms use and allowing pretrial detention for violent crimes; and to facilitate reliable and effective government response to resident needs by increasing data-sharing, transparency and resources.

But the work is far from over. I hear both the residents’ calls for continued responsiveness to crime and those calling for long-term investments in our communities. And I want them to hear this: We can and must do both. And we will.

We can make sure our kids get to school safely and invest in literacy training for our teachers who support them in their classrooms. We can refuse to tolerate gun crimes and carjackings when they happen and stand up well-coordinated violence intervention, de-escalation and restorative justice programs to stop the next cycle of violence before it starts. And as we make our public spaces safe, we can provide access to programming and recreational spaces so that our communities can experience not just baseline security but enrichment and joy.

Advertisement

The District has a bright future. Our communities demand and depend on it. And are working hard to get there.

The writer, a Democrat representing Ward 2, is chairwoman of the D.C. Council’s Committee on the Judiciary and Public Safety.

In the wake of the enactment of Secure D.C., the dialogue on public safety must shift toward solutions that not only ensure accountability for offenders but also prioritize residents’ well-being and tackle the catalysts of crime. We can reduce incarceration and lower crime rates simultaneously.

The cost of punishment — particularly through incarceration — is exceedingly high. In comparison, preventive initiatives such as early-childhood education, mentorship, employment opportunities and mental health services typically require a fraction of the cost and yield significant long-term societal benefits beyond reducing crime.

We should fully fund initiatives such as the Metropolitan Police Department Cadet Corps, which hires District residents between the ages of 17 and 24 for uniformed civilian jobs while also helping them pay for college courses. Efforts such as the Cadet Corps and initiatives to prioritize responsive and proactive community policing are essential to enhancing public safety.

Advertisement

Expanding employment opportunities, particularly through programs such as First Source, can provide individuals with viable alternatives to criminal activity. And establishing resource hubs in Ward 7 in collaboration with agencies including the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency, Pretrial Services Agency and the Court Support Services Division can help prevent relapse into criminal behavior. Intervening at the right time in people’s lives is crucial for breaking the cycle of crime and for successfully reintegrating returning citizens into society.

Prevention efforts not only have the potential to disrupt the intergenerational cycle of repeat offenders but also offer a path toward positive youth development. There’s a shortage of uplifting and productive activities for D.C. youths, often leaving them vulnerable to the influences of crime. Drawing from my extensive experience as a youth advocate with the Ward 7 Education Council and State Board of Education, I have witnessed the remarkable potential of our young people when provided with the right guidance and opportunities. Early identification of risk, coupled with targeted interventions, is vital in averting criminal behavior. Preventing disengagement from education and providing beneficial alternatives can effectively decrease youth recidivism.

Despite the use of the recent uptick in crime to discredit criminal justice reform, D.C. is ready for a more effective approach. By prioritizing prevention, rehabilitation, investing in early intervention and providing support systems, we can break the cycle of crime and foster positive youth development.

Eboni-Rose Thompson, Washington

The writer represents Ward 7 on D.C.’s State Board of Education.

Advertisement

The Post’s April 4 front-page article “Bill from D.C. mayor targets youth violence and truancy” discussed Mayor Muriel E. Bowser’s plan “to address a crisis among young people in the District.” She is right to be concerned. Last year, 106 children and teenagers in D.C. were shot. Sixteen of them died. Carjackings in the city nearly doubled in 2023, and the average age of those arrested for carjacking was 15. Guns were used in the commission of half of these crimes. And 37 percent of all D.C. school students last year were truant.

The mayor’s plan to get tougher with violent juvenile criminals is commendable. But I want to also applaud her for wanting to hold parents accountable if their children do not go to school. Fine the parents or put them in jail if their children are habitually truant. It’s the law, but, as The Post reported, no such penalties have been imposed in D.C. “in recent years.”

Recently, we learned that three D.C. individuals had been arrested and charged with the horrific beating to death of an elderly man with disabilities. The suspects are three girls ages of 12 and 13. According to The Post, all three had long-standing truancy issues. One of the girls reportedly did not attend a single day of classes this year. During their court hearings, The Post reported, “the girls’ parents sat in the back of the courtroom.” It appears that these parents, and many others in D.C., have for too long taken a back seat when it comes to raising their children.

The writer is president of Citizens Behind the Badge.

Don’t make crime someone else’s problem

Advertisement

The Post’s March 18 editorial, “Crime is falling almost everywhere except D.C. Who’s responsible?,” argued that “crime in Washington isn’t just the mayor’s problem, or the council’s. All of those with power to improve the situation owe the city more.” I would like to add some people and organizations with the power to make a difference to The Post’s list.

1. Parents and guardians. Some children are out of control, and adult supervision at their homes is either too lax or absent. Parents and guardians must be strongly encouraged to seek professional help for their wayward kids if they need it.

2. Schools. Parental engagement needs to be strengthened. There are schools that have no viable parent-teacher associations or equivalent organizations. Schools and the communities they serve should partner to develop more co-curricular and extracurricular activities to help students expand their interests and find their passions.

3. Churches. There are nearly 800 places of worship in D.C. Many youths see the inside of these houses of worship only when there are funerals. The pastors need to be more involved in community activities and open the doors of their churches to community for more than worship services.

4. Advisory neighborhood commissions. The members of the commissions should be more involved in organizing constructive and safe activities for our youths. The ANCs should recruit high school students to serve as interns and receive community service hours toward graduation.

Advertisement

5. Civic associations. Some D.C. civic associations are older than home rule. These organizations can play critical roles in establishing a sense of community place, pride and tradition. Unlike ANCs, which are governmental entities with restrictions, civic associations can operate with more flexibility. Unfortunately, there are east-of-the-river neighborhoods that have no civic associations and associations that are struggling to stay afloat or are poorly led.

6. The community at large. The code of silence in our community is killing people. There are many people who have information that could close homicide cases but will not come forth even though they can do it anonymously.

I realize that, like The Post Editorial Board, I am engaging in finger pointing. I feel that at the community level, if we are to engage in finger pointing, we should form a circle. We must all challenge one another to do more. We particularly owe that to the children.

Philip Pannell, Washington

The writer is executive director of the Anacostia Coordinating Council.

Advertisement



Source link

Washington, D.C

The Hottest Spot for Sunday Church Is a MAGA Dive Bar in Washington DC

Published

on

The Hottest Spot for Sunday Church Is a MAGA Dive Bar in Washington DC


But Welch and Palka aren’t fire-and-brimstone populists. They are careful. Disciplined. They speak moderation while building something more durable: nurturing a generation of young conservatives who will carry their teachings into agencies, congressional offices, the judiciary, and a returning Republican administration.

So does King’s function as a soft-power pipeline for young conservatives in Washington? Its leaders bristle at the suggestion.

“We have nothing to do with getting people jobs…. We have never, ever, ever done that,” says Palka. “I do think it could be a by-product, though.”

“Part of the Christian faith is that we don’t compartmentalize it,” says Welch. “So we want people to see that it does influence [your career], just like how your faith influences your family, your relationships, your kids, so that’s just natural to how the church operates—it’s not like this is the goal.”

Advertisement

King’s has done 250 baptisms in eight years. Palka jokes more than once that I could be baptized at their next ceremony. When I ask how long it takes to join the church, he smiles: “It could take 15 minutes, it could take 15 years.”

He believes Gen Z is drawn not to megachurch gimmicks like slingshots and zip-lining pastors but to ancient ritual. King’s recites the Nicene Creed weekly, rare among evangelical churches. Members must affirm nine core beliefs: God as Father, Son, Holy Ghost; Jesus fully God and fully human; born of a virgin; lived without sin; died; rose again; and will return to judge the living and the dead. Scripture is final. The church must carry out Christ’s mission until he returns.

“They’re looking to retrieve some of those anchors that have been lost,” Palka says. “That is something the young people are flocking to—the high church liturgy.”

Space, not attendance, is King’s real problem. Expansion plans to cities like Paris and Berlin are on hold until they secure a permanent space in DC, and they need money. Their flock consists largely of interns and junior staffers, earnest but broke.

Palka knows that securing a physical home would give King’s another ring of relevance, one more proof point that the church can be an institution.

Advertisement

“We thought we’d have a building by now,” says Palka. “You can hit up a denomination for funding, but this capital campaign, it’s been very slow.”

Worshippers show up a half hour early to claim seats, and some longtime congregants have grumbled about the intern influx. One faction, calling itself “King’s Church Members Take a Stand,” lines the back wall to save room for newcomers.

They launched with a $50,000 loan from the Southern Baptist Convention’s North American Mission Board—small by megachurch standards but enough to launch a movement. “I would love if we had a building of our own one day,” Palka says. “All the statistics say it gives the Church credibility, it makes it more real in people’s eyes when you see that it’s their location.”

Robertson, the 26-year-old running the intern ministry, may be one of the church’s most influential figures. “It’s a really interesting city,” he says. “The fact that 25-year-olds kind of run the government.” He is, in effect, their shepherd.

Conservatism Inc.

For interns living on stipends, King’s offers free lunches, Nationals tickets, and speaker events featuring K Street veterans, senior aides, operatives, and even a Fox News producer. There are mixers too, where future staff assistants meet future legislative directors.

Advertisement

For the Republican Party, that makes King’s more than a church. It’s a long-term investment.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

US to push for quicker action in reducing reliance on China for rare earths

Published

on

US to push for quicker action in reducing reliance on China for rare earths


  • US Treasury’s Bessent said frustrated with lack of urgency
  • G7 plus India, South Korea, Australia and Mexico to attend
  • China dominates critical minerals production

WASHINGTON, Jan 11 (Reuters) – U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent will urge Group of Seven nations and others to step up their efforts to reduce reliance on critical minerals from China when he hosts a dozen top finance officials on Monday, a senior U.S. official said.

The meeting, which kicks off with a dinner on Sunday evening, will include finance ministers or cabinet ministers from the G7 advanced economies, the European Union, Australia, India, South Korea and Mexico, said the official who was not authorized to speak publicly.

Sign up here.

Together, the grouping accounts for 60% of global demand for critical minerals.

Advertisement

“Urgency is the theme of the day. It’s a very big undertaking. There’s a lot of different angles, a lot of different countries involved and we really just need to move faster,” the official said.

Bessent on Friday told Reuters that he had been pressing for a separate meeting on the issue since a G7 leaders summit in Canada in June, where he delivered a rare earths presentation to gathered heads of state from the U.S., Britain, Japan, Canada, Germany, France, Italy and the European Union.

Leaders agreed to an action plan at the summit to secure their supply chains and boost their economies, but Bessent has grown frustrated about the lack of urgency demonstrated by attendees, the official said.

Aside from Japan, which took action after China abruptly cut off its critical minerals supplies in 2010, G7 members remain heavily dependent on critical minerals from China, which has threatened to impose strict export controls.

China dominates the critical minerals supply chain, refining between 47% and 87% of copper, lithium, cobalt, graphite and rare earths, according to the International Energy Agency. These minerals are used in defense technologies, semiconductors, renewable energy components, batteries and refining processes.

The U.S. is expected to issue a statement after the meeting, but no specific joint action is likely, the official added.

Advertisement

US URGES OTHERS TO FOLLOW ITS LEAD

“The United States is in the posture of calling everyone together, showing leadership, sharing what we have in mind going forward,” said the official. “We’re ready to move with those who feel a similar level of urgency … and others can join as they come to the realization of how serious this is.”

The official gave no details on what further steps were planned by the Trump administration, which is pushing forward to boost domestic production and reduce reliance on China through agreements with Australia, Ukraine and other producers.

The U.S. signed an agreement with Australia in October aimed at countering China’s dominance in critical minerals that includes an $8.5 billion project pipeline. The deal leverages Australia’s proposed strategic reserve, which will supply metals like rare earths and lithium that are vulnerable to disruption.

The official said there had been progress, but more work was needed. “It’s not solved,” they added.

Canberra has said it has subsequently received interest from Europe, Japan, South Korea and Singapore.

Monday’s meeting comes days after reports that China had begun restricting exports to Japanese companies of rare earths and powerful magnets containing them, as well as banning exports of dual-use items to the Japanese military.

The meeting was planned well before that action, U.S. officials said. China was still living up to its commitments to purchase U.S. soybeans and ship critical minerals to U.S. firms.

Advertisement

Reporting by Andrea Shalal; Editing by Michael Perry

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

Supporters press for a DC memorial to Thomas Paine, whose writings helped fuel the Revolutionary War – WTOP News

Published

on

Supporters press for a DC memorial to Thomas Paine, whose writings helped fuel the Revolutionary War – WTOP News


NEW YORK (AP) — Some 250 years after “Common Sense” helped inspire the 13 colonies to declare independence, Thomas Paine…

NEW YORK (AP) — Some 250 years after “Common Sense” helped inspire the 13 colonies to declare independence, Thomas Paine might receive a long-anticipated tribute from his adopted country.

A Paine memorial in Washington, D.C., authorized by a 2022 law, awaits approval from the U.S. Department of Interior. It would be the first landmark in the nation’s capital to be dedicated to one of the American Revolution’s most stirring, popular and quotable advocates — who also was one of the most intensely debated men of his time.

“He was a critical and singular voice,” said U.S. Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., a sponsor of the bill that backed the memorial. He said Paine has long been “underrecognized and overlooked.”

Advertisement

Saturday marks the 250th anniversary of the publication of Paine’s “Common Sense,” among the first major milestones of a yearlong commemoration of the country’s founding and the signing of the Declaration of Independence in 1776.

Paine supporters have waited decades for a memorial in the District of Columbia, and success is still not ensured: Federal memorials are initiated by Congress but usually built through private donations. In 1992, President George H.W. Bush signed bipartisan legislation for such a memorial, but the project was delayed, failed to attract adequate funding and was essentially forgotten by the mid-2000s.

The fate of the current legislation depends not just on financial support, but on President Donald Trump’s interior secretary, Doug Burgum.

In September 2024, the memorial was recommended by the National Capital Memorial Advisory Commission for placement on the National Mall. Burgum needs to endorse the plan, which would be sent back to Congress for final enactment. If approved, the memorial would have a 2030 deadline for completion.

A spokesperson for the department declined comment when asked about the timing for a decision.

Advertisement

“We are staying optimistic because we feel that Thomas Paine is such an important figure in the founding of the United States of America,” said Margaret Downey, president of the Thomas Paine Memorial Association, which has a mission to establish a memorial in Washington.

A contentious legacy

Scholars note that well into the 20th century, federal honors for Paine would have been nearly impossible. While Paine first made his name through “Common Sense,” the latter part of his life was defined by another pamphlet, “The Age of Reason.”

Published in installments starting in 1794, it was a fierce attack against organized religion. Paine believed in God and a divinely created universe but accepted no single faith. He scorned what he described as the Bible’s “paltry stories” and said Christianity was “too absurd for belief, too impossible to convince, and too inconsistent for practice.”

By the time of his death, in New York in 1809, he was estranged from friends and many of the surviving founders; only a handful of mourners attended his funeral. He has since been championed by everyone from labor leaders and communists to Thomas Edison, but presidents before Franklin Roosevelt in the 1930s rarely quoted him. Theodore Roosevelt referred to him as a “filthy little atheist.”

There are Paine landmarks around the country, including a monument and museum in New Rochelle, New York, and statue in Morristown, New Jersey. But other communities have resisted. In 1955, Mayor Walter H. Reynolds of Providence, Rhode Island, rejected a proposed Paine statue, saying “he was and remains so controversial a character.”

Advertisement

Harvey J. Kaye, author of “Thomas Paine and the Promise of America,” cites the election of Ronald Reagan as president in 1980 as a surprising turning point. Reagan’s victory was widely seen as a triumph for the modern conservative movement, but Reagan alarmed some Republicans and pleased Paine admirers during his acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention when he quoted Paine’s famous call to action: “We have it in our power to begin the world over again.”

Reagan helped make Paine palatable to both parties, Kaye said. When Congress approved a memorial in 1992, supporters ranged from a liberal giant, Democratic Sen. Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts, to a right-wing hero, Republican Sen. Jesse Helms of North Carolina.

“Reagan opened the door,” Kaye said.

An immigrant who stoked the fire of revolution

Paine’s story is very much American. He was a self-educated immigrant from Britain who departed for the colonies with little money but with hopes for a better life.

He was born Thomas Pain in Thetford in 1737, some 90 miles outside of London (he added the “e” to his last name after arriving in America). Paine was on the move for much of his early life. He spent just a few years in school before leaving at age 13 to work as an apprentice for his father, a corset maker. He would change jobs often, from teaching at a private academy to working as a government excise officer to running a tobacco shop.

Advertisement

By the time he sailed to the New World in 1774, he was struggling with debt, had been married twice and had failed or made himself unwelcome in virtually every profession he entered. But Paine also had absorbed enough of London’s intellectual life to form radical ideas about government and religion and to meet Benjamin Franklin, who provided him a letter of introduction that helped him find work in Philadelphia as a contributor to The Pennsylvania Magazine.

The Revolutionary War began in April 1775 and pamphlets helped frame the arguments, much as social media posts do today. The Philadelphia-based statesman and physician Benjamin Rush was impressed enough with Paine to suggest that he put forth his own thoughts. Paine had wanted to call his pamphlet “Plain Truth,” but agreed to Rush’s idea: “Common Sense.”

Paine’s brief tract was credited to “an Englishman” and released on Jan. 10, 1776. Later expanded to 47 pages, it was a popular sensation. Historians differ over how many copies were sold, but “Common Sense” was widely shared, talked about and read aloud.

Paine’s urgent, accessible prose was credited for helping to shift public opinion from simply opposing British aggression to calling for a full break. His vision was radical, even compared to some of his fellow revolutionaries. In taking on the British and King George III, he did not just attack the actions of an individual king, but the very idea of hereditary rule and monarchy. He denounced both as “evil” and “exceedingly ridiculous.”

“Of more worth is one honest man to society and in the sight of God, than all the crowned ruffians that ever lived,” he stated.

Advertisement

A message that continues to resonate

Historian Eric Foner would write that Paine’s appeal lasted through “his impatience with the past, his critical stance toward existing institutions, his belief that men can shape their own destiny.” But “Common Sense” was despised by British loyalists and challenged by some American leaders.

John Adams would refer to Paine as a “star of disaster,” while Franklin worried about his “rude way of writing.” Meanwhile, George Washington valued “Common Sense” for its “sound doctrine” and ”unanswerable reasoning,” and Thomas Jefferson, soon to be the principal author of the Declaration of Independence, befriended Paine and later invited him to the White House when he was president.

Paine’s message continues to be invoked by those on both sides of the political divide.

In his 2025 year-end report on the federal judiciary, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts began by citing the anniversary of “Common Sense” and praising Paine for “shunning legalese” as he articulated that “government’s purpose is to serve the people.” Last year, passages from “Common Sense” appeared often during the nationwide “No Kings” rallies against Trump’s policies.

One demonstrator’s sign in Boston said, “No King! No Tyranny! It’s Common Sense.”

Advertisement

Copyright
© 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, written or redistributed.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending