Connect with us

Washington, D.C

House passes bipartisan bill to let D.C. redevelop RFK Stadium site

Published

on

House passes bipartisan bill to let D.C. redevelop RFK Stadium site


After a rare bipartisan push to help D.C., a bill that would allow the city to redevelop the eyesore that is the defunct RFK Stadium cleared the House Wednesday with overwhelming support.

The bill, the D.C. RFK Memorial Stadium Campus Revitalization Act, passed by a vote of 348-55. Should it pass the Senate, the legislation would allow D.C. to turn the federally owned riverfront plot into an attractive mixed use development that could include commercial and residential uses — and, possibly, a new stadium for the Washington Commanders, which D.C. Mayor Muriel E. Bowser (D) is pursuing.

The mayor has long seen the RFK legislation as the first step to launching more serious talks with Commanders owner Josh Harris to lure the team back to its former home, and Wednesday’s passage puts Bowser closer to that goal — although it remains far from guaranteed.

“Tonight’s vote was a significant step forward in our efforts to unlock the full potential of the RFK Campus — for our residents and visitors, the community, and DC’s Comeback,” Bowser said in a statement.

Advertisement

The legislation was championed by Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), chairman of the House Oversight Committee, which more typically has targeted D.C. on crime and policing issues. His leadership and partnership with Bowser and D.C. Del Eleanor Holmes Norton (D), the lead co-sponsor of the bill, became one of the most intriguing political developments last year and ultimately served as a powerful bipartisan combo that helped motor the bill over the House finish line.

Comer has said that he decided to introduce the legislation after conversations with Bowser about how redeveloping RFK could serve as a major economic boost for the city and could return the crumbling stadium into an asset for D.C., stadium or no.

On the floor Wednesday, Comer touted Congress’s intense oversight of the city — including its bipartisan swat-down of the city’s revised criminal code last year — and said this bill was an extension of that “constitutional duty.”

The bill “represents Congress doing its job to oversee the District by authorizing the best utilization of area land to help the city thrive,” Comer said. “We should want this for the nation’s capital city, a home to the taxpayers’ federal workforce and a city that hosts millions of American visitors and global tourists each year.”

The legislation would transfer administrative control of the 174-acre riverfront parcel from the federal government to D.C., for a term of 99 years with no rent costs, enabling a range of development possibilities from a football stadium to restaurants, shops and housing. The city would pay any costs associated with remediation or environmental assessments of the land, along with demolition of the vacant stadium and future development and maintenance of the site. Norton and Comer described the arrangement as a “win-win” for D.C. and the National Park Service, which would no longer bear the costs of maintaining the land. The bill would also set aside 30 percent of the land for park and open space and require maintaining access to the Anacostia River.

Advertisement

“We can’t allow the largest unused tract of land in DC to continue crumbling when it could be put to productive use,” Norton said on X, formerly Twitter.

Bowser and Council Chairman Phil Mendelson (D) sent a letter to House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) with a similar message Wednesday morning. They urged support for the bill so the District could pursue a new development that could “create thousands of new jobs” and become “an attractive destination, not only for the enjoyment of District residents, but also for the 21 million visitors who travel to the nation’s capital annually.”

Perhaps strategically, they made no mention of a possible football stadium — which Mendelson has not been warm to in any case, and which was also an issue for some members of Congress who oppose the idea of using public funds or public land for a stadium. The legislation bars the use of federal funds for a stadium — but not local funds.

As the RFK bill wound its way through the House, the regional competition to host the Commanders at a new stadium hung prominently in the backdrop. Harris has talked with Bowser, Maryland Gov. Wes Moore (D) and Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R) about the possibility of a new stadium in one of the three jurisdictions — and in D.C., any more serious discussions are entirely reliant on Congress passing the RFK legislation.

The bill passed Wednesday despite unified opposition from the Maryland delegation, as Moore vies to keep the Commanders at their current home — which will soon no longer be called FedEx Field.

Advertisement

“Like other members of the Maryland delegation, I believe Prince George’s County in Maryland should be able to compete on a level playing field to keep the Washington Commanders,” Ivey said. “But this bill gives an unfair advantage to D.C. It’s most certainly not a level playing field when one interested jurisdiction receives a free transfer of federal government subsidized land.”

Raskin’s vote was not recorded, but when asked by a reporter why he did not vote, Raskin ran back into the House chamber to try to remedy that. He said he intended to vote no.

Raskin, typically one of D.C.’s staunchest home rule allies, said he did not view this bill as a home rule issue since it concerned federal land — which he said made restrictions on the land appropriate, such as not aiding multi-million-dollar sports franchises with local or federal public money.

Asked if he would oppose public funds for upgrades to FedEx Field, Raskin said it would depend. He said if D.C. got the gift of federal land and also put up public funds to lure the Commanders, he argued Maryland would struggle to compete and it would become unfair.

“It creates a very different scenario. It’s creating the problem I want to avoid. The problem I want to avoid is the federal government participating in a huge bonanza for a private franchise,” Raskin said.

Advertisement

Moore told reporters Wednesday he remained in “very, very close contact with the team.”

“My insistence and our insistence that the Commanders stay in Prince George’s County, it is not waning at all,” he said.

FedEx ends naming-rights deal for Commanders’ stadium two years early

Virginians, meanwhile, have since been more focused on the potential of a new basketball and hockey arena for the Washington Wizards and Capitals after their billionaire owner Ted Leonsis announced a handshake deal with Youngkin to move the teams from D.C.’s Capital One Arena to a future home in Potomac Yard. That major loss for D.C. — and its downtown recovery — only raised the stakes for Bowser as she continues to pursue the Commanders.

Still, even with the bill’s House passage, a new football stadium at RFK — or any development there — remains a long way off.

Advertisement

First the bill will head to the Senate, where at the moment there is no obvious mantle-carrier to advocate for it. D.C. bills rarely get stand-alone consideration on the Senate floor, and the RFK bill would be subject to the filibuster, requiring the support of 60 senators to advance. Some noncontroversial bills can go up for a unanimous consent vote — though that would also be highly unlikely because of a certain pair of Marylanders who also want the Commanders to stay in their state.

Should the bill pass Congress, and get President Biden’s signature, D.C. would more formally enter the competition for the Commanders. The decision would be up to Harris. Moore has previously expressed openness to using public funds to upgrade their current stadium, and the state has already invested $400 million in the Blue Line corridor revitalization project in the surrounding area. Bowser and Mendelson had put up a $500 million offer to Leonsis to upgrade Capital One Arena to try to keep the teams, leading some observers to wonder if that could end up as a floor in possible Commanders talks.

Further still, Bowser would need support from the D.C. Council, which, while united on using public funds to keep the Capitals and Wizards, is divided on using public money to build a new football stadium. And surrounding neighbors have already shown skepticism to the plan, too.

Many have advocated to use the parcel for more affordable housing, something Bowser said should be included in any development there. She has said she envisions a vibrant mixed-use space with dining, park space and recreational opportunities — not a “a lot of asphalt parking and only one use.”

A few longtime members of Congress who spoke in support of the bill expressed nostalgia for the days RFK used to be a “cornerstone of our nation’s capital’s sporting legacy,” as Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) put it.

Advertisement

“Just two miles from Capitol Hill, the RFK Stadium was a prime sports and entertainment venue for almost 50 years,” said Rep. James E. Clyburn (D-S.C.). “Today the stadium and the land that surrounds it sit vacant on the shore of the Anacostia River.”

The legislation, they urged, could finally change that.

Erin Cox contributed to this report.



Source link

Advertisement

Washington, D.C

Army Corps: Reservoir expansion ‘doesn’t fix, but improves’ DC’s drinking water supply for future Potomac River emergency – WTOP News

Published

on

Army Corps: Reservoir expansion ‘doesn’t fix, but improves’ DC’s drinking water supply for future Potomac River emergency – WTOP News


Developing a regional solution to enable all local water companies to share drinking water in the event of a future Potomac River emergency remains a long-term challenge facing the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Developing a regional solution to enable all local water companies to share drinking water in the event of a future Potomac River emergency remains a long-term challenge facing the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. But the Corps is leaning-in to near term solutions, for now, because current issues “are quite, quite dire.”

In an interview with WTOP, Trevor Cyran, Chief of the Civil Works project management office of the Baltimore District Corps of Engineers, elaborated on the Corps’ ongoing three-year feasibility study funded by Congress and the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.

Last week, during a House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee hearing, lawmakers pressed the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to explain what’s being done to secure solid backup options for the D.C. region’s drinking water.

Advertisement

D.C. Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton challenged the Corps after learning that the study that Congress authorized to identify a secondary water source for the region was being narrowed to only expanding the current Dalecarlia Reservoir, adjacent to the Washington Aqueduct, which remains the only source of drinking water for D.C., Arlington, and parts of Fairfax County, Virginia.

“Expansion of the reservoir is not a secondary water source,” Norton said. “With only a one day of backup water supply, human-made or natural events that make the river unusable would put residents, the District government and the regional economy at risk.”

Cyran said the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers doesn’t disagree.

“We’re trying to find a quick win that addresses some of the near-term issues, because they are quite, quite dire,” Cyran said. “The Dalecarlia expansion would add approximately 12 hours of water storage into the system,” he said. “So, while we know that doesn’t fix the problem, it improves the situation.”

Recently, drinking water in D.C., Northern Virginia and Maryland has remained safe because the January collapse of a portion of the aging Potomac Interceptor regional sewer line happened downstream of the main Potomac River water intake serving the Washington Aqueduct.

Advertisement

“We’ve moved forward with the Dalecarlia expansion, as our most probable recommendation,” said Cyran. “The Corps is laser focused on delivering something right here, right now that can actually help with the issue, while still exploring some of those long term solutions.”

Cyran said the dangers to public health and the economy are substantial, with the Potomac as the sole drinking water source. “It’s not a great situation — we’ve seen a very real risk come to fruition recently, with the spill.”

While drinking water has been unaffected by the spill, the advisory for the public to avoid contact with the Potomac River remains in effect in the District and Montgomery County, where the Potomac Interceptor spill happened, along the Clara Barton Parkway.

The advisory is expected to be lifted Monday, by the D.C. Department of Health, as E. coli levels have recently returned to the typical range for D.C.’s rivers.  The District’s Department of Energy and Environment is now doing daily testing of the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers.

How would increased storage at Dalecarlia Reservoir look?

According to the Army Corps, expanding the Reservoir over 54 available acres would provide approximately 70 million gallons per day, doubling the capacity at Dalecarlia. Since the land is already owned by the Washington Aqueduct, it would not require acquiring any land.

Advertisement

Cyran said it’s not yet certain whether the expansion would provide an extra 12 hours of storage of raw water from the Potomac, or finished water, after it had gone through the Washington Aqueduct’s water purification process.

Regardless, either option would result in the Aqueduct having more water on hand, if drawing water from the Potomac was suddenly unsafe.

Another near-term option that wouldn’t require land acquisition would be advanced treatment, Cyran said.

“We could implement something that allows us to treat for a wider array of contaminants, if you had a spill,” said Cyran, although noting the recent spill from the Potomac Interceptor, which poured approximately 240 millions of raw sewage into the Potomac, “might not be a good example” of how the technology would work.

The Army Corps list of possible solutions includes reusing water. In November 2025, DC Water outlined its own plans to recycle water from the utility’s Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant, the largest of its kind in the world.

Advertisement

Quarry storage cannot happen quickly

During its ongoing study, the Army Corps has identified possible long term regional solutions, including the potential use of the Travilah Quarry in Montgomery County, Maryland, and two quarries in Loudoun County, Virginia, owned by Luck Stone.

10 years ago, in December 2016, WTOP first reported that the Travilah Quarry, located on Piney Meetinghouse Road in Rockville, was quietly being considered by DC Water, WSSC Water, and Fairfax Water, as an alternative source of water, if the Potomac River were unavailable.

“The three utilities, and the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin, along with the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments have been working over the last several years to look at alternatives to get better interdependencies, to have more resilience in our system,” said Tom Jacobus in 2016, while he was general manager of the Aqueduct.

Now, a decade later, the logistical, real estate, and financial challenges of obtaining a quarry which could be interconnected between DC Water, WSSC Water, and Fairfax Water remain.

“We’re not saying they can never happen, we’re just saying they cannot, in any way, shape, or form, happen quickly,” said Cyran. “Travilah is still an active quarry, so that can’t even be considered for storage until they’re done mining, which might be 30 years from now.”

Advertisement

The Dalecarlia Reservoir expansion would not be regional solution, Cyran said.

“That would only benefit folks who are tied directly to the Aqueduct at this time,” he said. “However, while we’re going to be looking at other alternatives that we could potentially spin off and continue to look at, that would address some of those more regional issues.”

‘We can’t hand half-baked ideas to Congress’

While an interconnected, resilient system, that could provide additional water sources and storage to DC Water, WSSC Water, and Fairfax Water would be optimal, Cyran said the Corps is limited by a Congressional paradigm that limits its feasibility study to four years and five million dollars.

“We can’t hand half-baked ideas to Congress,” Cyran said.

With the Corps’ current focus of implementing near-term improvements, quickly, the agency will continue to use its expertise to envision a more resilient, long term solution.

Advertisement

“We are committed to looking at this issue and try to explore some regional solutions, within the paradigms of the legislation that we have to operate within,” said Cyran. “If Congress wants to consider something else to expand our authority, we could maybe look at a bigger solution, with more time and money.”

Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

© 2026 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

New AAPI-led Jaemi Theatre Company launches in DC

Published

on

New AAPI-led Jaemi Theatre Company launches in DC


Jaemi Theatre Company, a new AAPI-led theater company based in Washington, DC, officially launches this spring with its inaugural project, BAAL, a staged reading at the 2026 Atlas INTERSECTIONS Festival on Friday, March 6, at 7:30 PM at the Atlas Performing Arts Center.

Jaemi Theatre Company co-founder and playwright Youri Kim

Founded by Artistic Director Youri Kim and Artistic Associate Juyoung Koh, Jaemi Theatre was born out of a recognition that DC, one of the largest theater markets in the United States, had no company dedicated to centering Asian stories or led by Asian artists. The name “Jaemi” comes from a Korean word meaning “fun,” and in its Sino-Korean form, 在美, means both “to live in America” and “to live in beauty.”

“I kept hearing from companies that it was hard to find Asian actors, and I heard it so often that I started to believe it myself,” said Youri Kim. “But through building community with other AAPI theater artists in the area, I realized the talent was always here. What was missing was the infrastructure to connect us. Jaemi is that infrastructure.”

BAAL, an original work written by Youri Kim (not to be confused with Bertolt Brecht’s 1918 play of the same name), is a body horror drama set in a dystopian city where the air is toxic and birth is outlawed. In the city of Baal, citizens are forced into an impossible choice: terminate or sacrifice a family member. The play uses the language of biological mutation and bodily control to examine how systems of power decide who gets to exist and on what terms, questions that resonate deeply within AAPI and immigrant communities navigating structures that seek to define, contain, and assimilate them. The staged reading features a cast of seven and an original sound design.

BAAL plays as a staged reading Friday, March 6, 2026, at 7:30 PM in Lab Theatre II at the Atlas Performing Arts Center (1333 H St NE, Washington, DC). Tickets ($29.75) are available online.

Advertisement

Looking ahead, Jaemi Theatre plans to host a founding party and fundraiser this fall, and will launch an Asian Writer Play Submission program in the second half of 2026. The program will pair playwrights from selected Asian countries with Asian playwrights based in DC for a workshop development process, building a pipeline that connects diasporic voices across borders.

For more information, visit yourikimdirector.com or follow @jaemitheatre on Instagram.

About Jaemi Theatre Company
Jaemi Theatre is a newly formed AAPI-led performance initiative based in Washington, DC, co-founded by Artistic Director Youri Kim and Artistic Associate Juyoung Koh. “Jaemi” is Korean for “fun” and, in its Sino-Korean form, means “to live in America” and “to live in beauty.” The company creates interdisciplinary performance rooted in diasporic imagination and radical storytelling. Jaemi is a home for the unfinished and the unassimilated, where performance holds contradiction without needing to resolve it.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

San Francisco Ballet cancels upcoming performances at Kennedy Center

Published

on

San Francisco Ballet cancels upcoming performances at Kennedy Center


Sunday, March 1, 2026 6:36AM

SF Ballet cancels upcoming performances at Kennedy Center

SAN FRANCISCO (KGO) — The San Francisco Ballet board has voted to cancel its upcoming performances at the Kennedy Center.

The company is scheduled for a four-day run in Washington D.C. in May.

Petition urges SF Ballet to cancel Kennedy Center tour stop as company opens 2026 season

Last year, Pres. Donald Trump overhauled the Kennedy Center’s board, including naming himself the chairman.

Advertisement

That led several artists to cancel scheduled performances.

A statement from SF Ballet says the group “looks forward to performing for Washington, D.C. audiences in the future.”

Now Streaming 24/7 Click Here


Copyright © 2026 KGO-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending