Connect with us

Washington, D.C

Delays in Washington D.C. sports betting expansion: BetMGM, Caesars, and FanDuel in limbo

Published

on

Delays in Washington D.C. sports betting expansion: BetMGM, Caesars, and FanDuel in limbo


The anticipated launch of BetMGM and Caesars Sportsbook in Washington D.C. has hit a significant snag due to unresolved budget approval issues. The situation remains unchanged as of early Wednesday morning, July 17, 2024, with both platforms restricted to their respective brick-and-mortar locations and FanDuel halting its citywide online operations.

Budget Approval Issues Stall Sports Betting Expansion

FanDuel, currently the only online platform offering citywide sports gambling in D.C., stopped accepting bets on Tuesday. The halt came because Mayor Muriel E. Bowser had not signed the city’s budget for the 2025 fiscal year, which includes provisions for the continuation and expansion of sports betting. “FanDuel will resume sports betting operations in the city upon final approval of the FY2025 DC Budget,” the company stated to The Washington Post.

Mayor Bowser’s office clarified that she had returned the budget to the D.C. Council without her signature or a veto, effectively allowing the sports gambling provisions to take effect immediately. Despite this, FanDuel had not resumed its online operations by Tuesday evening, leaving bettors and industry stakeholders in a state of uncertainty.

Impact on BetMGM and Caesars Sportsbook

The budget delay has also affected BetMGM and Caesars Sportsbook, which were set to launch district-wide on July 15. BetMGM’s app continues to restrict bets to within a two-block radius of Nationals Park, where the company has a physical sportsbook. A planned promotional event for BetMGM’s expanded D.C. offerings was canceled, and the company stated that the initiative is “in a pause.” Similarly, Caesars Sportsbook, which operates a brick-and-mortar location at Capital One Arena, remains limited to that area.

Advertisement

Legislative and Market Dynamics

The confusion stems from the complex legislative and contractual dynamics involving the D.C. sports betting market. GambetDC, the city’s initial attempt at a mobile sports betting app, was a dismal failure, bringing in only $4.3 million over four years—well short of the projected $84 million. In April, FanDuel replaced GambetDC, generating $1.9 million in its first 30 days alone (Yogonet).

The new budget, which allows up to seven licenses for sports betting, was supposed to create a more competitive market. However, in a letter to Council Chair Phil Mendelson, FanDuel President Christian Genetski expressed concerns about the market opening to other companies, hinting that FanDuel might terminate its contract with Intralot and operate independently under the new framework.

Statements and Reactions

Kenyan R. McDuffie, a D.C. Council member, criticized the Office of Lottery and Gaming for prematurely releasing Intralot from its sports betting responsibilities, adding to the confusion. “Once again, the Office of Lottery and Gaming has created unnecessary confusion by prematurely releasing the contractor from their responsibilities. The Mayor is reviewing the budget, and we expect this to be resolved soon,” McDuffie said in a statement to The Washington Post.

Current Status and Next Steps

As of early Wednesday morning, July 17, 2024, the situation remains unchanged. FanDuel’s brick-and-mortar sportsbook at Audi Field continues to accept wagers, but its online operations are paused. BetMGM and Caesars Sportsbook have not provided timelines for when their citywide mobile betting services will commence.

The D.C. sports betting community eagerly awaits the resolution of these issues, hoping for a swift implementation of the expanded sports betting services promised by the new budget.

Advertisement

Stay tuned for further updates as this situation develops.



Source link

Washington, D.C

DDOT rolls out new fees for DC streateries

Published

on

DDOT rolls out new fees for DC streateries


The D.C. Department of Transportation is rolling out a new set of regulations and new costs for restaurants that want to hold on to their outdoor space.

Streateries were once a critical lifeline, helping restaurants stay afloat during the pandemic. Five years later, many remain fixtures in their neighborhoods and still generate much-needed revenue.

“They’re going to charge us extra for that, and we can’t afford it,” said Raja Shaukat, who owns La Grotta in Adams Morgan.

Shaukat says restaurants are already struggling to make ends meet. When News4 visited, his dining room was empty, and he says business has been slow.

Advertisement

Under the updated streatery rules, restaurants would face a new $260 permit fee plus $20 per square foot, and they’d be responsible for buying their own jersey barriers.

“We absolutely said no to them because there’s no point in having a streatery out,” Shaukat said. “[…] Plus, with the economy and what we are going through right now in D.C., we can’t afford it.”

DDOT says the changes are meant to make outdoor dining more uniform, while improving safety, accessibility and overall aesthetics. But some News4 spoke with say they’re disappointed by the stricter rules.

“I think it’s a real shame,” said Gwendolyn Reece, an Adams Morgan resident. “This has been such a boon to the neighborhood and to D.C generally. It’s about the only good thing to have actually come out of the pandemic.”

“It’s really added to the public ambiance of spaces where people can come and sit even if they’re patrons of businesses or not,” said Adams Morgan ANC Commissioner Peter Wood. “It’s changed the dynamics of who’s using the public space and for what reasons.”

Advertisement

But others say they won’t miss them. Nadi Saleh, who owns Queen’s Cafe Hookah, says the outdoor seating was fine in the summer months, but overall, the streateries haven’t helped his business.

“Having parking places for the people, it’s going to help our business a lot,” Saleh said. “I’ve been 21 years in business. Since they started to do this, business is going down a little bit.”

Even though temporary streatery permits expired on Sunday in the District, DDOT says it won’t begin enforcing rules on non-compliant streatery structures until early 2026.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

DC police issue 2 juvenile curfew zones to deter large gatherings of kids and teens – WTOP News

Published

on

DC police issue 2 juvenile curfew zones to deter large gatherings of kids and teens – WTOP News


Both juvenile curfew zones in D.C. will be in effect from 8 p.m. to 11 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday.

D.C. police are adding more dates for two juvenile curfew zones in Navy Yard and U Street that will be in effect to deter large gatherings of kids and teens.

The Navy Yard restrictions cover Interstate 695 to the Anacostia River and from 8th Street, SE, to South Capitol Street.

(Courtesy D.C. police)

The U Street perimeter covers V Street to Vermont Avenue, NW, and from 9th Street at Florida Avenue to 15th and T Streets.

Advertisement
(Courtesy D.C. police)

These two zones were in effect on Nov. 15 and 16 as well.

Both juvenile curfew zones will be in effect from 8 p.m. to 11 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday.

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser recently signed emergency legislation to reinstate the summer juvenile curfew at 11 p.m. for youth under 18 years old.

Under the order, those under 18 are “prohibited from gathering in a group of nine or more in any public place or on the premises of any establishment” unless they are taking part in certain exempted activities, police said.

The youth curfew comes after a hectic Halloween night that brought hundreds of teens to Navy Yard.

Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

Advertisement

© 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

Family of man killed by DC police questions officer’s tactics

Published

on

Family of man killed by DC police questions officer’s tactics


The family of a 25-year-old man who was shot and killed by a D.C. police officer last week is questioning the officer’s tactics and training after viewing the body camera video.

David Warren Childs, of Northeast D.C., was shot the night of Nov. 17 after police say he refused to obey the officer’s commands and appeared to reach for a firearm in his waistband. It happened near the Deanwood Metro station.

The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) says officers spotted Childs with a gun in his waistband and gave chase.

The body-worn camera video released by police this week doesn’t show the initial interaction. It begins in the middle of a foot pursuit that ended outside an apartment building on 47th Place NE.

Advertisement

It’s very hard to tell from the video, but the officer — who had Childs at gunpoint standing between a fence and the building — was without backup and alone for one minute and 23 seconds before the officer opened fire.

The video shows the moment the officer cornered Childs and said, “I’m gonna shoot you.”

“Why wasn’t the matter de-escalated?” Childs’ cousin Da’jon Mason asked. “If it’s the law enforcement’s job to de-escalate matters, why wasn’t the situation de-escalated? If you had 10 to 15 officers out here, why was there no other officer present to assist in the matter to de-escalate the situation? Why did you continue to escalate the situation, threatening to continuously shoot someone when they are telling you, ‘Don’t shoot me’?”

As soon as Childs was cornered near the fence line, the officer apparently got on the radio and said, “One at gunpoint” and “behind the building.”

“The officer used great restraint, gave multiple commands, multiple commands asking the subject to please, to raise his hands and not to reach for the firearm, and for some reason the subject did not obey those commands and reached for his firearm,” Executive Assistant Police Chief Andre Wright said.

Advertisement

It’s difficult to see on the video, but police say Childs moved his left hand toward his waistband and that’s when the officer opened fire.

After the shooting, other officers arrived and began to render first aid to Childs.

Police say this is the weapon Childs had in his waistband.

“The point where he was saying, ‘You know what, OK, if this is how it’s going to go, then do it,’ when we are the same amount of distance that we are now in this conversation, you could have taken him down,” Mason said. “You didn’t have to keep the gun pointed at him. You could have holstered your weapon and proceeded to take him down. You could have tased him. You could have used OC [pepper] spray.”

D.C. police declined to comment on the family’s concerns and referred News4 to the statement the police department made when the body camera video was released.

Advertisement

MPD said in a Nov. 18 news release in part: “The involved members have been placed on administrative leave, pursuant to MPD policy.”

The Internal Affairs Bureau’s Force Investigations Team is investigating the shooting, according to MPD.

“The United States Attorney’s Office will independently review the facts and evidence in the case,” MPD said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending