Connect with us

Washington, D.C

DC, federal employees and Trump's Department of Government Efficiency: What we know so far

Published

on

DC, federal employees and Trump's Department of Government Efficiency: What we know so far


President-elect Donald Trump’s promise to restructure federal agencies and cut bureaucracy could have a major impact on the D.C. area, where the government is the largest employer.

Tech billionaire Elon Musk and conservative activist Vivek Ramaswamy will lead a new Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE for short, Trump announced Tuesday night. Despite its name, the group will function outside of government and not be a government agency.

“These two wonderful Americans will pave the way for my Administration to dismantle Government Bureaucracy, slash excess regulations, cut wasteful expenditures, and restructure Federal Agencies,” Trump said in a statement.

News4 is working to learn more about how DOGE could affect federal employees and the DMV. Here’s what we know so far.

Advertisement

What is the Department of Government Efficiency and how will it work?

Trump said in his statement that Musk and Ramaswamy will offer the White House “advice and guidance” and will partner with the Office of Management and Budget to “drive large scale structural reform and create an entrepreneurial approach to Government never seen before.” He added the move would shock government systems.

It’s not clear exactly how the organization will operate. It could come under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, which dictates how external groups that advise the government must operate and be accountable to the public.
Federal employees are generally required to disclose their assets and entanglements to ward off any potential conflicts of interest, and to divest significant holdings relating to their work.

The arrangement would likely allow Musk and Ramaswamy to continue working in the private sector and serve without Senate approval.

Trump didn’t immediately provide details about how the two men would work together or who might pay for the operations of the group.

Trump had made clear Musk would likely not hold any kind of full-time position, given his other commitments.

Advertisement

“I don’t think I can get him full-time because he’s a little bit busy sending rockets up and all the things he does,” Trump said at a rally in Michigan in September. “He said the waste in this country is crazy. And we’re going to get Elon Musk to be our cost cutter.”

Here are five things to know about Elon Musk.

How many federal employees are there in the D.C. area and what could job cuts mean for the DMV’s Black middle class in particular?

Of more than 2 million full-time federal workers across the U.S., more than 300,000 are concentrated in the D.C. metro region.

For generations of Black residents of the DMV, federal jobs have been a powerful driver of wealth and stability. Federal job cuts could be particularly devastating to Black communities in our region, as the News4 I-Team reported.

More than 18% of federal workers are Black, according to the most recent statistics from the Office of Personnel Management. That’s higher than the proportion of Black Americans that make up the country’s population, at just over 12%.

Advertisement

Unionized federal employee Aleseia Saunders, a mother of three who works for the Department of Education, told News4 her family constantly worries about changes to the federal workforce.

“What’s going to happen to my household? What’s going to happen to my paycheck? What’s going to happen to my career?” Saunders asked.

Black Americans have been drawn to federal jobs in part because of benefits that have often eluded Black employees in private workplaces, Howard University political science professor Marcus Board previously told News4.

“They have worker protections, federal worker protections, that are guaranteed by the federal government, and so it’s one of the few places where they can be sure that they’re going to be supported, protected and taken care of,” he said.

What do we know about the goals of the Department of Government Efficiency?

The president-elect has often said he would give Musk a formal role overseeing a group akin to a blue-ribbon commission that would recommend ways to slash spending and make the federal government more efficient.

Advertisement

Musk has said he wants to cut $2 trillion from the federal budget, which is more than the discretionary budget of $1.7 trillion. He has provided few details about what he’d like to cut, though he has attacked relatively small recipients of federal money, such as the Education Department and NPR.

“This will send shockwaves through the system, and anyone involved in Government waste, which is a lot of people!” Musk said in the statement released by Trump’s transition team.

On X, he added: “Threat to democracy? Nope, threat to BUREAUCRACY!!!”

Ramaswamy has called for mass layoffs at federal agencies, a tactic that could sidestep legal protections that otherwise insulate the federal civil service from targeted political cuts.

Ramaswamy campaigned for president in the Republican primaries on eliminating federal agencies, and his initial targets included the FBI; the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; the Education Department; the Nuclear Regulatory Commission; and the Food and Nutrition Service within the Agriculture Department.

Trump said he wanted the department to help deliver “drastic change.” He compared its ambitions to those of the World War II project to develop atomic weapons.

“It will become, potentially, ‘The Manhattan Project’ of our time,” Trump said. “Republican politicians have dreamed about the objectives of ‘DOGE’ for a very long time.”

He gave a deadline of July 4, 2026, for the department to conclude its work.

Advertisement

What does the acronym DOGE reference?

“DOGE” is a nod to a meme and the dogecoin cryptocurrency associated with Musk.

How will the Government Accountability Office interact with the Department of Government Efficiency?

The Government Accountability Office (GAO), the main federal government watchdog, indicated it would provide any necessary information to the new entity.

“GAO has cooperated and shared information in the past when presidential or congressional commissions have been established to address the federal government’s programs and operations, as well as fiscal and other challenges. We will take that same approach with any new commissions formed and stand by ready to assist the new Congress and the Executive branch,” Gene Dodaro, United States Comptroller General and head of the GAO, said in part in a statement.

What do Project 2025 and Trump’s previous Schedule F executive order have to do with the Department of Government Efficiency?

Project 2025 is the right-wing think tank The Heritage Foundation’s sweeping plan for the incoming president. Its guidebook for Republican presidents has been published every four years for decades.

Advertisement

The document lays out the return of Trump’s Schedule F executive order, which was reversed by President Joe Biden. It would strip job protections from career officials in policy roles, make it easier to fire civil servants and require loyalty to the president.

Though former Trump officials helped craft Project 2025 and the plan praises Trump’s prior administration, the president-elect has distanced himself from the plan. He said in his debate with Vice President Kamala Harris that he had not read the document and will not read it.

The News4 I-Team asked experts on both sides of Project 2025 how the dismantling would affect the D.C. area’s Black middle class. News4’s Tracee Wilkins reports.

Facing a possible overhaul to the federal workforce, Department of Housing and Urban Development employee Ashaki Robinson previously told News4 she loves her job and doesn’t want to even consider leaving it.

“It has created such a stability. People talk about my ‘good government job.’ My good government job has paid for a lot of things,” she said.

Advertisement

This article includes reporting by NBC News’ David Ingram and Vaughn Hillyard, The Associated Press’ Colleen Long and Jill Colvin, and NBC Washington’s Tracee Wilkins and Caroline Tucker





Source link

Washington, D.C

Week Ahead in Washington: December 21

Published

on

Week Ahead in Washington: December 21


WASHINGTON (Gray DC) – With Congress in recess and President Donald Trump spending the holidays in Florida, attention has turned to the Epstein files and unresolved healthcare legislation.

The trove of documents partly released Friday has prompted some members of Congress to question whether the Department of Justice followed the law requiring their release, as many files were heavily redacted.

California Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna said Friday night he and Kentucky Republican Rep. Thomas Massie were considering drafting articles of impeachment against Attorney General Pam Bondi for not complying with the law the two authored earlier this year.

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press” some photos were held back at the request of victim advocacy groups as the DOJ looks at whether they need redactions to protect the victims.

Advertisement

With Congress gone, there remains no solution on healthcare. Enhanced Affordable Care Act tax credits are set to expire at the end of 2025.

Despite enough lawmakers signing onto a discharge petition forcing a vote to extend the subsidies, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) sent the House home without holding a vote.

Johnson said the full House will vote on the bill when Congress returns to Washington in early January, after the subsidies have lapsed.

Federal workers will get some extra time off this week. Trump signed an executive order closing federal agencies and offices on both Dec. 24 and 26, in addition to Christmas Day.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

Smith, Bowser respond to congressional panel accusing D.C. leaders of manipulating crime data

Published

on

Smith, Bowser respond to congressional panel accusing D.C. leaders of manipulating crime data


By Michael Kunzelman

Metropolitan Police Department Chief Pamela Smith and D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser are responding to allegations about the manipulation of crime data in the District.

Washington Metropolitan Police Chief Pamela Smith addresses questions during a news conference at the Department of Justice. Credit: AP Photo/Alex Brandon

A Republican-led congressional committee says that the police chief in the nation’s capital pressured subordinates to manipulate department data to artificially lower the city’s crime rates, according to a report by a Republican-led congressional committee.

Advertisement

The report, released Dec. 14 by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, says that the police chief often threatened, punished and retaliated against police commanders who presented her with “spikes in crime.”

A separate investigation by U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s office also found that a significant number of MPD reports had been misclassified to make crime rates appear lower than they are.

Pirro’s office began its investigation in August at the height of a political showdown between Republican President Donald Trump’s administration and the city over control of the police department. Trump claimed violent crime in Washington was getting worse as he ordered a federal takeover of the police department,

Neither investigation found grounds for charging anybody with a crime.

Smith, who is stepping down at the end of the year after two years in charge of the department, has said she doesn’t believe any crime numbers were manipulated during her tenure.

Advertisement

“I have never and will never authorize or even support any thought processes or activities with regards to crime numbers being manipulated,” she told Fox 5 during an interview earlier this month.

Mayor Bowser on Dec. 15  defended Smith’s performance and accused the House committee’s leaders of rushing to judgment “in order to serve a politically motivated timeline.”

“It is my expectation that the crime statistics we publish and rely on are accurate and of the highest quality possible,” Bowser, a Democrat, wrote in a letter addressed to the House committee’s chair and ranking member.

Homicides are down 31 percent this year, from 181 in 2024 to 125 with roughly two weeks left in 2025, according to MPD crime data. Bowser said independent data on hospital visits shows a 33 percent drop in firearm injuries for the first 10 months of 2025 compared to the same period of 2024. The mayor accused the committee of cherry-picking critical quotes from commanders without interviewing Smith or any assistant chiefs.

“Even a cursory review of the report reveals its prejudice: of the 22 block quotes presented as complaining about Chief Smith’s management style, 20 of them were made by only two command officials interviewed,” Bowser wrote.

Advertisement

The House committee said its findings are based in part on interviews with the commanders of all seven D.C. patrol districts and a former commander who is currently on leave. Commanders testified that Smith pushed for a more frequent use of “intermediate” criminal charges that go unreported as opposed to more serious charges that must be publicly reported, according to the committee.

“These combined efforts, as explained by commanders, amounted to manipulating MPD crime statistics in an effort to show lowered rates of crime to the public,” the report says.

Pirro, who was appointed by Trump, said her office reviewed nearly 6,000 police reports and interviewed more than 50 witnesses in concluding that a “significant number of reports had been misclassified, making crime appear artificially lower than it was.”

“The uncovering of these manipulated crime statistics makes clear that President Trump has reduced crime even more than originally thought, since crimes were actually higher than reported,” Pirro’s statement says.

The committee’s Republican chairman, Rep. James Comer of Kentucky, said Smith “cultivated a culture of fear to achieve her agenda.”

Advertisement

This article was originally published by The Associated Press.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

Available to download Friday, some Epstein files no longer there Saturday afternoon

Published

on

Available to download Friday, some Epstein files no longer there Saturday afternoon


The Robert F. Kennedy Department of Justice Building on Dec. 19, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

The Department of Justice started releasing files related to the life, death and criminal investigations of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein Friday. Files continued to be posted on its “Epstein Library” website on Saturday.

But NPR identified more than a dozen files released by the DOJ on Friday that are no longer available Saturday afternoon, including one that shows President Trump’s photo on a desk among several other photographs. The removed files also show various works of art, including those containing nudity.

Advertisement

On its website, the Justice Department directs people to report any files that should not have been posted by notifying the agency using a dedicated email address. A statement at the top of each page of the website said: “In view of the Congressional deadline, all reasonable efforts have been made to review and redact personal information pertaining to victims, other private individuals, and protect sensitive materials from disclosure.”

The DOJ acknowledged, though, “because of the volume of information involved, this website may nevertheless contain information that inadvertently includes non-public personally identifiable information or other sensitive content, to include matters of a sexual nature.”

The DOJ did not immediately respond to a request for comment on why the files were no longer available.

This photo illustration taken in Washington, DC, on Dec. 19, 2025 shows a court document after the Justice Department began releasing the long-awaited records from the investigation into the politically explosive case of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

This photo illustration taken in Washington, DC, on Dec. 19, 2025 shows a court document after the Justice Department began releasing the long-awaited records from the investigation into the politically explosive case of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images

After the initial release of files, some members of Congress raised concerns about what was missing from the data sets.

Advertisement

“There are powerful men, bankers, politicians who we know from survivors – they’ve told us this — who were at these parties where there were many young women, and a few were under age, and these powerful men knew about it, and they didn’t say anything,” Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., told NPR. They need to be at least publicly held accountable.”

Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., who cosponsored the Epstein Transparency Act in the House along with Khanna, criticized the redactions.

Posting on X, he said the release “grossly fails to comply with both the spirit and the letter of the law.” He also warned “a future DOJ could convict the current [Attorney General] and others” for not properly releasing all files the law mandated be made public.

Apart from the photo that is no longer available to download, Trump’s name and image appears rarely in the new documents available. There are a few pictures of him with women and a framed photo of Epstein and a redacted woman with a $22,500 oversized check signed by Trump.

While Trump wasn’t mentioned much this time around, he was a frequent subject of emails and text messages in another Epstein file tranche released by the House Democratic Oversight Committee — with well over a thousand different mentions — though mainly as the subject of Epstein’s near-obsession with his presidency, as the latter positioned himself as a Trump whisperer of sorts to his powerful associates.

Advertisement

NPR’s Rahul Mukherjee and Stephen Fowler contributed reporting.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending