Connect with us

Washington, D.C

Could Prohibition come back? These activists might declare any level of alcohol is unsafe.

Published

on

Could Prohibition come back? These activists might declare any level of alcohol is unsafe.



A parallel, opaque review process has been started by a secretive, six-person panel. This panel operates deep within the Department of Health and Human Services, receiving little public scrutiny.

play

In Wisconsin, tavern owners are proud to open their doors to just about everyone, without judgement of what their customers choose to drink.

But right now, in Washington, DC, a few little-known anti-alcohol activists are about to have a big impact on the beer you drink – unless something is done, and soon.

Every five years, the U.S. government reviews the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. For a decade or more, the guidelines have said it’s OK to have one beer (or cocktail or glass of wine) per day if you’re a woman, and two if you’re a man. Those decisions were made based on a scientific review.

But in 2023, the World Health Organization declared that “no safe level” of alcohol exists, and now the anti-alcohol activists in this country are coming for everyone’s beer.

And this time around, the dietary guidelines process appears to be heading in an alcohol-free direction, thanks in large part to zero-tolerance temperance groups that object to all drinking – even in moderation.

Advertisement

Federal agency reviewing dietary guidelines, including alcohol

In Washington, in addition to the normal review of the dietary guidelines process, a parallel, opaque review process has been started by a secretive, six-person panel. This panel operates deep within the Department of Health and Human Services, receiving little scrutiny from the public. 

It may seem far-fetched, but the truth is that behind closed doors, this six-person body will help decide whether the government should tell you that no amount of alcohol is safe to consume.

A hunt shouldn’t cause rancor. Wisconsin has stable and growing sandhill crane population.

Is this a fair and balanced approach? Can we trust these six people to determine what science that’s out there is sound, and judge it by a preponderance of the evidence as they’re supposed to?

Advertisement

The Wall Street Journal isn’t so sure. According to their reporting, half of the panel have already made up their minds, having authored reports that say any amount of alcohol is harmful. Can they be trusted to take an honest look at the evidence?

There is plenty of evidence that people who drink in moderation live as long or longer than people who do not. Telling people not to drink at all could well cause them to just disregard all advice regarding drinking.

This could be the start of alcohol scold culture, Prohibition 2.0

It might also lead us further down the road to a “scold” culture – to a Prohibition 2.0. If you’re attending the Wisconsin State Fair, celebrating Oktoberfest, tailgating at Camp Randall or having a beer after a long day at work, we just don’t need Washington telling us we shouldn’t have any alcohol at all.

Toasting Prohibition’s end: Turns out this ‘failure’ led to longer life spans

One person who we know understands the importance of this issue is U.S. Sen. Tammy Baldwin. We’re grateful to her for her work to bring light to this issue, and if you see her, we encourage you to thank her. We hope she can use her position to tell the White House to stop this rogue panel from conducting its stealth Prohibition campaign.

Advertisement

The process of reviewing the guidelines should be open and transparent. It should be free of the influence of those with an agenda or a conflict of interest. And it should be decided as the law requires – by a preponderance of sound scientific evidence – not by the whims of anti-alcohol groups.

Keith Kern is the President of the Tavern League of Wisconsin



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Washington, D.C

'Slave' texts telling people to come 'pick cotton' sent to DC, Virginia residents post election

Published

on

'Slave' texts telling people to come 'pick cotton' sent to DC, Virginia residents post election


People throughout the D.C. area and across the United States reported receiving racist spam text messages the day after the election that told them to report to plantations to pick cotton.

One person, who did not want to be identified, sent News4 a screenshot of the text, which said:

“Greetings, You have been selected to pick cotton at the nearest plantation. Be ready at 12PM SHARP with your belongings. Our Executive Slaves will come get you in a Black Van, be prepared to be searched down once you’ve enter[sic] the plantation. You are in Plantation Group S”

This text featured a person’s first name. We have blurred the name.

News4 obtained the screenshot of a similar text sent to another person from the region:

Advertisement

A third text shared on the Washingtonian Problems Instagram had specific references to the District and Virginia. In that message, the recipient was told they would be a “house slave” at the Abingdon Plantation in Arlington which is on land shared with Washington Reagan National Airport. They’re directed to an address in Southwest DC and are also told it is mandatory.

The Metropolitan Police Department’s Office of Homeland Security Intelligence is investigating the origins of the messages directing people to a Southwest address, police said.

Each message is slightly different in detail and specificity.

Some students in Montgomery County, Maryland, also received the texts, the school system said in a letter to families.

“We recognize that the emotional and psychological impact on our students, staff, and particularly our communities of color is profound. We stand in solidarity with those who feel targeted and hurt by these actions,” Montgomery County Public Schools said in the letter.

School officials asked anyone who received the messages to report them to local authorities or school staff.

Advertisement

The attorneys general for Washington, D.C. and Virginia condemned the texts and asked residents to reach out to local law enforcement if they’re in danger.

For District residents, the Office of the Attorney General asked anyone who received the texts to reach out to the civil rights section at 202-727-3400 or emailing OAGCivilRights@dc.gov.

D.C. police advised forwarding the messages to the Federal Trade Commission at 7726 or report them to ReportFraud.ftc.gov, as well as marking the messages as junk or spam in order to report them to the messaging app.

People in Alabama, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina and other states have also reported getting the texts, according to online news reports. Many of the texts appeared to go to students – including some in middle school.

The source of the widespread texts is unknown at this time and it’s unclear how they obtained the phone numbers and names of so many.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

What’s next for Initiative 83 in DC? – WTOP News

Published

on

What’s next for Initiative 83 in DC? – WTOP News


What’s next for the D.C. ballot Initiative 83? The measure has been approved by the voters, now it must be funded by the D.C. Council.

Tuesday’s election delivered two major voting reforms to the District of Columbia. Initiative 83, which passed overwhelmingly, has two components — first, it will allow independent voters to cast ballots in D.C. primaries and second, it will bring ranked choice voting to the city.

In D.C., where Democrats dominate and Republicans are hardly heard from in citywide results, elections tend to be won or lost in the primary — months ahead of the November election.

Lisa Rice, a D.C. resident and the lead supporter of the initiative, was motivated by her frustration as an independent voter who was shut out of primary elections.

Advertisement

“There are 75,000 of us who will be enfranchised and we will be able to vote in the election of consequence here in D.C. … We’re going to have politicians working harder for the people, by letting independents vote in primary elections,” said Rice.

While Arlington County continues with its pilot program of ranked choice voting, Initiative 83 will bring the same procedure to D.C.

“You vote for your favorite candidate and then you rank your backed up choices. If your favorite doesn’t win, your vote simply moves to your next choice until a candidate wins with 50%,” said Rice.

“I’ll be voting ‘no’ on the initiative,” D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, a high-profile critic of the idea, said last month.

She called ranked choice voting “a very complicated election system.”

Advertisement

“I am totally against ranked choice voting,” Bowser said. “I don’t think that our very good experience with elections suggests that we need to make any change.”

Rice said she thinks the system is “different,” rather than “complicated.”

“Voters like it and voters get used to it,” Rice said.

The measure has been approved by the voters, next it must be funded by the D.C. Council.

“Before the end of the year, it will be before them. We really are excited about that and we look forward to being part of the discussions about the budget process. … Our hope is this will be implemented in time for the 2026 election cycle — the June primary,” said Rice.

Advertisement

Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

© 2024 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

Harris concedes, DC area reacts to second Trump victory

Published

on

Harris concedes, DC area reacts to second Trump victory


The United States woke on Wednesday morning to the news that Donald Trump had won a second term, becoming the nation’s 47th president.

As the day after the 2024 election continued, residents across the DMV adjusted to a historic victory and what a return to a Trump White House could mean over the next four years.

In Washington, D.C., where more than 90% of voters chose Harris, the news was met with disappointment and anxiety.

“We are in trouble. We’re just in trouble,” one woman said in downtown D.C. Wednesday morning after election night and President-elect Donald Trump’s victory.

Advertisement

Businesses around downtown D.C. had boarded up windows before Election Day began, preparing for the possibility of violence. But after heightened security and fears in the city where, four years ago, rioters descended on the nation’s capitol to protest election results, D.C. police told News4 they made no arrests overnight.

Another voter said, “We’ve lived through him before. I think we will survive through this one, but I’m very disappointed.”

The prospect of a second Trump presidency was met with excitement at events across the U.S., including outside Trump Tower in New York City on election night.

All parts of the DMV — D.C., Maryland and Virginia — were called for Vice President Kamala Harris. In D.C. and Maryland, the win was decisive, but the margin in Virginia was much more narrow.

Virginia Gov. Glen Youngkin congratulated President-Elect Donald Trump and Vice President-Elect JD Vance on their victory in a message posted on social media platform X early Wednesday morning.

Advertisement

On the state level, Virginia re-elected Sen. Tim Kaine, who defeated challenger Hung Cao. Democrats also secured victories in Virginia’s 10th and 8th Congressional Districts.

The Associated Press has called Virginia’s 7th Congressional District for Democrat Eugene Vindman, in a highly contested race that decides who will replace Rep. Abigail Spanberger when she runs for governor in 2025. NBC News has not yet called the race.

In Maryland, the race for District 6 is also too close to call, though Democrat April McClain Delaney has a razor-thin lead over Republican candidate Neil Parrott. It’s a critical seat for the balance of power in the U.S. House.

But while some of the results of the election continue to trickle in, the biggest race was decided earlier than anyone anticipated.

President Biden spoke to both candidates in the wake of the presidential race being called. He congratulated Harris on her historic campaign and congratulated Trump on his victory. Biden “emphasized the importance of working to bring the country together,” and said he was committed to ensuring a smooth transition, according to the White House.

Advertisement

On Wednesday afternoon, Harris called now President-elect Trump to congratulate him on winning the 2024 presidential election, according to a senior Harris aide.

Harris also discussed the importance of a peaceful transfer of power and being a president for all Americans, the aide said.

At 4 p.m., Harris emerged on the stage on the Howard University campus, polished and dignified, and publicly conceded the race to Trump.

She emphasized that accepting a loss is an integral part of democracy, while emphasizing that her supporters “must accept the results of this election.”

“The light of America’s promise will always burn bright as long as we never give up and as long as we keep fighting,” she said, adding, “This is not a time to throw up our hands; it’s a time to roll up our sleeves.”

Advertisement

But though the election is over, Harris said, the fight is not.

“While I concede this election, I do not concede the fight that fueled this campaign,” she said.

She shared a message for young voters, many of them college students in the audience right in front of her. Shots of the crowd showed Howard students shedding tears as she spoke.

“On the campaign, I would often say, ‘When we fight, we win,’” Harris told the crowd, many of them in tears. “But here’s the thing: Sometime the fight takes a while. That doesn’t mean we won’t win. That doesn’t mean we won’t win. The important thing is don’t ever give up, don’t ever give up, don’t ever stop trying to make the world a better place.”  

“And don’t you ever listen when anyone tells you something is impossible because it has never been done before,” she added.

Advertisement

Kamala Harris conceded to Donald Trump in a speech at Howard University and said she will help Trump enact a peaceful transfer of power.

In the days and weeks leading up to Inauguration Day, the District will prepare for the historic ceremony and the second term of a man who has previously threatened a federal takeover of D.C.

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser said in a statement that she will support the transition process and continue to advance the priorities of the District.

In a post on X, Bowser said: “As the nation’s capital, we are proud to fulfill our role in the peaceful transition of power. We will actively support the incoming Trump Administration’s transition process and the 60th Presidential Inauguration of President-elect Trump. As your mayor, I have worked with three presidents, including President-elect Trump, and congressional leaders of both parties to advance the priorities of the District — infrastructure, housing affordability, downtown revitalization and our self-determination. And driven by our values, we will pursue a collaborative approach to our federal priorities in the District.”

While on the campaign trail, President-elect Donald Trump threatened a federal takeover of Washington, D.C. News4’s Mark Segraves explains what could happen once he’s back in office.

Advertisement

Her statement concluded: “We thank the DC Board of Elections and election officials across the country for conducting a free and fair election. And we congratulate DC councilmembers and commissioners, members of Congress and President-elect Trump on their victories.”

D.C. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson says he supports the democratic process and a peaceful transition of power, “even when we are unhappy with the results,” he wrote in a brief statement this afternoon.

“And despite our internal disagreements over how things could be better, we, the District of Columbia, have a very good city, financially sound, and well run. We will remain focused on our strengths, protect our autonomy, and make sure no one tries to take that away from us,” his statement concluded.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending