Connect with us

Virginia

Virginia’s largest county becomes a verb as ‘Don’t Fairfax Me’ signs pop up in rural areas

Published

on

Virginia’s largest county becomes a verb as ‘Don’t Fairfax Me’ signs pop up in rural areas


When early voting on the proposed redistricting amendment began, the General Assembly was still in session, so one pretty March day Del. Joe McNamara walked outside the State Capitol and recorded a short video to post on social media in which he urged a “no” vote. 

“This amendment will not only take power away from the local people,” the Roanoke County Republican said. “It will consolidate power in Northern Virginia.”

An image circulated by Del. Wren Williams, R-Patrick County.

McNamara was being mild. 

Advertisement

Del. Wren Williams, a fellow Republican from Patrick County, posted a social media message about what he called “Fairfaxphobia,” which he described as “A distrust or fear that political power concentrated in Fairfax County is dominating decisions for the entire Commonwealth and imposing policies on communities that they cannot afford.”

That, too, was mild compared with the video being circulated by the Freedom Caucus Fund, an offshoot of the conservative caucus in the U.S. House of Representatives. “Fairfax is a Sanctuary County with Virginia’s most insane Trans, Sex Ed and DEI policies,” the video says. “And if you don’t vote, they’ll control FIVE Virginia Congress Seats. Stop them.” The audio plays over images of protesters holding signs that say “Love Trans Kids” and, just for good measure, the proposed redistricting map is displayed in rainbow colors. 

A screenshot from the Freedom Caucus Fund ad.

Then there are the signs now appearing up and down the Shenandoah Valley that proclaim: “Don’t Fairfax Me.” The most prominent one is on a barn beside Interstate 81 just south of Harrisonburg where 29,000 or more drivers see it every day. 

The name of Virginia’s most populous county is now being invoked as a verb in rural Virginia to argue against the proposed redistricting amendment.

One of the signs in Southwest Virginia. Courtesy of Mark Obenshain.

We’re accustomed to candidates badmouthing one another or parties doing the same. Here’s a case where one of the main arguments employed by the “no” side, at least in certain rural parts of the state, is to run against a different part of the state. Even parts of Southwest Virginia where the redistricting map would leave voters in a Republican district, eight billboards have appeared urging: “Vote No” to a “Northern Virginia Power Grab.” They’re paid for by “Friends of Dr. Todd Pillion,” the Republican state senator who represents the region.

Advertisement

It’s hard enough to explain to the casual voter the multiyear process by which constitutional amendments are passed in Virginia, and perhaps even harder to explain redistricting even in more normal times. But invoking the specter of consolidating “power in Northern Virginia” might be a pretty powerful trigger for some conservative rural voters who are predisposed to see Northern Virginia as the reason why there’s a Democratic majority in the legislature passing bills they don’t like.

By that measure, “Don’t Fairfax Me” might be the clearest, punchiest campaign slogan that Virginia has seen since Jim Gilmore was swept into the governor’s office in 1997 on a platform of “No Car Tax!” We’ll see April 21 how effective it is.

The factual basis for “Don’t Fairfax Me” and the general campaign against Fairfax County and Northern Virginia as the villain in this political drama is political math. Northern Virginia is the state’s largest metro area; it’s also reliably Democratic. Right now Northern Virginia has three of the state’s 11 congressional districts, while a fourth contains part of Northern Virginia. For Democrats to maximize their power under redistricting (and conversely minimize Republican power), they needed to stretch those Northern Virginia districts into the Republican strongholds of the Shenandoah Valley and the Piedmont — to essentially “bury” those Republicans into districts dominated by Northern Virginia.

That’s why the proposed map has such elongated districts snaking out of Northern Virginia. 

Virginia’s current congressional districts, approved in late 2021. Courtesy of Twotwofourtysix.
This is the proposed map, as amended. Courtesy of Legislative Information Services.
Advertisement

From three districts wholly based in Northern Virginia and a fourth partially in Northern Virginia, we would now have five districts partially in Northern Virginia. Both Fairfax and Prince William County would be split among five different districts. In four of those (the 1st, 8th, 10th and 11th), Fairfax County would be the biggest locality, although those vote shares range from 24.4% in the 1st to 49.94% in the 11th. In the fifth, the proposed 8th District, Fairfax would be the third-biggest locality, at 12.9%, with Alexandria and Prince William County being the top two.

Got question about redistricting?

If the answer’s not on our Voter Guide, let us know and we’ll see if we can get it answered.

At present, there’s just one member of the U.S. House from Fairfax County: James Walkinshaw in the 11th. The other Northern Virginia members are from Prince William County (Eugene Vindman in the 7th), Alexandria (Don Beyer in the 8th) and Loudoun County (Suhas Subramanyam in the 10th). In practice, that likely wouldn’t change much in the short term, given the power of incumbency. In theory, though, we could wind up with five House members from the same county, albeit one with a population north of 1 million. Or, conversely, we could wind up with none.

In any case, Fairfax is now a verb, and a pejorative one in the context in which it’s being used. How do people in Fairfax feel about some of their fellow Virginians using their locality’s name in such a way? I didn’t have time to interview all 1.1 million residents of Fairfax County, but I did make contact with two people who have been entrusted with the power to speak for some of them.

One of those is Jeff McKay, the chairman of the county board of supervisors and, yes, a Democrat. Here’s what he sent me: 

Advertisement
Jeff McKay, chairman of Fairfax County Board of Supervisors. Courtesy of Fairfax County.

“As your reporting has noted, Fairfax County and Northern Virginia play a significant role in funding the rest of the state, from roads and schools to law enforcement. We are a major economic engine for the commonwealth, and it is unclear why that would be seen as a negative, especially for those statewide beneficiaries. Politics can unfortunately rely on pitting one part of the state against another, an old trick that does a disservice to Virginians. This is a distraction meant to make voters think this is about an in-state rivalry and to divert attention from the harmful policies of the Trump Administration. I understand why some would want to distract from that record. This is not about one part of the state versus another. It is about whether Virginians believe the Trump Administration needs to be checked and whether its policies have damaged Virginia’s economy, from sky-high gas prices and tariffs, to impacts on federal workers and contractors, to threats to the rule of law. Virginia families have been hit hard, and that issue is far more important than pitting parts of the state against each other. The stakes are simply too high at this moment in our country’s history for that to decide this vote.”

You can feel however you wish to feel about redistricting, but McKay is undeniably correct on one point: The most rural (and therefore the most Republican) parts of Virginia are financially dependent on Fairfax County and, more broadly, all of Northern Virginia. 

The go-to example: school funding. Rural schools (and also some non-rural schools) get most of their funding from the state (in some places, north of 60%). Where does the state get that money? The single biggest source of tax revenue is Northern Virginia; it accounts for about 42% of the state’s general fund tax revenue. According to the state Department of Taxation, Fairfax County residents account for 22.9% of the income taxes paid in Virginia. In second place, Loudoun County, with 8.1%. If money talked (and sometimes it does), Fairfax County would have the loudest say in how Virginia spends that money. 

Of course, that’s not exactly what those putting up “Don’t Fairfax Me” are talking about, but it is a useful reminder of how the state’s economy works. Rural Virginia wants Fairfax’s money, just not its politics.

Pat Herrity, the only Republican on the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors. Courtesy of Herrity.

On the other side of the spectrum is Fairfax’s lone Republican supervisor, Pat Herrity, who briefly sought the GOP nomination for lieutenant governor last year until he was sidelined by heart-related health issues. During a phone call, he told me he’s now recovered (thanks to two new aortas) and is back to playing hockey in a local adult league, which is not something most heart patients do. 

Advertisement

After we dispensed with those pleasantries, we got down to business. Fairfax as a verb? “It’s the life I live every day,” he told me. “If I were in rural Virginia, I wouldn’t want a bunch of Fairfax or Northern Virginia Democrats controlling my congressional representation or being my congressional representative. I think it’s bad from a tax standpoint, bad from a regulatory standpoint, bad from a public safety standpoint, bad from an affordability standpoint — a lot of bads.” He then proceeded to list lots of policy disagreements he had with the Democrats on the Fairfax board. 

Likewise, the chair of the Fairfax County Republicans had no problem with anyone who wants to run against Fairfax County to defeat the redistricting amendment. “Totally fair,” Katie Gorka said. “I feel people have every right to be upset. I don’t have bad feelings about it. I know people love to hate us.” 

We’ll find out April 21 just how much.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Virginia

Virginia Heat Wave: Richmond high temperatures near or above 100°. Heat index could exceed 110°.

Published

on

Virginia Heat Wave: Richmond high temperatures near or above 100°. Heat index could exceed 110°.


RICHMOND, Va. — A big ridge of high pressure will lock into place over the next few days, keeping temperatures significantly above normal, creating a dangerous combination of heat and humidity.

Highs will be near or above 100° for at least Thursday, Friday and Saturday, and the heat index could exceed 110°.

An Extreme Heat Warning is in effect for most of the region Thursday and Friday. Click here for the latest heat alerts.

The highs will challenge records on multiple days. Due to the high heat index values, and the very warm overnight lows, this will be the biggest heat wave since July 2012.

Advertisement

A few isolated storms are possible Friday, especially north and northwest of Richmond.

There is a better chance of a few storms over the weekend.

Rain chances will increase for Monday and Tuesday, and this should allow highs to drop to near-normal levels.

The drought continues for the Commonwealth. Since last week, the severe (level 3 out of 5) and extreme (level 4 out of 5) drought areas have dropped by a few percent, with the area of moderate drought (level 2 out of 5) expanding.

(WTVR)

Advertisement

Stay With CBS 6, The Weather Authority.

STORM TRACKING LINKS:

Weather Alerts
Closings & Delays
Interactive Radar
Map Center

📱 Download the new and improved CBS 6 Weather App for iPhone and Android.

The-Weather-Authority-1280x720.jpg

WTVR

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Virginia

House Bill 301 takes effect in VA, ending 50 years of limits on adoptee birth records

Published

on

House Bill 301 takes effect in VA, ending 50 years of limits on adoptee birth records


Adult adoptees in Virginia can now obtain copies of their original birth certificates under a new state law that took effect Wednesday, ending restrictions that had been in place for nearly 50 years.

House Bill 301 establishes a process allowing adult adoptees to request their original birth certificates from the Virginia Department of Health’s Office of Vital Records. The law also allows birth parents to file a form indicating their preferred level of contact with adoptees.

The legislation marks a significant change in Virginia adoption law. Since 1976, most adoptees have been unable to access their original birth certificates, documents that are generally available to other adults in the commonwealth.

Del. Wendell Walker, R-Lynchburg, who served as chief co-patron of the measure after language from his earlier House Bill 664 was incorporated into the final legislation, said the new law concludes several years of legislative efforts.

Advertisement

“This is a day that many adoptees and families have waited years to see,” Walker said in a statement. “Today, Virginia restores a simple but meaningful right: the ability for adult adoptees to obtain their own original birth certificate.”

Walker thanked Del. Katrina Callsen, D-Charlottesville, for helping carry the legislation during the 2026 General Assembly session. He also recognized advocates, adoptees and families who supported the effort, including the Virginia Adoptee Rights Alliance, a coalition that advocated for expanded access to original birth records.

Walker also reflected on someone much closer to home for us at ABC13: the late anchor Mark Spain, whom he credited with bringing the issue to his attention in 2022.

EARLIER: Why Virginia law makes it hard for adoptees to get information about their birth parents

Mark’s compassion and determination helped launch this effort,” Walker said. “While it is bittersweet that he is not here to see this day, his legacy lives on in the lives that will be impacted by this law.

Adult adoptees seeking their original birth certificates can submit requests through the Virginia Department of Health’s Office of Vital Records by clicking this link.

Advertisement

“Today marks the beginning of a new chapter for thousands of Virginians. For many adult adoptees, this law provides an opportunity to better understand their own story, their family history, and where they came from. I’m grateful to everyone who helped make this day possible,” Walker concluded.



Source link

Continue Reading

Virginia

Virginia’s Clean Slate Law takes effect, sealing records of certain convictions, offenses

Published

on

Virginia’s Clean Slate Law takes effect, sealing records of certain convictions, offenses


A Virginia law going into effect Wednesday seals the criminal records of many convicted of low-level offenses.

The Clean Slate Law allows for the automatic sealing of certain offenses, including traffic infractions and misdemeanor convictions like shoplifting, trespassing, distribution of marijuana and disorderly conduct. Eligible misdemeanor convictions will be automatically sealed after seven years if the person has not been convicted of any other crime in Virginia, any other state, the District of Columbia or a United States territory during that time.

RELATED | Virginia sees gun sale boom as ‘assault firearms’ ban put on hold

The law also allows for petition processes to seal certain convictions or deferred dismissals.

Advertisement

Sex crimes, violent felonies and protective order violations are among the instances not eligible for petition sealing. The petitioner must not have been convicted of any other felony within the past 10 years in order for a circuit court to grant a petition.

Comment with Bubbles

BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT

Under the law, there are exceptions where sealed records may be disseminated and used, including for background checks for firearm purposes and employment screenings for law enforcement and emergency medical services agencies.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending