Connect with us

Virginia

Public left out of talks about future of Virginia Aquarium, Virginia Beach council member says

Published

on

Public left out of talks about future of Virginia Aquarium, Virginia Beach council member says


VIRGINIA BEACH — A plan to create a roadmap for the future of the city-owned Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center — including a potential change in ownership or operations — is continuing to ruffle the feathers of some people who feel left out of the process.

At Tuesday’s City Council meeting, Councilwoman Barbara Henley said she’s “sick” about the way the city has handled the matter after Rick Biddle of Relevant Strategies and Solutions outlined a plan to gather input and explore alternative models.

The city has contracted with Biddle’s company at a cost of $108,850 to meet with city and Virginia Aquarium Foundation leaders, create a baseline financial model for the aquarium and to hold one-on-one-discussions with potential operating partners. Biddle plans to provide a status update at the end of the summer.

Two major entertainment companies are interested in taking over operations of the aquarium but the foundation — a nonprofit group that owns the animals and fundraises for the facility — is not yet on board.

Advertisement

The owners of Ripley’s Believe It or Not! and Dollywood responded to a city request last fall from “interested organizations related to operating, leasing and/or the purchase of the Aquarium.” The City Council decided last year to explore the option of turning over the nearly 40-year-old aquarium to a private entity after learning the tanks that hold the animals are deteriorating and will cost millions to repair.

“We’ve gone about this all wrong,” Henley said. “This has been anything but open and transparent.”

Council members have talked about the option of privatizing the aquarium in meetings closed to the public. There have been public briefings and a survey on the topic. Foundation members and facility staff became concerned and a wave of employees resigned amid the uncertainty, foundation Chair Dan Peterson wrote in a letter to the City Council in March. The aquarium has 125 full-time employees, according to the city.

“All of this has been done at a level other than including the public,” said Henley, adding that residents and foundation members have not yet had the opportunity to publicly address the council about the potential owner/operator change.

“It’s been the public and the volunteers who have made that aquarium, not the city,” Henley said. “It’s a total lack of respect.”

Advertisement

Mayor Bobby Dyer disagreed. He said the proper steps have been taken given the fiscal challenges the city will face in maintaining aquarium operations and replacing its aging infrastructure. The facility is projected to generate nearly $14 million in revenue this fiscal year. The city budgeted $20.4 million for operating expenditures, utilities and more.

City Manager Patrick Duhaney said the foundation hasn’t shared its financials with the city, but the group raised more than $14 million in charitable gifts to support the animals, exhibits and educational programs of a newly-renovated aquarium building.

Peterson emailed another letter to council members on Monday.

“The Foundation feels this process is being ‘rushed’ and the manner in which it has been conducted is extremely disrespectful to a 40 year partner,” Peterson wrote. “More specifically, The Foundation’s opinion/thoughts were never taken into consideration and the City did not ‘move forward’ with the Foundation as a partner which has impacted trust between the two parties.”

The foundation’s Chief Development Officer Suzanne Savage recently resigned.

Advertisement

“Once we come up with some viable options, that’s the time to bring the public in,” the mayor said.

“We all have a tremendous amount of respect for the volunteers and for the people who work at the aquarium,” said Councilman Joash Schulman. “This is because we care about the aquarium.”

Biddle has 35 years of experience with American Zoological Association institutions, including aquariums. His company has performed more than 21 governance transition studies and plans. He’s working on a memorandum of understanding between his company, the city and the foundation with the goal of exploring the “best operating model that ensures the future viability and sustainability of the Virginia Aquarium.”

“We’re a resource to you,” he said. “It really is a due diligence exercise; there are no predetermine outcomes.”

Stacy Parker, 757-222-5125, stacy.parker@pilotonline.com

Advertisement



Source link

Virginia

Falls Church leads the pack in Virginia’s most ‘dog-loving’ cities | ARLnow.com

Published

on

Falls Church leads the pack in Virginia’s most ‘dog-loving’ cities | ARLnow.com


Around Town

Advertisement

Falls Church is top dog in Virginia when it comes to devotion to adopting canines and showering them with purchases, according to one metric.

The Little City was crowned the No. 1 most “dog-loving” city in the commonwealth and No. 5 in the nation in a new ranking from PetSmart.

The pet supply company arrived at this conclusion by examining dog adoptions at PetSmart Charities events, plus sales of dog treats and products at its locations nationwide. Results were adjusted for the number of PetSmart stores in each locality and indexed against national performance.

“Top Dog Cities are home to passionate pet parents who treat their dogs like family, and we’re seeing that reflected in how they shop,” said Matt Byrnes, senior vice president of merchandising at PetSmart. “From tail-wagging toys and treats to stylish gear and premium health and wellness essentials, these top cities are making thoughtful purchases that help their dogs live happier, healthier lives.”

Falls Church made the ranking even though it doesn’t have a PetSmart within city limits. The closest one is at 6100 Arlington Blvd in Seven Corners.

Advertisement

Two other Northern Virginia localities made the ranking: Woodbridge in Prince William County (No. 17) and Vienna in Fairfax County (No. 24). Elsewhere in the D.C. area, Germantown, Md. ranked No. 25.

The localities in PetSmart’s list were scattered throughout the country and ranged from small towns to cities like Portland, Ore., Lexington, Ky. and New York City.

Advertisement
  • Dan Egitto is an editor and reporter at ARLnow. Originally from Central Florida, he graduated from Duke University and previously reported at the Palatka Daily News in Florida and the Vallejo Times-Herald in California. Dan joined ARLnow in January 2024.




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Virginia

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly from Virginia Tech’s 95-89 Loss to Wake Forest

Published

on

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly from Virginia Tech’s 95-89 Loss to Wake Forest


Virginia Tech’s ACC Tournament run ended in heartbreaking fashion Tuesday night in Charlotte, as the Hokies fell to Wake Forest 95-89 in overtime. It was a game full of swings. Virginia Tech erased deficits, battled back repeatedly and forced overtime, but couldn’t make enough plays in the extra period.

Here’s the good, the bad and the ugly from the game.

The Good: Rebounding dominance and a resilient fight

Advertisement

Virginia Tech did plenty of things well in this game, especially on the boards.

The Hokies outrebounded Wake Forest 45-28, including 21 offensive rebounds, which created 20 second-chance points and repeatedly extended possessions. That advantage helped Virginia Tech stay within striking distance even when the offense stalled.

Head coach Mike Young pointed to the rebounding margin as one of the more frustrating parts of the loss.

“You outrebound somebody 45 to 26 or whatever that is,” Young said. “You’re supposed to win the game. Unfortunately, we did not.”

Advertisement

Several Hokies contributed to that effort. Forward Tobi Lawal led the team with nine rebounds. Centers Christian Gurdak and Antonio Dorn combined for 15 rebounds, with Dorn seeing extended minutes after Amani Hansberry was sidelined with an injury he suffered against Virginia.

Advertisement

Virginia Tech showed its usual resilience. The Hokies erased multiple deficits throughout the game and were able to force overtime in a game where Wake Forest led for almost 36 minutes.

Young praised the fight his team showed throughout the night.

“It’s been a characteristic of this team throughout,” said Young. “They’ve got a lot to them, and great kids to coach.”

The Bad: A quiet night for Neoklis Avdalas

Advertisement

Virginia Tech needed contributions across the lineup in a tight postseason game, but Neoklis Avdalas struggled to make an impact.

Avdalas finished with five points, shooting 2-for-8 from the field. The Hokies’ assist leader was unable to record an assist against the Demon Deacons. He played 31 minutes before spending the final 7:37 of the second half and all of overtime on the bench.

Young confirmed the decision was performance-based.

“I just thought [Jaden Schutt and Jailen Bedford] were playing better than Neo, so that is how it went,” said Young.

Advertisement

Schutt played his most minutes in a game (29) since late January. He shot 3-for-7 from three and made all six of his free throws, ending the night with 15 points.

Advertisement

This game stands in stark contrast to Avdalas’ previous showing against Wake Forest. In that game from Feb. 21, Avdalas scored 17 points, shooting 6-for-14 from the field. He also recorded eight assists and three rebounds that game.

The Ugly: Turnovers early and execution in overtime

THe biggest issue for Virginia Tech came in two stretches: the early turnovers and in overtime.

Advertisement

The Hokies committed 10 turnovers in the first half, allowing Wake Forest to control the pace despite Virginia Tech’s 25-11 first-half rebounding advantage. Off those 10 first-half turnovers, Wake Forest scored 11 points.

Advertisement

“We had some terrible, terrible turnovers,” said Young.

Although Virginia Tech cleaned that up in the second half, only committing three turnovers for the remainder of the game, the early miscues forced the Hokies to play from behind most of the night.

After battling abck all night, overtime is where the Hokies ran out of answers.

Wake Forest quickly seized momentum in the extra period. Guard Myles Colvin gave the Demon Deacons a five-point advantage less than a minute into overtime, making a floater and a three.

Advertisement

The Hokies struggled to generate offense in overtime while Wake Forest capitalized repeatedly at the free-throw line. When Virginia Tech was forced to foul down late, Wake Forest did not allow any chance of a comeback, making all nine of its free throws in overtime.

Advertisement

“They were hitting shots,” Ben Hammond said. “Their point guard had the game of his life today.”

In the end, Wake Forest made the plays Virginia Tech could not.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Virginia

Virginia lawmakers criticize anti-redistricting mailer with Jim Crow-era images – WTOP News

Published

on

Virginia lawmakers criticize anti-redistricting mailer with Jim Crow-era images – WTOP News


The flyers encourage people to vote against the redistricting effort and feature pictures of the Ku Klux Klan and from the Civil Rights Movement.

Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones condemned flyers with Jim Crow-era images discouraging voters from supporting redistricting in the state.

The mailers, which Jones told WTOP he first learned about last weekend, featured pictures of the Ku Klux Klan and from the Civil Rights Movement. One such mailer said, “Our ancestors fought to represent us. Now Richmond politicians are trying to take our districts away.”

The flyers encourage people to vote against the redistricting effort.

Advertisement

Early voting is underway, as Democrats in the state push for changes to congressional districts that are expected to give them more of an advantage in Congress. They said it’s in response to President Donald Trump encouraging redistricting in Republican-led states such as Texas. Republicans, though, have been critical.

In an interview with WTOP, Jones, Virginia’s first Black attorney general, said the mailers are disturbing, shocking, offensive and deceptive.

“It’s very clear a MAGA-linked group that opposes the referendum is sending these mailers to Black voters, and they’re misusing very, very hurtful imagery from the Civil Rights Movement, even invoking Jim Crow, to weaponize one of the darkest chapters in our history, to scare people into voting no and help Republicans maintain a rigged map for 2026 so they can keep control of Congress,” Jones said.

Advertisement

In a statement, the NAACP Virginia State Conference said the flyers falsely compare redistricting to Jim Crow.

“While the NAACP is nonpartisan, we are deeply engaged in political advocacy to safeguard our communities,” said Rev. Cozy Bailey, president of NAACP Virginia.

The purpose of the mailers, Jones said, is to “suppress the vote. It’s to make sure that people don’t go make their voices heard during this election.”

The flyers said they’re paid for by a group called Democracy and Justice PAC. Former Virginia Del. A.C. Cordoza, a Republican, is listed as the chairman, according to Virginia Board of Elections documents.

“I couldn’t see why they say it’s insulting,” Cordoza told WTOP. “I’m a Black man. I don’t want my Black vote to be taken away.”

Advertisement

The proposed new map, Cordoza said, “ripped apart majority-minority districts in order to increase the number of white representatives from Northern Virginia.”

Cordoza said he didn’t know how many homes the mailers had been sent to or how much the PAC spent on them.

“I want people to do their research and see exactly what’s happening,” Cordoza said. “We, as Virginians, voted for a bipartisan redistricting commission for a reason.”

Jones, though, said he sits “across the dinner table from people who have had their right to vote denied because of the color of their skin. It’s 2026. I would hope that we’d be past tactics like this, but clearly we aren’t.”

Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

Advertisement

© 2026 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending