The Baltimore Banner thanks its sponsors. Become one.
Virginia
Not so fast. Proposal to relocate Wizards, Capitals to northern Virginia hits roadblock in legislature
RICHMOND, Va. â A proposal to lure the the NBAâs Washington Wizards and NHLâs Washington Capitals to Alexandria, Virginia took another big hit Thursday, when top Virginia lawmakers confirmed the budget they will take up later this week would not include language enabling the deal.
The news does not necessarily mean the end of the road for Gov. Glenn Youngkinâs ambitions of landing Virginia its first major pro sports teams in nearly 50 years through a $2 billion development district featuring a new arena. But it complicates the path forward for a top Youngkin priority that requires legislative approval.
In a news conference at the foot of the Capitol steps, the Republican governor said he believed the Democratic-led General Assembly was poised to make âa colossal mistakeâ and argued that lawmakers should reconsider and restore the project language to the budget before sending it to his desk.
âThey have a chance to stand up and do whatâs right. They have a chance to assess this one-of-a-kind, first-of-its-kind economic development opportunity on the merits of the opportunity,â he said.
State Sen. L. Louise Lucas of Portsmouth, a senior Democrat who used her perch as chair of the Senate Finance and Appropriations Committee to keep the deal out of the pending budget legislation, stood on the Capitol portico as Youngkin spoke, looking down and sometimes smiling.
The dealâs leading opponent and a sharp critic of the governor, Lucas told reporters she remains firmly opposed to the proposal, in large part because of its reliance on bonds backed by the state and city governments.
Both Lucas and Democratic Del. Luke Torian, who chairs the House Appropriations Committee and led negotiations for his chamber, confirmed that the arena-related provisions were removed from the budget legislation, which lawmakers are expected to take up Saturday.
The legislation had been in the hands of a conference committee â a small, bipartisan group of legislators thatâs been meeting behind closed doors to find compromise â after the two chambers passed competing budget bills earlier this session.
The budget was the last vehicle remaining this session for legislation to pave the way for the deal. Two other standalone bills were defeated after Lucas refused to grant them a committee hearing.
Youngkin and other backers have a few ways to try to keep the project alive. If lawmakers send the governor a budget without the arena language, he could pursue an amendment to restore it. Or he could call a special session, starting over with a new bill.
Legislators could also reject the budget and send it back to the conference committee, though Senate Majority Leader Scott Surovell said in an interview thatâs not likely to happen.
Surovell, who said he did not anticipate budget negotiators would be open to more last-minute talks before Saturday, also criticized Youngkin for what he called an unwillingness to consider some top Democratic top priorities.
âThis is a process that requires compromise, and so far the governor has made very little indication that heâs willing to compromise,â said Surovell, who has been more open to the deal than Lucas.
Youngkin rolled out the proposal with great fanfare in December when he and Ted Leonsis, an entrepreneur and the ultrawealthy CEO of Monumental Sports and Entertainment, the Capitalsâ and Wizardsâ parent company, announced that they had reached an understanding.
The Wizards, previously known as the Bullets, played in Baltimore from 1963 to 1973, when the franchise moved to the then-new Capital Centre in Landover, Maryland. They were joined there the following year by the expansion Capitals. In 1997, both franchises left suburban Maryland for a new downtown venue in Washington, now called Capital One Arena.
The competition within the DMV for the Capitals and Wizards comes as the District of Columbia also tries to lure the NFLâs Washington Commanders, who now play in Landover, back to the city. The U.S. House of Representatives last month passed a bill that would allow the District to redevelop the site of the teamâs former home, RFK Stadium, into a mixed-use project that possibly includes a new stadium. Marylandâs congressional delegation opposed the measure amid Gov. Wes Mooreâs efforts to keep the Commanders in Maryland, The Washington Post reported.
The Virginia deal calls for the creation of a $2 billion development, partly financed by public money, in the Potomac Yard section of Alexandria that would include an arena, practice facility and corporate headquarters for Monumental, plus a separate performing arts venue, all just miles from Washingtonâs Capital One Arena, where the teams currently play.
The company said in a statement that it is disappointed but remains âhopeful that the merits of the proposal will eventually get a fair hearing so this important project can advance for our fans, players, employees and the residents of Virginia.â
In Washington, Council Chair Phil Mendelson welcomed the news and expressed hope that the teams would remain in the city, which has made a $500 million offer to renovate Capital One.
âThe Arena and Monumental Sports have been partners with the District for almost 30 years, and a great asset to downtown,â Mendelson said in a statement. âAs a deal in Virginia remains uncertain, the Council continues to be ready to welcome Monumental Sportsâ change of mind.â
Under the Youngkin-negotiated terms, Monumental and the city of Alexandria would contribute some funds up front, but about $1.5 billion would be financed through bonds issued by a governmental entity that lawmakers would set up.
The bonds were to be repaid through a mix of revenues from the project, including naming rights, parking fees and taxes on tickets, concessions and athletes competing at the arena. Proponents say that would more than cover the debt, creating new revenues for the city and state in the projectâs first year. But about a third of the financing would be backed by the âmoral obligationâ of the city and state governments, meaning taxpayers could be on the hook if the project revenues donât come through as expected.
Youngkin, a private equity executive before he ran for public office, emphasized that the state would not be putting in upfront cash and that revenues that âotherwise will not be hereâ would help finance the deal. And he warned that the Senateâs handling of the deal could threaten Virginiaâs business-friendly reputation.
Lucas dismissed that concern and said she had serious worries about âputting taxpayersâ money behind the project of a billionaire.â
She acknowledged that blocking the arena could hurt the chances of securing Youngkinâs support for top Democratic legislative priorities like a measure establishing marijuana retail sales. But she thought the trade-off was worth it.
âI just stood firm on what I believe in my heart to be in the best interest of the Commonwealth. And that was just to say no to the Glenn Dome,â she said using a nickname sheâs given the proposed arena.
Torian, who had carried one of the standalone arena bills, said he was âperhaps a little disappointedâ the arena language didnât survive, but he emphasized other provisions that did, including pay raises for teachers and other public employees and increased spending on certain government services.
Also out of the budget are Youngkinâs proposed tax cuts, he said.
Associated Press writer Denise Lavoie contributed to this report.
Virginia
Democrat Beyer blasts GOP plan to counter Virginia redistricting by eliminating his seat
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
A Republican lawmaker is proposing to return Arlington and Alexandria to Washington, D.C., a move aimed at countering Democrats’ newly strengthened grip on Virginia’s congressional map following this week’s redistricting vote.
The “Make D.C. Square Again Act” from Rep. Rich McCormick, R-Ga., comes after voters approved Virginia’s new Democratic-backed map positioning the party to expand its congressional seat advantage by linking blue Northern Virginia suburbs with more rural districts — a shift Republicans warn could dilute GOP strength statewide.
Rep. Donald Beyer, D-Va., on Thursday lambasted McCormick’s plan to finish what lawmakers in the 1860s started and return the heavily Democratic district to the District.
“Rich McCormick’s bill is an embarrassing legislative tantrum,” Beyer told Fox News Digital.
SOROS-LINKED DARK MONEY NETWORK FUELS VIRGINIA REDISTRICTING PUSH BACKED BY NATIONAL DEMOCRATS
Rep. Donald Beyer Jr., D-Va., attends a protest in Washington. (Tom Williams/Getty Images)
“It is also unconstitutional, and a stupid waste of time. Republicans upset about the passage of Virginia’s redistricting referendum should stop whining, as they have no one to blame but themselves.”
McCormick’s bill called the 1846 retrocession “unconstitutional” and restore the District of Columbia’s original 100-square-mile boundary.
He lamented the redistricting vote and noted that Sen. Benjamin Wade, R-Ohio, originally sparked the retrocession movement with legislation in 1866. An 1836 effort by Sen. William Preston, a Whig from South Carolina, to cede the entirety of Washington, D.C., to Maryland also failed.
Alexandria County — now Arlington County and the city of Alexandria — retroceded from the District of Columbia to Virginia amid alleged economic inequities with then-Georgetown County, D.C., political mismanagement and tensions over Alexandria’s then-booming slave trade, as the North, including Washington, D.C., opposed the practice.
All that remains of Washington, D.C., on the Virginia side of the Potomac River is Columbia Island, also known as Lady Bird Johnson Island, which remains with the District of Columbia due to an arcane law regarding the river’s high-water mark.
Presidents Abraham Lincoln and William Taft also voiced support for Wade’s mission, but de-retrocession routinely died in the Senate in the several times it was tried.
NEWSOM TURNS VIRGINIA REDISTRICTING VICTORY INTO WARNING SHOT FOR TRUMP ADMINISTRATION
A Virginia welcome sign is posted in the grass near the intersection of Lee Highway, Key Bridge, and the George Washington Memorial Parkway in Rosslyn, Arlington County, Va. (Universal Images Group/Getty Images)
“Restore to the District of Columbia the portion of its territory taken away by the retrocession,” Taft demanded in his 1912 State of the Union.
McCormick argued that “absent the vote of DC bureaucrats,” the other 90% of Virginia’s geographic voice would remain intact with a “substantial Republican majority.”
He said 250,000 votes in Arlington and Alexandria — which Beyer’s district comprises along with parts of southern Fairfax — should rightly belong to Washington, D.C.
Beyer said that Virginia’s voice opposing President Donald Trump was rightly heard in Tuesday’s election and that Republicans like McCormick are trying to instead “permanently deprive hundreds of thousands of my constituents of their right to vote in federal elections.”
“Their contempt for voters is breathtaking,” Beyer said.
Beyer added that Americans want Congress to focus on economic issues and halting Trump’s Iran War but are instead faced with Republicans “humiliating themselves” to curry the president’s favor.
“Voters will remember,” he said.
In a response to Fox News Digital, McCormick shared a meme of a Google Map with Beyer’s portrait bordered by the District of Columbia.
“On the bright side, you can run for mayor now, Don Beyer.”
Former assistant U.S. Attorney and Heritage Foundation fellow Zack Smith noted to Fox News Digital that Taft later became Chief Justice of the U.S. and had legally analyzed retrocession to be “problematic”
“This questionable action should not be used as justification for radically transforming the boundaries and the status of the District of Columbia by simple legislation,” Smith wrote in a recent law review article.
Smith argued that Maryland’s consent should have been efforted in order to create Arlington and Alexandria, citing colonial law regarding Maryland having land carved from itself for the District – and not for the eventual formation of a piece of another state.
“Since Maryland donated the land for the purpose of creating the seat of the federal government, Maryland must consent to its use for another purpose,” Smith wrote.
JEFFRIES DEFENDS VIRGINIA REDISTRICTING AS ‘TEMPORARY MEASURE’ TO STOP TRUMP FROM TRYING TO ‘RIG’ MIDTERMS
An old map of Washington, D.C., when it included “Alexandria County” is on display at the D.C. City Museum. (Chris Maddaloni/Getty Images)
In a statement on the bill, McCormick argued that the Constitution is indeed on his side.
He said the Enclave Clause puts D.C.’s boundaries in Congress’ hands and gives no authority to retrocede territory back to the states.
“The Make DC Square Act restores the District of Columbia as the Founders envisioned it,” he said.
Meanwhile, a spokesperson for Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger rebuked the idea of giving Arlington and Alexandria back:
“Inflation is skyrocketing, gas is close to $4, and Virginia families are feeling squeezed by high prices because of the reckless policies coming out of Washington. Republicans in Congress should be focused on contending with the high costs and economic chaos created by President Trump,” the spokesperson said.
Not all Virginia lawmakers agreed with Beyer, including Del. Wren Williams of Patrick County in the southern part of the commonwealth.
Williams, who is also an attorney, told Fox News Digital he “fully supports this act.”
“If we’re going to claim we support the constitution while our federal capital remains split over separate jurisdictions, how are we any better than those who allow millions of illegal aliens to flow across our borders as enemies to our nation?” he asked.
“We need to resolve the inconsistency. We gave that land to the district, and there are no takebacks.”
GOP-LED COUNTIES PUSH BACK AGAINST DEMOCRAT’S REDISTRICTING CHARGE, TESTING VIRGINIA’S CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS
The Arlington, Virginia, skyline is seen from the sky on a hazy afternoon. (iStock/Getty Images)
Williams said returning Arlington and Alexandria to Washington would begin a necessary “healing process” in Virginia to correct a longstanding divide, which other Republicans have lamented has left southside Virginia without a full voice in Richmond.
The Washington-based government-transparency group The Oversight Project has also focused at times on the Arlington boundary dispute.
Mike Howell, an attorney and the organization’s president, told Fox News Digital that “aggressive actions” need to be undertaken to return the District of Columbia to its proper confines.
He called for returning “D.C. back in its proper constitutional place and to return order and dignity to the Nation’s capital.”
“The Oversight Project has been pushing this issue on many fronts, particularly as it relates to President Trump’s authority to take control of the area and an out of control D.C. bar.”
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Howell said his group is making headway in court and offered encouragement that McCormick’s bill would open the door to more action.
Given the heavily Democratic tilt of Beyer’s district, removing Arlington and Alexandria from Virginia would significantly alter the state’s political balance, potentially reshaping the state’s political balance after years of Democratic gains.
Democrats’ newly approved map relies heavily on Northern Virginia’s dense, reliably blue suburbs to anchor multiple districts, alongside other urban centers such as Richmond, Norfolk and Charlottesville — a structure that could be disrupted if those populations were no longer part of the state.
Such a shift could also ripple into state politics, where control of the legislature remains closely divided, though any downstream impact would depend on court challenges, implementation hurdles and whether the proposal gains traction in Congress.
Virginia
A proposal to merge Alexandria, Arlington back into DC sheds light on past retrocession
ALEXANDRIA, Va. (7News) — A Georgia congressman’s viral proposal to add Arlington and Alexandria back into Washington, D.C., is called the “Make D.C. Square Again Act,” which has a history lesson buried inside it.
Rep. Rick Allen McCormick posted the idea on X this week, arguing the two Virginia jurisdictions were “always meant” to be part of the nation’s capital. His proposal comes as Virginia fights a federal court order blocking certification of results from a special election tied to its ongoing congressional redistricting battle.
“What we want to do is make D.C. square again,” McCormick wrote. “We repeal that unconstitutional law, give back Virginia exactly what it should have, give D.C. what it should have, and get this thing right.”
There is currently no indication the proposal has any support in Congress or from leaders in D.C. or Virginia. But the history behind it is complicated.
1835 map showing Alexandria as part of original District of Columbia. (Library of Congress)
When Congress established a permanent home for the federal government through the Residence Act of 1790, Virginia and Maryland each surrendered territory to create it. The 100-square-mile District was made up of 69 square miles from Maryland and 31 square miles from Virginia, including what’s now known as Arlington and Alexandria.
When those areas were absorbed into the new District, its residents lost their Virginia state citizenship and, after 1802, could no longer vote in congressional or presidential elections.
Almost from the moment of its passage in 1801, Virginia was looking for a way to get its territory back. But it was economics, specifically the economics of slavery and the domestic slave trade, that ultimately made it happen.
Beginning in the 1820s, Alexandria became a major port of the domestic slave trade, with a series of slave trading companies operating out of a slave pen at 1315 Duke Street. Enslaved people from the Upper South, where tobacco farming was in decline, were bought and sold in Alexandria before being shipped to cotton plantations further south.
DMV 250 | DC marks 178th anniversary of The Pearl, the largest enslaved escape attempt in US history
Interior view of a slave pen at 1315 Duke Street in Alexandria, Virginia between 1861 and 1869. (Library of Congress)
Abolitionists had been vigorously lobbying Congress to end slavery and the slave trade in the District. In response, Alexandrians who profited from slaveholding wanted the town returned to Virginia’s jurisdiction, fearing abolitionists would succeed in banning the practice within the District.
A series of bills to return the “town and county of Alexandria” portion of D.C. to Virginia were proposed in Congress beginning in 1804. Both abolitionists and pro-slavery advocates at various times supported the effort, though for opposing reasons.
A key turning point came in 1844, when Congress ended its self-imposed ban on debating anti-slavery petitions. This was a sign that abolitionist political power was growing, and that the worst-case scenario for Virginia slaveholders was becoming more plausible.
By 1846, white civic leaders were actively lobbying for Alexandria and Arlington’s return to Virginia. Congress passed a retrocession act, and President James K. Polk signed it into law in July 1846. Virginia formally accepted those areas back under its jurisdiction in March 1847.
The decision had immediate consequences for Alexandria’s Black community. African American residents soon experienced the negative impacts of retrocession, including the closure of schools and other gathering sites they had previously been permitted to use while living under the District’s laws.
SEE ALSO | Virginia could adopt its 5th electoral map in 2 census cycles: how we got here
McCormick’s bill undoes the retrocession act passed by Congress. He has framed it as a solution to Virginia’s ongoing redistricting disputes, arguing the congressional map chaos could have been avoided under his proposal.
In a statement, Democratic Congressman Don Beyer, who represents the affected areas in Northern Virginia, called McCormick’s bill “an embarrassing legislative tantrum” and “unconstitutional.”
Wednesday, a federal judge blocked Virginia from certifying results from a redistricting-related special election, ruling both the referendum and the underlying bill unconstitutional. Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones confirmed his office will appeal.
No co-sponsors have emerged for McCormick’s proposal. It would also face enormous legal, political, and practical hurdles, including questions about whether Congress can unilaterally alter state boundaries and what it would mean for the about 250,000, largely Democrat, residents of Alexandria and Arlington who currently hold Virginia citizenship.
Virginia
Why the Virginia redistricting referendum wasn’t a slam dunk for Democrats
Democrats are celebrating after Virginia approved a redistricting plan that could help their party net up to four additional congressional seats in the race for control of the House. But it was a close call, thanks to lackluster turnout in Democratic areas and a rightward shift across much of the state, an NBC News Decision Desk analysis of precinct data shows.
-
North Dakota5 minutes agoGlatt to retire from ND Department of Environmental Quality; Armstrong thanks him for 43 years of service
-
Ohio12 minutes agoTwo hospitalized after shooting in Brecksville: Police
-
Oklahoma18 minutes agoShelters open to help families impacted by Oklahoma tornadoes
-
Oregon24 minutes agoHAPPENING TODAY: Prescribed burns around Central Oregon
-
Pennsylvania30 minutes agoCatchy chemistry: Pennsylvania musician sings songs about the periodic table of elements
-
Rhode Island36 minutes agoSix animals test positive for rabies in Providence County, health officials warn – What’s Up Newp
-
South-Carolina42 minutes agoStruggling South Carolina Farmers in Line for Assistance – FITSNews
-
South Dakota48 minutes agoDOC lacks population-specific programs, otherwise has ‘right things’ in place