Connect with us

Virginia

Cardinals draft West Virginia ‘baller’ JJ Wetherholt with their highest pick in decades

Published

on

Cardinals draft West Virginia ‘baller’ JJ Wetherholt with their highest pick in decades







Advertisement

JJ Wetherholt, an infielder who played at West Virginia, talks with members of the media moments after the Cardinals selected with the seventh pick in the MLB draft on Sunday, July 13, 2024.  


Derrick Goold


Advertisement


FORT WORTH, Texas — With a bolo tie purchased because he had come all this way to Texas and confidence to match its size, middle infielder JJ Wetherholt fielded his first question as a Cardinal with a smile.

“A baller,” he said when asked what they’re getting in him.

With their highest pick in decades, the Cardinals selected Wetherholt, an advanced hitter with high-average upside, with the seventh pick in the annual Major League Baseball draft. Wetherholt had been projected as a potential No. 1 pick and a likely top-three pick, but with the way the first-round played out he was available to the Cardinals at No. 7.

Wetherholt was the first player in attendance at Cowtown Coliseum for the draft to be selected, so he got to take the floor in a Cardinals jersey and wave to the crowd.

Wetherholt, 21, hit .331 with a .472 on-base percentage and a .589 slugging percentage for West Virginia. He was limited to 36 games because of a hamstring injury that did play a factor where teams slotted him on their draft. As a sophomore, he led the nation with a .449 average and Baseball America described him as the “top pure hitter” on Team USA’s national collegiate team.

Advertisement

People are also reading…



Advertisement




College Baseball Preview Players to Watch

West Virginia’s J.J. Wetherholt runs to first against Youngstown State during an NCAA college baseball game Thursday, March 24, 2022, in Morgantown, W.Va. 




A Pittsburgh Pirates fan growing up, Wetherholt told the Post-Dispatch in a quick interview following the pick that it was time to “flip that script” and root for the Cardinals.

Advertisement

Asked to describe his game, he called himself “a five-tool player” who can play anywhere on the field.

The No. 7 pick this year has an assigned slot value of $6,823,700. That is nearly 70% of the Cardinals’ total purse for this year’s draft and it sets the stage for one of their largest bonus offers ever to a first-round pick.

Teams can go below or above the slot assigned. Teams are assessed a fine if their total spending on draft bonuses goes above an assigned purse. The Cardinals are one of four teams that have gone beyond their bonus limit in each of the past 12 years and paid the tax. Their total spending for this year has been assigned a cap of $10,213,000 before they pay the overage tax.

The Cardinals landed the seventh pick after finishing with the fifth-worst record in the majors in 2023. That gave them the fifth-best odds of the first overall pack in the draft lottery. They actually slipped in the lottery, leapfrogged by division rival Cincinnati, which landed the No. 2 pick despite having a better record in 2023 than the Cardinals.

The Reds drafted Wake Forest ace Chase Burns, a pitcher who the Cardinals also had high views of entering this past collegiate season. Burns, a right-hander, went 10-1 with a 2.70 ERA in 16 starts and he struck out 191 batters in 100 innings.

Advertisement

With the No. 1 pick, Cleveland selected infielder Travis Bazzana out of Oregon State. He was born and grew up in Australia before coming to Oregon to play college baseball, and in his junior year he hit .407 with a .911 slugging percentage. He hit 28 homers for the Beavers in 60 games and he reached base nearly 57% of the times he came to the plate.

In 2023, Pittsburgh selected pitcher Paul Skenes with the first pick, and a year later he’s set to start Tuesday’s All-Star Game for the National League.

Cardinals assistant general manager Randy Flores speaks with the media via Zoom on Sunday, July 14, 2024, after the Cardinals picked JJ Wetherholt seventh overall in the Major League Baseball draft.

Advertisement

Ethan Erickson


In nine years with assistant general manager Randy Flores at the helm of the draft board, the Cardinals had not picked higher than 18th, let alone top.

The selection Sunday night was the Cardinals’ highest since 1998, when they took outfielder J. D. Drew with the fifth pick. Drew made his big-league debut later that season on the night Mark McGwire hit his 62nd homer of the summer, and the selection of Drew continued to pay off for the Cardinals for another 25 years.

He was the centerpiece of a 2003 trade with Atlanta that netted Adam Wainwright, who went on to become a World Series championship closer and a 200-game winner for the Cardinals.

The No. 7 pick in the draft has been fruitful in recent years with teams selecting aces Clayton Kershaw and Aaron Nola and also impact position players such as Troy Tulowitzki and Prince Fielder. The past three drafts have featured a pitcher selected seventh, and 12 of the past 15 drafts have seen a pitcher taken at No. 7.

Advertisement

This is a breaking news story and will be updated.

Sonny Gray builds momentum toward 2nd half. Cardinals offense has 2 days to do the same.

‘We need to nail it’: How Cardinals prepared for draft pick No. 7, their highest in generations

Emotionally charged Nolan Arenado delivers in a key spot as Cardinals sweep doubleheader

Advertisement



Source link

Virginia

Amazon-Virginia Tech initiative awards two Amazon Fellows, support for four faculty projects

Published

on

Amazon-Virginia Tech initiative awards two Amazon Fellows, support for four faculty projects


Faculty awards

Additionally, four faculty members received funding through the initiative for their projects. 

Muhammad Ali Gulzar, assistant professor in the Department of Computer Science, received funding for “Foundations on the Code Comprehensibility of Large Language Models.” LLMs have demonstrated strong performance in code generation. With the rise of agentic LLMs, their use is rapidly expanding into post development tasks requiring a deeper semantic understanding of code that is not strictly rooted in lexical and syntactic code features. While popular LLM benchmarks measure the accuracy of LLMs’ code generation, the extent to which LLMs truly understand code remains largely unevaluated. This project seeks to design a scalable, quantitative, and automated method for assessing how well an LLM understands code and the impact of this understanding on post-development tasks. The goal is to encourage more mindful use in coding tasks and, in the long run, provide an actionable basis for prioritizing training data for LLM fine-tuning.

Ming Jin, assistant professor in the Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, received funding for “Enhancing Foundation Model Reasoning through Reinforcement Learning with Novel Reward Design.” Current efforts to enhance foundation model reasoning face limitations like high compute costs; reward hacking and stability issues with learned reward models; difficulty balancing reasoning quality and efficiency; and challenges in multimodal contexts. Improving complex reasoning of foundation models reliably and efficiently is critical for Amazon’s AI ecosystem. Producing both critiques and actionable hints for a richer signal has shown promise for improving optimization efficiency and effectiveness in previous research. This proposal builds on this foundation by designing novel reward signals that guide a model’s reasoning process, transforming it into a more autonomous agent capable of tackling complex, multi-step problems. 

Chang-Tien Lu, professor in the Department of Computer Science and associate director of the Sanghani Center, received funding for “Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Reasoning in Multi-Agent Systems.” Multi-agent systems enhance performance by combining a weaker but locally accessible model with a more powerful yet proprietary black-box remote model. This combination exposes local data to a remote agent, raising concerns about information leakage, especially in sensitive domains like healthcare information, financial records, and e-commerce activities. For virtual assistants like Amazon Alexa and smart home systems, which frequently process sensitive user data, robust local data protection is also crucial for preserving user privacy and trust. The goal of this research is to design a collaborative reasoning mechanism without exposing sensitive local data to thoroughly protect it before the black-box model inference. 

Advertisement

Tu Vu, assistant professor in the Department of Computer Science, received funding for “Efficient Model Development through Fine-tuning Transfer.” Large Language Models are continually evolving, with newer versions released to improve pretraining quality, architecture, or alignment. Yet each new version of the base model typically demands repeated and computationally expensive alignment procedures. This inefficiency extends to domain- or language-specific models, where fine-tuning must be redone from scratch with every base model upgrade. Transferring fine-tuning updates (i.e., weight differences or “diff vectors”) across model versions offers a compelling alternative: enabling model updates without full retraining. This proposed approach promises to significantly reduce training costs while maintaining competitive performance, making it a viable strategy for sustainable LLM development.

About the workshop

The invitation-only AI workshop was held in Ocotber at Academic Building One in Alexandria and included remarks by Lance Collins, vice president of the greater Washington, D.C., area; Ramakrishnan; and Anand Rathi, center liaison and director, software development, artificial general intelligence, at Amazon. 

“We are pleased to welcome our Amazon collaborators to Virginia Tech’s new Academic Building One in Alexandria for our annual gathering,” Ramakrishnan said. “It is a great opportunity to connect Virginia Tech faculty in the space of AI with Amazon researchers and foster future collaborations.”  

“Our collaboration with Virginia Tech represents a strategic investment in developing the next generation of AI talent and innovation,” said Rathi. “The research emerging from this partnership continues to advance our understanding of responsible and efficient AI systems while preparing students for the complex challenges of tomorrow.”

Additionally, Chalapathi Choppa, senior manager, security engineer, Amazon, discussed Amazon Artificial General Intelligence and the importance of responsible AI, and two Virginia Tech faculty members who have sponsored research projects with Amazon gave lightning talks. They were: 

Advertisement
  • Ruoxi Jia, assistant professor, Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Tech, “A Compositional Framework for Proactive AI Safety”
  • Hongliang Xin, assistant professor, Department of Chemical Engineering, “Next-Generation Catalysts for Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis”

Previous events related to the initiative have been held at the Virginia Tech Research Center — Arlington and on the university’s Blacksburg campus.





Source link

Continue Reading

Virginia

Postseason Bowl Projections for Virginia Football After Win Over Virginia Tech

Published

on

Postseason Bowl Projections for Virginia Football After Win Over Virginia Tech


The Virginia Cavaliers’ regular season is now over, and fortunately, they ended it on a high note. On Saturday, they clinched a 27-7 victory over Virginia Tech, landing themselves a spot in the ACC Championship Game. Prior to now, the Hokies held a winning streak over UVA, but the Cavaliers redeemed themselves by making a remarkable comeback.

“It gives us motivation. It gives us encouragement, a little bit of validation that we’re definitely headed in the right direction to make this a competitive rivalry and make Virginia a program of relevance locally and then also nationally,” head coach Tony Elliott said during his latest media appearance.

Not only was this victory a massive achievement for the players, but it was a major step in the right direction for Elliott. Doubt filled the air before their 2025 campaign began, but Elliott maintained a tight mindset — his players were capable of more than most expected. With the regular season now behind them, what are the postseason projections looking like?

A football player in a navy blue uniform running with a brown football while a player in white tries to tackle him

Nov 29, 2025; Charlottesville, Virginia, USA; Virginia Cavaliers wide receiver Kameron Courtney (5) is pushed out of bounds after a catch by Virginia Tech Hokies cornerback Thomas Williams (23) in the second quarter at Scott Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Geoff Burke-Imagn Images / Geoff Burke-Imagn Images

ESPN: Mark Schlabach of ESPN projects that Virginia will be facing Ole Miss, currently ranked at No. 6 in the AP Top 25, on Dec. 20. Not only is UVA facing Ole Miss in this projection, but the Cavaliers are projected to win the game. In the CFP Quarterfinal on Jan. 1, he has UVA taking on No. 3 Georgia at the Allstate Sugar Bowl. As for ESPN writer Kyle Bonagura, he has Virginia playing No. 6 Oregon on Dec. 20, but he does not have the Cavaliers playing in the CFP Quarterfinal.

Advertisement

CBS: Brad Crawford of CBS Sports projects that UVA will face Oregon in the first round on Dec. 19 or 20, with the winner taking on Indiana. A Virginia-Oregon matchup would be an interesting night, as the Ducks currently own an overall record of 11-1 and are 8-1 in conference play. They would undoubtedly put UVA to the test, but this wouldn’t be the first time the Cavaliers have overcome a challenge.

Elliott said it best, “… the hardest part is when you’re trying to teach others, you can’t do it for them, right? You can’t do it for them, but you can encourage them. You can try to inspire them, and you can get them to that point, but man, they’ve got to do it for themselves. And that’s really the coolest thing, right?

Virginia’s regular season activity may be over, but now is the time for the Cavaliers to really dig in and achieve what most thought would be impossible this year. The Cavaliers have had a remarkable 2025 campaign, but how far will they be able to push their limits in college football this time around?



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Virginia

Virginia, Duke to play for ACC title: Could the conference miss the Playoff?

Published

on

Virginia, Duke to play for ACC title: Could the conference miss the Playoff?


Next week’s ACC championship game won’t include the league’s best team. It will instead feature a doomsday scenario that could leave the power conference out of the College Football Playoff entirely.

First, the matchup: No. 18 Virginia vs. unranked Duke. The Cavaliers (10-2, 7-1 ACC) easily earned their spot with Saturday night’s 27-7 triumph over Virginia Tech. J’Mari Taylor rushed for a touchdown and threw for another in the first half, and the defense forced seven three-and-outs and snagged two interceptions in the Hokies’ first 10 drives to put the Cavaliers in the conference title game for the first time since 2019.

“This is what we came here for,” Cavaliers head coach Tony Elliott said on the ESPN broadcast. “Just super proud of the staff, super proud of the players, but we have four more quarters.”

Those four quarters are, surprisingly, against Duke, which ended up atop a log jam of five other teams with two conference losses (joining Miami, Pitt, SMU, Georgia Tech) … even though the Blue Devils were the only one unranked by the CFP selection committee.

Advertisement

Duke’s first appearance in the ACC championship since 2013 opens the door for a disastrous scenario for the conference. The CFP’s protocol does not guarantee a bid to every Power 4 conference. Rather, it reserves a spot for the five top conference champions, regardless of their league. Duke’s resume includes defeats against UConn, Illinois and Tulane. If the Blue Devils beat Virginia, the CFP selection committee could snub the ACC’s champion in favor of whoever wins the American Conference (Tulane or North Texas) and James Madison (11-1 entering next week’s Sun Belt championship) for the fourth and fifth automatic bids. The Mountain West’s champion (San Diego State, New Mexico, Boise State or UNLV) could also have a case.

The Athletic’s Playoff projection model gives Duke a 47 percent chance of winning the ACC title game, but just a 7 percent chance of making the Playoff — while James Madison has a 47 percent chance.

No. 12 Miami is regarded as the ACC’s top team, but losses to SMU and Louisville put the Hurricanes in a complicated web of tiebreakers despite Saturday’s 38-7 triumph at No. 22 Pitt.

The No. 21 Mustangs (8-4, 6-2) were in the best position to join Virginia in Charlotte, N.C., next week. All they had to do was beat a 6-5 Cal team led by interim coach Nick Rolovich to play for the ACC title for a second consecutive year.

They could not. SMU lost a wild game 38-35 on the road despite making a furious comeback. The Mustangs trailed by 17 early in the fourth quarter but scored touchdowns on four consecutive drives to take the lead with 2:22 to go. Cal’s standout freshman quarterback, Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutele, led the Golden Bears on a 75-yard drive, and Kendrick Raphael twisted out of a would-be tackle and past the goal line for the winning score with 43 seconds remaining. SMU missed a 52-yard field goal in the closing seconds, sealing the loss.

Advertisement

The Mustangs’ defeat gave the final spot to Duke, which did its part Saturday afternoon with a 49-32 win over Wake Forest. The Blue Devils (7-5, 6-2) recovered three fumbles, and quarterback Darian Mensah threw for two touchdowns to pass Maalik Murphy for the Blue Devils’ single-season record (28). Mensah also rushed for a touchdown.

Regardless of who wins the ACC, Miami would still have a shot at making the field as an at-large team. That bubble is crowded, too, however, as the Hurricanes compete against the likes of Notre Dame (which Miami beat), Alabama, BYU and Texas.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending