Texas
Texas vs. South Carolina Livestream: How To Watch Women’s NCAA March Madness Final Four 2025 Online
If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, The Hollywood Reporter may receive an affiliate commission.
The 2025 NCAA Women’s March Madness Final Four features the best college basketball teams in the country.
The women’s college basketball tournament continues with Texas taking on South Carolina in the Final Four on Friday, April 4. Learn more about NCAA Women’s March Madness, along with college basketball bracket info here.
At a glance: Watch NCAA Women’s March Madness Texas vs. South Carolina Online
How to Watch NCAA Women’s March Madness Texas vs. South Carolina: Date, Time
Women’s March Madness Final Four continues on Friday, April 4, at 4 p.m. PT/7 p.m. ET with No. 1-ranked Texas Longhorns vs. No. 1-ranked South Carolina Gamecocks at Amalie Arena in Tampa, Florida on ESPN.
Cord-cutters can watch the Texas-South Carolina game through any live TV streaming service that carries ESPN, such as Fubo, Hulu + Live TV, Sling, DirecTV Stream and others. Sign up for a seven-day free trial from Fubo to watch it for free. All web-based services are accessible on your smartphone, tablet, laptop or smart TV.
Aside from Women’s March Madness, fans can watch even more big sports events on ESPN, including The Masters Tournament, WNBA Draft, NBA and NHL Playoffs, NFL Draft, Wimbledon Championships and other events throughout the spring and summer.
Keep reading to find out how to watch the NCAA Women’s March Madness Final Four with and without a cable subscription, including more details on how to watch the game for free, the women’s college basketball schedule and where to buy last-minute tickets.
How to Stream NCAA Women’s March Madness Texas vs. South Carolina Without Cable
While the NCAA Women’s March Madness Final Four broadcasts on TV on ESPN, the college basketball game can also be streamed on web-based streaming cable services, including on some that offer free trials. If you act fast and sign up now, you can watch the game online for free.
Learn more about how to stream the NCAA Women’s March Madness Texas-South Carolina game below.
Best For ESPN Programming
ESPN+
Watch select the Texas-South Carolina game on ESPN+, which goes for $11.99 per month
If you’d like to livestream the NCAA March Madness Final Four, then ESPN+ ($11.99 per month) is the only option. It has the entire racing event and access to other sporting events from UFC, NFL, MLB, college football and more.
Along with ESPN+, the Disney Bundle Trio comes with the ad-supported versions of Hulu and Disney+ for $17.99 per month. This is nearly 45 percent less than if you were to subscribe to each service individually. However, if you’d like to go (mostly) ad-free, that Disney Bundle Trio goes for $26.99 per month.
Best For Cable Networks
Fubo
Stream ESPN; plans on sale from $64.99 for the first month
Watch the Texas-South Carolina game on ESPN, along with more than 220 other news, entertainment and sports channels with a subscription to Fubo, which starts at $64.99 for your first month of service ($84.99 per month afterward with Fubo’s current deals).
The online TV streaming service offers a seven-day trial for new subscribers, so you can watch Women’s March Madness online for free.
Best For Streaming Bundles
Hulu + Live TV
Stream ESPN on Hulu + Live TV for free with three-day free trial; plans start at $82.99 per month
You can watch the Texas-South Carolina game on ESPN with a subscription to Hulu + Live TV. The streaming service has access to more than 90 live channels — like BET, CNN, Discovery Channel, Food Network and more — starting at $82.99 per month and comes with Hulu’s entire streaming library, as well as Disney+ and ESPN+.
It includes unlimited cloud DVR too. Right now, Hulu + Live TV offers a three-day free trial so you can watch March Madness games online for free.
Best Wallet-Friendly
Sling
Stream ESPN on Sling’s Orange package; plans on sale starting at $23 for the first month
Sling might be a good fit to watch the Texas-South Carolina game on ESPN. It’s the most wallet-friendly cable alternative at $23 for your first month of service with Sling Orange ($45.99 per month afterward).
The Sling Orange package includes ESPN for Women’s March Madness, while it also has Disney Channel, Freeform, QVC, AMC, A&E, BBC America, BET, CNN, Comedy Central, Food Network, IFC, Lifetime, TBS, TNT, Vice and other channels. Sling currently does not offer a free trial.
Please note: Pricing and channel availability varies by TV market. Learn more about Sling Orange here.
Best for Sports
DirecTV Stream
Watch ESPN with DirecTV Stream starting at $74.99 per month
Watch the Texas-South Carolina game on DirecTV Stream. All of the cable alternative’s packages offer ESPN.
Additionally, DirecTV Stream has a new MySports package priced at $69.99 per month. It features more than 25 of the best sports channels, such as ESPN, Fox Sports, NBA TV, NFL Network and others. Learn more about DirecTV Stream’s MySports here.
The streamer has a five-day free trial available — more than enough time to watch March Madness games online. Packages start with the Entertainment tier that offers over 90 channels, such as AMC, Bravo, CNBC, Disney Channel, Nickelodeon and much more.
How to Watch NCAA Women’s March Madness Texas vs. South Carolina on TV
The NCAA women’s game broadcasts live across ESPN. You can watch the game on TV through your cable provider, on ESPN.com or the ESPN mobile app with your cable TV account credentials, including traditional and streaming services such as DirecTV, Hulu + Live TV, Verizon, Philo, Sling, Xfinity and others.
What Is the NCAA Women’s March Madness Schedule?
The NCAA Women’s March Madness continues with the Final Four starting on Friday, April 4 at 4 p.m. PT/7 p.m. ET on ESPN. The game takes place at Amalie Arena in Tampa, Florida. Check out a complete NCAA Women’s March Madness schedule here.
Where to Buy NCAA Women’s March Madness Texas vs. South Carolina Tickets Online
The NCAA Women’s March Madness goes until Saturday, April 6. Tickets are still available for the women’s college basketball game at GameTime, SeatGeek, StubHub, Ticket Liquidator, Ticketmaster, Ticket Network and Vivid Seats.
Looking for the best deals on tickets? See below for The Hollywood Reporter‘s exclusive promo codes to save on soccer tournament seats and other events (restrictions may apply):
- Ticket Network: $150 off orders over $500 with code THR150 or $300 off orders over $1,000 with code THR300
- Vivid Seats: Save $30 on orders over $300 with code THR30
- SeatGeek: Save $10 on orders over $250 for new customers with code HOLLYWOOD10
Texas
A Judge Issued a Rebuke to the Texas GOP’s Claims About the East Plano Islamic Center
For more than a year, high-profile Texas Republicans have argued that Muslims are secretly plotting to take over Texas, centering their outrage on the East Plano Islamic Center, a mosque and Muslim community in North Texas known as EPIC. That hysteria resulted in a range of government enforcement actions last year, including a probe by the Texas Funeral Service Commission that barred EPIC from performing funeral rites. Last July EPIC sued the state, alleging Texas had violated its religious freedom. Late Wednesday, a federal judge in the Western District of Texas ruled that the mosque’s lawsuit can proceed despite the state’s attempt to dismiss it. In his ruling, the judge also issued a strong rebuke to claims made by Governor Greg Abbott and other state officials, writing that “no evidence has been presented” that EPIC intends to impose “Sharia law,” Islamic teachings based on the Quran and words of the Prophet Muhammad, on Texans.
The case stems from last March, when the funeral commission issued a cease and desist order that barred the mosque from performing traditional cleansing, shrouding, and prayer over bodies, on the grounds that EPIC may have been unlawfully conducting such rites without a license. (EPIC denies this allegation.) As Texas Monthly has reported, the agency was pushed to issue the order by some of Abbott’s closest advisers, who had made unsupported claims that EPIC and a proposed housing development it was affiliated with, EPIC City, was building a “no go zone” exclusive to Muslims (it was not).
EPIC sued the funeral commission in July 2025, arguing that the cease and desist order was an unconstitutional prohibition on religious practices. In Islam, preparing bodies for funerals stands as one of the most sacred rites; by the time of EPIC’s lawsuit, according to the petition, at least eleven congregants had been forced to receive rites elsewhere—away from their home mosque.
EPIC later amended its lawsuit to include former funeral commission chair Kristin Tips after text messages were released showing she had shared anti-Muslim messages and videos as the agency’s investigation unfolded. Among the examples was a graphic Tips had sent to the commission’s then–executive director, Scott Bingaman, that accused Islam of allowing child marriage and pedophilia. After sending it, Tips texted Bingaman a YouTube video with the title: “EPIC CITY TEXAS! Are Muslims planning a TAKEOVER?”
For nearly a year, the case has been locked in a procedural back-and-forth as Tips and the agency—represented by Attorney General Ken Paxton’s office—have pushed for the court to dismiss the case. Late Wednesday evening, Judge David Alan Ezra, a Ronald Reagan appointee, issued an order denying Tips’s attempt to dismiss the lawsuit. He also rejected Tips’s claim of qualified immunity, which can shield government officials from personal liability in civil cases. That rejection is rare in courts, such as this one, that appeal to the Fifth Circuit, which is one of the most conservative federal appellate courts in the country and is typically welcoming to government defendants.
In his ruling, Ezra cited the funeral commission’s deviation from historical norm in the EPIC case, as the agency has repeatedly asserted—first in 1987 and again in 2014—that Islamic religious organizations could conduct funeral and burial services without government oversight. The judge also affirmed that the alleged conduct—including the cease and desist order and Tips’s anti-Muslim messages—was seemingly “the result of religious discrimination” that violated EPIC’s clearly established religious rights under the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause and other laws protecting religious liberty. In a rather remarkable footnote, the judge added that, based on the evidence offered, the court firmly rejected claims “suggesting that EPIC has applied, or intends to apply, ‘Sharia law’ in its practices.”
Though the case will now continue to wind through the courts, the judge’s ruling is a firm rebuke of the anti-Muslim political hysteria fueled by Abbott and his team of advisers. As Texas Monthly reported this month, the governor’s inner circle took an unusually active role in the funeral commission’s regulatory case against EPIC. After being looped into the agency’s pending investigation, which stemmed from an April 2024 complaint levied by a private individual, the governor’s attorneys, including Abbott’s general counsel, Trevor Ezell, edited the boilerplate cease and desist order the commission was ready to issue to make it more severe and punitive.
The original document, drafted by a funeral commission staffer, included a line warning that noncompliance would result in the agency taking “legal action.” Abbott’s team struck that line and suggested replacing it with a “criminal referral” to the Collin County district attorney—in what amounted to a hijacking of the agency’s usual independent regulatory process. At one point, a close adviser of Abbott even reported to a commission staffer that Abbott had texted him that after the cease and desist order was sent out, the funeral commission was his new favorite agency.
Over the following months, the governor’s advisers, including Ezell and a budget and policy adviser, Alex Aragon, weighed in often on the EPIC probe, requesting regular updates, coordinating public statements, and, at times, directing regulatory action. When the agency investigated other cases—such as a high-profile incident in which a Dallas funeral home allegedly accidentally shipped a stillborn baby to a Louisiana laundry facility—the governor’s team exhibited no similar interest. More than a year after the funeral commission’s cease and desist order, its investigation remains ongoing. No violations have been found.
Tips, the agency’s former chair, led the funeral commission until March 12, when, according to an email obtained by Texas Monthly, she “prayerfully” resigned, effective immediately, late in the night. While the circumstances around her departure remain unknown, she had spent months under fire for allegations that she had illegally lobbied for tort reform in her position as chair, which she denies. But in her absence, the governor’s pursuit of EPIC has continued. In March, the funeral commission issued a broad new subpoena to EPIC, seeking every record of funeral services that the mosque has on file.
After EPIC’s attorneys pushed back, arguing the order was too large in scope, Paxton’s office got involved—issuing a letter that demanded EPIC comply. Meanwhile, Abbott has continued his crusade against the mosque, going on Fox News earlier this week to deride EPIC and what he alleged were “multiple violations” of the law. The governor has touted that a dozen state agencies have investigated EPIC. To date, no criminal charges have been filed against the mosque, and a federal probe into EPIC by the the Department of Justice was dropped with no findings of malfeasance.
Texas
USDA reports screwworm spread in Texas
Texas
Why Texas? Explaining ins and outs of NHL exploring team for Houston or Austin
The NHL took the first step toward expansion in Texas earlier this week, agreeing to terms with billionaire Dan Friedkin and his family to explore the feasibility of putting a franchise in Houston or Austin.
Far enough from the Dallas Stars, who relocated from Minnesota in 1993, a new team would not interfere with their territorial rights. And the league has shown no fear of adding one team at a time, so No. 33 does not have to come with No. 34.
“Symmetry I don’t think should necessarily govern expansion,” Commissioner Gary Bettman said Tuesday. “You expand if you think it makes sense and enhances what the league has.”
What is behind the NHL’s interest in Texas
Money is the obvious answer. Bettman said the total investment of the project would be some $3.5 billion, which would include expansion fees paid to established owners along with the cost of building a new arena.
The Houston Rockets’ arena downtown is publicly owned but controlled by team owner Tilman Fertitta’s Clutch City Sports and Entertainment group. The home of the American Hockey League’s Texas Stars, in the Austin suburb of Cedar Park, has a capacity of 8,000 that is a little over half the size of the NHL’s smallest current rink (Winnipeg).
“I would be surprised if the NHL would be OK with an expansion team that does not have a new arena,” said Brian Mills, an associate professor at the University of Texas who teaches courses on sports economics and strategy. “The revenue potential with the luxury boxes and the way that they set those up and the money that they like to extract from the local cities is way too large to pass up.”
They are also huge markets. Houston at nearly 2.4 million is the fourth-most-populated U.S. city; Austin at just over 1 million is in the top 12.
“Obviously it makes sense if you’re a sports league to have a franchise in the nation’s fifth-largest metro area and one that is growing rapidly,” said Holy Cross professor Victor Matheson, an expert in sports economics. “Houston obviously makes sense in general as a destination for any league.”
Austin is smaller but has doubled its population since the mid-1990s and has seen an infusion of people over the past five years. Only eight of the NHL’s existing markets are bigger.
“It’s becoming more and more of a tech city, so I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s more hockey fans here than there used to be,” Mills said. “I would imagine there’s some market for the NHL here in Austin, particularly more than when it was a sleepy, small town capital of Texas 30 years ago.”
History of hockey in Houston and Austin
When hockey was picking up in popularity in the 1960s and ‘70s and the NHL went from six teams to 18, the rival World Hockey Association was founded and Houston got a franchise when the one in Dayton, Ohio, failed to get off the ground.
The Aeros’ inaugural season was in 1972-78, and they were best known for “Mr. Hockey” Gordie Howe playing for them along with sons Mark and Marty. They won four Avco World Trophies as WHA champions before folding.
An AHL team using the same name existed in Houston from 1994-2013. The Texas Stars have played in Austin since ’09.
“There’s some interest of hockey,” University of Houston economics professor Steven G. Craig said. “Houston is full of immigrants from around the country and around the world. And Austin is sort of similar in the sense of a pretty heterogeneous population.”
Pros and cons of a Houston or Austin NHL franchise
Growing the sport in another so-called non-traditional spot is a big benefit. Smashing successes in places like Las Vegas and Tampa, Florida, show what hockey can do across the Sun Belt when strong ownership is involved.
“Southern cities have been doing pretty well now these days in the NHL: the Lightning and the Panthers,” Mills said of the two teams in Florida. “You’ve got some pretty good hockey teams after some pretty miserable failures with some earlier expansion to the South.”
Abandoning the second try in Atlanta (the Thrashers from 2000-11) was more a failure of ownership than the market. The same could be said in Arizona, where a revolving door of owners led to arena miscues and eventually the Coyotes being sold and moved to Salt Lake City in 2024 to become the Utah Mammoth.
A 33rd team also means 20-23 more NHL players and hopefuls in the minors. The changing landscape of hockey development at the junior and college levels has the potential to churn more talent through the pipeline in North America than ever before, along with players coming from Europe.
“You do have a pretty big pool of players,” Matheson said. “I’m not particularly worried about diluting the talent there because I think there’s a lot of skill.”
What’s next and where the 34th team may be
After this six-month exploratory phase is complete, recent history suggests a season-ticket drive would be one of the subsequent steps. Ticket drives validated interest that led to the Vegas Golden Knights and Seattle Kraken.
The Board of Governors would need to approve moving forward in the process. No vote has yet been held, though the executive committee supported exploring Houston and Austin.
And while the NHL is comfortable with unbalanced Eastern and Western conferences, getting to 34 teams seems inevitable if it goes to 33. Bettman said the board on Tuesday was updated on situations in Atlanta and Arizona, and it would be no surprise if one of those places got another crack at it.
ere’s everything you need to know about one of the most recognizable trophies in North American sports — The Stanley Cup.
-
Politics10 minutes agoControversial billionaire tax proposal will appear on November ballot
-
Sports18 minutes agoShohei Ohtani is the first Dodger to be named 2026 All-Star
-
World28 minutes agoWho will control Africa’s AI infrastructure and at what cost
-
News55 minutes agoThe Supreme Court says the U.S. can turn away asylum seekers at the border
-
Los Angeles, Ca2 hours agoJury says it is deadlocked in trial of man accused in Palisades Fire
-
Detroit, MI3 hours agoScene active as police shoot, kill man on Detroit’s west side
-
San Francisco, CA3 hours agoCivil grand jury report warns of wildfire risk at SF’s Glen Canyon Park
-
Dallas, TX3 hours agoIvory Coast advances at World Cup, how to buy Ivory Coast tickets