Connect with us

Texas

Texas mother Kate Cox on the outcome of her legal fight for an abortion:

Published

on

Texas mother Kate Cox on the outcome of her legal fight for an abortion:


Lifelong Texans Kate and Justin Cox were already parents to a young girl and boy when they found out last August that Kate was pregnant again. “We have the two children that we absolutely adore, and yeah, the thought of having a third one added to the family was incredible,” Justin said.

But a series of tests revealed the baby they were expecting, a girl, had trisomy 18, a genetic condition that causes severe developmental problems.

According to a 2016 study, nine out of 10 infants won’t survive more than a year.  And for Kate and Justin’s baby, the prognosis was even more grim.

Kate said, “We asked, ‘How long we could have with our baby – best-case scenario?’ And she said she thought maybe a week. … If she survived the pregnancy and the birth, that it might be a week. And what that would mean as far as – I didn’t want to watch her suffer. That would be very hard. She would have had to be placed directly on to hospice. There’s no treatment that can be done.”

Advertisement

Smith asked, “Did you think your health, your life, would be threatened if you went through with the birth?”

“Yes,” Kate replied. “We know a lot of the trisomy 18 babies don’t survive birth, so I could lose her at any point in the pregnancy. There’s risk of infection, risk of uterine rupture. And we want more children as well, so what does that mean for future pregnancies?”

kate-and-justin-cox.jpg
Kate and Justin Cox.

CBS News


The Coxes wanted to get an abortion. But in Texas, abortion is illegal. So, Kate contacted the Center for Reproductive Rights and attorney Molly Duane.

Advertisement

“She made it very clear that this is where her home was,” Duane said. “She needed and wanted an abortion, and she wanted to be able to access it in her home community.”

Kate said, “I wanted to be here, close to home. I mean, it’s the hardest thing I’ve been through. I wanted to come home, cry on my own pillow, hold my babies, be near my doctors. So, I was really hopeful. That’s really what I thought about most going into this.”

Smith asked, “Some of the people on this other side of the issue say, ‘Why not just have the baby naturally, and whatever happens, happens’?”

“I want more babies,” Kate replied. “I talked with our doctors. And I didn’t want her to suffer. I felt it was best for her, and I felt it was best for our family as well. We want to be able to have more babies. We want to give siblings to our kids.”

Since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade in 2022, 14 states (including Texas) have broadly banned abortion. The Texas law says there are exceptions for a “life-threatening physical condition … or a serious risk of substantial impairment of a major bodily function.” 

Advertisement
abortion-bans.jpg

CBS News


Duane believed Kate’s case fell under that exception: “Yes, and so did her doctor. The problem is, no one knows what that means. Major bodily function? What about a minor bodily function? Surely fertility would count as a major bodily function. But there’s no clarity about this.”

In 2021, the year before the bans, there were more than 50,000 abortions performed in Texas. Last year, there were just 40.

The penalties Texas doctors face for performing an abortion are high: fines of at least $100,000, and up to 99 years in prison.

Advertisement

And there’s more: “Anyone who provides an abortion, or aids or abets in the provision of an abortion, is potentially liable for at least a $10,000 fine that can be filed by anyone in the world,” Duane said. “So, if Justin drove Kate to the doctor’s office for the abortion procedure, then he has ‘aided or abetted.’”

“He could be liable for $10,000?” asked Smith.

“At least $10,000, correct”

So far, no private citizen has successfully sued another for aiding an abortion. But the Coxes, and their doctor, didn’t want to risk prosecution. So, in December, when Kate was 20 weeks pregnant, they sued the state of Texas. “We were asking for a court order to say Kate can get an abortion in Texas, and her doctor and her husband would be protected by that court order,” Duane said.

The District Court granted their restraining order. But the Texas attorney general sent a letter to doctors and hospitals warning they could still be prosecuted if they helped Kate get an abortion – and he filed an appeal with the State Supreme Court.

Advertisement

Smith asked, “As the Texas Supreme Court is debating this, what are you going through?”

“I mean, I didn’t hardly get out of bed – stressed, you know? I had a timeline. I couldn’t wait,” Kate said.

They decided they had to go out of state. The Coxes had the abortion in New Mexico, and said goodbye to a future they’d already been grieving.

“Her name’s Chloe,” Kate said.

“Why did you feel it was important to give her a name?” Smith asked.  

Advertisement

“I gave her a name because she’ll always be my baby,” Kate replied. “Her middle name is my grandfather’s name, so that she knew who to look for in heaven.”

On December 11, while the Coxes were away, the Texas Supreme Court overturned the lower court’s ruling.

Duane said the court decided that “essentially, Kate wasn’t sick enough. And I think what that makes clear to me, and the fact that the attorney general fought it as hard as he did, is that the exception in Texas doesn’t exist at all.”

Smith asked Kate what she though when she heard their ruling.

“It was crushing,” said Kate. “I was shocked that the state of Texas wanted me to continue a pregnancy where I would have to wait until a baby dies in my belly, or dies at birth, or lives for days, and put my own health at risk, and a future pregnancy at risk.”

Advertisement

CBS News reached out to the Texas attorney general, and received no reply. 

The Coxes received hundreds of letters of support. But Kate stayed away from social media, where people on both sides weighed in, including former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum. In the middle of the debate, he posted a picture online of his daughter, who has trisomy 18 and is a teenager.

Smith asked, “Did you think there was any chance that your baby could have survived?”

Justin replied, “You can’t simply say, ‘My child has trisomy 18, so yours would have ended up like this.’ I think that’s a little ridiculous. Every case is different. And ours was extremely, extremely bleak. It was as severe as it gets, basically.”

The Coxes say the holidays with their family gave them some time to get back to normal. And they’ll soon try to have another baby. 

Advertisement

Molly Duane has another abortion case in front of the Texas Supreme Court, and she says she’s hopeful.

Smith asked, “Ultimately, Kate Cox didn’t prevail. She lost. But did she make a difference?”

“She absolutely made a difference,” Duane replied. “She got the healthcare that she needed. She got an abortion. But in terms of big picture, she brought people along on this journey with her, and she helped people understand the true human toll that abortion bans take on families.”

Smith asked Kate, “If you could do it all over again, would you do this again? Would you go through with the lawsuit again?”

“I would,” said Kate. “I’ve gotten to hear a lot of stories, you know, for other women. And I have a daughter. I hope the law will be different one day. So, if I had to do it over, I would.”

Advertisement

      
For more info:

     
Story produced by Kay Lim. Editor: Lauren Barnello. 

       
See also:



Source link

Advertisement

Texas

Latest in recruiting war for elite 2028 QB has Texas Football joyful

Published

on

Latest in recruiting war for elite 2028 QB has Texas Football joyful



Neimann Lawrence list the Longhorns as one school that is standing out

As the Longhorns continue to build for the future, one of their targets is four-star prospect Neimann Lawrence. The Miami native is one of the best quarterbacks in the 2028 class and is attracting interest from some of the nation’s top programs. On Monday, Lawrence revealed the schools that have stood out so far, including the Longhorns. 

While Mondays update was encouraging, Texas was not the only school Lawrence mentioned. He also highlighted Michigan, Miami, Ohio State, Texas A&M, and Tennessee. That is not an easy list of schools to go to battle with; the Longhorns have time to make themselves stand out. 

Advertisement

Currently, the Miami Northwestern High star is ranked as the fourth-best quarterback in is class by 247Sports. They also rank him as the ninth-best player from Florida and the 39th-best player in the nation. With collegiate debut still over a year away, those rankings could change. 

At the moment, the Longhorns do not have a commitment in the 2028 class, but they have made offers to some of the top recruits. That includes Brysen Wright, Jalanie George, Jamarios Canton, Micah Rhodes, and King Pitts. Landing any of those players would give Texas a bright future. 

With a decision still months away, Lawrence will be a player to watch. A lot could change as his recruitment continues, but it is a good sign for Texas that they are standing out early on in the process. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Texas

Orange County wedding photographer deported on way to job in Texas

Published

on

Orange County wedding photographer deported on way to job in Texas


An Orange County photographer is speaking out after he was deported as he was heading to Texas to photograph a wedding.

What they’re saying:

Advertisement

“I was trying to do it the right way, the legal way and it just feels like they don’t care about that,” said Adan Caceres.

Caceres came to the United States under asylum in 2014, fleeing a violent El Salvador.

“My mom’s sister was murdered and she was thrown in front of our house. She also was abused sexually before they murdered her and then my brother and I were threatened by the gangs,” said Caceres.

Advertisement

He says he never received the deportation order that was issued in 2018 and only learned about it in 2023. He then started the process of reopening his case.

“I was paying my taxes. I’m a business owner, I’m a wedding photographer. I’m also married,” said Caceres.

Advertisement

In October, Caceres was going through security at John Wayne Airport, heading to a job in Texas, when he was detained. He says from Santa Ana, he was sent to the Adelanto Detention Center then one in El Paso, Texas where he says the conditions were inhumane.

“We’re not even asking ‘hey let us out’ we’re asking for water, we’re asking for us to be able to use the restroom, these are basic human rights,” said Caceres.

He says now that he’s back in the country he once fled, he’s most concerned about his wife back in Orange County.

Advertisement

“I was providing a lot of income for our household and now my wife has to take care of all of those things on her own; paying car insurance, the rent, all the bills,” said Caceres.

Caceres says he had no criminal history and feels he was on the path to citizenship when it was ripped away from him, leaving his future with his family uncertain.

Advertisement

“I don’t know if I’m going to see them. I don’t know when I’m going to see them,” said Caceres.

The other side:

FOX11 reached out to the Department of Homeland Security asking about Caceres’ case but had not heard back at the time this story aired. 

Advertisement

The Source: Information for this story came from an interview with Adan Caceres.

ImmigrationOrange County



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Texas

SCOTUS won’t rule on Texas library’s book banning case

Published

on

SCOTUS won’t rule on Texas library’s book banning case


In a years-long Texas book banning case that’s seen rulings from multiple judges, the highest court in the nation has decided not to weigh in. 

It all started in 2021, when a community in a small county near Austin decided to rid their public library’s shelves of “inappropriate” literature. 

Advertisement

SCOTUS declines to rule

The latest:

The Supreme Court of the United States decided Monday they would not rule on an appeal in the Llano County case. Decisions by lower courts had previously allowed for books regarding topics like sex and social issues to be removed from the shelves. 

Advertisement

According to the court’s timeline of proceedings, they first received an application to file a petition in the case on July 24. Since this summer, the petition was filed, motions to extend were passed through, numerous briefs were submitted in support of the appeal, and finally, in November, the petition was distributed for conference. 

After nearly a month of no further actions, the next proceeding was a simple denial. 

Anti-censorship groups request action

Advertisement

What they’re saying:

Numerous groups and organizations advocating free speech and expression submitted briefs to the court in favor of the appeal.

One group was The National Coalition Against Censorship, whose conclusion reads in part as follows: 

Advertisement

“Allowing the Fifth Circuit’s decision to stand threatens to make public libraries a doctrinal oxymoron—institutions with a proud historical tradition of providing access to the widest possible range of ideas would become one of the only areas where the government could openly censor private viewpoints.”

Another group, PEN America, expressed a similar view in their brief:

Advertisement

“Library doors are open to all without regard to wealth, status, education, profession, or identity, and their collections run the gamut of expression. That extraordinary public service demands safeguards against official orthodoxy. Fortunately, the First Amendment has long offered such protection. This Court should reaffirm as much here.”

The removal of books from Llano County libraries

The backstory:

Advertisement

In 2021, a group of community members began working to have several books they deemed inappropriate removed from Llano County public library shelves.

A group of seven Llano County residents filed a federal lawsuit against the county judge, commissioners, library board members and the library systems director for restricting and banning books from the three-branch library system.

The lawsuit stated that the county judge, commissioners and library director removed several books off shelves, suspended access to digital library books, replaced the Llano County library board with community members in favor of book bans, halted new library book orders and allowed the library board to close its meetings to the public in a coordinated censorship campaign that violates the First Amendment and 14th Amendment.

Advertisement

In 2024, a divided panel from the Fifth Circuit ordered eight of the removed books returned.

Both the majority opinion of the 2024 panel and the dissenting opinion from Friday’s decision called the removal of the books a political decision.

Advertisement

What are the books?

The books at issue in the case include “Caste: The Origins of Our Discontent” by Isabel Wilkerson; “They Called Themselves the K.K.K: The Birth of an American Terrorist Group,” by Susan Campbell Bartoletti; “In the Night Kitchen” by Maurice Sendak; “It’s Perfectly Normal: Changing Bodies, Growing Up, Sex and Sexual Health” by Robie H. Harris; and “Being Jazz: My Life as a (Transgender) Teen” by Jazz Jennings.

Other titles include “Larry the Farting Leprechaun” by Jane Bexley and “My Butt is So Noisy!” by Dawn McMillan.

Advertisement

The Source: Information in this article comes from the Supreme Court of the United States and briefs filed in a petition to the court. 

TexasTexas PoliticsLGBTQNews



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending