For all who love chaos, the potential eight-team tie for first place in the SEC is sadly over. The potential six-team tie, however, remains very much alive after Saturday’s action.

But clarity is nearing on who will play in the SEC championship: If no more upsets occur, Alabama would likely play the winner of the Texas at Texas A&M regular-season finale.

Of course, more upsets could occur.

Here are the updated standings at the top of the league. All three-loss teams are officially eliminated from championship game consideration because Georgia and one of Texas and Texas A&M are guaranteed to finish with two (or fewer) losses. That includes LSU and Missouri, which each suffered their third conference loss on Saturday.

There is one clean, but not very likely, way for first and second place to be settled: Texas and Texas A&M both win next week, and Tennessee, Ole Miss and Alabama all lose at least one more game. That would leave Georgia playing the winner of Texas at Texas A&M.

Otherwise, this will come down to the newly installed SEC tiebreakers, which are all based on conference play, and also heavily contingent on teams playing each other — which most of the time they have not, thanks to a 16-team league in which each team plays an eight-game schedule.

The first tiebreaker is head-to-head, whether among just two teams or three-plus teams. The second is record vs. common opponents. The third is record against top teams in the standings and working your way down, but that’s contingent on the teams involved in those first three tiebreakers having played the same teams. Georgia has played all the other contenders except Texas A&M, going 2-2, but Alabama has only played Georgia and Tennessee, Texas will have only played Georgia and Texas A&M, and so on. There are few if any scenarios where everyone involved in a tiebreaker will have played each other.

Simply put, it is unlikely any of the top three tiebreakers will settle it.

Therefore the most likely solution will be the fourth tiebreaker: The combined record of teams’ conference opponents, in essence, schedule strength. As of now, here are the combined opponents’ record for the six contenders, including future opponents. (But not assuming results of games yet to be played.)

The records will change, but probably not too drastically, as there are just 12 conference games left. Again, the above standings already include each team’s future conference opponents’ records, just not any results. That’s why Alabama is in the best position right now — unless it loses at Oklahoma next week, or against Auburn. One loss and it’s out. The same goes for Ole Miss and Tennessee.

The picture got a bit clearer on Saturday. But it’s still murky enough to be interesting.

The Pulse Newsletter

Advertisement

Free, daily sports updates direct to your inbox.

Free, daily sports updates direct to your inbox.

Sign Up

(Photo of Alabama’s Ryan Williams: Brandon Sumrall / Getty Images)

Let’s look at this thing strictly from what happened on the field. A novel idea, I know. 

Texas beat Arkansas 20-10 Saturday in Fayetteville, an uninspiring effort that continued to underscore the Longhorns’ slog to the top of the College Football Playoff rankings. 

Two weeks ago, in the same stadium against the same Arkansas team, Ole Miss humiliated the Hogs 63-31. A week ago, Ole Miss embarrassed big, bad Georgia by 18.

Yet if you looked at the current CFP rankings, the gap between Texas and Ole Miss is as wide as Florida State’s dreams of joining the Big Ten and reality. 

And this is the problem with the playoff rankings — and more specifically, the selection committee that clearly abides by the rule of he who loses less, gains more.

Look at the Texas schedule, there’s nothing there. No signature win, no impressive run of games or undeniable statement that proves the Longhorns deserve their No. 3 ranking. 

Then there’s Ole Miss, and in the CFP committee’s eyes, it’s clearly more than the beatdown of Georgia that leaves the Rebels at No. 11 in the poll. And by more, I don’t mean the 24-point win at the hottest team in the SEC (South Carolina). 

By more, I mean losses. Ole Miss its has two, Texas has one. 

Wait, it gets better. 

Texas lost at home to Georgia — the same team Ole Miss handed its worst regular-season loss since 2018 — where it was 23-0 in the second quarter before Texas could exhale. Where coach Steve Sarkisian was so flustered, he benched starting quarterback and Heisman Trophy candidate Quinn Ewers, and by the third quarter, both Ewers and Arch Manning wanted no part of the Georgia defense.

Ole Miss lost at home to Kentucky and at LSU, both on fourth-down prayer throws. Without those two improbable plays, Ole Miss is unbeaten. 

And that’s the rub with the committee. There’s no nuance in the rankings, no examination of teams and common opponents and degree of difficulty. 

The exact reason why the playoff was expanded to 12 teams.

This blatant avoidance of what’s playing out on the field is bad for the College Football Playoff, and bad for the game. There’s too much money involved in the process ($1.2 billion annually) for the committee to get this wrong. 

The easy response is relax, there are three more weeks for this thing to play out and the committee to get it right. But that’s not the point. 

Because if this is how the committee deliberates and comes to these specific conclusions, what does that mean about the rest of the poll? If something so blatant as this is ignored, where else will it happen again?

These committee decisions are critical because the No. 7-10 slots in the poll will be so close, the aforementioned arguments will be deciding factors in who hosts a playoff game, and who travels. 

If a team from the south travels to a team from the midwest, and plays a December game in sub-freezing temperatures and possibly snow, or plays at home in the 50s.

If the committee can’t see something as simple as Texas’ best win is against Colorado State of the Group of Five or at Vanderbilt, and that Ole Miss has beaten Georgia and South Carolina, what else will the committee ignore for the sake of one less loss?

The hard work and heavy lifting happens on the field. Not the secluded and secretive selection committee room. 

It’s no different than the confounding Bowl Championship Series rankings, where computer polls – each with its own weighted and secret formula – helped decide who played for the national title. 

Think about this: we’ve taken the most important process of the college football season, and put it in the hands of athletic directors and random businessmen and women on the committee. 

Rule No. 1, everybody: big wins are more important than a gut-punch of a loss.

A novel idea, I know.

Matt Hayes is the senior national college football writer for USA TODAY Sports Network. Follow him on X at @MattHayesCFB.

Live Coverage for this began on 10:57p ET