Connect with us

Texas

Memo to College Football Playoff ranking committee: Ole Miss is everything Texas isn’t

Published

on

Memo to College Football Playoff ranking committee: Ole Miss is everything Texas isn’t


play

Let’s look at this thing strictly from what happened on the field. A novel idea, I know. 

Texas beat Arkansas 20-10 Saturday in Fayetteville, an uninspiring effort that continued to underscore the Longhorns’ slog to the top of the College Football Playoff rankings. 

Advertisement

Two weeks ago, in the same stadium against the same Arkansas team, Ole Miss humiliated the Hogs 63-31. A week ago, Ole Miss embarrassed big, bad Georgia by 18.

Yet if you looked at the current CFP rankings, the gap between Texas and Ole Miss is as wide as Florida State’s dreams of joining the Big Ten and reality. 

And this is the problem with the playoff rankings — and more specifically, the selection committee that clearly abides by the rule of he who loses less, gains more.

Look at the Texas schedule, there’s nothing there. No signature win, no impressive run of games or undeniable statement that proves the Longhorns deserve their No. 3 ranking. 

Advertisement

Then there’s Ole Miss, and in the CFP committee’s eyes, it’s clearly more than the beatdown of Georgia that leaves the Rebels at No. 11 in the poll. And by more, I don’t mean the 24-point win at the hottest team in the SEC (South Carolina). 

By more, I mean losses. Ole Miss its has two, Texas has one. 

Wait, it gets better. 

Texas lost at home to Georgia — the same team Ole Miss handed its worst regular-season loss since 2018 — where it was 23-0 in the second quarter before Texas could exhale. Where coach Steve Sarkisian was so flustered, he benched starting quarterback and Heisman Trophy candidate Quinn Ewers, and by the third quarter, both Ewers and Arch Manning wanted no part of the Georgia defense.

Advertisement

Ole Miss lost at home to Kentucky and at LSU, both on fourth-down prayer throws. Without those two improbable plays, Ole Miss is unbeaten. 

And that’s the rub with the committee. There’s no nuance in the rankings, no examination of teams and common opponents and degree of difficulty. 

The exact reason why the playoff was expanded to 12 teams.

This blatant avoidance of what’s playing out on the field is bad for the College Football Playoff, and bad for the game. There’s too much money involved in the process ($1.2 billion annually) for the committee to get this wrong. 

The easy response is relax, there are three more weeks for this thing to play out and the committee to get it right. But that’s not the point. 

Advertisement

Because if this is how the committee deliberates and comes to these specific conclusions, what does that mean about the rest of the poll? If something so blatant as this is ignored, where else will it happen again?

These committee decisions are critical because the No. 7-10 slots in the poll will be so close, the aforementioned arguments will be deciding factors in who hosts a playoff game, and who travels. 

If a team from the south travels to a team from the midwest, and plays a December game in sub-freezing temperatures and possibly snow, or plays at home in the 50s.

If the committee can’t see something as simple as Texas’ best win is against Colorado State of the Group of Five or at Vanderbilt, and that Ole Miss has beaten Georgia and South Carolina, what else will the committee ignore for the sake of one less loss?

The hard work and heavy lifting happens on the field. Not the secluded and secretive selection committee room. 

Advertisement

It’s no different than the confounding Bowl Championship Series rankings, where computer polls – each with its own weighted and secret formula – helped decide who played for the national title. 

Think about this: we’ve taken the most important process of the college football season, and put it in the hands of athletic directors and random businessmen and women on the committee. 

Rule No. 1, everybody: big wins are more important than a gut-punch of a loss.

A novel idea, I know.

Advertisement

Matt Hayes is the senior national college football writer for USA TODAY Sports Network. Follow him on X at @MattHayesCFB.





Source link

Texas

Texas A&M’s injection of speed, explosiveness into offense powering Aggies’ meteoric rise

Published

on

Texas A&M’s injection of speed, explosiveness into offense powering Aggies’ meteoric rise


BATON ROUGE, La. — KC Concepcion zig-zagged up Tiger Stadium’s turf, tightrope walked his way around defenders to remain in bounds next to the home team’s sideline and sprinted back in the opposition to jog the second half of his punt return completely untouched.

A member of LSU’s staff spiked his headset into the dirt before the Texas A&M wide receiver had even crossed into the end zone.

Speed and explosivity — especially the variety which the Aggies have — may cause that side effect for opponents.

Related

Advertisement

Sports Roundup

Get the latest D-FW sports news, analysis and opinion delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, Kevin Sherrington’s A La Carte.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

The Aggies (8-0, 5-0 SEC) steamrolled their way to a 49-25 win Saturday night at Tiger Stadium in large part because they were the most physical team and the most cohesive offense, yes, but the pure athleticism and agility displayed by their quarterback and wide receivers were what lit the fuse for a definitive win in head coach Mike Elko’s tenure.

“I think that’s the biggest thing we talked about having to do, to flip, where we were trying to go,” Elko said. “If you look at teams that have won the SEC, the teams that have gotten far in the playoffs, they have explosive playmakers on offense that can take the game over.”

Advertisement

That’s more than an anecdotal reference. Ohio State won last year’s national championship with wide receiver Jeremiah Smith (who reached 21.7 mph in a game last season) and running back TreVeyon Henderson (who ran a 4.43 second 40-yard dash time at this spring’s NFL combine) factored heavily into their scheme.

Texas lost to those Buckeyes in the Cotton Bowl but reached the semifinals in part because of wide receivers Matthew Golden (4.29 second 40-yard dash time) and Isaiah Bond (4.39 second 40-yard dash time). The Longhorns had wide receiver Xavier Worthy and his ludicrous 4.21 second 40-yard dash time the season prior when they reached the semifinals for the first time. Ask them if they’d like to have those caliber of athletes back this season.

The Aggies don’t need to beg. Concepcion ran a 4.43 40-yard dash time last summer, per 247Sports.com, and Craver clocked a 10.74 100-meter dash time at the high school level. Running back Rueben Owens Jr. charted four sub.-11 second 100-meter dash times at El Campo before he enrolled early at College Station and Reed has his own wheels. He outran the entire Tigers defense for a 41-yard touchdown in the first quarter of Saturday night’s win and totaled 108 yards on the ground.

“Me running down the field, 40 something yards, at whatever weight I and and whatever height I am, I don’t know, those guys should be faster than me,” the 6-foot-1, 185 pound Reed said. “They’re not.”

They weren’t quick enough to catch Concepcion, either, and he finished with 177 total all-purpose yards because of it. Craver caught a modest four passes Saturday night but has been a must-cover big-play threat for the Aggies this season. His acrobatic 86-yard touchdown against Notre Dame last month helped spark A&M’s first ranked road win this fall.

Advertisement

Concepcion, a N.C. State transfer, and Craver, a Mississippi State transfer, may arguably create A&M’s most talented wide receiver duo in at least a decade. Craver’s 716 receiving yards and Concepcion’s seven touchdowns both rank second in the conference. Craver has the highest receiver grade in the SEC, per Pro Football Focus, and Craver ranks fifth. They are the only teammate duo within the top five.

“We felt like it was critical when I took over that we add those elements,” Elko said. “We have them in the backfield, we have them at wide receiver, we have them at quarterback with the ball in his hands every play. I think that makes us a really challenging offense to defend.”

    College football poll (Oct. 26): A&M receives first-place vote, Texas climbs after OT win
    SMU haunted by familiar last-second defeat, but this one has far more severe consequences

Find more college sports coverage from The Dallas Morning News here.

Find more Texas A&M coverage from The Dallas Morning News here.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Texas

Jimbo Fisher’s $77 million buyout was money well spent for Texas A&M. Just look

Published

on

Jimbo Fisher’s  million buyout was money well spent for Texas A&M. Just look


play

I hate to be a voice for the opulent, but if the money works, flaunt it.

All the way to the elite of college football.

Advertisement

So while Texas A&M was dismantling LSU 49-25 Saturday night and taking control of he SEC race, it was hard to not see it for what it was.

While the college football world is collectively sick over the financial waste of universities firing coaches and paying exorbitant buyouts (Penn State, Florida), Texas A&M is doing just fine, thank you. After two years ago paying the largest buyout in college football history.   

That was Texas A&M at the end of the 2023 season, doing the utter unthinkable by firing Jimbo Fisher and giving him $77 million to please go away as fast as possible. 

That was Texas A&M on Saturday night in LSU’s famed Death Valley, where dreams go to die. Unless you have a spare $77 million laying in the desk drawer. 

Advertisement

Hey, you’ve got to spend money to make money, right?

Because that cash — the unimaginable buyout of a colossal mistake of a coaching hire — brought hardscrabble coach Mike Elko to College Station. 

You’ve seen Elko by now. Looks like a short order cook, wears a t-shirt on the sideline — untucked because, well, of course it is. 

He also has the best team in the best conference in college football 21 games into his buildout at historically underachieving Texas A&M. So underachieving, in fact, that the joke around the SEC is they’re not Texas A&M. 

Advertisement

They’re Texas 8&5. Every flipping year — despite every possible advantage to winning.

That’s why it was so strange when Elko stood at the SEC spring meetings in Destin, Fla., five months ago, and said he really liked this team. No, you don’t get it, he said. 

He really liked this team. As in, this team can win a championship. 

And everywhere around the SEC, they laughed. Because they’ve watched Kevin Sumlin and Fisher since the Aggies rolled into the SEC in 2012. 

They’ve watched the program waste one of the greatest talents in college football history (Johnny Manziel), and the greatest high school recruiting class in history (2022). 

Advertisement

And frankly, they watched the same Texas A&M begin its first season under Elko by winning seven of eight games. Then lose four of its last five to finish — you guessed it — 8-5. 

That’s what makes this season so impressive. It’s not just that Elko has this group of players executing at their collective ceiling and dominating the big, bad SEC, it’s the way they’re burying the narratives of the past. 

The Aggies are soft. They’ll fold when it matters most. Punch them in the mouth, and they back down. 

They had six sacks against LSU. They had more than 200 yards rushing and 200 yards passing and — get this — won despite being negative-2 in turnover ratio. 

They had eight runs of at least 10 yards. Had five catches of at least 17 yards. That’s 13 explosion plays, if you’re counting at home. 

Advertisement

They held LSU to 55 yards rushing on 25 carries, and forced talented quarterback Garrett Nussmeier into his worst game of the season. With each play that exposed LSU’s fraud season of hype, coach Brian Kelly’s ball cap spun in a crooked mess. 

Let this sink in: Texas A&M, the perpetual underachievers for decades upon decades, outscored LSU 35-7 in the second half. The Tigers’ only touchdown came in garbage time from a backup quarterback throwing to a backup wide receiver — against the backup Texas A&M defense. 

And Elko was livid. 

Just like he was livid when the Aggies allowed 40 points to Notre Dame and first-year starting quarterback CJ Carr. Took the final drive of the game in South Bend to win that one, a road victory that can only be surpassed by winning in Death Valley for the fist time since 1994. 

As LSU coach Brian Kelly walked off the field, LSU fans chanted “Fire Kelly.” Meanwhile, in their own corner of Death Valley, Elko and the players swayed and sang the Aggie War Hymn with the 10,000 or so fans who followed for the ride. 

Advertisement

There’s nothing fluky about it. You’ve got to spend money to make money. 

Or in this case, to make champions.     

Matt Hayes is the senior college football writer for USA TODAY Sports Network. Follow him on X at @MattHayesCFB.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Texas

State to take control of Fort Worth ISD, sparking mixed reactions

Published

on

State to take control of Fort Worth ISD, sparking mixed reactions


Parents and teachers across Fort Worth ISD are reacting to news that the Texas Education Agency will take control of the district — a move that’s leaving many educators uneasy but giving some parents hope for change.

Longtime Fort Worth ISD teacher Kelsey De La Torre said the announcement immediately brought her to tears.

“Honestly, I read it today. I got the notification on my phone, and I glanced at it, and I got tears in my eyes,” De La Torre said. “Because it delivers a sense of insecurity and a sense of uncertainty in an environment where you need to be secure and certain.”

State plans leadership overhaul

Texas Education Commissioner Mike Morath said the state will appoint a new board of trustees and begin a nationwide search for a new superintendent.

Advertisement

De La Torre worries that leadership changes at the top will trickle down to classrooms.

“The people who are basically giving us our materials, our instruction, our strategies, our resources — that will inevitably impact each and every one of us,” she said.

Parents see opportunity for change

While some teachers fear the change, others in the community see it as a much-needed reset.

Fort Worth parent Adrienne Alexander Haynes said she felt relieved when the news broke.

“I feel like we’ve been stuck in this position of asking for a bare minimum,” Haynes said. “With the state takeover, it’s almost as though we’re finally being rescued out of this hamster wheel that we’ve been in, in our education system.”

Advertisement

Other parents echoed that optimism.

“I’m excited for the future,” said Kathy Kessler, another Fort Worth ISD parent. “I’m excited that there are opportunities to try and make things better, where our kids are being more productive in school.”

Concerns about deeper systemic issues

Still, De La Torre — who also has three children in the district — said the state’s intervention doesn’t address the real barriers students face.

“We’re still going to have an issue with poverty. We’re still going to have an issue with students who are homeless. We’re still going to have an issue with kids who go home and don’t have any food,” she said. “When are we going to fix those issues? Because that’s what’s keeping kids from growing.”

Support for current superintendent

Both parents and teachers agreed on one thing — they want Superintendent Dr. Karen Molinar to stay in her role. Many believe she’s made significant progress in the short time she’s led the district.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending