Texas
Letters to the Editor — Ken Paxton, immigrants, Opal Lee, Texas drivers, public transit
Truth shall set us free
Re: “What is Paxton afraid of?” by Susan Richmond, Saturday Letters.
This letter by Richmond states that “an innocent man would want to have his day in court” and goes on to say that Ken Paxton has resisted going under oath during the whistleblower trial.
She is correct, and the fact that we are all continuing to watch this sad spectacle play out demonstrates how far we are from having a person of character in this elected position.
Well said, Susan. I also love the reference to John 8:31-32. The truth shall set us free.
Clarke Pich, Southlake
Blame Congress, not immigrants
Re: “Help immigrants, don’t vilify them — This country needs immigrants, and it serves no purpose to make them feel unwelcome,” by Frank R. Lloyd, Sunday Opinion.
Thank you for publishing this opinion piece about immigrants. I am a second-generation American by birth. My grandparents came here from Belgium.
My mom’s parents became vegetable farmers just outside San Antonio and had only daughters who all worked in the fields. My mom drove vegetables to the market in their truck. My dad’s parents started a general store in San Antonio that later became a major lumber and hardware store, and had all boys. Four of their boys fought in World War II. Those boys all went on to run their own businesses, and their kids and grandkids have also contributed to the success of Texas and this country. The girls all went on to be successful also, as did their children and grandchildren.
Considering my family’s history, it was no surprise to me that the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office recently released a budget projection with a note that said, “We estimate that, from 2023 to 2034, GDP will be greater by about $7 trillion and revenues will be greater by about $1 trillion than they would have been otherwise.” By revenue, it means the money paid to the U.S. government in the form of taxes. The reason? Immigrant numbers were higher than originally projected.
That’s the secret to the success of the U.S. since its creation: Immigrants tend to confer more benefits to our country than they take. They start businesses, create jobs for others, fight for our country, pay their taxes and enrich our society culturally.
That doesn’t mean we don’t have a problem at the border. It’s a problem that Congress has failed to address for decades. Our elected officials have failed to enact legislation that would provide for an adequate number of visas for those entering legally, quick and fair amnesty hearings and humane treatment of those awaiting an amnesty determination.
The recently proposed bipartisan legislation on immigration in Congress could have been a start. But once again, the House failed to even consider it. I’ll remember that when I vote this year. And I hope we all remember that we are all immigrants or descendants of immigrants.
Arnold Grothues, Arlington
Capitol hides Lee’s portrait
On a recent visit to the Texas Capitol, I was looking forward to seeing civil rights icon Opal Lee’s portrait hanging in the Senate Chamber. It was unveiled about a year ago.
The Legislature was not in session and the public was free to walk around, but the left and right side of the chamber was roped off. Lee’s portrait is on the left side at least 40 feet away. You wouldn’t know it was there if you weren’t looking for it.
I asked a Senate page if I could go see it. He said, “no” but he would be glad to take my phone and take a picture of it for me which he did.
It’s sad to know most people touring the Capitol will miss seeing Lee’s portrait.
Mark Schnyder, Arlington
Broken barriers everywhere
“Congenial” is not a word that comes to mind when I think of drivers in or through Dallas. The amount of damage to the impact-absorbing barriers at on and off ramps is beyond imagination. And that comes at the cost of the taxpayer living in this city. The taxpayers’ dollars cover the costs of the repeated repairs or replacement of those broken barriers. The taxpayer paid for its installation in the first place.
Imagine what it will be like if the law holds the driver and his insurance responsible for the repair costs. That, too, will affect the accounts of taxpayers living in this city. Just recently, the increase of auto insurance rates in Texas was a news article.
Could the city or the Texas Department of Transportation take more responsibility against this soft crime?
Nicolaas Geldenhuys, Dallas
Fix Dallas transit first
Let’s be honest. We live in a state that doesn’t care much about the environment. Southwest Airlines has 12 direct flights to Houston plus there are 24 additional flights to Houston originating out of Dallas Fort Worth International Airport. We can get to Houston fast.
All the while, if you live near South Oak Cliff High School and don’t have your own car, it takes you two hours or more using our present public-transit system to get to a job interview in the Plano Legacy area.
Might we consider improving our ability to move all of our citizens around and within our own city before we start spending billions of dollars on opaque high-speed rail schemes to rifle a select few from Dallas to Houston?
Jon Altschuler, Highland Park
Is history repeating itself?
There are harsh similarities between the 1920s and the 2020s, and who says history does not repeat itself? Both decades suffered from the geopolitical manifestation of dramatic communicative paradigm shifts. Both decades were filled with the rise of dictatorships. In the 1920s, the emergence of the radio allowed the propagandizing of people who could not read. In the 2020s, the internet allowed the propagandizing of people who cannot think for themselves.
Bob Gillard, Plano
We welcome your thoughts in a letter to the editor. See the guidelines and submit your letter here. If you have problems with the form, you can submit via email at letters@dallasnews.com
Texas
Guidelines for Texas’ controversial school voucher program released
TEXAS (KTRK) — The State Comptroller’s Office has released guidelines for the Texas Education Freedom Accounts. This program is also referred to as school choice or school vouchers, and has stirred up controversy.
It’s funded through $1B taxpayer dollars, and while proponents say it gives families the choice to pick the best education for their child, critics have said it takes money away from already underfunded and struggling public school systems.
This program is open to students in pre-K through high school. Standard students who wish to attend a state-approved private school can receive approximately $10,800 per child, per year.
Students with disabilities or additional learning needs must have their individual education program, or IEP, on file with the school district to be eligible for up to $30,000 per student, per year
And homeschooled children can get up to $2,000 per child, per year.
SEE ALSO: Private school vouchers are now law in Texas. Here’s how they will work
State law dictates that priority will be given to children who have siblings already in the program and based on income and the federal poverty line. If more students enroll than funding allows, a lottery will be instituted.
Eyewitness News previously reported that the funds would probably fund around 90,000 students, even though the Texas Education Agency estimated in 2024 that over 5 million school-aged children live in Texas.
The first important enrollment date comes for private schools and vendors who want to accept voucher students, and is part of the one billion dollars the state is pouring into it. The State Comptroller’s office says schools and vendors can start signing on through Odyssey on Dec. 9. Odyssey is the company the state selected to run the voucher lottery and operate a platform that allows families to spend the money awarded to them by the state.
The second important date comes for families, which is Feb. 4. That’s when families can start signing up students. The State Comptroller said this gives the state and families ample time to make decisions ahead of the 2026-27 school year
The State Comptroller said schools that wish to apply for the program must have a Texas location and have been accredited for at least two years, but this applies to schools both in and outside of Texas, so in theory, a program accredited outside of Texas could build a campus in the state this year and still be eligible.
SEE ALSO: ABC13 obtains exclusive HISD student enrollment records for 2025-26 school year
The state is also dictating that private schools wishing to be a part of the program will have to administer an assessment to voucher students in grades 3 through 12
The program will be monitored by the State Comptroller’s office, which will partner with a private group to audit the program at least once a year.
State education groups pushed the state to be more transparent about how families were spending money and where, though our partners at the Houston Chronicle note the state rejected those ideas.
For more news updates, follow Lileana Pearson on Facebook, X and Instagram.
Copyright © 2025 KTRK-TV. All Rights Reserved.
Texas
Pack Closes Maui Invitational with Loss to Texas – NC State University Athletics
The Longhorns hit 16 three-pointers, shooting 50 percent from long-range for the game. The 16 three-pointers tie for the most ever made by an NC State opponent.
The first 12 minutes of the game featured the two teams going back and forth, but with Texas holding a 25-23 the Longhorns went on an extended 20-7 run to take its largest lead of the game, 45-30, with 1:33 to play.
The Pack ended the half on a mini 7-2 run to go into the locker room down 10, 47-37.
NC State opened the second half on a 16-7 run to get within one on a Paul McNeil three-pointer with 15:09 to play.
Texas stayed in front though until Alyn Breed drove past the Longhorn defense to lay it in and give the Pack a 71-70 lead with 7:51 to go.
The lead was short-lived though as Texas immediately responded with a 10-0 spurt to retake the lead and the Pack was never able to get closer than five points the rest of the way.
Quadir Copeland led NC State with a career-high 28 points. He finished the game 10-of-14 from the field and also had a team-high six assists.
Ven-Allen Lubin finished one rebound shy of a double-double with 23 points and nine rebounds while Paul McNeil finished with 20 points.
It’s the first time NC State has had three players all score 20 or more points in the same game in more than 20 years.
NC State ended the game with a 46-20 advantage in points in the paint, but Texas had a 24-7 advantage in fast break points and the Longhorns shot 55.8 percent from the field and made 28 of its 34 free throw attempts.
NC State is back in action next Wednesday when it plays at Auburn as part of the ACC-SEC Challenge. Tipoff at Auburn is scheduled for 9:15 p.m. ET and the game will be televised on ESPN.
Texas
Betting Texas A&M-Texas: Why the balanced Aggies pose problems for Longhorns
No. 3 Texas A&M walks into Austin with everything still on the table, while No. 17 Texas is clinging to the final thread of a postseason dream that’s been unraveling since the team was ranked preseason No. 1 for the first time in their history.
One side is chasing a conference title, and the other is trying to keep its season from folding in its own backyard. The matchup has urgency, consequence and an energy that guarantees excitement, twists and everything in between, but the reasons why sit beneath the surface.
Saddle up … Aggies versus Longhorns is about who can handle the ride.
All odds by ESPN BET
No. 3 Texas A&M Aggies at No. 17 Texas Longhorns
Friday, 7:30 p.m. ET, ABC
Line: Texas A&M -2.5
Money line: Texas A&M (-120), Texas (Even)
Over/Under: 51.5 (O -110, U -110)
Texas: a team that lives in between potential and production
This Texas team can be so much more and maybe in 2026 they can be. They have the quarterback talent, the receiver room and the pass-rush ceiling, and the solid markers to build a base that can go toe to toe with any team in the country.
Unfortunately, we’ve been seeing the same story unfold since the start of the season, even a continuation of last year. Texas moves through games with volatility instead of a steady foundation. When Arch Manning has time, the Longhorns can hit explosives in a way that genuinely scares opponents. He’s thrown 23 touchdowns and is throwing 8.1 yards per pass, which shows that the ability is there, the firepower is there.
The catch is how often the Longhorns offense is forced into that mode. The run game is nearly non-existent, hovering near 3.7 yards per carry, outside of the top 100 in the country, which means they aren’t consistently living in second-and-4 or even third and manageable. This can make such a difference. Instead, we see Texas always one negative play away from giving possessions back. It means Manning is having to manufacture answers to predicaments that shouldn’t exist. The offense isn’t giving him the framework, so he’s sticking it together on the fly.
On the fly doesn’t work in competitive football unless you’re Johnny Manziel.
Defensively, the effort is there and the pressure numbers are real, generating over 200 pressures, but the coverage isn’t airtight enough to hide the moments where the pass rush doesn’t immediately hit.
When Texas wins, the question is always, “is Texas good?” And when they lose, it’s always “oh, right, that’s more like it.” The Longhorns are talented, explosive, and competitive, but Texas is also dependent on conditions, timing, rhythm, and quarterback brilliance. That’s the space they operate in and why their path to winning requires chaos, which means a lot of things have to go right, far more than it should.
Texas A&M: a team with a fully formed identity and multiple ways to win
The Aggies are built with an offense that doesn’t lean on one player or one phase, it’s the product of balance. Texas A&M has a run game that actually shifts the way defenses behave, averaging 5 yards per carry, top 30 in the FBS, giving them a kind of control most teams never find. The Aggies playcalling can stay patient. It means comebacks can happen, it means Marcel Reed can operate a system designed for efficiency, not heroism.
Reed’s 9.0 yards per pass is happening because the offense is forcing defenses into conflict on every snap. The scoring outputs back it up: 54 total touchdowns on the season is a clear sign that the Aggies can finish drives and don’t waste possessions. The red zone efficiency tells the same story. A&M plays football with the understanding that momentum is built, stacked and maintained.
Defensively, tackling has been a weak point but it hasn’t derailed their ability to dictate games or control pace. The Aggies play inside their identity every week, an advantage that shows up when the games get tight.
Betting consideration: Texas A&M -2.5
The Aggies are the more complete team so this is a wager that backs up the side that holds up under pressure. In KC Concepcion and Mario Craver, they have a WR duo that is a matchup nightmare for a Texas secondary that sits out of the top 50 in coverage grade, and has been vulnerable anytime the pass rush doesn’t close.
Concepcion’s ability to separate underneath and Craver’s vertical range stretch the defense horizontally and vertically at the same time, forcing Texas into coverage trade-offs they haven’t solved all year.
Then there’s the Aggies defense, which plays aggressively with over 200 pressures on the season, but aren’t reckless. They’ll heat up Manning without exposing themselves behind it. That kind of balance matters against a Texas offense that’s built on volatility. Texas needs pop-offs to survive, which becomes harder when the opposing front dictates and the back end holds up well enough to avoid collapse.
If the Aggies play balanced and are able to attack the exact weak points Texas can’t hide, then laying a short number on the road is justified, and possibly even a few points short.
Betting trends
Courtesy of ESPN Research
-
Texas is 0-4 ATS against AP Top-5 teams since the start of last season, worst in FBS.
-
The Aggies are 7-15 ATS as a favorite since the start of last season, T-worst among Power 4 schools with UGA (min. 20 games).
-
Texas is 5-1-1 ATS as a home underdog over the last 10 years, T-best in FBS with Notre Dame/App State (min. 5 games).
-
Texas A&M is 3-7-2 ATS when the spread is between a FG (+3 to -3) since 2022, worst among power conference teams (min. 10 games as Power 4 team in span).
-
World1 week agoFrance and Germany support simplification push for digital rules
-
Science6 days agoWashington state resident dies of new H5N5 form of bird flu
-
World1 week agoPoland to close last Russian consulate over ‘unprecedented act of sabotage’
-
Politics1 week agoLawmakers warned PennDOT of illegal immigrant-CDL crisis before bust; GOP demands answers from Shapiro
-
News1 week agoHow Every House Member Voted to Release the Epstein Files
-
News1 week agoAnalysis: Is Trump a lame duck now? | CNN Politics
-
Business1 week ago
Amazon’s Zoox offers free robotaxi rides in San Francisco
-
Technology1 week agoThe best early Black Friday deals we’ve found so far on laptops, TVs, and more