Texas
Attorney for accused McGregor, Texas mass shooter claims client’s due process rights are being violated in Waco, wants to transfer case to federal court
WACO, Texas (KWTX) – An attorney for the former McGregor man found incompetent to stand trial in the 2022 shooting deaths of five people is seeking to transfer his case to the federal system because he says his client’s due process rights are being violated by the long wait for a state mental hospital bed to become available.
While Clay Thomas acknowledges his request to remove Nicolas Jaimes-Hernandez’s capital murder cases from 19th State District Court to Waco’s U.S. District Court is rare, he said Monday that the motion is not without precedent.
Thomas said overcrowding in state mental health facilities, especially maximum-security facilities, has caused a “breathtakingly lengthy” waiting list for open beds that can stretch to two years and that his client is languishing in the McLennan County jail while his physical and mental states are deteriorating.
“If we move into federal court, then the (federal) Bureau of Prisons takes it over and then they will send him to a federal medical facility,” Thomas said. “On the federal end, they don’t have to sit around and wait and they can get help much quicker, most likely. Federal courts have ruled waiting more than eight months is a violation of due process, and the idea is they would get him into federal court and sent to the Bureau of Prisons to some place that could help him. That is typically within four months, probably even sooner.”
Judge Thomas West of 19th State District Court found Jaimes-Hernandez incompetent to stand trial on Nov. 26, 2024, and the undocumented Mexican citizen, who has been in the McLennan County Jail 873 days, has been waiting to be transferred to one of four maximum-security state mental hospitals.
There are a combined total of 462 beds for adults and 32 beds for juveniles at the state’s four maximum-security facilities, according to Thomas’ motion.
Jaimes-Hernandez, 37, who remains paralyzed from the waist down after being shot by police in the Sept. 29, 2022, incident, is charged with capital murder in the deaths of Monica Aviles and her teenage children, Miguel Avila and Natalie Avila.
Jaimes-Hernandez, who is also being held on an immigration detainer, was living with the 38-year-old Aviles on South Monroe Street in McGregor. He has lived in Texas about 20 years and worked as a house painter, Thomas said.
He also is charged with capital murder in the shooting deaths Lori Aviles and her 20-year-old daughter, Natalie, who lived next door.
Jaimes-Hernandez also is charged with two counts of aggravated assault in the drive-by shooting of Jeronimo Olvera Jr. and the attempted shooting of Jeronimo Olvera Sr. at a home in the 800 block of Monroe that same day.
McLennan County District Attorney Josh Tetens said his office will oppose the request and called the removal motion “not only ironically untimely, but unnecessary.”
“The defendant in this case is going to receive the same mental health care any other defendant is granted under the law,” Tetens said Monday. “The defendant should remain in state custody where he will receive treatment, competency restoration, and we expect, be tried.”
Thomas acknowledges in his motion that federal law provides that a notice of removal in a criminal case must be filed no later than 30 days after a defendant receives a copy of the indictment against him “unless good cause is shown.” His motion states that “because of the extraordinary circumstances,” enforcing the timeliness rule would prejudice his rights.
Jaimes-Hernandez spent about three weeks in the hospital and weighed about 170 pounds when released to jail. His last recorded weight at the jail was 123 pounds, Thomas’ motion to transfer alleges.
“He has been locked up in a 5-by-7 cell with concrete walls and a steel door with no human interaction for more than two years,” Thomas said. “You can imagine someone there – no matter what they have done – in a room like that, confined in a wheelchair and confined to essentially a box for two years. What do you think that is going to do to the capabilities of him ever becoming competent?”
Longtime Waco psychologist Lee Carter found Jaimes-Hernandez, who is said to speak limited English, incompetent because he determined he doesn’t have a rational understanding of the charges against him; can’t reasonably confer with his attorney or assist in his defense; can’t exhibit appropriate behavior; and lacks the capacity to testify in his own behalf.
“Mr. Jaimes has a disorder that adversely affects his emotional presentation and thought patterns,” Carter wrote in his report to the court. “He is heavily paranoid, mentally confused, delusional, and combative. His disorder is treatable, but compliance is an obvious concern. Mr. Jaimes does not realize he is mentally ill and refuses to comply with treatment. His medical needs and the depth of his disturbance are sufficiently advanced that he cannot participate in a community-based competence restoration program. Inpatient care in a secure hospital setting is required.”
Thomas said seeing Jaimes-Hernandez’s condition continue to deteriorate during a recent jail visit “really bothered me deeply.” He said besides his concerns about due process violations, his current confinement situation borders on 8th Amendment violations against cruel and unusual punishment.
“Dr. Carter’s assessment, while proper for the purpose of a competency examination, fails to address the continuing mental and physical health issues Mr. Jaimes-Hernandez experiences while remaining on a long and crowded wait list,” Thomas wrote in the motion to transfer. “Mr. Jaimes-Hernandez, as a matter of course, refuses to utilize a hand-held urinal to void his bladder, choosing instead to urinate in his jail uniform. Additionally, he defecates in that jail uniform at will. As a result, he is subjected to forced medical showers to alleviate the filth accumulated in a jail uniform that must sometimes be physically cut from his body.”
Thomas rejects the notion that Jaimes-Hernandez is faking his condition to escape a possible death sentence.
“I don’t buy that he is malingering. That is a good thing for everyone to say because it gives them an excuse for it to be over,” Thomas said. “The reality is that no person in any sort of right mind would go through all of that and be able to keep up that kind of behavior for that length of time. Someone might be able to keep it up for a few weeks or even months, but not for two years.”
No hearing date has been set to hear the motion, which was filed electronically over the weekend.
Copyright 2025 KWTX. All rights reserved.
Texas
Texas Rangers Announce 2027 Regular Season Schedule
hosting the Athletics in the club’s home opener on Thursday, April 1. The complete 2027 schedule was announced today
by Major League Baseball.
The Rangers’ season opener on March 25
Texas
NTSB Confirms Texas Tesla Had 100% Floored Accelerator Pedal During Fatal Crash
In an incident that was horrific beyond words, late last month, a stunned family watched in horror as a car plowed into the Katy, Texas home of a 76-year-old mother and grandmother, killing her. The driver has been charged with manslaughter.
In the aftermath of the crash, it emerged that the car in question was a Tesla, and that the driver was making use of full self-driving mode (FSD) around the time the crash occurred. The victim’s family has named Tesla and the driver as defendants in a lawsuit. But per Electrek, Tesla was able to view crash data very quickly after the incident, and the head of AI at the company, Ashok Elluswamy, said the driver “manually overrode self-driving by pressing the accelerator all the way to 100% of the accel pedal in this residential area.”
In the days after the crash, Tesla fans took issue with coverage that characterized the car as in FSD when the crash occurred. CEO Elon Musk seemed to agree, replying to a post, “Yes, this makes no sense. FSD drives slowly through neighborhood streets and this was a high speed crash!”
But Musk seems to be assuming bad faith, as if coverage implied FSD had suddenly shifted into, perhaps, some kind of previously unannounced homicidal maniac mode and attacked a house. If anyone was saying this is what happened, they should apologize. It’s clearly not what happened.
And on Wednesday, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) largely confirmed Tesla’s version of events. Their report reads, in part:
“Electronic data recovered from the vehicle indicated that before the crash, the driver manually overrode FSD (Supervised) by pressing the accelerator pedal to 100%, and the vehicle’s speed was greater than 70 mph when the crash occurred.”
But cooler heads had noted weeks earlier that, like with good old fashioned cruise control, accelerating doesn’t boot you from FSD. The car takes the input, and stays in FSD. The question isn’t one of mechanics and technology, but one of philosophy: if FSD is meant to be “driving” when someone jams on the accelerator in a residential area, FSD may not be the “driver” in one important sense, but the car was still in FSD mode.
Because as much as Tesla would probably like FSD to be a total non-factor in the incident, that may not be the case either.
ABC News noted that, according to court documents, the driver claimed he “passed out” with the car in FSD on the highway, and that’s the last thing he remembers before the crash. He says he wasn’t sick, and medical records show no seizures, cardiac episodes, drugs, or alcohol.
A local Fox affiliate says records show the car was making deliveries for DoorDash while in FSD in the “hours and minutes leading up to the crash.” While in a neighborhood, it apparently signaled it was going to turn left onto one street, but instead the pedal went to the metal. This took the Tesla onto the victim’s cul-de-sac instead, and put it on its fateful collision course with her house.
To make matters weirder, other court records now show, per Electrek, that the driver had Googled the terms, “Tesla fsd not aggressive enough 2026,” “FSD is not aggressive enough for city driving,” and “Tesla fsd too timid.” That’s the kind of thing you Google when you’re looking for a Reddit post from someone sharing your consumer gripe.
In any case, the odds aren’t good that the driver wanted this to happen, nor that Tesla programmed its cars with evil intent. But FSD was being used around the time of this unusual fatal incident, and the public deserves to know more. Fortunately, a lot more will come out as the lawsuit progresses.
Texas
Texas AG secures 23andMe bankruptcy settlement after 2023 data breach
AUSTIN – Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said Wednesday he has secured a settlement of bankruptcy claims against genetic testing company 23andMe stemming from a 2023 data breach that exposed personal information, including some genetic ancestry data, of 6.9 million customers worldwide.
Paxton’s office said the settlement includes $150 million for a multistate coalition of 42 states. But because of limited funds in 23andMe’s bankruptcy estate and competing claims, the states’ recovery will be $18 million paid immediately, with Texas receiving $1,266,860.
23andMe disclosed in October 2023 that attackers had accessed accounts affecting 6.9 million consumers. Some of the information was later posted for sale on the dark web, according to Paxton’s office, which said the company learned of the breach months after the data became publicly available. The office said 23andMe initially denied a breach and later blamed consumers’ account settings and password practices.
Paxton joined a multistate investigation that concluded 23andMe used unreasonable security practices and failed to implement adequate safeguards against hacking, the office said.
23andMe filed for bankruptcy protection in March 2025. Paxton’s office said the settlement incorporates privacy and cybersecurity requirements, including enhanced security standards, comprehensive risk assessments and creation of an independent advisory board, along with enforcement of state privacy laws and continued consumer data deletion rights.
“Companies that collect and profit from Texans’ most personal information have a legal duty to protect it,” Paxton said in a statement.
The company also agreed to a $46.75 million class-action settlement in the bankruptcy case for affected U.S. consumers who submitted claims by Feb. 17, 2026, Paxton’s office said.
Copyright 2026 by KPRC Click2Houston – All rights reserved.
-
Iowa3 minutes agoJaylen Raynor Wisely Predicted To Be Starting Quarterback for Iowa State Football
-
Kansas9 minutes ago
Chiefs Name Burns & McDonnell as Owner’s Representative for New Practice Facility and Headquarters in Olathe
-
Kentucky15 minutes agoSaturated soil raises flooding risk across Kentucky after recent heavy rain
-
Louisiana21 minutes ago
Why Louisiana is one of the most mosquito infested states in the US
-
Maine27 minutes agoWife of Colombian father killed by ICE in Maine says they had planned to grow old together
-
Maryland33 minutes agoWashington Nationals 1st-round pick from Potomac Md. signs contract – WTOP News
-
Michigan39 minutes agoMichigan AG Dana Nessel visits Kalamazoo to address rising energy prices
-
Massachusetts45 minutes agoSpringfield attorney named to 2026 Massachusetts Super Lawyers list