Connect with us

South-Carolina

South Carolina’s “Sister Senators” on finding common ground

Published

on

South Carolina’s “Sister Senators” on finding common ground


If the walls of Sandy Senn’s office could talk, they might not have much to say anymore. The South Carolina State Senator is stripping them of their memories. Meanwhile, Senator Katrina Shealy has her 12-year political career all crammed into cardboard boxes. And we found freshman Senator Penry Gustafson sorting through emails from her soon-to-be former constituents.

All three lost in their primaries this past June.

Asked if she thinks she will get back into politics, Gustafson replied, “I don’t know.”

Earlier this summer the three said their goodbyes in the South Carolina Senate Chamber. “My farewell is conflicted, because I don’t want to go,” Gustafson said.

Advertisement

Shealy told her soon-to-be-former colleagues, “We’ve helped women and we’ve helped veterans, and what I’m so worried about is, who is going to do that now?”

Senn was firm: “I don’t regret a single vote that I ever took,” she said, “and I would make the vote again.”

That vote, in opposition of the state’s near-total ban on abortion, would be of little surprise if it came from Democrats. But these three are all members of the GOP.

“I’m a Republican, I think!” Shealy said. “I’m not sure right now, do they claim me or not?”

Gustafson said, “If you look at my voting record, there’s no doubt I’m a red R, but that one vote makes be a RINO baby-killer.”

Advertisement

“Republican In Name Only” – they heard that a lot. They didn’t just buck their party; they reached across the aisle to Margie Bright Matthews, a Democrat, and Mia McLeod, an Independent. “I’m super-proud of my sisters,” McLeod said, “because they knew what was at stake, they knew what they stood to lose, and they did it anyway.”

sister-senators.jpg
Clockwise from top right: South Carolina State Senators Penry Gustafson, Sandy Senn and Katrina Shealy (all Republican), with Democrat Margie Bright Matthews and Independent Mia McLeod. 

CBS News


This unusual coalition, on three separate occasions, successfully filibustered an abortion ban, halting its passage. Not that they agreed on everything (they didn’t), but as women and mothers, they agreed that banning an abortion at six weeks was time too little. Gustafson explained to the Senate, “We do not know when we’re pregnant, when we get pregnant.”

“If we didn’t say it on the floor, it wasn’t going to be heard,” Gustafson told “Sunday Morning.”

Advertisement

On the Senate floor Bright Matthews declared, “This bill is about control, using the Bible to say that you can control my body.”

“I’d say things just to rattle the men,” Bright Matthews laughed. “Like, ‘Wouldn’t you want your side piece to be able to get an abortion?’ And then all the older men just looked at me like, You don’t say things like that!

Shealy told the 46-member Senate (41 of whom were male), “Maybe the men who wrote it know more about pregnancy than the women in this chamber who can actually get pregnant and give birth.”

Asked when they knew they were jeopardizing their political careers by filibustering the abortion bill, Shealy replied, “I knew it at the time I said it, because my party was, like, calling me and screaming at me.”

“Two hours before the vote, I was pulled off the floor, and had a very strong, intense conversation: ‘This could be a career-ending vote,’” Gustafson said.

Advertisement

Senn said, “I didn’t care. I had to look myself in the mirror.”

They were the only five women in the Senate, in a state that, they say, has often left women behind. Shealy said, “In 1920 they gave women the right to vote. Well, South Carolina didn’t ratify that ’til 1969, and then we didn’t put it into law until 1973. We are just a little behind.”

The filibusters were their versions of “mansplaining.” Bright Matthews said, “When someone makes a statement, ‘Well, if you’re raped or you get pregnant as the result of incest, it’s not the child’s fault; you just need to learn to love on the baby’?”

McCleod added, “That same senator held up a woman’s picture and said she told him she was ‘grateful’ to have been raped, because it was the only opportunity God gave her to conceive a child. And I almost lost it. As a survivor of sexual assault … there are no words.”

They didn’t have words for the level of anti-abortion pushback, either; taunts, personal attacks, odd gifts left in their offices, like spines that came with a note warning them to “grow one.”

Advertisement

Shealy took her gifted spine to the Senate floor and said, “I’ve got one hell of a spine already, but now I’ve got another backup!”

It got more intense, and even more disturbing. According to Shealy, “We had one gentleman – I’m not sure we can call him that – stands at the top of the escalator every day, and he preaches to us, he has his Bible.”

“Swings a baby around with a rope, noose around its neck,” added Senn.

The same man went to Shealy’s church, calling her a “baby killer.” “And she’s singing in the choir while he’s doing this,” Senn said.

Shealy also said she had her tires slashed, and a window in her home shot with a pellet gun. “My kids and grandkids were seeing that,” she said. “I’m glad I’m not going to be in politics, because politics are mean.”

Advertisement

In May of last year, the “Sister Senators” could no longer hold off the vote on what is now the state’s law: a six-week ban on abortion.

And yet, not all was lost. All five senators were recognized last year with the John F. Kennedy Profile in Courage Award. At the presentation ceremony Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg said, “We’re fortunate to be able to gather to celebrate courageous leadership, which we need more than ever today.”

Noting her award during her goodbye speech on the Senate floor, Shealy said, “I am proud of losing this Senate race, just to get this. Because I stood up for the right thing. I stood up for women, I stood up for children, I stood up for South Carolina.”

According to Bright Matthews, the abortion restriction passed is not popular among the public. “The polling shows that 70+ percent of women in South Carolina do not want a total ban. All of us have stood up and agreed and tried to put forth a referendum to put it on the ballot; they said we can’t.”

Unlike 10 other states that will have abortion rights on the ballot in November (Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Maryland, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New York and South Dakota), South Carolina doesn’t allow voters that option.

Advertisement

What is clear is that post-Roe v. Wade, abortion rarely breaks down on clean partisan lines.

What the Sister Senators have shown is, it’s in that grey area where compromise, while costly, may not be as endangered as we all think.

“Instead of just attack someone for feeling differently on an issue, it’s better to ask why,” said Bright Matthews.

Gustafson said, “In a world of politics where we’re constantly being told we can’t do that, or we shouldn’t do that, and you’re expected to be this way, we’ve just broke that political, social mores right in half.”

“But, you paid the price for it,” said Cowan.

Advertisement

“We paid the price for it, but look what we have right now,” Gustafson said. “We have this national ear for the most wonderful thing of finding common ground, respect, civility in politics. That is what we gain, that is what America gains, from the Sister Senators of South Carolina.”

      
For more info:

     
Story produced by Deirdre Cohen. Editor: Ed Givnish. 

Advertisement



Source link

South-Carolina

Republican candidates for South Carolina governor debate key issues in Charleston

Published

on

Republican candidates for South Carolina governor debate key issues in Charleston


Six Republican candidates vying to become South Carolina’s next governor met in downtown Charleston for a wide-ranging debate that put abortion, infrastructure and the future of data centers at the center of the race.

The forum was held at the Sottile Theatre, where Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette, state Sen. Josh Kimbrell, U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace, U.S. Rep. Ralph Norman, Lowcountry businessman Rom Reddy and Attorney General Alan Wilson took the stage.

Questions included whether they would support a state hate crime law, how they would address concerns about growth and infrastructure, how to navigate collaboration, abortion and the future of data centers in the state.

One issue that drew near-unanimous opposition was state Senate Bill 1095, a proposed total abortion ban that passed out of committee earlier in the day. All of the candidates opposed the bill, but they differed on what they would do if it reached the governor’s desk.

Advertisement

READ MORE | South Carolina governor candidates tout infrastructure, growth at business forum

Norman said he would sign it.

“You know, this is an emotional issue, but I will tell you if this bill came to my desk as governor. If it passed the House and the Senate, I would sign it,” Norman said.

All of the other candidates on stage said they would veto the bill if it came across their desk as governor, with Reddy arguing the question should be decided by voters.

“The Supreme Court did not say the loudest voice in the ruling class prevails. It said it’s up to the people in the state, so let’s put it to a referendum,” Reddy said.

Advertisement

On infrastructure, candidates discussed reforming the South Carolina Department of Transportation and allowing private-sector involvement to help pay for improvements.

Wilson outlined ideas that included leasing interstate easements and expanding private express lanes.

“We privatized that grass between the interstates. We turn it into private express lanes that can be told we leased the easements on the sides of interstates to telecommunication companies and energy companies, and charge them for natural gas line and fiber optic fiber optic cables,” Wilson said.

Evette also pointed to public-private partnerships and the possibility of fast-pass lanes.

READ MORE | South Carolina governor candidates tout infrastructure, growth at business forum

Advertisement

“We want to make sure that we’re innovative public private partnerships coming in and creating fast pass lanes to allow people that are in a hurry to be able to utilize that,” Evette said.

The final question focused on data centers, with candidates agreeing corporations should “pay their way.”

“They should pay for their water. They should pay for their infrastructure, any roads around it, and we should look at what Governor Ron DeSantis has done in Florida with the large data centers that are coming to Florida. That should be the model in South Carolina and everywhere,” Mace said.

Kimbrell said the state should set limits to protect natural resources and guard against higher power costs for residents.

“Put parameters around data centers to ensure that the water consumption does not impact places like the ACE Basin,” Kimbrell said. “Ensuring that the Public Service Commission makes absolutely sure nobody’s power rate goes up and we try to get behind the meter energy grids in place so they can be self-sufficient.”

Advertisement

Two more debates are planned ahead of the primaries on June 9.



Source link

Continue Reading

South-Carolina

SC lawmakers’ second push to ban most abortions advances

Published

on

SC lawmakers’ second push to ban most abortions advances


A bill that could make it a felony for doctors to perform an abortion is moving to the full South Carolina Senate with just a few weeks left in the legislative session.

The South Carolina Senate medical affairs committee continued a debate of Senate Bill 1095 on April 21 in Columbia. The bill, sponsored by State Sen. Richard Cash, R-Anderson, builds on a restrictive abortion bill that failed to progress in the fall.

The committee passed the measure in an 8-4 vote, moving it to the full Senate for consideration. Lawmakers have until May 14, the last day of the 2026 legislative session, to pass the bill for it to become law.

Advertisement

Senate Bill 1095, also called the “Unborn Child Protection Act,” bans performing an abortion or supplying abortion drugs. It makes it illegal for a woman to get an abortion, with the only exception being to save a pregnant woman’s life.

It also makes mifepristone and misoprostol Schedule IV controlled substances. Alprazolam (Xanax) and zolpidem (Ambien) are two other examples of Schedule IV substances.

Pro-Life Greenville, an anti-abortion organization based in Greenville, responded to the bill’s progress with “full endorsement” of the legislation.

“Unborn children, like all human beings, deserve to have their lives protected under law here in the Palmetto State,” Pro-Life Greenville stated. “Today’s vote by the SC Senate Medical Affairs Committee brings that urgent need one step closer to reality.”

Advertisement

Under the bill, a woman who has an abortion could face misdemeanor charges. The maximum sentence would be two years in jail with a $1,000 fine.

Those found guilty of performing an abortion or providing a pregnant woman with abortion-inducing drugs could face felony charges, a maximum sentence of 20 years in jail, and a possible $100,000 fine.

Planned Parenthood South Atlantic (PPSAT), a firm opponent of the bill, decried the Senate committee passage. PPSAT Director of Public Affairs Vicki Ringer said in a statement that the bill will cost people their lives, and it will make it more difficult for women to get reproductive and pregnancy healthcare.

“Abortion bans have and will continue to cost people their lives,” Ringer stated. “As this ban inches closer to the governor’s desk, it is becoming increasingly clear just how many of our lives anti-abortion lawmakers are willing to endanger in service to their agenda.”

Bella Carpentier covers the South Carolina legislature, state, and Greenville County politics. Contact her at bcarpentier@gannett.com

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

South-Carolina

SLED issues Blue Alert for armed, dangerous woman in Midlands

Published

on

SLED issues Blue Alert for armed, dangerous woman in Midlands


BARNWELL, S.C. (WRDW/WAGT) – An officer was injured, and the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) has issued a Blue Alert for an “armed and dangerous” woman.

According to the Blue Alert, Cushman is wanted in connection with an officer being injured.

The location of the assault was Gardenia Road in Blackville, S.C.

On Monday night around 10:35 p.m., officials said they were looking for Lacey Cushman, 37, a white woman who is 5 feet 9 inches tall and weighs about 210 pounds.

Advertisement
SLED issues Blue Alert for armed, dangerous woman in Barnwell County(WRDW)

According to SLED, she has brown eyes and an unknown hair color. Her hairstyle and clothing are unknown.

She was last seen driving a 2011 white Chevrolet Traverse with an S.C. tag, 706IRU, in Barnwell County.

Her last known direction of travel was toward Bamberg County.

If you see her or have information, call 911 immediately.

Feel more informed, prepared, and connected with FOX Carolina. For more free content like this, download our apps.

Advertisement

Copyright 2026 WHNS. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending