South-Carolina
South Carolina man facing federal charge after killing police K-9
PROSPERITY, S.C. (WBTV) – A South Carolina man is facing a federal charge after he allegedly shot and killed a police K-9 over the summer.
Authorities had been attempting to serve a burglary warrant against 37-year-old James Robert Peterson in Newberry County on June 11, according to sister-station WIS.
WIS reported that when law enforcement arrived at Peterson’s mother’s home, the K-9 found him inside. He then was accused of shooting the dog and at authorities. Law enforcement fired back, hitting him.
The dog, a Belgian Malinois mix named “Coba,” died after being taken to an emergency veterinarian. He had been with the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) since 2021.
In June, Peterson was charged with cruelty to a police dog, breach of peace, possession of a weapon by a person convicted of certain crimes, resisting arrest with a deadly weapon and four counts of pointing and presenting a firearm at a person.
He is being tried for those crimes at the state level.
Now, six months after the shooting, SLED said Peterson has been federally indicted for being a felon in possession of a gun. He could face up to 15 years in prison on that charge if convicted.
Jail records show Peterson remains in custody as of Dec. 13.
Peterson’s mother, Scarlett Boyd, was also arrested and was charged with hindering law enforcement. According to WIS, she told authorities she had not seen her son when they arrived to serve the initial warrant.
Also Read: Body of missing South Carolina mother found in Charlotte, family says
Copyright 2024 WBTV. All rights reserved.
South-Carolina
Biden commuted 21 South Carolinians. Who are they and when are their release dates?
More than a dozen federal inmates convicted in South Carolina were among the nearly 1,500 who had sentences commuted by President Joe Biden on Thursday.
In a move the White House said was the largest single-day act of clemency in modern history, Biden commuted 1,499 sentences and granted 39 pardons for people convicted of non-violent crimes. Two South Carolina women, Denita Parker of Gaffney and Shawnte Williams of Columbia, received pardons.
The White House said all who received the commuted sentences had been serving the remainder of their sentences at home in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic.
A pardon forgives a crime, while commutations leave the convictions in place but eliminate or reduce a sentence.
The South Carolina list of people commuted, along with their new set release dates include:
- James Brown, 46, set release date of Feb. 13, 2027
- Sirrico Burnside, 53, set release date of Feb. 20, 2027
- Benard Clark, 54, set release date of Nov. 06, 2025
- Hendrick Cousar, 45, set release date of March 20, 2028
- Melvin Daniels, 34, set release date of Aug. 16, 2025
- Vernon Edwards, 48, set release date of Oct. 8, 2027
- Antonio Gaddist, 49, set release date of Dec. 24, 2027
- Lidderick Gomez, 30, set release date of Dec. 18, 2026
- Shawn Green, 46, set release date of May 6, 2025
- Frank Hamilton, 47, set release date of July 5, 2025
- James Harper, 51, set release date of March 10, 2025
- Terrence Hodge, 36, set release of date Feb. 7, 2025
- Joseph Dee Jacobs, 46, set release of date Dec. 22, 2024
- Lee Lindsey, 38, set release date of March 28, 2027
- April Miller, 50, set release date of Dec. 22, 2024
- Devonte Prioleau, 32, set release date of May 25, 2025
- Gena Randolph, 50, set release date of Jan. 4, 2025
- Flint Randolph, 62, set release date of May 14, 2025
- James Snowden III, 40, set release date of June 11, 2025
- Roderick Strong, 45, set release date of Feb. 11, 2028
- Tara Thompson, 45, set release date of May 1, 2025
South-Carolina
State audit of SC DJJ reveals longstanding issues have persisted, making it less safe for youth
COLUMBIA, S.C. (WIS) – A newly-released state audit of the South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice finds that longstanding issues have persisted at the agency in the midst of federal scrutiny, making it less safe for youth.
The report, written by the Legislative Audit Council, found that only about half of the 101 recommendations made to the agency in its 2021 audit have been addressed.
Of 24 safety recommendations, the report says that only eight have been fully implemented.
DJJ contends that it has, in fact, implemented more of these recommendations than the audit team stated, and added that there was “no opportunity for the agency to engage directly with auditors to fully understand the rationale behind some findings.”
- Read more: SC DJJ Director addresses potential influx of newly-arrested Richland County teens in coming months
Chief among the concerns is frequent staff turnover, something that DJJ officials have cited for years as an issue.
The report says the problem has only gotten worse, though.
The American Civil Liberties Union, which is suing the agency over conditions there, says this audit report is further evidence that youth are routinely “alienated, victimized and retraumatized.”
One former employee, who requested anonymity to speak candidly about her experience, said she is not surprised by the report’s findings.
“It has nothing to with the age of you guys having to house, it’s DJJ,” she said. “It’s not the age of the youth, it’s the agency.”
- Read more: Ex-SC DJJ employee voices safety concerns as federal oversight continues
According to Madalyn Wasilczuk, a University of South Carolina law professor whose work specializes in juvenile detention, recruitment and retention could be the root cause of some of DJJ’s issues.
“No matter what policies and procedures are put in place, if you don’t have the staff on the ground who have the experience and training and commitment to putting those policies in place and making them work, an agency is going to struggle,” she said.
Of the 118 juvenile detention center officers the audit team reviewed that were hired in 2023, 93 had left their positions by August of this year.
Those officer stayed on the job for an average of just three months, according to the report’s findings.
Wasilczuk said there are effective interventions for trouble youth, but they require a significant amount training and resources to be successful.
“There’s a learning curve,” she said. “So if you have people cycling in and out every three months, you’re not going to have people who are experts at how to deescalate with children who can be difficult to manage, who aren’t always the easiest to get along with and I think it promotes both a mistrust between the kids and the corrections officers and between the corrections officers and the kids.”
Another concern raised in the report is access to medical care. It found that the agency does not have an adequate transportation plan in place, and that some juveniles have missed necessary medical appointments.
“That’s basically neglect,” the ex-employee said. “They did what they did and committed their crimes, but we still under oath have to treat them good. We still have things that we’re supposed to do. They’re still children, and it’s very delicate with children.”
Progress, however, was noted in some areas.
The agency has added more than 1,100 state-of-the-art cameras at its facilities since 2021, and has taken steps to increase salaries and hold staff with disciplinary offenses accountable.
Wasilczuk said systemic change will not come until the state stops locking up children for status offenses, which are things that would not be considered crimes if they were adults.
“We do need to look at these back-end resources, but we also have to look at what we’re doing on the front-end, what cases we decide children should be arrested and detained in, and stop using our resources on status offenses, on school discipline issues that are appropriately dealt with as school discipline issues rather than as crimes,” she said. “If we don’t deal with that front-end problem, there’s no amount of back-end work that is going to fix the problem. We just would never have that much resources.”
DJJ’s Executive Director Eden Hendrick was not available for an interview on Thursday, but in a statement she discussed a number of headwinds that the agency is facing which can make progress difficult.
Among them: legislation that raised the maximum age for teen offenders in the criminal justice system from 17 to 18, a backlog of court cases and the closure of two county jail juvenile wings in Richland and Greenville County.
Last week, a legislative committee voted to approve $3 million to open up the vacant Greenville facility to address overcrowding at DJJ facilities.
The lease on the Greenville facility begins in January, but it will not open until staff has been properly trained, a DJJ spokesperson said. No timeline has been established for when it may start housing youth.
Feel more informed, prepared, and connected with WIS. For more free content like this, subscribe to our email newsletter, and download our apps. Have feedback that can help us improve? Click here.
Copyright 2024 WIS. All rights reserved.
South-Carolina
South Carolina Republicans Set To Reintroduce Bill Allowing Death Penalty For Abortions
A handful of South Carolina Republicans plan to reintroduce a bill that would define abortion as homicide — a crime punishable by death under state law.
State Rep. Rob Harris (R) pre-filed the South Carolina Prenatal Equal Protection Act earlier this month, and it will be introduced in the judiciary committee when the legislative session begins in January. The proposed bill seeks to amend the state’s criminal code to widen the definition of “person” to include “an unborn child at any stage of development.”
The bill would define abortion, with few exceptions, as equivalent to killing a person under the criminal code. South Carolina currently has a six-week abortion ban in effect. If passed, this bill would effectively enact a total abortion ban because it considers all abortion, starting “from the moment of fertilization,” to be homicide.
South Carolina’s criminal code carries a mandatory minimum sentence of 30 years in prison for homicide. Under special circumstances — including when a victim is under 11 years old — the minimum sentence can be life in prison or the death penalty. Taken together, this could mean anyone aborting a pregnancy in the state would face life in prison or execution.
The proposal does include some exceptions for “spontaneous” miscarriage and life-saving procedures, but all too often these types of exceptions are real in name only.
Harris originally introduced the same bill in 2023, and the idea that lawmakers would consider using capital punishment on people who get abortions sparked national outrage. Several Republicans who co-sponsored that bill quietly removed their names after public outcry. The 2023 version died shortly after it was introduced in the state House.
Harris did not respond to HuffPost’s request for comment this week, but defended the bill in 2023 to HuffPost reporter Lydia O’Connor.
“My bill does not single out women,” Harris said at the time. “It prohibits everyone from committing murder. It provides the same due process that everyone enjoys under our current laws.”
It’s very unlikely that the bill will go anywhere this time around. The current version has six co-sponsors, including Harris, all of whom are white men and members of the South Carolina Freedom Caucus, part of the more extreme sector of the Republican Party.
“I think that the majority of people, even the most strident Republicans, would say the death penalty bill is not where we want to go with abortion,” Vicki Ringer, the director of public affairs at Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, told HuffPost.
Support for prosecuting abortion patients is a fringe position, even within the anti-abortion movement, and most large groups have distanced themselves from the idea. Most anti-abortion laws include carve-outs to ensure that patients aren’t criminalized for their pregnancy outcomes. Still, many have been arrested despite these laws.
Democracy In The Balance
Support HuffPost
Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.
Although Ringer believes the bill will be dead on arrival, she hopes people will not dismiss how frightening it is that some lawmakers are comfortable introducing legislation like this.
“I don’t know who is getting equal protection, but it appears in South Carolina that only fetuses and embryos get equal protection,” she said. “Women and trans people do not.”
-
World1 week ago
Freedom is permanent for Missourian described as the longest-held wrongly incarcerated woman in US
-
Technology6 days ago
Struggling to hear TV dialogue? Try these simple fixes
-
Business4 days ago
OpenAI's controversial Sora is finally launching today. Will it truly disrupt Hollywood?
-
World1 week ago
Brussels denies knowledge of Reynders's alleged money laundering
-
Science1 week ago
All raw milk from Fresno dairy farm will be cleared from store shelves; cows have bird flu
-
News1 week ago
Read Representative Jerrold Nadler’s Letter
-
Politics1 week ago
Oklahoma measure seeks to make school district superintendents an elected position
-
Science1 week ago
How the FDA allows companies to add secret ingredients to our food