Connect with us

South-Carolina

I saw South Carolina use a firing squad to execute a man. I am sick with rage. | Opinion

Published

on

I saw South Carolina use a firing squad to execute a man. I am sick with rage. | Opinion



My client was convicted of murder and sentenced to death. We argued his mental illness warranted a reprieve. But he became the first prisoner executed by firing squad in 15 years. I witnessed it.

play

Just after 6 p.m. on March 7, the curtain hiding South Carolina’s execution chamber jerks open. From my front-row seat, the room reveals itself in phases. First, two wardens. Next, the lethal injection gurney and ancient electric chair. Finally, its newest method of execution: a slanted chair in the far corner, facing a short black curtain in the right wall. The man tied to the chair is my client, Brad Sigmon.  

The cruelest aspect of executions is the restraints. I saw three men in Georgia tied down with arms outstretched and feet together, crucifixion-style. Brad is strapped across his ankles, lap and waist. His right arm has been wrenched straight back and tied to the chair. A white square with a red “bullseye” is attached to his chest, where it rises and falls with his breathing.  

Brad is wearing a new black T-shirt and sweatpants. At our final visit that afternoon. Brad, who is 67, said they were the most comfortable clothes he’d worn in 23 years on death row. “And it’s true what they say,” he laughed. “Black is slimming.” The purpose of the color occurred to me later: to hide his blood.  

Brad looked scared until he saw me and his spiritual advisor, who sits on my left. Now he smiles. He tries to face us, which is difficult because of the last restraint: a light-colored strap, like an Ace bandage, that secures his chin and jaw to the chair. He keeps mouthing words until we understand him. “I’m okay. I love you. I’m okay.” 

Advertisement

Sick with rage

Focused on Brad, I miss the wardens’ cue. I have to read Brad’s last words. I stand and cross to a microphone mounted on the wall. “I want my closing statement to be one of love and a calling to my fellow Christians to help us end the death penalty,” I begin. Brad wrote this knowing it would be spoken only if his death was certain. He pleads now for his 28 friends still on death row. I recite the scriptures Brad selected and his closing prayer: “We are now under God’s grace and mercy.”  

When I sit back down, Brad is still smiling. I am sick with rage. South Carolina is my home. Before last fall, we’d had no executions for 13 years. Brad will be the fourth man killed in less than six months. The three before lingered on the gurney for 20 minutes. Brad was sentenced to death for the 2001 beating deaths of his ex-girlfriend’s parents, David and Gladys Larke. Brad always acknowledged that he did it. We argued, unsuccessfully, that he deserved a reprieve because of his severe mental illness. To avoid the electric chair, Brad had to choose between lethal injection and the firing squad, which no state has used since 2010.

I know because I am chief of the Capital Habeas Unit for the appellate jurisdiction of the Fourth Circuit, which includes South Carolina. I previously worked at the capital habeas unit in Georgia.

I agreed to witness so that Brad would not be alone. But I cannot believe what we are about to see.   

Advertisement

I make myself smile. I hold Brad’s eyes, my hand over my heart, until someone – I do not see who – pulls a black hood over his head. Ours are the last faces he sees.  

The execution

When I entered the witness room, I was given a plastic sauce cup that held two orange earplugs. As the black curtain opposite Brad rises – exposing three square ports – I jam them in my ears.   

I peer inside the ports. I cannot see even the tips of the rifles. I look back to Brad. His breathing has slowed. He is trying to still himself. The wait is agony. I do not want this to happen. But I do not want Brad enduring endless seconds in darkness and fear.   

Advertisement

A wound opens on his chest before the sound reaches us. The target is gone. Maybe the bullets vaporized it. Maybe they pushed it into the fist-sized hole streaming blood over Brad’s stomach and into his lap. Blood flows from Brad’s dying heart steadily, with occasional spills. Like someone tipped a glass behind his broken ribs, sloshing onto his black shirt, which conceals red very well.  

When the sound arrives, it is a chorus of explosions. Each of the three bullets makes its own noise, with its own echo, and cuts through the foam to ring in my ears. For a second, they stop my heart.   

Brad’s body shudders. His arm launches forward, pulling on the restraints with all of his strength. For a second, I think he will break free and press his hands over the hole, holding and pushing himself back together. He heaves twice, his stomach rising. The blood still flows as his arm, trembling with the strain, starts to slacken and twitch.   

I have shifted forward in my seat, preparing to jump to my feet. Today, I memorized telephone numbers for the first time in decades; I could use the prison’s phone if anything went wrong. Watching Brad’s struggling arm, I know that everything has gone wrong. But no call can fix it.    

Advertisement

A man enters the chamber with a stethoscope. I stare at the hole’s tattered edges and the glistening, saturated front of Brad’s shirt. His chest still moves as the doctor nears.  

The doctor leans in, the stethoscope poised. Then he straightens and steps back. He stands at ease but ready, a posture I recognize. He has to wait. But not for long. After a moment, when Brad seems still, he leans in again, darting the stethoscope from place to place. When he steps back again, he turns away and nods. The wardens return. The curtain races back across the window, hiding Brad’s slumped and stained body. A voice tells us to leave. I am supposed to stand. I don’t remember how.    

Bo King is chief of the Capital Habeas Unit for the Fourth Circuit, which is part of the Federal Public Defender’s Office for the Western District of North Carolina. 



Source link

Advertisement

South-Carolina

NCAA women’s Final Four: UConn v South Carolina, UCLA v Texas – live updates

Published

on

NCAA women’s Final Four: UConn v South Carolina, UCLA v Texas – live updates


Key events

South Carolina 40-39 UConn, 0:46 left, third quarter: South Carolina thought they had UConn trapped, but the Huskies work the ball around to a wide-open Quiñónez, who atones for her fouls by hitting the open 3-pointer. Raven Johnson turns it over, and at last, Azzi Fudd hits a 3.

Nine points in about 90 seconds.

Share



Source link

Continue Reading

South-Carolina

Undeserved Mercy? Or ‘Real Justice?’ South Carolina Solicitor Under Fire – FITSNews

Published

on

Undeserved Mercy? Or ‘Real Justice?’ South Carolina Solicitor Under Fire – FITSNews


by JENN WOOD

***

A brutally violent child murder case that once moved through a Laurens County, South Carolina courtroom has become a political football in the Palmetto State’s attorney general’s race, with S.C. eight circuit solicitor David Stumbo facing scrutiny over a plea agreement that spared the defendant from the death penalty.

Stumbo is one of three candidates for the Republican nomination for attorney general.

A text message circulated to voters this week accused Stumbo of cutting a “sweetheart deal” with convicted killer William Ryan Looper — who admitted to the rape, torture and murder of a two-year-old boy. It directs recipients to a website expanding on that claim – while urging voters to reject Stumbo in the June 9, 2026 Republican primary. The messaging is blunt, emotionally charged and politically pointed, framing the outcome of the case as an example of failed prosecutorial judgment at a time when Stumbo is seeking to become the state’s chief prosecutor.

Advertisement

***

THE CRIME — AND THE CASE

The underlying case presents a more complex picture than the campaign rhetoric suggests. Looper was charged in the 2018 death of his girlfriend’s young son in Laurens County – a case investigators described as exceptionally disturbing even by the standards of violent crime. According to law enforcement findings and court records, the child suffered extensive injuries consistent with prolonged abuse and sexual assault before his death.

Early in the prosecution, Stumbo’s office formally sought the death penalty and spent years preparing the case for trial, positioning it as a capital prosecution under South Carolina law.

That posture ultimately changed in November 2021, when Looper entered a guilty plea to multiple charges, including murder and first-degree criminal sexual conduct with a minor. In exchange for that plea, prosecutors removed the death penalty as a sentencing option. A circuit court judge subsequently imposed a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole for murder, along with decades-long concurrent sentences on the remaining charges — ensuring Looper will spend the rest of his life behind bars in a maximum-security state facility.

The ad insisted things went down differently, accusing Stumbo of “refusing” to seek the death penalty.

“Instead (he) offered mercy to this pedophile murderer,” the ad claimed. “Each and every day, Looper receives three meals a day, a place to lay his head at night and access to entertainment – like books, music and movies – all funded by you, the taxpayer.”

Advertisement

Here’s the spot…

***

***

STUMBO’S RESPONSE — AND THE CONTEXT

Stumbo, responding to the attack, rejected the characterization of the plea agreement and defended both the process and the outcome.

“That’s dishonest politics, plain and simple,” the solicitor said. “I hunted Looper with the death penalty for over three years — and leveraged every ounce of that pressure to do something almost unheard of: reach back over decades to lock up the abusive father who created that monster and ensured Looper himself will die in a cold prison cell one day. I also spared two young boys from reliving that trauma in court on the witness stand through decades of appeals.”

“Each and every family, law enforcement officer, and counselor supported that decision,” Stumbo added. “That’s what victim-centered, real justice looks like — not chasing headlines for politics.”

According to information provided to FITSNews, the case involved two surviving siblings who would likely have been required to testify about the abuse and death of their younger brother had the case proceeded to trial. Concerns about the emotional and psychological toll of that testimony — particularly given the likelihood of repeated proceedings through years of appeals — weighed heavily in discussions surrounding the resolution.

Advertisement

Prosecutors also faced the broader realities of South Carolina’s death penalty system at the time. Although the state had authorized capital punishment, executions had effectively stalled for years due to issues obtaining lethal injection drugs, leaving death sentences subject to prolonged delays and uncertainty. Even when ultimately carried out, capital cases can take decades to resolve — a reality illustrated by other South Carolina cases in which defendants have remained on death row for more than twenty years following conviction.

Within that framework, a life-without-parole sentence offered finality: no possibility of release and no extended appellate process requiring the victim’s family to repeatedly revisit the case. According to sources familiar with the decision-making process, the victim’s family supported the plea agreement after being advised of those considerations.

***

RELATED | FEDS TO SEEK DEATH PENALTY IN 2024 MURDER

***

THE SECOND CASE — AND NEW QUESTIONS

The resolution of the Looper case also led to a secondary prosecution involving his father, who was later charged and convicted on child abuse-related offenses stemming from conduct years earlier. That case has been cited by Stumbo as a rare example of prosecutors reaching back to hold an alleged source of long-term abuse accountable.

However, records (.pdf) reviewed by FITSNews indicate the elder Looper ultimately resolved his case through a negotiated plea as well, receiving a sentence that — while significant — includes parole eligibility. According to a South Carolina Department of Corrections (SCDC) inmate report (.pdf), he is currently serving multiple child neglect sentences and is projected to become eligible for parole in May 2026.

That outcome has prompted additional criticism from some observers, who question whether the broader strategy — using the capital case against the younger Looper to build a case against his father — ultimately resulted in a proportionate long-term outcome for both defendants.

Advertisement

Those concerns stand in contrast to Stumbo’s characterization of the dual prosecutions as a comprehensive approach to addressing both the immediate crime and its alleged underlying causes.

***

A CASE NOW AT THE CENTER OF A CAMPAIGN

None of that context appears in the attack message now circulating to voters, which reduces the outcome to a single point of contention: that the death penalty was ultimately taken off the table. As Stumbo campaigns for attorney general, his handling of violent crime cases is likely to remain a focal point, particularly as opponents and outside groups seek to distill complex prosecutorial decisions into politically resonant narratives.

At its core, the controversy reflects a broader dynamic increasingly visible in South Carolina’s legal and political landscape. Decisions once made within the confines of a courtroom — often shaped by evidentiary realities, victim considerations and long-term legal risk — are now being reframed in campaign messaging designed for maximum emotional impact.

Whether voters view the Looper plea as pragmatism, restraint or something else entirely may ultimately depend less on those underlying factors than on which version of the story gains traction.

***

ABOUT THE AUTHOR …

Jenn Wood (Provided)

As a private investigator turned journalist, Jenn Wood brings a unique skill set to FITSNews as its research director. Known for her meticulous sourcing and victim-centered approach, she helps shape the newsroom’s most complex investigative stories while producing the FITSFiles and Cheer Incorporated podcasts. Jenn lives in South Carolina with her family, where her work continues to spotlight truth, accountability, and justice.

***

Advertisement

WANNA SOUND OFF?

Got something you’d like to say in response to one of our articles? Or an issue you’d like to address proactively? We have an open microphone policy! Submit your letter to the editor (or guest column) via email HERE. Got a tip for a story? CLICK HERE. Got a technical question or a glitch to report? CLICK HERE.





Source link

Continue Reading

South-Carolina

Introducing USC’s Storm Stop & Shake Cheer Club!

Published

on

Introducing USC’s Storm Stop & Shake Cheer Club!


COLUMBIA, S.C. (WIS) – The University of South Carolina now has a club stomp and cheer team, the first club of its kind at the college.

Our Billie Jean Shaw went live outside the WIS News station with Captains Anaiya and Tiana to discuss the start and organization of the Storm Stomp and Shake cheer team!

The group also showed glimpses of their dancing with a live performance!

Watch the performance below:

Advertisement
The University of South Carolina now has a club stomp and cheer team, the first club of its kind at the college.

Feel more informed, prepared, and connected with WIS. For more free content like this, subscribe to our email newsletter, and download our apps. Have feedback that can help us improve? Click here.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending