Connect with us

South-Carolina

2024 Endorsements: Reject South Carolina's Ruling 'Uni-party' – FITSNews

Published

on

2024 Endorsements: Reject South Carolina's Ruling 'Uni-party' – FITSNews


For decades, South Carolina has failed miserably to live up to its vast, untapped potential. The state’s numerous competitive advantages – including breathtaking natural beauty, abundant resources and industrious citizens – have withered on the vine as neighboring states have raced past us on every important indicator. The primary culprit behind this chronic lack of competitiveness? An antiquated, byzantine, corrupt, dysfunctional state government – one that empowers and enriches itself (and the entrenched interests which prop up its ruling politicians) rather than the people and businesses which provide its lifeblood.

We see the pervasive rot in our anemic workforce, in our struggling schools, in our third-world infrastructure and in our increasingly violent cities and neighborhoods. And we continue to see it despite massive increases in government spending fueled by some of the nation’s highest tax rates and most oppressive fees.

“Republican” politicians in Columbia, S.C. – like the Democrats who preceded them – simply refuse to change this broken, one-way ratchet. They refuse to rethink what government should be and how it should function. They refuse to reduce its size and scope – or insist it be ethical and accountable. They also refuse to invest in real “economic development” – a.k.a. taxpayers and small businesses – as they engage all manner of pay-to-play corporate cronyism.

They are, in short, stealing our money … and worse, stealing our promise as a state. And the cost of this ongoing theft – in both dollars and lost opportunity – is soaring.

Advertisement

***

RELATED | SC ‘RESTRUCTURING’ BATTLE

***

It’s gotten to the point these “leaders” can literally misplace $2 billion of your money … for five years … and not even miss a beat. Oh, and not even think for half a second to give that money back to the people who provided it (since the government clearly didn’t need it).

Good ‘ol boy corruption and self-serving bureaucratic excess are not new to South Carolina. They have been generational for … well, generations. But the racket is officially bipartisan now … starting with the drawing of anti-competitive districts meant to insulate dutiful uni-party puppets from credible challengers.

What have decades of anti-competitive elections wrought? Easy: “Bipartisanshit.”

To recap: From 1878-1994, generations of corrupt, self-serving white Democrats bore exclusive blame for the myriad problems plaguing the Palmetto State – rising poverty, academic regression, third world roads and bridges, escalating violence, etc. Over the last quarter century, however, legislative power has been vested exclusively in the hands of white “Republicans” – many of whom simply flipped parties (albeit not governing philosophies) as a means of maintaining their power over the pursestrings. Oh, and their power over the judges.

To keep up appearances, select black leaders have been invited to participate in the ongoing graft and corruption – creating a self-serving, self-perpetuating (and perpetually results-challenged) uni-party oligarchy.

Advertisement

And I say “uni-party” because let’s be clear … the words “Republican” and “Democrat” mean absolutely nothing anymore in Columbia, S.C. And haven’t meant anything since the GOP got its hand on the rudder of the ship of state.

***

In fact, to be a “Republican” in South Carolina these days means to be a sworn enemy of all the things the party purports to stand for: Less government, lower taxes, more prosperity and more personal freedom. Such beliefs – shouted from the rafters by all GOP candidates when they are seeking votes – vanish completely from the equation when they start casting votes.

Grand old pussies, people. That’s what they are.

Not only do ostensibly foundational GOP values have no place in the GOP anymore, “Republican” leaders are actively trying to oust the small handful of lawmakers who still subscribe to them.

To wit: An ongoing status quo jihad against a small group of conservative lawmakers who have christened themselves the Freedom Caucus.

Advertisement

This group has had a target on its back since it formed – and over the last two years, the amount of establishment flak being poured into that target could stop an Eastern Front army in its tracks.

Since obtaining their numerical supermajority following the 2022 elections, House “Republican” leaders have engaged in a full-frontal attack on the Freedom Caucus aimed not at reducing its ranks – but eliminating it from existence. Last year, they kicked these conservative Republicans out of their own caucus for declining to sign a “loyalty oath” to the establishment. This year, they’ve effectively bribed challengers to run against Freedom Caucus members in GOP primary elections – begging their special interest masters for the funds to “get rid of them.”

***

***

Is there any confusion as to whether the S.C. House of Representatives’ leadership is behind this effort? No … there is not.

They are 100 percent behind it – just as they are zero percent transparent about who is funding it. Although if you look on the disclosure forms of challengers to the Freedom Caucus, you’ll see a lot of the same names contributing identical amounts to the same group of puppet candidates.

Let me be clear: This column – which will doubtlessly be contorted and distorted by the more vocal status quo apologists in Columbia – is not a blanket endorsement of everything the Freedom Caucus has done. There are many legitimate criticisms of the group – in fact, I published one such criticism on my website last week. Also, I personally called out many of the group’s members for their hypocritical opposition to a long-overdue medical marijuana bill last year.

Advertisement

“GOP leaders killed (medical marijuana) with a capable assist from a recently formed ‘freedom’ caucus … yet another example of Palmetto State politicians acting in a manner totally inconsistent with their self-applied political adhesives,” I noted at the time.

I’ve even blasted a few of them for being hypocrites in their own use of state tax dollars.

So obviously the Freedom Caucus isn’t perfect … and some of its members are, as their critics have suggested, a few bricks shy of the proverbial full load. Maybe more than a few bricks.

But as a collective – as a united, uncompromising and (hopefully) expanding force against uni-party rule under the S.C. State House dome – they are indispensable to a desperately needed reorientation of the governing ideology of the Palmetto State. Because right now, South Carolina’s governing ideology is that of a cancer cell … mindless growth that will one day destroy it from within.

Accordingly, those who care about a freer, more prosperous, more accountable future for our state would be well-served by clicking the box for the following candidates in this spring’s GOP primary elections …

Advertisement

***

Thomas Beach
Jody Bohman
Mike Burns
Bill Chumley
April Cromer
Vic Dabney
Bill DeVore
Adam Duncan
Sarita Edgerton
Elizabeth Enns
Stephen Frank
Greg Ford
Lee Gilreath
Shannon Grady
Rob Harris
Sherry Hodges
Chris Huff
Jay Kilmartin
Josiah Magnuson
RJ May III

Ryan McCabe
Alan Morgan
Brandy Tarleton
Jackie Terribile

Stan Tzouvelakas
Joe White

***

Like ’em or not, the Freedom Caucus is making a difference – by forcing difficult votes that force the ruling party to at least pretend to honor its stated convictions. Or be exposed as hypocrites. And as crazy as some of them are, its members are successfully changing the rules of engagement in Columbia, S.C. – which is probably why the party bosses threatened by this group’s existence are dropping seven figures in an effort to take its members out.

A clumsy effort, at that …

For the first time ever, there is a legitimate check to the failed uni-party establishment in the S.C. General Assembly. For the first time ever, there is a credible challenge to the shameful, self-serving status quo which has produced a crappy economy, crappier schools, crappier roads, crime-infested communities (especially rural ones) and corrupt courts – all while vacuuming billions and billions of additional dollars from historically low-income, overtaxed, out-of-work citizens struggling to make ends meet.

As I’ve previously noted, South Carolina was home to the most liberal GOP-controlled legislature in America three years running – until the Freedom Caucus came along and started challenging Republican leaders on key spending votes. I’m a bottom line guy … and the bottom line is South Carolina taxpayers will benefit tremendously by expanding the membership of the Freedom Caucus and shrinking the ranks of the corrupt ruling uni-party.

Advertisement

Not everyone in the media agrees with me, though …

“The S.C. House’s Freedom Caucus is unlike anything we’ve encountered before, and it has forced us to write this unprecedented anti-endorsement,” the editorial board of The (Charleston, S.C.) Post and Courier opined this week.

The pro-establishment paper’s full-throated defense of the status quo begged its readers to vote for “anti-Freedom Caucus candidates, and help our legislature get back to serving us.”

“Most of what Republicans and Democrats in the legislature do is work together to solve actual problems,” the fawning propaganda piece continued.

The problem with that perspective? It is based on a demonstrably false premise and a dangerously disingenuous naïveté. Our legislature is not serving us … it is stealing from us. And its “Republican” and Democratic members are not working together to “solve problems,” they are conspiring with one another to enrich themselves and the interests they serve as they exacerbate those problems. And they are doing so at your expense – and at the expense of future generations of South Carolinians.

Advertisement

Your vote in the upcoming primary will either preserve that failure … or give those who are fighting it a fighting chance.

So choose wisely …

***

ABOUT THE AUTHOR …

(Travis Bell Photography)

Will Folks is the founding editor of the news outlet you are currently reading. Prior to founding FITSNews, he served as press secretary to the governor of South Carolina and before that he was a bass guitarist and dive bar bouncer. He lives in the Midlands region of the state with his wife and eight children.

***

WANNA SOUND OFF?

Got something you’d like to say in response to one of our articles? Or an issue you’d like to proactively address? We have an open microphone policy here at FITSNews! Submit your letter to the editor (or guest column) via email HERE. Got a tip for a story? CLICK HERE. Got a technical question or a glitch to report? CLICK HERE.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

South-Carolina

SC lawmakers’ second push to ban most abortions advances

Published

on

SC lawmakers’ second push to ban most abortions advances


A bill that could make it a felony for doctors to perform an abortion is moving to the full South Carolina Senate with just a few weeks left in the legislative session.

The South Carolina Senate medical affairs committee continued a debate of Senate Bill 1095 on April 21 in Columbia. The bill, sponsored by State Sen. Richard Cash, R-Anderson, builds on a restrictive abortion bill that failed to progress in the fall.

The committee passed the measure in an 8-4 vote, moving it to the full Senate for consideration. Lawmakers have until May 14, the last day of the 2026 legislative session, to pass the bill for it to become law.

Advertisement

Senate Bill 1095, also called the “Unborn Child Protection Act,” bans performing an abortion or supplying abortion drugs. It makes it illegal for a woman to get an abortion, with the only exception being to save a pregnant woman’s life.

It also makes mifepristone and misoprostol Schedule IV controlled substances. Alprazolam (Xanax) and zolpidem (Ambien) are two other examples of Schedule IV substances.

Pro-Life Greenville, an anti-abortion organization based in Greenville, responded to the bill’s progress with “full endorsement” of the legislation.

“Unborn children, like all human beings, deserve to have their lives protected under law here in the Palmetto State,” Pro-Life Greenville stated. “Today’s vote by the SC Senate Medical Affairs Committee brings that urgent need one step closer to reality.”

Advertisement

Under the bill, a woman who has an abortion could face misdemeanor charges. The maximum sentence would be two years in jail with a $1,000 fine.

Those found guilty of performing an abortion or providing a pregnant woman with abortion-inducing drugs could face felony charges, a maximum sentence of 20 years in jail, and a possible $100,000 fine.

Planned Parenthood South Atlantic (PPSAT), a firm opponent of the bill, decried the Senate committee passage. PPSAT Director of Public Affairs Vicki Ringer said in a statement that the bill will cost people their lives, and it will make it more difficult for women to get reproductive and pregnancy healthcare.

“Abortion bans have and will continue to cost people their lives,” Ringer stated. “As this ban inches closer to the governor’s desk, it is becoming increasingly clear just how many of our lives anti-abortion lawmakers are willing to endanger in service to their agenda.”

Bella Carpentier covers the South Carolina legislature, state, and Greenville County politics. Contact her at bcarpentier@gannett.com

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

South-Carolina

SLED issues Blue Alert for armed, dangerous woman in Midlands

Published

on

SLED issues Blue Alert for armed, dangerous woman in Midlands


BARNWELL, S.C. (WRDW/WAGT) – An officer was injured, and the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) has issued a Blue Alert for an “armed and dangerous” woman.

According to the Blue Alert, Cushman is wanted in connection with an officer being injured.

The location of the assault was Gardenia Road in Blackville, S.C.

On Monday night around 10:35 p.m., officials said they were looking for Lacey Cushman, 37, a white woman who is 5 feet 9 inches tall and weighs about 210 pounds.

Advertisement
SLED issues Blue Alert for armed, dangerous woman in Barnwell County(WRDW)

According to SLED, she has brown eyes and an unknown hair color. Her hairstyle and clothing are unknown.

She was last seen driving a 2011 white Chevrolet Traverse with an S.C. tag, 706IRU, in Barnwell County.

Her last known direction of travel was toward Bamberg County.

If you see her or have information, call 911 immediately.

Feel more informed, prepared, and connected with FOX Carolina. For more free content like this, download our apps.

Advertisement

Copyright 2026 WHNS. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

South-Carolina

Crossroads 2026: Second South Carolina Governor’s Debate Preview – FITSNews

Published

on

Crossroads 2026: Second South Carolina Governor’s Debate Preview – FITSNews


by MARK POWELL

***

South Carolina’s first Republican gubernatorial debate in Newberry earlier this month was a cordial affair. Candidates stayed focused on the issues – and kept things civil.

Will the same be said after this week’s second round?

When the curtain rises on Tuesday evening (April 21, 2026) at the College of Charleston’s Sottile Theatre, five of the six GOP candidates have committed to being on stage. Attorney general Alan Wilson, fifth district congressman Ralph Norman and state senator Josh Kimbrell will appear before votes a second time, while lieutenant governor Pamela Evette and Lowcountry businessman Rom Reddy – both of whom skipped the first debate – will make their 2026 debuts.

Advertisement

As of press time, congresswoman Nancy Mace – who had a solid performance during the first exchange – was the only uncommitted candidate, waiting to see how the U.S. House of Representatives’ schedule unfolded.

Regardless of whether there will be five podiums on stage or six, the stakes are incredibly high as we are now just fifty (50) days away from the decisive Republican gubernatorial primary in the Palmetto State. I say “decisive” because the GOP nominee has won the last six governor’s races in South Carolina. Republican nominees are winning by bigger and bigger margins, too, as the last Democrat gubernatorial nominee barely clearly the 40% threshold in 2022.

***

The closer we get to primary day, the more likely things are to get nasty – meaning this week’s GOP exchange is expected to yield far more fireworks than the last one.

We’re told several candidates spent the weekend prepping for this upcoming encounter, boning up on stats and pre-planning “off the cuff” zingers the way college students cram for their finals. They were wise to invest time in such planning, too – because a debate this close to the primary isn’t something a serious candidate wings.

A single, careless slip of the tongue or inadvertent stumble could instantly turn into a lethal landmine – crippling a frontrunner and killing their momentum. Conversely, the ability to think fast on one’s feet when opportunity arises can produce the modern-day political equivalent of the Holy Grail – a viral moment that captures lightning in a bottle, resonates with broad swaths of the electorate and propels a candidate to the front of the pack.

Advertisement

If recent polling is accurate, each campaign needs such a boost, too, as “undecided” still sits squarely in the driver’s seat in this race. Remember this, too: if no candidate receives a majority of votes on June 9, the top two vote-getters would face off in a head-to-head runoff election two weeks later.

Here’s a recap of what to watch for on Tuesday night as each of the six contenders (including Mace, should she show) jockey for position…

***

JOSH KIMBRELL

Josh Kimbrell (Facebook)

***

NEEDS: Relevancy
NEEDS TO AVOID: Fallout from his legal drama
WATCH FOR: Who he attacks (and defends)   

Let’s be frank: The senator from Spartanburg County is faring so poorly in the polls that it’s unlikely his opponents will waste any of their political capital attacking him.

Also, if recent headlines are any indication, Kimbrell is doing a good enough job damaging his own candidacy.

Things could change in the event Kimbrell – who also performed well during the first debate – manages to land an effective jab against a rival. Guns could then swing his way, and he would likely find himself on the explaining end of unpleasant questions about his ongoing legal woes.

Advertisement

And as they say in politics, if you’re explaining, you’re losing.

For Kimbrell, simply coming off the stage with his campaign maintaining a fluttering pulse would be a win – although as we continue to note, his legal troubles have become all-consuming.

Something worth watching is how Kimbrell interacts with the other candidates. Does he attack any of them? Laud any of them? Given the close relationships between certain consultants in this race, the direction of his venom – or praise – could prove telling.

***

PAMELA EVETTE

Pamela Evette (Facebook)
NEEDS: To step out of the current governor’s shadow
NEEDS TO AVOID: Falling on her face as she does so
WATCH FOR: The number of times she says ‘Trump’

It’s not easy being second banana in South Carolina, where the executive branch is already constitutionally neutered. It gets even harder when your time comes to seek the top job – and there’s very little to show for your time in office.

Such is the dilemma confronting the “lite governor.” 

Yes, Pamela Evette has been long-serving governor Henry McMaster‘s dutiful co-pilot these past eight years. And yes, she has reaped the backing of a big chunk of the state’s GOP establishment as her reward. But when the question turns to, “what has she really accomplished?” the answers don’t suggest bold visionary leadership. Sure, highway beautification, stepping on golden shovels at groundbreakings, and saluting student accomplishments are all well and good. But at a moment in its history when South Carolinians are restless and increasingly intolerant of the status quo, such establishment photo-ops “don’t feed the bulldog,” as they say.

Advertisement

The noticeable lack of yeast in Evette’s polling numbers (despite her spending more money than any other candidate) bears witness to her struggle.

In fairness to Evette, the office she currently occupies was specifically designed not to accomplish much (thus ensuring the spotlight always falls on the governor). Still, she needs to move beyond, “if you like what you got from Henry these last ten years, you’ll love what you’ll get from me.”

Voters aren’t having that this cycle, which is one reason why Evette hasn’t advanced in the polls.

It’s a tightrope, though. At the same time she seeks to distance herself from the status quo, Evette can’t afford to let a single ray of sunlight come between her and her boss, either. Or else it’s an indictment of her, too.

This much is certain: Expert to hear that Evette loves Donald Trump. A lot.

Advertisement

Many believe Evette’s only path to victory is by securing Trump’s endorsement – something it appeared for awhile as though she had the inside track to receive. The longer she goes without getting it, though, the narrower her path becomes.

***

NANCY MACE

Nancy Mace (Facebook)
NEEDS: An electability argument
NEEDS TO AVOID: Aggression overload
WATCH FOR: Her homestretch strategy

Should she show up, you’ve got to wonder which version of Nancy Mace will take the stage. Will it be the “Nice Nancy” we saw at Congressman Russell Fry’s recent candidate forum in Florence? Or will it be the “Primary Pitbull,” the Mace who unofficially kicked off her campaign with a scathing “scorched earth” attack on Alan Wilson delivered from the floor of the U.S. House?

Mace can be a polarizing political personality. Those who like her really, really like her; conversely, those who dislike her do so with a vengeance. But with the primary so close at hand – and so many voters still undecided – she needs to convince the GOP base of her electability. Being a bomb thrower on issues she feels passionate about may be good for grabbing headlines, but is it a sound approach to winning over eleventh hour converts?

Then there are her personal issues. Most notably, her infamous meltdown with officials at Charleston’s airport late last October. Although Mace’s base stayed with her after that contretemps, conventional wisdom suggests the disapproval it produced in other Republicans is too baked into the cake to overcome.

Should she participate, the debate could be her last best chance to turn the page once and for all.

Mace’s performance in Charleston – her backyard – will also reveal what sort of approach she intends to bring to the final seven weeks of this race.

Advertisement

***

RALPH NORMAN

Ralph Norman (Facebook)
NEEDS: A rebound
NEEDS TO AVOID: Being cast as a D.C. insider
WATCH FOR: A breakout ‘relatability’ moment

Ralph Norman didn’t have his best performance during the first GOP debate – but he’s promised his supporters he’s not going to let it happen again.

For Norman to succeed onstage in Charleston, he needs to differentiate. This being South Carolina, every candidate with an ‘R’ beside their name claims to be a conservative. But a growing number of those on the right flank of the ideological spectrum – including the founding editor of this media outlet – insist that’s no longer good enough.

And South Carolina’s consistently less-than-robust outcomes would support that view…

These voters want proof that a candidate’s conservative rhetoric on the campaign trail is matched by a consistently conservative voting record in office. As a member of the U.S. House’s Freedom Caucus, Ralph Norman’s bona fides are established. However, serving on Capitol Hill these days is accompanied by the tainted stench of Washington. Look for someone to try to tag him as a “Washington Insider,” a point which Norman has given them some ammunition to hit him with.

Norman has done a good job of differentiating so far. For example, while most of the candidates who appeared at Fry’s forum mentioned earlier discussed the same issues (deplorable roads, the pressing need for judicial reform, etc.), Norman talked about them in a down-home, folksy way that had many in the audience nodding in agreement.

If he establishes “relatability street cred” Tuesday night, it could open up a new path for support while also creating new headaches for his opponents. 

Advertisement

***

ROM REDDY

Rom Reddy (Facebook)
NEEDS: A breakthrough
NEEDS TO AVOID: Talking over people
WATCH FOR: A new dynamic to the debate

You never get a second chance to make a first impression, as the old saying goes… and the Charleston debate will be a political first date of sorts for Rom Reddy, a local multi-millionaire and founder of the since-scuttled DOGE SC movement. A known commodity in the Palmetto Lowcountry, Reddy remains a mystery to many rank-and-file Republicans across the state.

Seeing as this will be the first time a substantial number of them take his measure, how will the diminutive Indian-Italian stack up next to the competition? Reddy has previously bashed his rivals as “clowns.” What happens if he fails to impress against them?

Because he’s only been in the race for six weeks – during which time he’s spent at least $1.5 million to boost his name identification – Reddy is a definitional wildcard. He’s also a political novice, one who will be surrounded on stage by experienced campaigners.

Reddy has many bold, innovative ideas for the state. However, he needs to avoid unloading too many at once and steer clear of diving into too many policy details. Voters are just getting to know him, after all.

Still, there’s no denying that Reddy has a strategic opportunity to turn this race on its head.

Will he seize it on Tuesday night? 

Advertisement

Reddy must also learn to adapt to political realities. Jumping in the race so late means he has to make up a lot of ground – in a limited amount of time. For him to have a chance to make the GOP runoff election on June 9, he needs to take out the politician most likely to capture the votes he needs. That’s Norman – so watch and see if Reddy trains his fire on his fellow multi-millionaire during Tuesday night’s exchange.

***

ALAN WILSON

Alan Wilson (Facebook)
NEEDS: To be the adult on stage
NEEDS TO AVOID: Taking the bulk of the attacks
WATCH FOR: Strong counterpunches

Alan Wilson’s newly released campaign commercial touts his service in the Iraq War. That experience will likely come in handy on Tuesday night, as the four-term attorney general – the race’s frontrunner – is expected to face a barrage of incoming attacks.

Wilson leads his rivals in the polls – and in the pivotal money battle. That makes him the top target in this race, and the likely recipient of the most attacks on the debate stage Tuesday evening (Evette in particular is likely to be gunning for him).

There’s a big risk with the strategy of attacking Wilson, however. The veteran prosecutor has tried to remain above the fray throughout this contest, and for the most part he’s succeeded. But as the old saying reminds us, you can only poke the bear so many times before the bear roars back.

Wilson has strategically absorbed several punches during this race – but he will not permit himself to become a punching bag as it enters its pivotal phase. In other words, candidates who insist on going after him should be prepared for him to punch back.

Wilson’s team has portrayed him as the grown-up in this race, the one candidate who has stayed above name-calling and petty mudslinging. They would like to preserve that image – but it may not be possible much longer. 

Advertisement

It’s often remarked in political circles that Wilson is a gentleman, a truly nice guy. But opponents who think he’ll simply roll over and play dead without fighting back could be in for a surprise. Because sometimes, even the most polished gentleman has a good right hook – and reason to use it.

We have no idea what counterpunches the Wilson campaign is cooking up. But we would be thunderstruck if he walks onto that stage with his guard down.

***

ABOUT THE AUTHOR…

Mark Powell (Provided)

J. Mark Powell is an award-winning former TV journalist, government communications veteran, and a political consultant. He is also an author and an avid Civil War enthusiast. Got a tip or a story idea for Mark? Email him at mark@fitsnews.com.

***

WANNA SOUND OFF?

Got something you’d like to say in response to one of our articles? Or an issue you’d like to address proactively? We have an open microphone policy! Submit your letter to the editor (or guest column) via email HERE. Got a tip for a story? CLICK HERE. Got a technical question or a glitch to report? CLICK HERE.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending