Connect with us

Oklahoma

PREVIEW: (6) Iowa WBB vs (3) Oklahoma (NCAA Tournament)

Published

on

PREVIEW: (6) Iowa WBB vs (3) Oklahoma (NCAA Tournament)


PREVIEW: (6) Iowa WBB vs (3) Oklahoma (NCAA Tournament)

WHO: 3-seed Oklahoma Sooners (26-7, 11-5 Big 12)

Advertisement

WHEN: 3:00 PM CT (Monday, March 24, 2025)

WHERE: Lloyd Noble Center (Norman, OK)

TV: ESPN (Kevin Fitzgerald, Kim Adams)

RADIO: Hawkeye Radio Network (Rob Brooks, Kathryn Reynolds)

MOBILE: espn.com/app

Advertisement

ONLINE: espn.com/watch

FOLLOW: @HawkeyeBeacon | @IowaWBB | @espnW | @IowaonBTN |

LINE: Oklahoma -4.5

To advance to the Sweet 16 for the fourth time in the last five seasons, Iowa will need to do something on Monday that Lisa Bluder never did and that no Iowa team has done since 1993: win a second round game on an opponent’s court. Iowa did win a second round game away from home in 2021 — but that was the COVID-impacted tournament, when all of the games were played on neutral sites in and around San Antonio.

You have to go back to 1993 and an Iowa win at Old Dominion to find a second round win for the Hawkeyes in a true road game. This year, Iowa will need to defeat 3-seed Oklahoma on its home floor to make it back to the Sweet 16 for a third consecutive season.

Advertisement

Oklahoma went 26-7 this season overall and 11-5 in SEC play and, like Iowa, the Sooners were one of the hottest teams in the country down the stretch. After falling to 4-5 in league play on February 2, Oklahoma ran off seven wins in a row to wrap up the regular season, then added two more wins in the SEC Tournament before losing to South Carolina in the semifinals. This is a Sooner team playing with a lot of confidence heading into Monday’s game.

PROJECTED IOWA STARTING LINEUP          

G Lucy Olsen (5’10”; 17.8 ppg, 3.6 rpg, 5.2 apg, 44.0 FG%, 35.2 3FG%)

G Kylie Feuerbach (6’0″; 6.5 ppg, 2.0 rpg, 2.4 apg; 37.2 FG%, 28.1 3FG%)

G Taylor McCabe (5’9″; 6.8 ppg, 2.4 rpg, 1.2 apg, 41.5 FG%, 40.6 3FG%)

Advertisement

F Sydney Affolter (5’11”; 8.7 ppg, 7.8 rpg, 2.6 apg, 49.5 FG%, 48.1 3FG%)

F Hannah Stuelke (6’2″; 12.8 ppg, 7.8 rpg, 2.2 apg, 50.0 FG%, 11.8 3FG%)

PROJECTED OKLAHOMA STARTING LINEUP          

G Payton Verhulst (6’1″, 14.9 ppg, 5.8 rpg, 4.0 apg, 1.5 spg, 42.6 FG%, 34.8 3FG%)

G Reyna Scott (5’10”, 4.7 ppg, 1.7 rpg, 2.1 apg, 45.6 FG%, 26.8 3FG%)

F Sahara Williams (5’11”, 10.5 ppg, 4.7 rpg, 2.2 apg, 40.7 FG%, 29.8 3FG%)

Advertisement

F Skylar Vann (6’0″, 9.8 ppg, 4.9 rpg, 2.7 apg, 41.0 FG%, 25.8 3FG%)

C Raegan Beers (6’4″, 17.7 ppg, 9.2 rpg, 1.1 apg, 1.1 bpg, 65.0 FG%, 37.9 3FG%)

PREVIEW  

From one high-scoring offense to another — on Saturday, Iowa faced Murray State, who entered the game with the leading scoring offense in the nation (87.9 ppg). On Monday, Iowa faces Oklahoma, who enters the game with the… fifth-leading scoring offense in the country at 85.1 ppg. Iowa smothered the Racers, holding them to a season-low 57 points and just 5-of-30 shooting from distance.

Oklahoma looks like a much more formidable test for Iowa than Murray State, though. The Sooners are 11th overall in Bart Torvik’s rankings and they achieved that lofty ranking by being good on both ends of the floor. Oklahoma ranks 23rd in offensive efficiency and have been even better on defense, ranking 11th in defensive efficiency.

The Sooners strength on comes from their ability to shoot the ball — and their ability to crash the offensive glass. Oklahoma is 25th nationally in effective FG% (52.1%) and that number is fueled primarily by their ability to make 2-point shots; they rank 9th nationally in 2-point field goal percentage, at 54.5%. The Sooners aren’t as proficient from long range — 32.2% from beyond the arc,128th nationally — so it tracks that they rank just 82nd in three-point rate.

Advertisement

Oklahoma also makes sure to emphasize rebounding; the Sooners are 25th nationally in offensive rebounding rate, grabbing 37.5% of their misses. They’ve been even better at preventing opponents from getting their misses, too; ranking 11th nationally in that category on defense and allowing opponents to claim just 24.7% of their misses this year. The Sooners are second in the nation in total rebounds per game (47.5) and defensive rebounds per game (32.8).

On top of that, Oklahoma is also an elite passing team with crisp ball movement and a keen willingness to set up teammates for good looks and easy baskets. Oklahoma leads the nation in assists this season (21.9 per game) and that’s largely a function of team-wide distribution — seven different players are averaging at least 1.8 assists per game this season and only one is averaging more than 2.7 assists per game.

On defense, Oklahoma’s strengths mimic their strengths on offense. The Sooners don’t force a lot of turnovers (282nd in turnovers forced) and they have a good-not-excellent free throw rate (127th), but they’re excellent at contesting shots and keeping opponents from collecting their misses.

Opponents have an effective FG% of 41.9% against Oklahoma, which ranks 21st nationally. Opponents have converted only 41.4% of their 2-point attempts (30th) and 28.7% of their 3-point tries (50th) against the Sooners. Good luck getting one of those missed shots back as well — as noted, opponents get just 24.7% of their missed baskets this year (11th nationally).

Advertisement

While Iowa enjoyed a significant size advantage against Murray State (especially after the Racers’ star player, Katelyn Young, left early in the third quarter with an injury), that won’t be the case against Oklahoma. The Sooners start four players 5’11” or taller, led by Oregon State transfer Raegan Beers in the middle, a 6’4″ post with tremendous length and skill.

Despite averaging only 22.2 minutes per game, Beers leads the Sooners in scoring (17.7 ppg), rebounding (9.2 rpg), and blocks (1.1 bpg), all while shooting a hyper-efficient 65.0% from the floor. While almost 90% of her attempts have been inside the 3-point line, she’s flashed some floor-stretching ability as well, making 37.9% of her 3-point efforts, albeit on just 29 attempts. Keeping her in check is going to take a massive effort from Hannah Stuelke, Ava Heiden, and Addison O’Grady.

Guard Payton Verhulst provides some outside scoring pop to help balance Beers’ post production. She’s a well-rounded player, ranking second on the team in scoring (14.9 ppg) and rebounding (5.8 rpg) and serving as the ringleader of the Sooners’ passing attack (team-high 4.0 assists per game). While Beers does most of her damage in the paint and around the rim, Verhulst is one of Oklahoma’s top outside threats, launching almost seven three-pointers per game and converting on 34.8% of those tries.

Sahara Williams, who played at Waterloo West as a prep and was an Iowa target in recruiting, is the final Sooner averaging in double figures at 10.5 ppg, alongside 4.7 rpg and 2.2 apg. Williams, alongside fellow starting forward Skylar Vann (9.8 ppg, 4.79 rpg, 2.7 apg) have been two of Oklahoma’s more willing 3-point shooters, ranking second and fourth on the team in long range attempts, though they’ve only made 29.8% and 25.8% of their 3-poitn tries, respectively.

Williams isn’t even the only Iowan on the OU roster, as the Sooners also have Aubrey Joens, an Iowa City native who started her college career at Iowa State before transferring to Oklahoma two seasons ago. She has played a limited role this season, averaging 2.2 ppg in 5.7 minutes of action.

Reyna Scott rounds out the expected starting five for Oklahoma; she’s averaged 4.7 ppg, 1.7 rpg, and 2.1 apg this season while shooting 45.6% from the floor (26.8% from deep). But Oklahoma is a team that’s not afraid to go deep into its bench for players — at least 10 Sooners are averaging at least 14 minutes per game and eight players are averaging at five points per game.

Guards Zya Vann and Lexy Keys and forward Liz Scott have been three of the most prominent Sooners off the bench. Vann (15.3 minutes per game) has averaged 7.0 ppg, 2.4 rpg, and 1.9 apg on 42.4% shooting from the field (36.2% from 3-point range). Keys (21.1 mpg) has been a major weapon from outside, averaging 3.9 triples per game and making 35.4% of those long range efforts. Scott (14.0 mpg) provides size of the bench (6’2″) and has contributed 6.6 ppg, 4.8 rpg, and 1.3 apg on 53.0% shooting from the floor.

Advertisement

The Hawkeyes played one of their best games of the season to demolish Murray State in the opening round; they’ll likely need to summon a similar effort in order to knock off an Oklahoma team that has significant length and depth alongside one of the most potent offenses in the country this year.



Source link

Oklahoma

What Oklahoma Does Better Than Texas and Why It Matters

Published

on

What Oklahoma Does Better Than Texas and Why It Matters


During Oklahoma’s Lincoln Riley era, the Sooners dominated Texas. Riley went 6–1 against the Longhorns, including a victory in the Big 12 Championship Game on Dec. 1, 2018. However, things have been different over the last half-decade.

Brent Venables took over as the Sooners’ head coach in 2022, one year after Steve Sarkisian became the Longhorns’ lead man. Texas is 3–1 since Venables was appointed, with an average margin of victory over the Longhorns’ three wins of 32.3 points.

Texas is looking to extend its winning streak to three games for the first time since 1997–99. Oklahoma has one clear advantage, and while it has not mattered in previous matchups, it could define the 2026 edition.

Advertisement

Oklahoma’s Defense Could Cause Texas-Sized Problems

Oklahoma Sooners defensive lineman Taylor Wein in the first half of the Red River Rivalry college football game between the Sooners and the Texas Longhorns at the Cotton Bowl Stadium in Dallas, Texas, Saturday, Oct. 11, 2025. | SARAH PHIPPS/THE OKLAHOMAN / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images
Advertisement

When Oklahoma’s defense lines up against the Texas offense, the two best units in the game will be on the field at the same time.

Advertisement

When it comes to the Red River Rivalry, it often feels as though preconceived notions about the team are irrelevant. The intensity and familiarity set both teams back to the basics. However, the matchup of the Longhorns’ offense and the Sooners’ defense will likely define this season’s rivalry game.

Last season, Oklahoma was carried by its defense to the College Football Playoff, with its offense doing just enough to get the job done. The Sooners were 79th in points per game (26.2) while allowing the seventh-fewest points per game (15.5).

There is optimism that Oklahoma’s offense will improve. Quarterback John Mateer could take the next step with Parker Livingstone and Trell Harris coming in to catch passes. However, the Sooners’ defense has been among the best in the country during Venables’ tenure and has come to characterize the program — a far cry from the Riley era.

Advertisement

Oklahoma Sooners defensive lineman R Mason Thomas and linebacker Kip Lewis celebrate during the game between the Texas Longhorns and the Oklahoma Sooners at the Cotton Bowl. | Jerome Miron-Imagn Images

Under Venables, Oklahoma has ranked inside the top 20 in each of the last three seasons in adjusted EPA per play allowed. Last season, it ranked second behind only Texas Tech, according to GameOnPaper. This includes top-three finishes in yards allowed per rush attempt (2.4, second) and sacks (45, third).

The Longhorns were productive on defense last season, ranking in the top 30 in points allowed per game. The defense was particularly impactful against the Sooners, dominating in all four quarters. In nearly every metric, though, Oklahoma outperformed its rival defensively last season.

Stat

Texas Longhorns’ Defense (Rank)

Advertisement

Oklahoma Sooners’ Defense (Rank)

Rushing Yards Allowed per Attempt

3.1 (12th)

2.4 (2nd)

EPA per Rush

Advertisement

-0.05 (27th)

-0.21 (2nd)

Passing Yards Allowed per Attempt

6.6 (38th)

6.2 (22nd)

Advertisement

EPA per Dropback

-0.06 (33rd)

-0.17 (9th)

Advertisement

Over the last four matchups, however, this defensive production has been mostly meaningless. Texas is averaging 34 points per game and outpacing the Sooners’ season averages.

Season

Oklahoma PPG Allowed

Points Allowed vs. Texas

Advertisement

Oklahoma YPG Allowed

Yards Allowed vs. Texas

2022

30.0

49

Advertisement

461.0

585

2023

23.5

30

Advertisement

389.4

527

2024

21.5

34

Advertisement

318.2

406

2025

15.5

23

Advertisement

272.5

302

While this has been the case every season since Venables took over for OU, the Sooners have also steadily improved defensively. This has decreased the margin for error on the Longhorns’ side. Texas needs to take advantage of every opportunity it gets.

Advertisement

Last season, Texas missed multiple field goals. The Longhorns avoided disaster, though, by winning the turnover battle 3–0 and getting relentless pressure on Mateer. This season, they may not be as fortunate, as the Sooners will test the new-look Longhorns offense

Advertisement

Sign up to our free newsletter and follow us on FacebookX and Instagram for the latest news. 

Add us as a preferred source on Google





Source link

Continue Reading

Oklahoma

Oklahoma data center boom sparks backlash as Yukon leaders, residents raise concerns

Published

on

Oklahoma data center boom sparks backlash as Yukon leaders, residents raise concerns


A contentious debate over water and growth is intensifying in Yukon as residents and city leaders grapple with the long-term costs of supplying major industrial projects, including a data center that uses up to 3 million gallons a day.

The discussion spilled into another packed Yukon City Council meeting, where residents learned how strained and expensive the city’s water outlook could be over the next 25 years.

Emotions ran high, with one resident comparing city leadership to a Nazi regime.

Yukon’s water supply plan examines eight options, including five aquifers, non-potable reuse water, direct potable reuse water, and purchasing 2 million gallons a day from Oklahoma City.

Advertisement

Projected costs exceed $200 million, with millions more expected over the next 25 years for operations and maintenance.

The data center was part of the conversation from the start of the water study, which began in late 2024.

The facility uses up to 3 million gallons a day to cool its servers. One option discussed for meeting that demand is a non-potable supply providing 3 million gallons a day, with $55.9 million in capital costs and a required 18-inch pipe stretching 3.5 miles.

The option is recommended to meet great industrial demands, including a data center.

Council member Rick Cacini said his focus is on residents’ needs rather than industrial users. Cacini said, “We had water problems 8 years ago when I started, and we have water problems today.”

Advertisement

Another council member raised the idea of taking cost out of the equation when considering whether to supply water to the data center.

Residents spoke out one after another against the data center after hearing details of the water plan and costs.

One resident referenced Piedmont, where two data center proposals were tabled on Monday. Another resident said, “It’s not a good deal for us, and the other cities know it already.”

Some residents escalated their criticism of city leadership. One resident said, “I voted for Pillmore, and I regret that vote more than anything probably I’ve ever done in my life because this feels like some nazi regime.”

Others called for city leaders to be recalled. “We will collect those signatures within 30 days, and we’re gonna remove you.”

Advertisement

Concerns also grew over the data center agreement, centered on the purchaser having an “out” while the seller does not.

The city manager was said to have gotten something wrong in August.

The meeting ended with Cacini threatening to sue Mayor Brian Pillmore over comments made in an early May meeting.

Pillmore was not at the meeting, saying he was on vacation with his family.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Oklahoma

Oklahoma AG files petition to block proposed smelting project in Inola

Published

on

Oklahoma AG files petition to block proposed smelting project in Inola


INOLA, Okla. — Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond has filed a petition in Rogers County seeking to block a proposed aluminum-smelting facility in Inola.

According to Drummond, Emirates Global Aluminum holds a 60% controlling interest in the project. The company is based in the United Arab Emirates.

Century Aluminum, a company headquartered in Chicago, owns the remaining 40%.

If completed, Oklahoma Primary Aluminum would be the largest primary aluminum production plant in the United States. However, the facility would produce hazardous waste, which has raised concerns in both the Inola community and across the state. Billboards have been spotted along Highway 412 in Inola, warning others about the proposal.

Advertisement

The facility would also draw more than 1,000 megawatts of continuous energy.

“A primary aluminum smelter does not belong in a community’s backyard, and its emissions do not respect property lines,” Drummond said, adding that winds could carry pollutants into the surrounding northeastern Oklahoma communities. “The injury is imminent, it is grave, and it is irreparable.”

However, Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt has criticized Drummond’s actions, saying the facility would be one of the state’s largest economic development projects in history.

It is important to note that Drummond is currently running for Governor.

“As soon as President Trump made his endorsement in the governor’s race, Drummond dropped the act and showed his true colors,” said Stitt. “Now he is turning his machine against one of President Trump’s top priorities, once again weaponizing his office to settle scores instead of serving Oklahomans. President Trump’s aluminum project in Inola will rapidly grow Oklahoma’s economy and strengthen America’s supply chain for generations, while Drummond turns his back on our state in favor of cheap political gimmicks and personal gain.”

Advertisement

President Trump has endorsed Mike Mazzei in Oklahoma’s gubernatorial race. The Republican primary is scheduled for June 16.


Stay in touch with us anytime, anywhere —





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending