Connect with us

Oklahoma

Oklahoma high school basketball scoreboard: Schedule, scores, stats for Friday, Feb. 21

Published

on

Oklahoma high school basketball scoreboard: Schedule, scores, stats for Friday, Feb. 21


Regional and district playoffs are underway for Oklahoma high school basketball Classes 4A, 3A, 2A, A and B. Here is Friday’s schedule and results.

Friday’s Oklahoma high school basketball scores

Advertisement

Friday’s Oklahoma high school basketball regional playoff games

Class 2A

Note: Loser bracket girls play at 1 p.m.; boys at 2:30. Winners bracket girls play at 6 p.m.; boys at 7:30.

AREA I

Winners Bracket

Morrison vs. Fairview

Tonkawa vs. Hooker

Advertisement

Wyandotte vs. Fairland

Nowata vs. Okemah

Oklahoma Bible vs. Fairview (girls)

Newkirk vs. Hooker (girls)

Pawhuska vs. Fairland (girls)

Advertisement

Caney Valley vs. Okemah (girls)

Losers Bracket

Sayre, bye

Newkirk 67, Watonga 65

Pawhuska vs. Quapaw

Advertisement

Caney Valley vs. Haskell

Sayre 41, Morrison 30 (girls)

Watonga 35, Tonkawa 23 (girls)

Wyandotte vs. Quapaw (girls)

Nowata vs. Haskell (girls)

Advertisement

AREA II

Winners Bracket

Hobart vs. Riverside

Frederick vs. Crescent

Colbert vs. Hartshorne

Advertisement

Elmore City vs. Vanoss

Hobart vs. Riverside (girls)

Merritt vs. Hinton (girls)

Tushka vs. Hartshorne (girls)

Wilson vs. Vanoss (girls)

Advertisement

Losers Bracket

Mangum 63, Walters 29

Hinton 45, Merritt 32

Tushka 61, Coalgate 58, OT

Wilson 65, Dibble 49

Advertisement

Walters 41, Mangum 38 (girls)

Frederick 56, Crescent 53, OT (girls)

Colbert vs. Coalgate (girls)

Dibble, bye (girls)

AREA III

Advertisement

Winners Bracket

Wynnewood vs. Christian Heritage

Rejoice Christian vs. Howe

Central Sallisaw vs. Oktaha

Pawnee vs. Dale

Advertisement

Calera vs. Christian Heritage (girls)

Rejoice Christian vs. Howe (girls)

Central Sallisaw vs. Oktaha (girls)

Pawnee vs. Dale (girls)

Losers Bracket

Advertisement

Calera 47, Konawa 31

Wilburton 56, Chouteau 41

Oklahoma Union 46, Hulbert 31

Meeker 61, Mounds 54

Wynnewood 36, Konawa 34 (girls)

Advertisement

Chouteau 49, Wilburton 26 (girls)

Hulbert 60, Oklahoma Union 34 (girls)

Meeker vs. Mounds (girls)

AREA IV

Winners Bracket

Advertisement

Pocola vs. Talihina

Panama vs. Ketchum

Preston vs. Latta

Luther vs. Cashion

Pocola vs. Talihina (girls)

Advertisement

Panama vs. Chelsea (girls)

Stratford vs. Latta (girls)

Minco vs. Cashion (girls)

Losers Bracket

Warner 60, Vian 52

Advertisement

Chelsea 83, Colcord 76

Wewoka 69, Stratford 43

Stroud 60, Minco 47

Warner 63, Vian 37 (girls)

Colcord 38, Ketchum 17 (girls)

Advertisement

Wewoka 49, Preston 45 (girls)

Stroud 43, Luther 13 (girls)

Class A

Note: Loser bracket girls play at 1 p.m.; boys at 2:30. Winners bracket girls play at 6 p.m.; boys at 7:30.

Advertisement

AREA I

Winners Bracket

Okarche vs. Garber

Drummond vs. Pond Creek-Hunter

Liberty vs. Red Oak

Advertisement

Summit Christian vs. Ripley

Okarche vs. Garber (girls)

Mooreland vs. Seiling (girls)

Cave Springs vs. Red Oak (girls)

Porter vs. Ripley (girls)

Advertisement

Losers Bracket

Woodland 68, Cherokee 59

Mooreland 51, Laverne 44

Cameron 54, Afton 43

Wesleyan Christian 49, Yale 47

Advertisement

Cherokee 34, Glencoe 25 (girls)

Laverne 52, Drummond 40 (girls)

Afton 34, Webbers Falls 31 (girls)

Summit Christian 32, Barnsdall 24 (girls)

AREA II

Advertisement

Winners Bracket

Sterling vs. Hydro-Eakly

Caddo vs. Central Marlow

Binger-Oney vs. Verden

Oklahoma Christian School vs. Amber-Pocasset

Advertisement

Sterling vs. Alex (girls)

Caddo vs. Navajo (girls)

Empire vs. Turner (girls)

Thomas vs. Amber-Pocasset (girls)

Losers Bracket

Advertisement

Carnegie 49, Fletcher 44

Hollis 45, Rock Creek 43

Empire 67, Turner 41

Thomas 61, Ninnekah 40

Hydro-Eakly 49, Healdton 46 (girls)

Advertisement

Hollis 53, Rock Creek 51 (girls)

Binger-Oney 45, Verden 35 (girls)

Union City 48, Coyle 27 (girls)

AREA III

Winners Bracket

Advertisement

Allen vs. Weleetka

Riverfield vs. Rattan

Crowder vs. Wright City

Velma-Alma vs. Cyril

Allen vs. Weleetka (girls)

Advertisement

Wellston vs. Rattan (girls)

Crowder vs. Wright City (girls)

Ringling vs. Cyril (girls)

Losers Bracket

Porum 47, Keota 28

Advertisement

Wetumka 63, Wister 61

Savanna 49, Haworth 40

Stonewall 84, Wayne 75

Porum 35, Clayton 30 (girls)

Wetumka 54, Wister 53 (girls)

Advertisement

Canadian 28, Savanna 25 (girls)

Stonewall 41, Wayne 34 (girls)

AREA IV

Winners Bracket

Waukomis vs. Dewar

Advertisement

Okay vs. Gore

Texhoma vs. SW Covenant

The Academy vs. Canute

Waukomis vs. Dewar (girls)

Okay vs. Quinton (girls)

Advertisement

Turpin vs. Cheyenne/Reydon (girls)

Apache vs. Canute (girls)

Losers Bracket

Hominy 62, Depew 40

Regent Prep 71, Quinton 35

Advertisement

Turpin 43, Cheyenne/Reydon 37

Apache 36, Arapaho-Butler 32

Hominy 53, Drumright 29 (girls)

Davenport 51, Regent Prep 29 (girls)

SW Covenant 43, Texhoma 35 (girls)

Advertisement

Arapaho-Butler 62, The Academy 38 (girls)

Class B

Note: Loser bracket girls play at 1 p.m.; boys at 2:30. Winners bracket girls play at 6 p.m.; boys at 7:30.

AREA I

Advertisement

Winners Bracket

Lomega vs. Calumet

Copan vs. DC-Lamont

Leedey vs. Vici

Arnett vs. Frontier

Advertisement

Lomega vs. Prue (girls)

South Coffeyville vs. Medford (girls)

Leedey vs. Timberlake (girls)

Arnett vs. Frontier (girls)

Losers Bracket

Advertisement

Cimarron 67, Covington-Douglas 60

Medford 69, Bluejacket 28

Kremlin-Hillsdale 52, Timberlake 47

Felt/Yarbrough 59, Billings 46

Calumet 61, Mulhall-Orlando 39 (girls)

Advertisement

Shidler 47, Welch 38 (girls)

Kremlin-Hillsdale 60, Vici 24 (girls)

Hillsdale Christian 48, Beaver 43 (girls)

AREA II

Winners Bracket

Advertisement

Sentinel vs. Boise City

Fort Cobb-Broxton vs. Hammon

Granite vs. Erick

Duke vs. Big Pasture

Canton vs. Balko/Forgan (girls)

Advertisement

Fort Cobb-Broxton vs. Hammon (girls)

Granite vs. Mt. View-Gotebo (girls)

Geronimo vs. Chattanooga (girls)

Losers Bracket

Balko/Forgan 59, Waynoka 30

Advertisement

Sweetwater 51, Corn Bible 40

Blair 63, Mt. View-Gotebo 35

Chattanooga 69, Ryan 42

Boise City 42, Waynoka 39 (girls)

Corn Bible vs. Taloga (girls)

Advertisement

Tipton 54, Fox 40 (girls)

Grandfield 46, Ryan 43 (girls)

AREA III

Winners Bracket

Mill Creek vs. Stuart

Advertisement

Bennington vs. Kiowa

Smithville vs. Asher

Paden vs. Braggs

Achille vs. Stringtown (girls)

Maysville vs. Kiowa (girls)

Advertisement

Smithville vs. Asher (girls)

Buffalo Valley vs. McCurtain (girls)

Losers Bracket

Achille vs. Caney

Boswell 63, Springer 38

Advertisement

Eagletown 76, Moss 44

Legacy Christian 59, Schulter 51

Thackerville vs. Caney (girls)

Soper 37, Bennington 27 (girls)

Moss 54, LeFlore 34 (girls)

Advertisement

Paden 65, Schulter 33 (girls)

AREA IV

Winners Bracket

Dover vs. Carney

Wilson (Henryetta) vs. Sasakwa

Advertisement

Battiest vs. Moyers

Tupelo vs. Varnum

Dover vs. Lookeba-Sickles (girls)

Wilson (Henryetta) vs. Earlsboro (girls)

Whitesboro vs. Moyers (girls)

Advertisement

Pittsburgh vs. Varnum (girls)

Losers Bracket

Strother 52, Geary 48

Earlsboro 61, Haileyville 30

Whitesboro 44, Calvin 41

Advertisement

Pittsburg 73, Bowlegs 43

Strother 64, Geary 40 (girls)

Sasakwa 51, Midway 44 (girls)

Kinta 51, New Lima 25 (girls)

Roff 41, Macomb 38 (girls)

Advertisement

Friday’s Oklahoma high school basketball district playoff games

Class 4A

Note: Girls play at 6 p.m.; boys at 8.

AREA I

Mannford at Cushing

Advertisement

Woodward at Elk City

Catoosa, bye

Jay at Grove

Mannford at Cushing (girls)

Woodward at Elk City (girls)

Advertisement

Catoosa at Vinita (girls)

Jay at Grove (girls)

AREA II

Chickasha at Bridge Creek

Purcell at Ada

Advertisement

Sulphur vs. Pauls Valley at Lone Grove

Plainview at Ardmore

Chickasha at Bridge Creek (girls)

Purcell at Ada (girls)

Pauls Valley at Lone Grove (girls)

Advertisement

Plainview at Ardmore (girls)

AREA III

Stigler at Muldrow

Poteau at Broken Bow

Skiatook at Glenpool

Advertisement

Tecumseh at Eufaula

Stigler at Muldrow (girls)

Poteau at Broken Bow (girls)

Skiatook at Glenpool (girls)

Tecumseh at Eufaula (girls)

Advertisement

AREA IV

Harding Arts at Blanchard

Harrah at Oklahoma Christian School

Holland Hall at Tulsa McLain

Victory Christian vs. Verdigris at Lincoln Chr.

Advertisement

Harding Arts at Blanchard (girls)

Harrah, bye (girls)

Holland Hall at Tulsa McLain (girls)

Victory Christian at Lincoln Christian

Advertisement

Class 3A

AREA I

Star Spencer at Heritage Hall

Casady at Chisholm

Blackwell at Hennessey

Advertisement

Lindsay, bye

Star Spencer at Heritage Hall (girls)

Casady at Chisholm (girls)

Blackwell at Hennessey (girls)

Crossings at Lindsay (girls)

Advertisement

AREA II

Davis at Marlow

Atoka at Tishomingo

Beggs at Chandler

Silo at Dickson

Advertisement

Davis at Marlow (girls)

Atoka at Tishomingo (girls)

Beggs at Chandler (girls)

Silo at Dickson (girls)

AREA III

Advertisement

Tulsa Dove Science at Henryetta

Salina at Kansas

Checotah at Kiefer

Hugo at Valliant

Metro Christian at Henryetta (girls)

Advertisement

Salina at Kansas (girls)

Kiefer, bye (girls)

Hugo at Valliant (girls)

AREA IV

Westville at Kellyville

Advertisement

Dewey at Commerce

Okmulgee at Keys (Park Hill)

Little Axe at Holdenville

Westville at Kellyville (girls)

Dewey at Commerce (girls)

Advertisement

Okmulgee at Keys (Park Hill) (girls)

Little Axe at Holdenville (girls)



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Oklahoma

Kendall Wells Falls Behind in Home Run Race as Oklahoma Waits for Selection Sunday

Published

on

Kendall Wells Falls Behind in Home Run Race as Oklahoma Waits for Selection Sunday


Oklahoma’s early exit at the SEC Tournament opened the door for UCLA to take the lead in the home run race.

Kendall Wells, who was named the SEC Freshman of the Year on Friday for her outstanding 2026 season, went 0-for-3 with a walk in Thursday’s defeat to Georgia, meaning she enters the NCAA Tournament sitting on 36 home runs.

She’s no longer chasing former Arizona star Laura Espinoza, however.

Advertisement

UCLA slugger Megan Grant hit home runs on Friday and Saturday to equal and surpass the record set by Espinoza in 1995.

Advertisement

Grant broke the record in the top of the third inning in Saturday’s Big Ten Championship Game. She hammered the 0-2 delivery from former OU pitcher Jordy Frahm for home run No. 38.

The solo shot put the Bruins up 2-0, but Frahm and the Cornhuskers roared back to win the game 7-2.

Wells still has the entire NCAA Tournament to chase down and pass Grant. Her next home run will tie Espinoza’s mark of 37 long balls.

It wouldn’t be the first time things have shifted in this massive 2026 home run race, either.

Advertisement

OU was the first team to catch and surpass the 161 home runs hit by the 2021 Sooners.

Advertisement

UCLA’s run at the Big Ten Tournament flipped the race.

The Bruins homered four times against Penn State on Thursday and four times on Friday against Wisconsin before Grant’s record-breaking blast on Saturday.

As a result, UCLA will enter the NCAA Tournament having hit 182 home runs to Oklahoma’s 174 home runs, and the Sooners have played one additional game.


Advertisement

Sign up to our free newsletter and follow us on Facebook and X for the latest news.


Both teams a virtually guaranteed to be hosting regionals when the full NCAA Tournament field is revealed on Sunday evening.

Advertisement

Despite the loss to Georgia, Oklahoma is in strong position to earn a top four seed in the tournament. Patty Gasso’s team enters the tournament 48-8 overall, including a 20-4 mark in SEC play during the regular season, which clinched the program’s second-straight regular season crown.

Advertisement

Should the Sooners advance out of the first weekend of the tournament, they are also projected to host a Super Regional at Love’s Field.

UCLA finished the weekend 47-8 overall following their run at the Big Ten Tournament, and the Bruins went 20-4 in league play during the regular season.

The NCAA Tournament Selection Show will air on ESPN2 on Sunday at 6 p.m.

Add us as a preferred source on Google



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Oklahoma

Oklahoma County jail searches for new solution to jail transportation

Published

on

Oklahoma County jail searches for new solution to jail transportation


OKLAHOMA CITY –

Tensions over changes to transportation between the Oklahoma County Detention Center and courthouse reached a peak during a special meeting of the jail’s governing trust on Friday.

Early in April, Sheriff Tommie Johnson III announced he would no longer task any of his own deputies with driving inmates and detainees the half-mile route from the jail to their court hearings, effective May 11. However, from May 11 through June 30, Johnson’s plan included keeping some deputies on the assignment to train and work alongside the jail’s own detention officers.

Along the way, other members of the jail trust have expressed some concerns about the trust’s ability to fully assume the transportation duties.

Advertisement

Oklahoma County’s district attorney, chief public defender, and presiding judge all made rare appearances at the trust meeting on Friday to share some of their own thoughts.

“I want you to consider this decision on whether or not the detention center should take over transport of detainees from the jail to the courthouse, because there is no plan,” District Attorney Vicki Behenna told the trust. “There are no employees at the detention center right now that can fulfill this obligation.”

Behenna also cited concerns that the already understaffed jail would face a worsening staffing situation if it has to pull some of its existing detention officers to provide transportation.

“In my opinion, and the opinion of other lawyers in my office, the indenture requires the Sheriff’s department to do transport,” she added, referencing the indenture which created and assigned control of jail operations to the trust in 2020.

Sheriff Tommie Johnson III cited his own budget concerns as a reason to discontinue the transportation service. His office believes it needs roughly 17 to 19 more deputies inside the courthouse for court security, and it could begin by reassigning

Advertisement

Presiding District Court Judge Sheila Stinson shared her own remarks with the trust, stating that this week alone, three judges had faced death threats. Johnson said his ambition is to have a deputy in every courtroom.

Ultimately, Behenna suggested the trust should not accept the end of the contract and that the sheriff has a duty to continue providing the service, regardless of if the sheriff is paid for the service.

In response, Sheriff Johnson accused the district attorney of being misleading.

“Considering the gross amount of misrepresentation in this section, and relative ease to obtain the correct information, I must assume — I must assume — that this was intentionally misstated to persuade this body to make an ill-informed decision to further the DA’s agenda,” he said.

The district attorney and sheriff eventually got into a back-and-forth.

Advertisement

“Sheriff Johnson, I don’t understand why you have such a visceral reaction to me,” Behenna stated. “If the DA has an agenda, my agenda is public safety.”

Tensions settled some later in the meeting, with trust members still pressed to find an alternative solution.

Trustee Derrick Scobey proposed a solution for the trust and sheriff to work together to find a private partner to operate the transportation service, rather than tasking their own in-house staff to perform the duties.

Sheriff Johnson eventually agreed that his office could help identify a private partner, but that the timeline for gradually taking his deputies out of the task would remain.

Jail administrator Tim Kimrey acknowledged that three of his detention officers would be available starting Monday to work alongside three of Johnson’s deputies to train and learn about the transportation duties while both parties work to find a private partner.

Advertisement

Kimrey said his office had already begun some research on private jail transportation partners, including The GEO Group, TransCor, and LaSalle Corrections.

The trust postponed officially accepting the end of the sheriff’s contract until its next meeting.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Oklahoma

Chad Weiberg Says Oklahoma State Doesn’t Intend on Using RedBird Credit Line from Big 12 Deal

Published

on

Chad Weiberg Says Oklahoma State Doesn’t Intend on Using RedBird Credit Line from Big 12 Deal


For the time being, Oklahoma State will not opt in to the credit line through the Big 12’s recent deal with RedBird.

In case you missed it last week, the Big 12 approved a five-year agreement with RedBird Capital Partners, becoming the first conference to have a league-wide, private capital deal.

The deal provides the Big 12 with a $12.5 million capital infusion while the league’s institutions have the opportunity to opt into a $30 million credit line that would have to be paid back with a “double-digit” interest rate, according to ESPN.

It doesn’t sound like many (if any) schools will take RedBird up on that deal, and that includes Oklahoma State. OSU athletic director Chad Weiberg spoke with Dave Hunziker in a podcast that released Friday, where Weiberg cleared things up from the OSU side of things.

Advertisement

“First of all, I give commissioner (Brett) Yormark a lot of credit for providing opportunities to the schools to look at,” Weiberg said. “He is an innovator. He pushes the envelope. He’s not afraid of trying new things to better the conference and all the member institutions. So, I think there’s a little bit of a misconception on this. This isn’t a private equity deal. There’s no ownership stake or control in the conference they’re taking. It’s more of a private investment opportunity. RedBird is a huge global entity. They’ve got a lot of partnerships. The conference office will get out of it some money to be able to invest in some other business entities, take an investment in those to try to grow revenues from a different revenue stream. I think that’s something that’s worth exploring in this time that we’re in. And then the schools have the option to opt into a line of credit through that, and that’s up to each institution. It doesn’t effect the deal with the conference itself.

“As of right now, that is something that Oklahoma State will not do at this point. Should we need something like that, we believe we have other avenues or levers we could pull first before that. But again, I applaud the commissioner for making those options available to us.”

Weiberg and Hunziker also got into some other financial matters, like the report last week that the Big Ten distributed a record $1.37 billion to its 18 members in the 2024-25 fiscal year — a jump of about $500 million. The SEC announced in February that it had distributed more than $1 billion to its 16 members for the fiscal year.

So, dividing that up, that’s about $76 million on average for each Big Ten school and about $62.5 million for each SEC school.

The Big 12 hasn’t announced its allocations yet, but Weiberg said he expects the average Big 12 distribution to come in “north of $35 million.”

Advertisement

“That’s a wide discrepancy,” Weiberg said. “It’s a wider discrepancy than we’ve ever seen in the history of college athletics.”

To try to level that playing field as much as possible, Weiberg said OSU has asked all of its programs to cut expenses by 10%, OSU has increased ticket prices and the Boys From Oklahoma concerts have also helped with that.

It’s an uphill battle, but Weiberg noted that OSU has had to compete with the likes of Texas, one of the highest-funded athletic departments in the country, for years.

“There’s a bigger discrepancy now between what some conferences are getting and what others are than there ever has been before,” Weiberg said. “So, that presents unique challenges in terms of just the level playing field. At the end of the day, when you’re in a competition, part of what makes the competition interesting is when you’re trying to compete on a level playing field. Now, I say that acknowledging that there’s never an exactly level playing field — I don’t care if its the NFL or Major League Baseball or whatever, there’s not that. But I think to keep it interesting, there needs to be some version of a level playing field, and that’s getting very tilted in this environment.

“We’ve competed before. We’ve never been the highest-resourced institution in our conference or in the country or anything like that, and we’ve competed at a very high level in all of our sports, from football through all the other sports. Obviously the 55 national championships are a great indicator of that.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending