Connect with us

Oklahoma

Federal court halts Oklahoma’s newest immigration law before going into effect

Published

on

Federal court halts Oklahoma’s newest immigration law before going into effect


OKLAHOMA CITY (KSWO) – A federal judge approved a preliminary injunction on Oklahoma’s newest immigration law after the U.S. Government filed a lawsuit against the measure. House Bill 4156 was set to go into effect July 1.

Immigration bill sees movement

The embattled measure would have allowed for the placing of criminal penalties upon those in the state who entered the country illegally.

In particular, the law would make it illegal for anyone who does not have legal authorization to enter the United States to come into Oklahoma.

The first offense would be a misdemeanor and carry a jail time no longer than a year and fines up to $500. A second offense would be a felony and carry a jail time up to two years and a fine up to $1,000. In both cases, the individual charged would have 72 hours to leave the state after punishment is complete.

Advertisement

Even before the measure was signed into law by Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt, advocacy groups alongside some state legislators voiced their concerns amongst Republican cheers for the bill.

But it was Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond who urged the passage of the bill after the U.S. Supreme Court was hesitant on blocking Texas’ SB4 immigration measure.

“The Biden Administration has been utterly derelict in its duty to enforce federal law,” Drummond said after the state Senate passed HB4156. “If the president won’t secure the nation’s border, then our state must step in to protect Oklahomans. I appreciate President Pro Tempore Treat and Speaker McCall for their swift work on this bill and I encourage Gov. Stitt to sign it into law.”

Southwest-based legislator Sen. Jessica Garvin (R-Duncan) voted for the bill because she believes it will keep Oklahoma safe. Garvin lost her primary race in June.

“Immigration is top of mind for many Oklahomans as we see an unprecedented number of illegal immigrants crossing our nation’s Southern border, bringing illicit drugs and criminal activity that pose a threat to our public safety,” Garvin said.

Advertisement

However, a quite different view was held by the Oklahoma Association of Chiefs of Police and Metro Law Enforcement Agency Leaders.

“Law enforcement leaders from state organizations and municipalities were not substantively involved during the process of drafting and signing HB4156 into law,” the groups wrote. “This bill places crime victims at risk by increasing the fear of reporting to law enforcement. Further, HB4156 brings forth legal challenges in fair and impartial policing and anti-racial profiling.”

Democratic State Sen. Michael Brooks (D-OKC) said he thought the bill missed the mark on truly helping residents of the state.

“We could have provided the framework to give a state ID or driver license to those individuals who comply with specific requirements, including paying state and federal income tax, verifying their identity with the state, registering their address, and submitting a fingerprint to the largest law enforcement database in the nation,” Sen. Brooks said. “These are real solutions that would move our state forward in terms of both our economy and in addressing public safety concerns.”

The bill passed the House by way of a 39-8 vote and the Senate by a vote of 77 to 20.

Advertisement

Every Southwest-based state representative voted in favor of the measure, except for Reps. Trey Caldwell and Daniel Pae who were listed as excused.

Gov. Stitt signed the bill into law April 30.

The DOJ filed lawsuit

In May, the United States Department of Justice filed a lawsuit challenging the newly signed measure.

The lawsuit claimed the bill violates the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause as well as the Foreign Commerce Clause. The DOJ is further claiming the Constitution gives only the federal government the ability to regulate immigration and international borders.

“Oklahoma cannot disregard the U.S. Constitution and settled Supreme Court precedent,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian M. Boynton, head of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. “We have brought this action to ensure that Oklahoma adheres to the Constitution and the framework adopted by Congress for regulation of immigration.”

Advertisement

Republican leaders in the state quickly answered with a pushback toward the lawsuit. One of them was Oklahoma Speaker of the House Charles McCall (R-22).

“House Bill 4156 was a carefully crafted, well-thought-out piece of legislation designed to acknowledge the role of the federal government in immigration matters, while at the same time protect the sovereignty and security of our state’s borders,” McCall said.

Now the United States District Court Western District of Oklahoma has issued a preliminary injunction halting the law from going into effect. It was set to take effect July 1.

Members of the Latino Caucus of the Oklahoma Legislature sent out reactionary comments following the issuing of the injunction.

“This bill was a clear political stunt meant to secure the primary elections of our Republican leaders and it wasn’t even successful,” said Rep. Annie Menz, D-Norman. “Instead, it targeted a large portion of Oklahoma, angered law enforcement officials, and attempted to bypass the constitution. An injunction is the obvious choice.”

Advertisement

One member of the caucus said they will not stop working on the behalf of Oklahoma residents to keep them protected.

“Please know that we are working tirelessly to protect your rights and ensure that this bill does not go into effect,” said Rep. Arturo Alonso-Sandoval, D-Oklahoma City. “HB 4156 is a cheap political move that will cost taxpayers millions and will only manage to lose an essential workforce to the state. Oklahoma will be so much better once we are willing to have conversations about actual solutions.”

Those who advocated for this bill’s passage from the beginning, like AG Drummond, were upset at the court’s decision.

“While today’s court ruling is disappointing, I will not stop fighting for Oklahoma and our right to protect our borders,” Drummond said. “The Biden Administration’s complete failure to enforce federal immigration laws made House Bill 4156 a necessity. We intend to appeal today’s decision and defend one of the most powerful tools we have to fight the criminal activity largely being fueled by illegal aliens in Oklahoma.”

As it currently stands, Oklahoma is unable to enforce the provisions of HB4156 until further court rulings.

Advertisement

You can read the full preliminary injunction order below:



Source link

Oklahoma

What could happen if Oklahoma State Superintendent becomes an appointed position

Published

on

What could happen if Oklahoma State Superintendent becomes an appointed position


Governor Kevin Stitt has said he wants the State Superintendent of Education to be a governor-elected position instead of an elected one. Political analyst Scott Mitchell examines what this would mean for the state.

Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt is urging lawmakers to send a state question to voters that would make the state superintendent an appointed position, as he named Lindel Fields of Tulsa to the role and announced a turnaround team to help implement his education agenda.

Is the State Superintendent an elected role?

Yes, the State Superintendent of Education is still an elected role. Elections are scheduled for Nov. 3, 2026.

Cons of making the superintendent an appointed position

Advertisement

Mitchell said making this position appointed could cause distrust among some Oklahomans

“Over the years, we’ve seen that capture of regulatory sort of is easy to do when you have term limits, then lobbies become more powerful, and they have all the history. It’s very complicated.

He also said if the position were to be elected, they would likely have the same agenda as the governor.

“Yes, and I think the governor would be absolutely saying, ‘Yes, they’re going to do what I want them to do.’”

Changing how the superintendent is chosen changes what the founding fathers set.

Advertisement

“Voters are going to have to say yay or nay if it gets to them, is whether or not we want to change the way that the founding fathers set up the way that we make sure that power is not concentrated in Oklahoma,” he said.

Is Ryan Walters’ term the reason Stitt wants to make this position appointed?

Mitchell said he believes the former State Superintendent played a role in the government wanting to appoint this position.

During his time as superintendent, Walters was known to have multiple controversies. He resigned in 2025, allowing Stitt to appoint Lindel Fields.

“His impact on this, even though he’s gone, is certainly evident,” said Mitchell. “Walters left midstream, right? And so the governor had a chance to appoint someone. Well, it wasn’t just an appointment; it was chaos before and relative calm and competency after. And that has given the governor an opening for people to see with their own eyes. Yeah, you can put somebody in, we’re talking about Lindel Fields, that appears to get up every day, not trying to find some, get a click on social media, but rather to do his job. And across the board, for the most part, this guy’s getting thumbs up.

Advertisement

Stitt said electing Fields has already given him some leverage since he has been well perceived so far.

“That allows a governor to say, Look, I’ve got some standing, some leverage to go to the voters and say, let’s put expertise as the main reason that a person’s there, not because they were able to win an election because they had some sort of populist or dramatic ideas.”

Who is running for Oklahoma State Superintendent?

Republican Ballot

  • Sen. Adam Pugh
  • John Cox
  • Rep. Toni Hasenbeck
  • Ana Landsaw

Democrat Ballot

  • Craig Mcvay
  • Jennettie Marshall

Independent

To learn more about each candidate, click here.

Advertisement

A full breakdown of candidates in the 2026 Oklahoma State Superintendent race, including party affiliation, background and key education priorities.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Oklahoma

Oklahoma lawmakers propose “Toby Keith Expressway” to honor late country star

Published

on

Oklahoma lawmakers propose “Toby Keith Expressway” to honor late country star


OKLAHOMA CITY –

An Oklahoma highway could soon be named after the late country superstar, Toby Keith, pending new legislation.

House Concurrent Resolution 1019 would rename a proposed turnpike project the “Toby Keith Expressway.” This roadway is set to be built from Interstate 44 East to Interstate-35, continuing East and North to Interstate 40. This road is a part of the ACCESS Oklahoma Long-Range Plan, which is meant to update and expand the state’s turnpike system.

This resolution was adopted by the House on Wednesday.

Advertisement

“Toby Keith was more than a country music star. He was a proud Oklahoman who never forgot where he came from,” said Rep. Jason Blair, R-Moore. “Naming this turnpike in his honor is a fitting way to recognize a man who represented our state with ultimate patriotism and generosity.”

Keith was born in Clinton, Oklahoma, raised in Moore and resided in Norman. He died on February 5, 2024, in a battle with cancer.

“Over the course of his legendary career, Toby Keith never forgot where he came from or what he stood for,” said Sen. Lisa Standridge, R-Norman. “His Oklahoma roots shaped him, and his love of America defined him. He was a country music superstar and a true patriot. I can think of no better way to honor his memory than by naming this future stretch of Norman turnpike in his honor, creating a lasting tribute to the legacy he leaves behind.”

Advertisement

During his career, Keith sold over 40 million records and more than 20 number-one singles

Legislation authors believe this would commemorate the life and legacy of Toby Keith.

The bill will now head to the Senate.

To read the full House Resolution, click here.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Oklahoma

Oklahoma congressional delegation offer praise to Trump speech

Published

on

Oklahoma congressional delegation offer praise to Trump speech


WASHINGTON, D.C. –

President Donald Trump delivered a 108-minute State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress Tuesday night. The speech celebrated what Trump called a “turnaround for the ages,” highlighting what he says have been broad economic gains over the past year, as well as historic achievements in border security, immigration enforcement and foreign policy. Democrats, in their rebuttal, painted a very different picture, insisting economic conditions have worsened under Trump and that his administration shows little respect for the rule of law while striving to enrich themselves.

The members of the Oklahoma delegation, all Republicans, offered praise for the president and his message:

Sen. James Lankford (interview with Griffin Media):

Advertisement

“Yeah, the President spoke for just less than two hours, but he walked through some key issues that I’ve had a lot of Oklahomans ask about. Where are we on illegal immigration? How are we handling enforcement? Where’s the economy? He spent a tremendous amount of time at the beginning talking about, ‘Here are the change in prices we’ve seen in eggs, in vehicles, in mortgages and inflation rate, and the significant change that that has come down.’ He spent a lot of time talking about international issues at the end, and a lot of time talking about crime and things that Americans really talk about, and I’ve had a lot of Oklahomans ask about at the beginning. So, he spent the first half talking through, I think, the Americans—the kitchen table issues there: crime, economy, where are we going as a country? Starting more jobs, having more opportunities, the tax cut changes that are really affecting a lot of Oklahomans. And then towards the end, spend a lot of time talking about international issues, including Iran. I think he needed to spend a little more time talking about the issues with Iran, since we have such a military build-up there to explain to the American people. This is why this is such a big issue, and he spent the time doing that.”

Rep. Stephanie Bice (interview with Griffin Media):

“Well, I thought it was really an opportunity for the president to talk about what he’s done over the last year and also highlight the wins. You know, we’ve seen so many people impacted by things like border security, the Big Beautiful Bill, you know, economic reform, and so he was really highlighting that tonight…There were some really amazing stories, and it was a feel-good evening. I feel like he really—I think he connected with the American people tonight.”

Rep. Tom Cole (statement)
“Throughout the first year of President Trump’s term as the 47th President of the United States, the President has delivered on the mandate of the American people and truly ushered in the golden age. Tonight, President Trump delivered a powerful speech that illustrated just that.

“At the border, we have seen a complete one-eighty, as illegal “getaways” are down by 95 percent and migrant crossings are down by 99.99 percent. Rampant crime and disorder are turning into safer communities. We have made national security a priority again, making generational investments in America’s defense through the One Big Beautiful Bill and utilizing decisive leadership to make bold but necessary decisions like air striking Iran last year and capturing Venezuelan President Maduro earlier this year.

Advertisement

“I would be remiss not to mention the significant economic strides. The One Big Beautiful Bill provided the largest tax cuts in history and will bring long-lasting financial relief to families, workers, and small businesses. Years of inflation and stagnation are being replaced with renewed growth and a resurgent economy. Measurable progress has been made on cost-of-living pressures, drug costs have been lowered on the consumer, and red tape has been cut for small businesses.

“In just one year, President Trump has turned this country around. Under the previous Administration, our country had turned a blind eye to illegal immigration, we had lost respect on the world stage, and inflation was skyrocketing. Now, the American Dream is back. The United States is strong, prosperous, and respected – and, as President Trump said, the state of our union is strong.”

Rep. Kevin Hern (statement)
“Tonight, President Trump reaffirmed that when we put America first, America wins. At an unprecedented pace, he’s reversed the damage caused by four years of reckless Biden-era policies that sent our nation down the wrong path. Families are now seeing historic tax relief, lower inflation, a secure border, and peace around the world – this is only the beginning. I’m proud to stand alongside President Trump as we continue our work to lower costs, put more money in Americans’ pockets, and strengthen the American Dream for families across the country.”

Rep. Josh Brecheen (statement)
“It was an honor to attend President Trump’s State of the Union address tonight. Congress, alongside President Trump, has fought hard to restore conservative values within our great nation. While there’s still lots of work to be done, I am encouraged by the direction our nation is headed and look forward to the year ahead! The American Dream is possible once again!!!”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending