Connect with us

North Carolina

North Carolina mail carrier kidnapped and killed while on her route, authorities say

Published

on

North Carolina mail carrier kidnapped and killed while on her route, authorities say


A man kidnapped and killed a U.S. Postal Service worker while she was delivering mail in North Carolina last week, police said, orphaning her two daughters, who lost their father just a few months before.

Brandi Reynolds, 35, was found dead following a call for help to authorities in Hays, North Carolina, Friday afternoon, the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation said in a statement.

“I can confirm that Brandi Reynolds was delivering mail on her route when the incident occurred,” U.S. Postal Inspector Michael Martel said by email.

Prosecutors in Wilkes County charged William Craig Durham, 56, of the community of Roaring River, with first-degree kidnapping and murder, according to court records.

The defendant, arrested the day of the murder, remained in Wilkes County Jail on Tuesday, according to a third-party inmate information service used by the county. His lawyer did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday.

A warrant filed in district court alleged Durham committed kidnapping “by unlawfully restraining the victim, removing the victim from one place to another without the consent of the victim.”

Advertisement

It said Durham carried out the alleged kidnapping “for the purpose of terrorizing” Reynolds and “doing serious bodily injury” to her.

It’s unclear how Durham allegedly committed the killing. Any weapons that may have been used were not mentioned in the document, and any motive was unavailable.

On Monday, district court Judge Robert J. Crumpton ordered the defendant to remain in custody without bond, citing his “significant criminal record.”

State prison records show Durham has served time for second-degree kidnapping, assault on a female and possession of a gun by a felon, among other offenses.

An investigation into the killing was being conducted jointly by the United States Postal Inspection Service, the Wilkes County Sheriff’s Office and the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation, the bureau said.

Advertisement

Reynolds was the mother of two girls, according to her obituary. She lost her husband, Brent Reynolds, on Dec. 23, 2025, when the pickup he was driving veered off a road in Rhonda, North Carolina, and struck a tree, according to NBC affiliate WXII of Winston-Salem.

His obituary stated at the time that he was the father of the couple’s two girls — “the light of his life.”

Reynolds’ obituary, likewise, stated that her daughters “were her whole world.”

She left behind her mother, two sisters and several nieces and nephews, it said.

“The U.S. Postal Service is deeply saddened about the death of our colleague, Brandi Byrd Reynolds,” Postal Service spokesperson Martha Johnson said by email. “We extend our heartfelt sympathies to her family, friends, and co-workers at the Hays Post Office.”

Advertisement



Source link

North Carolina

NC Supreme Court gives new hope to parents in private school enrollment fight

Published

on

NC Supreme Court gives new hope to parents in private school enrollment fight


A politically connected couple that has given tens of thousands of dollars to Republican politicians and causes got a win from the GOP majority on the North Carolina Supreme Court on Friday — when the court gave their case new life even while also noting that many of their claims were “meritless as a matter of law.”

The ruling was 5-2, a party-line decision with the court’s Republican justices siding with the family and the Democratic justices writing that they would’ve upheld the previous court decisions against them.

The case could lead to statewide consequences, WRAL reported during oral arguments for the case in October. It could possibly pave the way for more lawsuits against private schools over their decisions over who to enroll or not — and, more broadly, against other private businesses that choose to cut customers loose.

At its heart is a dispute between one prominent Charlotte couple and the prestigious private school their children used to attend.

Advertisement

The ruling in their favor had been urged on by more than a dozen Republican politicians representing North Carolina in Congress or the state legislature. On the other side were groups that run or advocate for private schools around North Carolina, including the Catholic Church.

Doug and Nicole Turpin sued Charlotte Latin School in 2022, alleging that school leaders engaged in cancel culture against their beliefs and unfairly targeted their children in retaliation. They alleged that the school booted their kids over the parents’ fight with school administrators over Covid-era mask requirements and the school’s actions acknowledging the Black Lives Matter movement.

They lost after a Mecklenburg County judge found the family failed to make valid legal claims. The state Court of Appeals upheld that decision.

But the Supreme Court gave them new life, even as the majority opinion agreed in part with the other courts that their legal arguments were lacking.

“The 60 pages of allegations occasionally resemble a press release more than a legal filing,” Justice Richard Dietz wrote for the majority. “This likely complicated the lower courts’ review because many portions of the complaint assert claims or legal theories that are meritless as a matter of law and were properly dismissed.”

Advertisement

However, Dietz continued, some things the family claimed happened could be grounds for a valid lawsuit, if true, and if challenged properly. So the Supreme Court gave them a second chance, sending the case back to the Court of Appeals “so that the Turpins can proceed on this more limited set of properly pleaded claims.”

The family’s claims against Charlotte Latin could net the family a financial windfall if a jury sides with them.

There’s also reputation at stake. If each side is accusing the other of harming their reputation, Turpin attorney Chris Edwards told justices during oral arguments at the Supreme Court last year, “that’s something that the conscience of the community — the jury — needs to figure out.”

Charlotte Latin disagrees. Even if the school ends up winning at trial, its lawyer told justices during the 2025 oral arguments, the damage from simply allowing a trial to be held would still be immense. It would create “a potential tort minefield” not just for every private school in the state but for any business that might want to stop associating with customers who refuse to follow its rules, Jennifer Van Zant, a lawyer for the school, said at the time.

A ruling in favor of the Turpins would encourage more parents to sue their schools — and eventually water down the quality that parents expect when they pay to send their children to private schools, Van Zant said.

Advertisement

“If a private school cannot exercise its contractual right in the relationship without fear of tort liability, the private schools would turn into vanilla, one-size-fits-all experiences that avoid offending everyone and end up pleasing no one,” she said in oral arguments.

The Supreme Court’s Democratic justices agreed, in a dissent written by Justice Allison Riggs. She said the court risks opening every private school in the state to lawsuits, and also risks opening up defamation lawsuits against many individual people and groups, not just schools. She said the majority wrongfully lends credence to arguments that she said were wholly without merit, and which go against a long history of legal precedent.

“I fear this superficial treatment of the limitations on the use of state defamation law to constrain free speech will have significant chilling effects on important public discourse and will fling open the courthouse doors to disputes that should be settled in open, public conversations, not by judges,” Riggs wrote in dissent.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Carolina

Hang Up: N.C. Judicial System Warns of Sophisticated Court-Payment Scams

Published

on

Hang Up: N.C. Judicial System Warns of Sophisticated Court-Payment Scams


RALEIGH, N.C. (WECT) – The North Carolina Judicial Branch and the North Carolina Retail Merchants Association have launched a joint campaign to warn consumers about scammers impersonating court officials and law enforcement officers.

Scammers are contacting North Carolina residents and falsely claiming they owe court costs, bail, or jury-duty penalties. The fraudulent demands frequently threaten immediate arrest or financial penalties if the victim does not pay right away.

To protect the public, officials emphasize that the North Carolina Judicial Branch will never demand immediate payment through:

  • Gift cards
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Wire transfers or peer-to-peer payment apps
  • ATM cash deposits
  • Money-transfer services

Court officials urge anyone who receives an urgent, court-related payment demand to hang up and independently verify the claim.

Residents can search cases, check outstanding balances, and make legitimate payments securely online through the state’s official records portal here, or by contacting their local clerk of superior court directly.

Advertisement

Copyright 2026 WECT. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

North Carolina

Multiple agencies searching for a man who fled a Benson crash scene

Published

on

Multiple agencies searching for a man who fled a Benson crash scene


A manhunt is underway in Benson after a man fled the scene of a traffic crash Thursday afternoon.

Benson police said the North Carolina State Highway Patrol is searching for a Hispanic man wearing pink shorts and no shirt. The crash happened around 2 p.m. on I-95S and helicopters were used to search the area for several hours.

Around 3:45 p.m. Benson police said they were assisting the Highway Patrol with the help of deputies from the Johnston County Sheriff’s Office and a K9 team. 

Benson residents told WRAL that helicopters are back searching the area this evening. 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending