Connect with us

North Carolina

North Carolina House revives LGBTQ+ education limits in final days of session

Published

on

North Carolina House revives LGBTQ+ education limits in final days of session


RALEIGH, N.C. — Previously stalled legislation that would limit LGBTQ+ instruction in North Carolina public schools and require teachers to out transgender kids to their parents gained momentum Wednesday after months of inaction as state legislators race to push policies across the finish line before the session ends.

North Carolina’s House education committee advanced the bill requiring all public school teachers in most circumstances to alert parents before they call a student by a different name or pronoun. It would also prohibit instruction about gender identity and sexuality in K-4 classrooms, which critics have likened to the Florida law that opponents call “ Don’t Say Gay.”

When the GOP-controlled Senate passed the bill in February, House Republicans were one seat shy of a supermajority and would have needed some Democratic support for the bill to become law. But during the four months that it idled in the House, Mecklenburg County Rep. Tricia Cotham switched parties from Democrat to Republican, giving the GOP veto-proof margins and a clear path to advance more conservative policies. Republicans filed six bills aimed at trans youth the following day.

The proposal must clear one more committee before it heads to the House floor for a vote. Some Republicans expressed support Wednesday for amending it in the future to also apply to private and charter schools or to extend the curriculum restriction through fifth grade. House Speaker Tim Moore has said he’s confident the bill will pass his chamber this session.

Advertisement

Although Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper has denounced it as “wrong” and harmful, he now has little power to block it.

While bill sponsors, such as Republican Sen. Amy Galey of Alamance County, say it’s needed to keep parents informed about what their children are being taught in school, LGBTQ+ youth and their supporters say it would destroy the trust between teachers and students, making schools unsafe spaces for them to explore their identities at their own pace.

“Children don’t have rights versus their parents,” Galey said. “Parents have the right to educate and give the world training and to provide for the physical safety of children unless the parent is abusive.”

For transgender kids, like 17-year-old Griffin Rogers of Raleigh, teachers often serve as crucial confidants before they feel ready to talk to parents or peers about their gender identity.

Rogers said he spends a lot of time worrying about what will happen to his closeted trans friends with unsupportive families if this bill — and others moving through the legislature that pertain to LGBTQ+ youth — pass in the coming days. Several of his friends use different names or pronouns at school than they do at home and are “terrified” that teachers could soon be required to inform their parents, he said.

Advertisement

“I have lots of friends who know that if they get outed or their parents find out that they’re trans, they’ll get beat or they’ll get kicked out — my closest friends,” Rogers said. “It just makes you feel so trapped to not be able to talk about that stuff.”

Some North Carolina teachers are already planning to protest the new restrictions.

Art teacher Gretchen Phillips, faculty sponsor for the Gay–Straight Alliance at Orange High School in Hillsborough, has assured her students that she will not compromise their safety by outing them without consent. She anticipates many teachers in the state will refuse to comply or find loopholes in the legislation.

An exception in the bill would prevent parents from accessing school records if there is reason to believe it would lead to abuse or neglect. But Phillips said the very idea of outing an LGBTQ+ child is “going to lead to abuse,” regardless of whether the school can anticipate it. One of her own students was kicked out of their home earlier this year because their parents did not approve of their gender identity, she said.

“By trying to tie my hands on that, it means that I won’t be able to have a voice for the kids who need an adult to speak up for them the loudest,” Phillips said. “My job is to be there for them as they’re figuring out who they are, and if I can’t be that for them and support them as they are, then I can’t even begin to teach them.”

Advertisement

She worries the “forced outing” provision could lead more parents to send their children to conversion therapy, a discredited practice that seeks to change a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity. North Carolina does not ban the practice outright but prohibits using taxpayer dollars to perform it on minors.

For Rogers and other trans students, being able to express their identities and find acceptance at school “gives us a chance to feel like we’re human,” he said, “which, especially living in the South, we don’t really get that opportunity a lot of the time.”



Source link

North Carolina

Former North Carolina, Arkansas QB Jacolby Criswell signs with surprising school

Published

on

Former North Carolina, Arkansas QB Jacolby Criswell signs with surprising school


North Carolina transfer quarterback Jacolby Criswell has signed to play for East Tennessee State in 2025, On3’s Pete Nakos confirmed. He spent four total seasons in Chapel Hill and will have one year of eligibility remaining.

Criswell played the first three seasons of his college career with the Tar Heels before transferring to Arkansas ahead of 2023. He played one year in Fayetteville before deciding to come back to North Carolina ahead of this season.

Criswell didn’t begin as the starter this past season but took over after Max Johnson went down with injury. He finished the year with 2,459 yards and 15 touchdowns to six interceptions.

This story will be updated.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

North Carolina

North Carolina among 18 states suing to stop Trump’s order blocking birthright citizenship

Published

on

North Carolina among 18 states suing to stop Trump’s order blocking birthright citizenship


WASHINGTON, D.C. (WITN) – Attorneys general from 18 states sued Tuesday to block President Donald Trump’s move to end a decades-old immigration policy known as birthright citizenship guaranteeing that U.S.-born children are citizens regardless of their parents’ status.

Trump’s roughly 700-word executive order, issued late Monday, amounts to a fulfillment of something he’s talked about during the presidential campaign. But whether it succeeds is far from certain amid what is likely to be a lengthy legal battle over the president’s immigration policies.

North Carolina is one of the 18 states challenging the executive order. Attorney General Jeff Jackson is asking the court to invalidate the executive order and stop it from being implemented.

“This executive order is a straightforward violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees citizenship to all people born on U.S. soil. For over a century, this principle has been upheld by the Supreme Court and remains a bedrock of our constitutional framework,” said Jackson.

Advertisement

Attorney General Jackson says the Constitution leaves no room for reinterpreting this matter.

“As Attorney General, my role is straightforward as well: to defend the Constitution. That’s why I’ve joined this lawsuit, to uphold the rule of law and preserve the rights that have defined our nation for generations,” said Jackson.

Here’s a closer look at birthright citizenship, Trump’s executive order and reaction to it:

What is birthright citizenship?

Birthright citizenship means anyone born in the U.S. is a citizen, regardless of their parents’ immigration status. People, for instance, in the United States on a tourist or other visa or in the country illegally can become the parents of a citizen if their child is born here.

It’s been in place for decades and enshrined in the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, supporters say. But Trump and allies dispute the reading of the amendment and say there need to be tougher standards on becoming a citizen.

Advertisement

What does Trump’s order say?

The order questions that the 14th Amendment extends citizenship automatically to anyone born in the United States.

The 14th Amendment was born in the aftermath of the Civil War and ratified in 1868. It says: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

Trump’s order excludes the following people from automatic citizenship: those whose mothers were not legally in the United States and whose fathers were not U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents; people whose mothers were in the country legally but on a temporary basis and whose fathers were not citizens or legal permanent residents.

It goes on to bar federal agencies from recognizing the citizenship of people in those categories. It takes effect 30 days from Tuesday, on Feb. 19.

What is the history of the issue?

The 14th Amendment did not always guarantee birthright citizenship to all U.S.-born people. Congress did not authorize citizenship for all Native Americans born in the United States, for instance, until 1924.

Advertisement

In 1898 an important birthright citizenship case unfolded in the U.S. Supreme Court. The court held that Wong Kim Ark, who was born in San Francisco to Chinese immigrants, was a U.S. citizen because he was born in the country. After a trip abroad, he had faced denied reentry by the federal government on the grounds that he wasn’t a citizen under the Chinese Exclusion Act.

But some advocates of immigration restrictions have argued that while the case clearly applied to children born to parents who are both legal immigrants, it’s less clear whether it applies to children born to parents without legal status.

What has the reaction to Trump’s order been?

Eighteen states, plus the District of Columbia and San Francisco sued in federal court to block Trump’s order.

New Jersey Democratic Attorney General Matt Platkin said Tuesday that presidents might have broad authority but they are not kings.

“The president cannot, with a stroke of a pen, write the 14th Amendment out of existence, period,” he said.

Advertisement

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong, a U.S. citizen by birthright and the nation’s first Chinese American elected attorney general, said the lawsuit was personal for him.

“The 14th Amendment says what it means, and it means what it says —- if you are born on American soil, you are an American. Period. Full stop,” he said. “There is no legitimate legal debate on this question. But the fact that Trump is dead wrong will not prevent him from inflicting serious harm right now on American families like my own.”

Not long after Trump signed the order, immigrant rights groups filed suit to stop it.

Chapters of the American Civil Liberties Union in New Hampshire, Maine and Massachusetts along with other immigrant rights advocates filed a suit in New Hampshire federal court.

The suit asks the court to find the order to be unconstitutional. It highlights the case of a woman identified as “Carmen,” who is pregnant but is not a citizen. The lawsuit says she has lived in the United States for more than 15 years and has a pending visa application that could lead to permanent status. She has no other immigration status, and the father of her expected child has no immigration status either, the suit says.

Advertisement

“Stripping children of the ‘priceless treasure’ of citizenship is a grave injury,” the suit said. “It denies them the full membership in U.S. society to which they are entitled.”

In addition to North Carolina, New Jersey and the two cities, California, Massachusetts, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin joined the lawsuit to stop the order.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Carolina

Tropical Storm Helene destroyed nearly 1,000 homes in NC, FEMA maps show

Published

on

Tropical Storm Helene destroyed nearly 1,000 homes in NC, FEMA maps show


play

Tropical Storm Helene destroyed nearly 1,000 homes when it tore through Western North Carolina Sept. 27, maps from the Federal Emergency Management Agency show.

The maps, which show verified damage to homes as of Jan. 7, were presented to the Buncombe County Board of Commissioners at its Jan. 16 budget retreat.

Advertisement

In Buncombe County, Helene destroyed 340 homes, according to the maps. More than 170 were owner-occupied, while the remaining were rental properties.

The maps also show how many homes across the state sustained major damage and how many require repairs so residents can move back in.

According to the maps, 2,360 homes suffered major damage. Nearly one-third were rentals. Additionally, nearly 30,000 homes require habitability repairs, according to the maps. More than 6,000 of those homes were occupied by renters.

The number of damaged homes verified by FEMA is significantly lower than initial estimates from the state. According to a Dec. 13 damage needs assessment compiled by the N.C. Office of State Budget and Management, more than 73,000 homes were projected to be damaged, the majority of which were expected to be single-family and manufactured homes, and duplexes. In total, the state is estimating nearly $13 billion in residential damage alone.

Advertisement

The Citizen Times requested updated damage maps from FEMA on Jan. 17.

How did homes in Buncombe, Henderson, McDowell, Madison and Yancey counties fare?

Destroyed homes:

Buncombe: 340

Advertisement

Henderson: 89

McDowell: 92

Yancey: 100

Madison:11+

Major damage:

Advertisement

Buncombe: 640

Henderson: 354

McDowell: 128

Yancey: 166

Madison: 56

Advertisement

Homes requiring habitability repairs:

Buncombe: 8,920

Henderson: 3,988

McDowell: 1,442

Yancey: 1,767

Advertisement

Madison: 302

Jacob Biba is the county watchdog reporter at the Asheville Citizen Times, part of the USA TODAY Network. Email him at jbiba@citizentimes.com.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending