North Carolina

Challenged NC voters get 15 days to prove they're legit, appellate panel says

Published

1 year ago

April 5, 2025

Challenged NC voters get 15 days to prove they're legit, appellate panel says

More than 61,000 voters challenged by NC Supreme Court candidate Jefferson Griffin have 15 business days to prove their eligibility, or have their ballots removed from the count in Griffin’s 2024 bid to unseat Justice Allison Riggs, according to a Friday ruling from a three-judge panel of the NC Court of Appeals.

After all votes were tallied in November, the contest came down to 734 votes, with incumbent Riggs, a Democrat, in the lead. Soon thereafter, Griffin, a Republican Court of Appeals judge, asked for recounts and filed election protests.

The recounts maintained Rigg’s lead, while the State Board of Elections dismissed the protests.

Since then, Griffin’s legal challenges and countering lawsuits from Riggs have made their way through state and federal courts on their path to a delayed resolution while Riggs retains her seat.

Friday, the most significant decision in the case came down from two Republican justices on the North Carolina Court of Appeals. In a 2-1 decision from the panel, the court declared that Griffin’s protests were valid.

Incomplete voter registrations

The panel majority ruled that the largest portion of challenged voters, those who have “incomplete voter registrations” without a driver’s license or Social Security number included in their elections records, are ineligible to vote because they were not registered to vote correctly.

The blame lies squarely on the State Boards of Elections, which did not update voter registration form to make that information required in accordance with the federal Help America Vote Act, the panel majority opinion states.

Once the issue was identified in 2023, the State Board issued a new registration form, but didn’t go back and contact registrants who didn’t list a driver’s license or Social Security number, or check a box saying they had neither to be assigned a unique identification number.

Now, the appellate court panel says those voters are ineligible. The majority emphasized that the court has the right to remove ballots cast by these voters from the count, but is choosing not to do so immediately.

Instead, they are returning the case to the Wake County Superior Court, and instructing them to tell the State Board to contact impacted voters to provide them an opportunity to fill in the missing information. If voters do so within 15 business days of notification, their votes will count. If not, they will be removed from the count for the Supreme Court race, but not other races.

Overseas and military photo ID

The court panel ruled similarly on Griffin’s second protest, which challenged overseas and military voters who did not provide photo identification with their absentee ballots.

During legal proceedings, the State Board has argued that under the state’s Uniform Military and Overseas Voters Act, overseas and military voters are exempt from the voter ID requirement. UMOVA is contained in a separate statute from the one including photo ID requirements, and the Board argued that was intentional.

The appellate court panel disagreed. It ruled that the two statutes were intended to be read together, and that all voters are subject to the photo ID requirement.

Again, implicated voters have 15 business days to provide photo identification or an exception form, or be removed from the count.

In his dissent, Judge Toby Hampson, the loan Democrat on the panel, said providing time to fix these issues does not make up for the fact that impacted voters followed the rules available to them at the time.

“The proposition that a significant portion of these 61,682 voters will receive notice and timely take curative measures is a fiction that does not disguise the act of mass disenfranchisement the majority’s decision represents,” Hampson wrote.

Panel nixes ‘Never Residents’

North Carolina law includes an exception to the state constitution’s residency requirement for a small subset of voters labeled “Never Residents:” overseas U.S. citizens who were born outside the country and whose parents or legal guardians’ last residence was North Carolina.

Friday, the appellate court ruled that statute ran afoul of the state Constitution, and voided the votes of Never Residents.

Panel dissent and equal protection issues

Hampson’s dissent had a few arguments that may be seen again in future litigation.

First, he questioned the timing of Griffin’s protests. The statutes and Board interpretations that are being challenged have been in existence for several election cycles.

The majority declared that eligibility is determined as of Election Day, Hampson noted.

“Despite professing this basic tenet, the majority changes the rules of the 2024 election — and only for one race — months after election day,” he wrote. “It does so even though there is no actual showing or forecast that any challenged voter was not registered or otherwise unqualified to vote.”

Second, Hampson objected to which votes are being challenged. All protests include only early and absentee voters, since that was the information Griffin had available at the time he filed them.

Additionally, the overseas and military photo ID protest only includes Guilford County ballots.

“Each of these voters is at risk of being disenfranchised while similarly-situated voters are not, simply because of the county in which they reside, when they cast their ballot, or their physical location,” Hampson wrote.

What’s next after appeals panel?

The appellate decision may be key in determining the ultimate outcome of the race.

Riggs has already declared her intention to appeal the decision to the North Carolina Supreme Court, calling it a “deeply misinformed decision that threatens to disenfranchise more than 65,000 lawful voters and sets a dangerous precedent, allowing disappointed politicians to thwart the will of the people.”

However, if the North Carolina Supreme Court comes to a very possible 3-3 tie, the appellate court’s decision would be the one that stands. Either way, if the state high court fails to take the case or acts to leave the panel’s ruling in place, Riggs’ legal team has indicated it will likely return the case to the federal courts on equal protection grounds.

The State Board also issued a statement saying that they would comply with the order, if it goes into effect.

“Regardless of the ultimate outcome of this ongoing legal dispute, any voter who is concerned that their voter registration information is incomplete or is not up to date should submit an updated voter registration form,” the statement read.

Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin was less neutral.

“This partisan decision has no legal basis and is an all-out assault on our democracy and the basic premise that voters decide who wins their elections, not the courts,” he said in a statement. “If upheld, this could allow politicians across the country to overturn the will of the people.”

While Griffin has stayed mum since November, North Carolina Republican Chairman Jason Simmons called the ruling a “victory for the rule of law and election integrity” in a social media post.

“This decision and order finally holds the N.C. State Board of Elections accountable for their actions and confirms every legal vote will be counted in this contest,” he wrote.

Source link

Related Topics:amdaily appeal ballots Elections Featured lawsuit state board of elections statewide Supreme Court voters

Click to comment

North Carolina

NC Lottery Pick 3 Day, Pick 3 Evening results for April 16, 2026

Published

8 hours ago

April 16, 2026

Press Room

The NC Lottery offers several draw games for those aiming to win big.

Here’s a look at Thursday, April 16, 2026 results for each game:

Winning Pick 3 numbers from April 16 drawing

Day: 1-1-2, Fireball: 8

Evening: 3-3-4, Fireball: 9

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 4 numbers from April 16 drawing

Day: 6-2-3-1, Fireball: 9

Evening: 9-7-5-6, Fireball: 0

Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Cash 5 numbers from April 16 drawing

06-07-28-29-32

Check Cash 5 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Double Play numbers from April 16 drawing

06-08-15-19-42

Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from April 16 drawing

01-02-31-47-57, Bonus: 04

Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize

All North Carolina Lottery retailers will redeem prizes up to $599.

For prizes over $599, winners can submit winning tickets through the mail or in person at North Carolina Lottery Offices. By mail, send a prize claim form, your signed lottery ticket, copies of a government-issued photo ID and social security card to: North Carolina Education Lottery, P.O. Box 41606, Raleigh, NC 27629. Prize claims less than $600 do not require copies of photo ID or a social security card.

To submit in person, sign the back of your ticket, fill out a prize claim form and deliver the form, along with your signed lottery ticket and government-issued photo ID and social security card to any of these locations:

Asheville Regional Office & Claim Center: 16-G Regent Park Blvd., Asheville, NC 28806, 877-625-6886 press #1. Hours: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday. This office can cash prizes up to $99,999.
Greensboro Regional Office & Claim Center: 20A Oak Branch Drive, Greensboro, NC 27407, 877-625-6886 press #2. Hours: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday. This office can cash prizes up to $99,999.
Charlotte Regional Office & Claim Center: 5029-A West W. T. Harris Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28269-1861, 877-625-6886 press #3. Hours: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday. This office can cash prizes up to $99,999.
NC Lottery Headquarters: Raleigh Claim Center & Regional Office, 2728 Capital Blvd., Suite 144, Raleigh, NC 27604, 877-625-6886 press #4. Hours: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday. This office can cash prizes of any amount.
Greenville Regional Office & Claim Center: 2790 Dickinson Avenue, Suite A, Greenville, NC 27834, 877-625-6886 press #5. Hours: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday. This office can cash prizes up to $99,999.
Wilmington Regional Office & Claim Center: 123 North Cardinal Drive Extension, Suite 140, Wilmington, NC 28405, 877-625-6886 press #6. Hours: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday. This office can cash prizes up to $99,999.

Check previous winning numbers and payouts at https://nclottery.com/.

When are the North Carolina Lottery drawings held?

Powerball: 10:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
Mega Millions: 11 p.m. Tuesday and Friday.
Lucky for Life: 10:38 p.m. daily.
Pick 3, 4: 3:00 p.m. and 11:22 p.m. daily.
Cash 5: 11:22 p.m. daily.
Millionaire for Life: 11:15 p.m. daily.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Carolina Connect editor. You can send feedback using this form.

Source link

North Carolina

Hundreds gather in Asheville, many voicing opposition to proposed ‘Roadless Rule’ rollback

Published

1 day ago

April 15, 2026

Press Room

Hundreds gather in Asheville, many voicing opposition to proposed ‘Roadless Rule’ rollback

ASHEVILLE, N.C. (WLOS) — Hundreds of people gathered in Asheville to share their thoughts on the U.S. Forest Service’s proposed rollback of the “Roadless Rule.”

This rule established prohibitions on road construction, road reconstruction and timber harvests on nearly 60 million acres of national forests and grasslands, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

MountainTrue, the Sierra Club and other nonprofits organized the public hearing. The organizers will send the audio recording from the meeting and the written comments to the federal government.

“When the rule was created, the federal government held 600 public meetings. Now that the government is rescinding the rule, they’re holding no public meetings and it’s being done in a rush,” said MountainTrue’s resilient forests director Josh Kelly.

Kelly said anyone was welcome to the event, even people who want to see the rule rescinded. However, everyone News 13 spoke with before the event said they’re against rescinding the “Roadless Rule.”

PROPOSED ROLLBACK OF USFS ‘ROADLESS RULE’ PROMPTS ASHEVILLE ROUNDTABLE

“We should not be subjected to cutting up the forest, mining up the forest,” said Pat Davis, a Hickory resident.

“When they run these roads in, they start logging … We’re going to have all this runoff. It’s going to destroy basically the last strongholds of these trout. They are in those national forest areas,” said Roy DuVerger, a Whittier Resident.

SEPT. 21, 2025 – Nantahala National Forest in Topton, N.C. (Photo credit: Suzanne Thomas)

According to a U.S. Department of Agriculture press release, rescinding the roadless rule would allow for fire prevention and responsible timber production.

But Kelly said rescinding this rule would have negative impacts.

“The impact would mean much more taxpayer dollars spent on and wasted on building roads into the most inaccessible and rugged parts of our national forest,” said Kelly.

U.S. FOREST SERVICE RESTRUCTURING RAISES QUESTIONS FOR WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA FORESTS

It would also result in erosion and damage to fish and wildlife habitat, according to Kelly.

He said affected areas in western North Carolina include the South Mills River, the Black Mountains and Tusquitee Bald.

This public hearing is the first of a series of community events across WNC this month aiming to provide citizens with the opportunity to learn about the U.S. Forest Service’s proposed rollback of the “Roadless Rule.”

Click here for more information about the upcoming events on MountainTrue’s website.

Source link

North Carolina

Is North Carolina at risk of ‘water bankruptcy’?

Published

2 days ago

April 15, 2026

Press Room

Is North Carolina at risk of ‘water bankruptcy’?

North Carolina’s drought is pushing water levels lower and putting a sharper focus on whether the state’s water supply can keep pace with growth and a changing climate.

At Falls Lake, Raleigh’s primary source, levels are hovering just 2% above the threshold that could trigger restrictions.

“It is incredibly unusual for Falls Lake to be two and a half feet down in the middle of April,” Raleigh Water Assistant Director Ed Buchan said.

Reservoirs typically refill through the winter and spring. This year’s dry stretch has disrupted that pattern, leaving systems with less cushion heading into warmer months.

But drought is just one piece of a larger strain on the state’s water supplies.

A system under pressure

A recent United Nations report warns that many water systems worldwide are moving beyond short-term shortages and into a more persistent imbalance. Researchers describe it as “water bankruptcy,” when long-term use and damage outpace what natural systems can replenish.

In those cases, recovery to past conditions is no longer realistic.

The report points to a combination of factors, including population growth, overuse, pollution and climate change. Drought plays a role, but increasingly as part of a broader pattern driven by human activity.

Some of the same global pressures are beginning to surface in North Carolina.

Growth, transfers and demand

Across the state, communities are growing and looking for new water sources.

In Fuquay-Varina, officials are seeking to withdraw millions of gallons per day from the Cape Fear River Basin to support future demand, while returning treated water to a different basin. The proposal has drawn opposition from downstream communities concerned about long-term impacts.

Moving water between river basins can reduce the supply where it is taken from, especially during dry periods.

“The more we transfer water out of river basins, the greater that’s going to impact rural communities,” Western Piedmont Council of Governments Executive Director Anthony Starr said.

Those decisions are becoming more common as utilities try to keep pace with growth, but they also raise questions about how much water can be moved — and from where — before systems begin to feel the strain.

Local decisions, limited visibility

At the local level, officials say they are often weighing those questions without a complete picture of long-term impacts.

In Chatham County, commissioners recently approved a moratorium on data centers, driven in part by concerns about water use.

“I think that is probably the single greatest concern, and that is that probably what was weighed by the minds of our commissioners in deciding to pass the moratorium more than anything else,” Chatham Commissioner Karen Howard said. “We know that our climate future is at risk. We are in the process of creating a climate plan and the use of water is a significant concern for us.”

Howard said the pace of development can outstrip the ability to fully study its effects.

That uncertainty extends to smaller systems across the state.

“These rural systems don’t have the resources to do engineering studies so they don’t fully understand the impact before approving these projects,” said Heather Somers, director of the North Carolina Rural Water Association.

“If we don’t get some reins in place to reel that in and have some oversight on what these industrial users are going to pull from our resources, we’re going to be in trouble for sure,” Somers said.

Climate and compounding drought

Climate change is expected to make those challenges more complex.

Higher temperatures increase evaporation, while rainfall is becoming less predictable. That can mean longer dry periods followed by more intense storms, which do not always replenish water supplies in the same way.

Even when conditions improve, recovery may be incomplete.

“It takes a long time to get into a drought, and a long time to get out,” Buchan said.

Some water managers are increasingly looking at drought not as a single event, but as part of a longer cycle. Systems may not fully recover between dry periods, leaving less margin for the next one.

A changing balance

North Carolina’s water system has long depended on balance. Much of the water withdrawn by utilities is treated and returned to rivers, where it becomes part of the supply again.

But that balance can shift as demand changes.

Some large industrial users, including certain types of data centers, rely on cooling systems that remove water from the local system through evaporation.

“That’s water not going back to the Neuse River,” Buchan said. “It’s just gone.”

At the same time, long-term planning is built on projections that can be difficult to predict.

Regional utilities are working together through the Triangle Water Supply Partnership to map out demand decades into the future, but new types of growth and changing climate conditions add uncertainty to those forecasts.

“You’re really making a lot of assumptions,” Buchan said.

For now, utilities say North Carolina has the capacity to manage through the current drought.

But the combination of growth, shifting demand, climate variability and decisions about how water is shared across regions is raising a broader question.

Not just how to respond to this drought — but whether the system, as it exists today, can sustain what is coming next.

Source link