Connect with us

North Carolina

Challenged NC voters get 15 days to prove they're legit, appellate panel says

Published

on

Challenged NC voters get 15 days to prove they're legit, appellate panel says


More than 61,000 voters challenged by NC Supreme Court candidate Jefferson Griffin have 15 business days to prove their eligibility, or have their ballots removed from the count in Griffin’s 2024 bid to unseat Justice Allison Riggs, according to a Friday ruling from a three-judge panel of the NC Court of Appeals. 

After all votes were tallied in November, the contest came down to 734 votes, with incumbent Riggs, a Democrat, in the lead. Soon thereafter, Griffin, a Republican Court of Appeals judge, asked for recounts and filed election protests. 

The recounts maintained Rigg’s lead, while the State Board of Elections dismissed the protests. 

Since then, Griffin’s legal challenges and countering lawsuits from Riggs have made their way through state and federal courts on their path to a delayed resolution while Riggs retains her seat. 

Advertisement

Friday, the most significant decision in the case came down from two Republican justices on the North Carolina Court of Appeals. In a 2-1 decision from the panel, the court declared that Griffin’s protests were valid.  

Incomplete voter registrations

The panel majority ruled that the largest portion of challenged voters, those who have “incomplete voter registrations” without a driver’s license or Social Security number included in their elections records, are ineligible to vote because they were not registered to vote correctly.

The blame lies squarely on the State Boards of Elections, which did not update voter registration form to make that information required in accordance with the federal Help America Vote Act, the panel majority opinion states. 

Once the issue was identified in 2023, the State Board issued a new registration form, but didn’t go back and contact registrants who didn’t list a driver’s license or Social Security number, or check a box saying they had neither to be assigned a unique identification number. 

Now, the appellate court panel says those voters are ineligible. The majority emphasized that the court has the right to remove ballots cast by these voters from the count, but is choosing not to do so immediately. 

Advertisement

Instead, they are returning the case to the Wake County Superior Court, and instructing them to tell the State Board to contact impacted voters to provide them an opportunity to fill in the missing information. If voters do so within 15 business days of notification, their votes will count. If not, they will be removed from the count for the Supreme Court race, but not other races. 

Overseas and military photo ID

The court panel ruled similarly on Griffin’s second protest, which challenged overseas and military voters who did not provide photo identification with their absentee ballots. 

During legal proceedings, the State Board has argued that under the state’s Uniform Military and Overseas Voters Act, overseas and military voters are exempt from the voter ID requirement. UMOVA is contained in a separate statute from the one including photo ID requirements, and the Board argued that was intentional. 

The appellate court panel disagreed. It ruled that the two statutes were intended to be read together, and that all voters are subject to the photo ID requirement. 

Again, implicated voters have 15 business days to provide photo identification or an exception form, or be removed from the count. 

Advertisement

In his dissent, Judge Toby Hampson, the loan Democrat on the panel, said providing time to fix these issues does not make up for the fact that impacted voters followed the rules available to them at the time. 

“The proposition that a significant portion of these 61,682 voters will receive notice and timely take curative measures is a fiction that does not disguise the act of mass disenfranchisement the majority’s decision represents,” Hampson wrote. 

Panel nixes ‘Never Residents’

North Carolina law includes an exception to the state constitution’s residency requirement for a small subset of voters labeled “Never Residents:” overseas U.S. citizens who were born outside the country and whose parents or legal guardians’ last residence was North Carolina. 

Friday, the appellate court ruled that statute ran afoul of the state Constitution, and voided the votes of Never Residents. 

Panel dissent and equal protection issues 

Hampson’s dissent had a few arguments that may be seen again in future litigation. 

Advertisement

First, he questioned the timing of Griffin’s protests. The statutes and Board interpretations that are being challenged have been in existence for several election cycles. 

The majority declared that eligibility is determined as of Election Day, Hampson noted. 

“Despite professing this basic tenet, the majority changes the rules of the 2024 election — and only for one race — months after election day,” he wrote. “It does so even though there is no actual showing or forecast that any challenged voter was not registered or otherwise unqualified to vote.”

Second, Hampson objected to which votes are being challenged. All protests include only early and absentee voters, since that was the information Griffin had available at the time he filed them.

Additionally, the overseas and military photo ID protest only includes Guilford County ballots. 

Advertisement

“Each of these voters is at risk of being disenfranchised while similarly-situated voters are not, simply because of the county in which they reside, when they cast their ballot, or their physical location,” Hampson wrote. 

What’s next after appeals panel? 

The appellate decision may be key in determining the ultimate outcome of the race. 

Riggs has already declared her intention to appeal the decision to the North Carolina Supreme Court, calling it a “deeply misinformed decision that threatens to disenfranchise more than 65,000 lawful voters and sets a dangerous precedent, allowing disappointed politicians to thwart the will of the people.”

However, if the North Carolina Supreme Court comes to a very possible 3-3 tie, the appellate court’s decision would be the one that stands. Either way, if the state high court fails to take the case or acts to leave the panel’s ruling in place, Riggs’ legal team has indicated it will likely return the case to the federal courts on equal protection grounds. 

The State Board also issued a statement saying that they would comply with the order, if it goes into effect.

Advertisement

“Regardless of the ultimate outcome of this ongoing legal dispute, any voter who is concerned that their voter registration information is incomplete or is not up to date should submit an updated voter registration form,” the statement read. 

Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin was less neutral. 

“This partisan decision has no legal basis and is an all-out assault on our democracy and the basic premise that voters decide who wins their elections, not the courts,” he said in a statement. “If upheld, this could allow politicians across the country to overturn the will of the people.”

While Griffin has stayed mum since November, North Carolina Republican Chairman Jason Simmons called the ruling a “victory for the rule of law and election integrity” in a social media post. 

“This decision and order finally holds the N.C. State Board of Elections accountable for their actions and confirms every legal vote will be counted in this contest,” he wrote. 

Advertisement

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. You may republish our stories for free, online or in print. Simply copy and paste the article contents from the box below. Note, some images and interactive features may not be included here.





Source link

Advertisement

North Carolina

Student from North Carolina finishes 4th in national spelling bee

Published

on

Student from North Carolina finishes 4th in national spelling bee


WASHINGTON (WBTV) – A student from North Carolina finished fourth in the Scripps National Spelling Bee on Thursday night.

Thirteen-year-old Kushi Gottimukkala made it to the 15th round of the May 28 spelling bee in Washington, D.C. before she misspelled the word “cara sposa.” She spelled it “carra spoza.”

According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, cara sposa is an Italian word that means “dear wife.”

Gottimukkala is a seventh-grader at Carnage G&T Magnet Middle School in Raleigh. She was one of a handful of students to have been sponsored by the Carolina Panthers.

Advertisement

This year’s bee was not her first time participating in the national spelling competition. She finished 41st in the 2025 event.

Outside of spelling, Gottimukkala is active in Science Olympiad, MathCounts and a dance group. She enjoys reading and has an interest in history books and documentaries.

Fourteen-year-old Shrey Parikh from California won Thursday’s spelling bee after a “spell-off” decided the champion.

Kushi Gottimukkala finished 4th in the 2026 Scripps National Spelling Bee.(Allison Robbert | AP Photo/Allison Robbert)

Also Read: 14-year-old battles nerves, dominates spell-off to win National Spelling Bee

Copyright 2026 WBTV. All rights reserved.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

North Carolina

Raleigh courthouse shooting rekindles push for red-flag laws in North Carolina

Published

on

Raleigh courthouse shooting rekindles push for red-flag laws in North Carolina


A shooting last week outside a Raleigh courthouse is reviving a push for laws that would allow a court to confiscate firearms from people who are believed to be a threat to themselves or others.

Twenty-two states have laws allowing extreme risk protection orders, known as “red- flag” laws, which allow courts to temporarily restrict firearm access for people considered dangerous.

The laws generally allow a judge to make that determination and order a gun owner to surrender firearms and permits. It would also allow an appeals process.

Authorities say Gwendolyn White retrieved a handgun from her vehicle before shooting two lawyers outside a Wake County courthouse on Friday. Authorities said they later recovered multiple firearms from her home, including rifles. White has been charged in the shootings. 

Advertisement

Attempts to reach White and her current legal representative have been unsuccessful. 

Seth Blum, a lawyer who previously represented White, told WRAL that she called the police on her neighbors dozens of times. “Every time the police came out, they would investigate,” Blum said. “And Ms. White had this fixed belief that her neighbors were poisoning her through her air conditioning system, which there’s no evidence at all that that was true.”

Police alleged that White previously threatened a hospital and Blum described her as having an “untreated mental illness.”

“This case shows why this should be law,” said Wiley Nickel, a Democrat who is running unopposed for Wake County district attorney, referring to red-flag laws.

Democratic state Rep. Marcia Morey, has introduced red-flag legislation since 2018, but the bills have not advanced in the Republican-led General Assembly.

Advertisement

“From just the news reports I’ve heard, I agree that this might have helped,” Morey said, referring to the White case. She said under her proposal, a judge could have been asked to temporarily remove firearms if concerns were raised about mental illness and access to guns.

Spokespeople for Senate leader Phil Berger did not respond to requests for comment.

A spokesperson for House Speaker Destin Hall said Thursday: “This legislation is going nowhere” and criticized Democrats, including Morey, who voted against legislation last year that ramps up monitoring of alleged criminals with mental health problems, among other reforms.  Morey didn’t immediately provide a response to Hall’s comment.

Republicans and gun rights groups oppose the proposal, arguing it violates due process protections by allowing firearms to be removed based on allegations — before an actual criminal conviction. They also argue the focus should be on keeping repeat violent offenders and people in crisis off the streets, rather than restricting access to guns through civil court orders.

Paul Valone, president of gun-rights advocacy group Grass Roots North Carolina, said existing laws surrounding involuntary commitment and criminal enforcement should be used more aggressively instead of creating a new firearm restriction process. 

Advertisement

“They leave violent offenders on the streets, while confiscating firearms from lawful gun owners, in ex-parte hearings that defendants might not even know are occurring, much less get a chance to defend themselves in court,” Valone said.

Eighty-seven percent of respondents to a 2022 WRAL News poll supported red-flag laws.

Gov. Josh Stein has also supported similar restrictions. After a 2024 mass shooting in Southport, Stein said North Carolina needed a stronger response to “profoundly troubled” people and called for adoption of a red-flag law.

At the federal level, the debate intensified after a school shooting in Uvalde, Texas, that left 19 students dead. 

U.S. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., helped negotiate the bipartisan federal gun safety law signed by former President Joe Biden that encouraged states to adopt crisis intervention and red-flag programs.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

North Carolina

Pilot program aims to help with prison staffing shortages in NC

Published

on

Pilot program aims to help with prison staffing shortages in NC


RALEIGH, N.C. (WTVD) — North Carolina leaders are raising concerns about staffing shortages at state prisons, as officials roll out a pilot program aimed at boosting hiring for correctional officers.

“The Department of (Adult) Correction has only about half of the correctional officers needed to safely operate state prisons,” said Governor Josh Stein.

Those vacancies have impacted daily operations.

“My primary goal is to make sure that everyone working at the institution and everyone that’s incarcerated there stays safe. Having critical shortages of staff makes that much more difficult. Ten years ago, it was routine to have about 28 officers and five sergeants on shift and lineup. Today you may see seven or eight officers and three sergeants on shift,” said Captain Derrick Simmons of Neuse Correctional Facility.

Advertisement

Simmons said shortages can limit access to rehabilitation programs for inmates.

“If you don’t have the custody staff where they have the programs, that they won’t be able to have them because they don’t have that security there,” he said.

Officials point to pay as a key factor contributing to vacancies, an issue that would need to be addressed through the state budget process. Stein is calling for a 15% raise for correctional officers, in addition to step increases, while Republican leaders have proposed average 15.4% raises with their step increases.

“Twenty years ago, our correctional officers were among the best paid in the Southeast. Now we are second to last in the country,” Stein said.

As those budget discussions continue, the state has introduced a pilot program designed to streamline hiring. The initiative uses a contingent hiring model that allows applicants to begin working in certain roles while completing certification requirements.

Advertisement

“We are using now a contingent hiring model to address the problem,” Gov. Stein said. “Once someone passes through the initial steps of getting hired, we put them to work immediately in other roles as the certification steps continued to play out.”

Dismukes cited workers can fill roles in the gatehouse or control booth while their certification process moves forward.

“This will allow us to bring people inside the walls and allow them to experience what it’s like to work with us before we send them through basic training,” said Dismukes.

The program has been implemented at Central Prison, Harnett Correctional, and Pasquotank Correctional. Officials say it has led to 31 new hires at Central Prison, 43 hires at Harnett Correctional, and 21 hires at Pasquotank Correctional.

“We’re hiring people at a higher rate, and we reduced the time to hire by about ten days,” Dismukes said. “So fewer people are dropping out of the hiring process along the way.”

Advertisement

SEE ALSO | New Executive Order targets use of insider information in prediction markets

Download the ABC11 News app for breaking news alerts

Copyright © 2026 WTVD-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending