Connect with us

Maryland

Takeaways from Maryland men’s basketball’s 81-66 win over Maryland-Eastern Shore

Published

on

Takeaways from Maryland men’s basketball’s 81-66 win over Maryland-Eastern Shore


Maryland men’s basketball improved to 11-2 Saturday with a 81-66 win over Maryland-Eastern Shore at Xfinity Center.

The Terps struggled at times, but found their way in the final 10 minutes, expanding a seven-point lead to a 23-point one, which they rode to victory.

Here are three takeaways from the game.

Maryland ended nonconference play with a win

After 11 games, the Terps are now finished with nonconference play for the regular season — finishing the slate with a 10-1 record — and ended it in convincing fashion.

Advertisement

Maryland started slow, but finished strong. It led by just a point nearly 10 minutes into the first half, but entered halftime with a 16-point lead and never trailed.

The Terps were particularly dominant in the paint. They out-rebounded the Hawks, 37-32, and scored 46 points in the paint compared to Maryland-Eastern Shore’s 36. They also forced 14 turnovers.

Dominance over nonconference opponents has been common for Maryland this season. Against mid- and low-major opponents, the Terps are 8-0, winning by an average of 37.1 points per game.

Against fellow high-major opponents, Maryland has still performed well. It won two of three games, with the most significant being a 27-point victory over Syracuse a week ago.

With buy games and expected wins in the Terps’ rearview mirror, they will now have to prove they can compete with Big Ten competition on a nightly basis, starting on Thursday against Washington.

Advertisement

Julian Reese had a day

Reese has been a mismatch this season against mid- and low-major opponents, who don’t have forwards with the size or skill to stop him in the paint. He posted double-doubles in six of eight games against lower-major opponents, and nearly did so in the first half Saturday, tallying 13 points and seven rebounds in 16 minutes.

Feeding Reese in the paint was a clear focal point of the Terps’ game plan. Early in the first half, he was involved in multiple pick-and-rolls in which he received a bounce pass from the ball handler that led to an open push shot in the middle of the paint. He scored seven of Maryland’s first 11 points.

Reese was also given the opportunity to create his own shots. Late in the first half, Reese received the ball on the block, muscled through two defenders and then laid the ball in for an and-one.

He finished the game with 23 points, 11 rebounds, two blocks and two assists, while shooting 8-of-12 from the field and 7-of-12 from the free-throw line. He was also plus-29 when on the court, which led the team.

Reese has struggled this season against ranked opponents, averaging just 3.5 points, but will have an opportunity to redeem himself and prove his worth among the nation’s best in a week against No. 9 Oregon.

Advertisement

Neither team knocked down 3-pointers

Maryland entered the game shooting 37.1% from 3-point range, its best mark since 2017-18. But the Terps were far from good from deep Saturday, going 5 for 18 (27.8%).

Selton Miguel spearheaded Maryland’s shooting struggles with a 1-of-7 performance from distance, while Ja’Kobi Gillespie and Rodney Rice combined for 2-of-7 shooting. These struggles were particularly surprising for Miguel, who was Maryland’s leading scorer in the prior two games. Against Saint Francis (PA) and Syracuse, Miguel averaged 24 points and three assists per game, while shooting 75% from the field and 66.7% from 3-point range.

The Terps received some 3-point production from unlikely sources, though, as Jordan Geronimo and DeShawn Harris-Smith knocked down deep shots. They each shot below 21% from beyond the arc last season.

Luckily for Maryland, Maryland-Eastern Shore was even worse, shooting 4-of-16 (25%) from beyond the arc. Graduate Evan Johnson and junior Cardell Bailey were the only Hawks to make a 3-pointer.



Source link

Advertisement

Maryland

Maryland high court rejects municipal climate change damages suit

Published

on

Maryland high court rejects municipal climate change damages suit


Maryland’s highest court on Tuesday dismissed several local government claims to recover damages against several large energy companies for harm created by climate change, finding that federal law preempts the case and state law does not support it.

The case dates to 2018, when the city of Baltimore filed a lawsuit against the energy companies, alleging that their decades-long activities contributed to climate-related damages to the city. Anne Arundel County and Annapolis filed similar lawsuits. After a number of procedural disputes over several years, in part over federal jurisdiction and venue, the case arrived in Maryland state courts and consolidated on appeal.

In a consolidated decision, Maryland’s Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of the local government suits against the energy companies. Plaintiffs had alleged that the companies contributed to climate change through the production and promotion of fossil fuels, asserting state law claims including public nuisance, trespass, and failure to warn.

The court determined that state claims were displaced by federal common law regarding interstate pollution and further preempted by federal legislation, including the Clean Air Act. According to the court, allowing state tort actions to go forward would interfere with a comprehensive federal regulatory scheme regarding greenhouse gases.

Advertisement

The court also found that even if these claims were not preempted, they would not succeed on other grounds. The court emphasized the difficulty in proving causation between large scale activity’s localized effects and concerns regarding the timing of the alleged injuries.

The decision is a substantial roadblock for state and local governments looking to recover costs related to climate change. It is also one in a growing line of case law that limits state court ability to address global emissions.



Source link

Continue Reading

Maryland

Gas prices surge in Maryland, provoking debate on what to do about it

Published

on

Gas prices surge in Maryland, provoking debate on what to do about it


play

  • Gas prices in Maryland are rising following joint U.S. and Israeli military strikes against Iran.
  • The average price for gasoline in Maryland has reached $3.86 per gallon, an increase of over 25 cents in the last week.
  • Maryland officials are debating a potential gas tax suspension to provide relief to consumers.

Gas prices are surging in Maryland, and state officials are beginning to weigh in on a potential gas tax suspension.

The price jump occured after the United States and Israel launched joint military strikes against Iran beginning on Feb. 28, 2026.

Advertisement

Average gasoline prices in Maryland have risen 25.2 cents per gallon within the last week, now averaging $3.86/g, according to GasBuddy’s survey of 2,167 stations in the state.

Prices in Maryland are 87.7 cents per gallon higher than one month ago, and stand 85.1 cents per gallon higher than one year ago, GasBuddy shared.

As of March 25, gas prices in Salisbury are between $3.73/g and $3.99/g. The current lowest reported cost, $3.73/g, was found at Sam’s Club at 2700 North Salisbury Boulevard.

Advertisement

“Gas prices continued to rise nationwide over the last week as seasonal factors, combined with ongoing supply concerns tied to the continued disruption in the Strait of Hormuz, pushed both gasoline and diesel prices sharply higher,” Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy, said.

“It now appears increasingly likely that the national average price of gasoline will reach the $4-per-gallon mark — potentially as early as this week — for the first time since 2022, while diesel prices are surging to multi-year highs, with some markets nearing record territory,” De Haan continued.

Gas price averages in Maryland over the last five years

Here’s a closer look at the historical gasoline prices in Maryland and the national average within the last five years, according to GasBuddy:

  • March 23, 2025: $3.00/g (U.S. Average: $3.08/g)
  • March 23, 2024: $3.56/g (U.S. Average: $3.53/g)
  • March 23, 2023: $3.26/g (U.S. Average: $3.42/g)
  • March 23, 2022: $3.79/g (U.S. Average: $4.23/g)
  • March 23, 2021: $2.84/g (U.S. Average: $2.86/g)

Will Maryland suspend its gas tax? Officials weigh in

Advertisement

Ammar Moussa, a spokesperson for Maryland Govenor Wes Moore, weighed in on the state’s potential gas tax suspension:

“Marylanders need real relief, not a 30-day gas tax suspension that would blow a $100 million hole in our transportation budget at the same time we’re working to close Maryland’s budget shortfall. If Maryland Republicans are serious about lowering costs, they should pick up the phone and call Donald Trump and tell him to end this missionless war — instead of asking Maryland taxpayers to help pay for it.

“This war is costing more than a billion dollars a day and driving up the price of oil, fuel, and everyday goods. The best way to bring prices down is to address the source of the pain, not shift the cost of Donald Trump’s war onto Maryland families.”

Nicole Beus Harris, Chairwoman of the Maryland Republican Party, shared her thoughts next with Delmarva Now:

“We know Wes Moore thinks about the White House 24/7, but his responsibility, just like Republicans in the General Assembly, is to make state policy. A temporary pause of the state gas tax is a commonsense solution to this temporary crisis, but we’ll never see meaningful tax relief under this Governor.”

Advertisement

Are other states suspending their gas tax to cut prices?

As of March 2026, Georgia has become the first and only state to temporarily suspend its gas tax.

Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, a Republican, suspended the state’s motor fuel tax for 60 days on March 20. The excise tax on gasoline is currently 33.3 cents per gallon, and a few cents higher on diesel, USA Today reported.

Olivia Minzola covers communities on the Lower Shore. Contact her with tips and story ideas at ominzola@delmarvanow.com.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Maryland

Rachel Morin’s mother criticizes Gov. Moore for opposing ICE detention center in Maryland

Published

on

Rachel Morin’s mother criticizes Gov. Moore for opposing ICE detention center in Maryland


A legal fight is underway in Washington County over plans to convert a warehouse into an immigration detention center, with Gov. Wes Moore opposing the project and securing a temporary pause in construction.

The Trump administration wants to convert the warehouse into an immigration detention center. Moore has taken the issue to court and obtained a temporary halt. In a public service announcement, Moore called the center “concerning.”

“This is being done without transparency, without public input or accountability. And it’s raising serious concerns from Marylanders, all across our state,” Moore said.

ALSO READ | What’s next for the planned immigration detention center near Hagerstown?

Advertisement

Not all Marylanders agree. Patty Morin criticized Moore on social media and said he is out of touch, also speaking with FOX45 News about her concerns.

“First off, I was just really angry because he is misrepresenting the people of Maryland,” Morin said.

“Last time I looked, statistics said 1.3 million immigrants in Maryland. And you know that some of those are here illegally,” Morin said.

Morin’s daughter, Rachel Morin, a mother of five, was killed by an illegal immigrant in Harford County in August of 2023.

Moore said his administration is prioritizing residents’ concerns as the federal government moves forward.

Advertisement

“While the Trump administration is moving forward without any consideration for Marylanders, we’re putting your concerns front and center,” Moore said.

ALSO READ | Emergency order seeks to stop Washington County ICE detention facility construction

Morin said Moore is not listening to residents and argued the detention center is about enforcing the law, not targeting a specific group.

“He is totally politics over people. He genuinely does not care about the people of Maryland or the constituents that he represents. I all the time, Marylanders are like, what is the matter with this governor? Why is he doing this? It’s ludicrous,” Morin said.

“The very word itself, illegal means against the law or not lawful. And they have broken a federal law. Federal law supersedes state law,” Morin said.

Advertisement

It’s not rocket science.”

Morin also said Moore should consider all Marylanders when making decisions about the proposed facility.

“Marylanders that are here want ICE, want law enforcement to protect us. That’s what we’re paying our taxpayer dollars for. Not for a Governor Moore to go to the courts and fight this imaginary battle because he’s trying to, I don’t know, maybe make points with the Democrat party or something. He’s completely out of touch with Marylanders and it’s just, it’s very upsetting,” Morin said.

The court-ordered pause remains in effect until mid-April. Federal officials will announce next steps after the pause is lifted.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending