Louisiana
Louisiana voters reject all four constitutional amendments, despite Gov. Jeff Landry’s support
Louisiana voters soundly rejected all four proposed amendments to the state constitution on Saturday, shutting the door on changes to courts, government finances, teacher pay increases, juvenile crime, and elections for judicial seats.
Read more: Gov. Jeff Landry points to ‘far left liberals’ as the reason why Amendment 2 failed
With nearly 100% of the precincts in, all four amendments had received less than 40% of the vote.
The defeat of Amendment 2, a sprawling revision of the section of the constitution that deals with state taxes and budgeting, was a loss for Gov. Jeff Landry, who had stumped across the state in support of the change. He couched it as part of his larger effort to make Louisiana’s tax system more attractive to business investment.
Landry in a statement Saturday night said, “Although we are disappointed in tonight’s results, we do not see this as a failure.”
“We realize how hard positive change can be to implement in a state that is conditioned for failure,” he said. “We will continue to fight to make the generational changes for Louisiana to succeed.”
Just 35% of voters supported the amendment, while 65% were opposed. Its defeat also means teachers will likely not get a planned pay raise, and it may disrupt state lawmakers’ plans for the state budget they will soon need to craft for the upcoming fiscal year.
With the rejection of Amendment 3, Louisiana will not see an increase in the number of felony crimes for which teenagers can be charged as adults, a change that had been sought by some tough-on-crime lawmakers but decried by youth and criminal justice advocates. It failed 34% to 66%.
Louisiana will not see the creation of new regional or statewide specialty courts with the rejection of Amendment 1, which failed 35% to 65%. And the rejection of Amendment 4 means that the the timing of elections to fill vacant or newly created judicial seats will not change. It failed 36% to 64%.
Here is what the failed amendments sought to change in the Louisiana Constitution.
Amendment 1
State lawmakers would have gained the power to create regional and statewide specialty courts, examples of which include drug, mental health and veterans courts. Currently, legislators can only create specialty courts within a parish or a judicial district.
Amendment 1 would have also clarified that, under the Louisiana Constitution, the state Supreme Court has authority over disciplinary cases involving misconduct by out-of-state attorneys doing legal work in Louisiana. The current constitutional language says the Supreme Court has authority over “disciplinary proceedings against a member of the bar.”
Proponents said the amendment would give state lawmakers flexibility to set up needed legal forums like business courts and ensure the state can punish bad actors who don’t live here. Opponents, however, said those pushing for the broader jurisdictional limits for courts hadn’t revealed exactly which kinds of courts they wanted to create nor the real reason behind the change.
Amendment 2
This amendment would have restructured one of the 14 articles of the Louisiana Constitution that governs state taxes and finance.
The legislation itself included dozens of changes. But at a broad level, Amendment 2 would have given state lawmakers more power to decide which revenue streams should fund government and how to spend those funds.
This would have been accomplished by moving some of the state’s tax and budgeting policies out of the constitution, where any policy change requires voter approval, and into state statute, which can be changed by lawmakers without a vote of the people.
Some constitutionally protected education trust funds would have been liquidated, and approximately $2 billion would have gone toward paying down a portion of debt in the Teachers’ Retirement System of Louisiana. Savings from that debt payment would have funded a $2,000 salary increase for teachers and $1,000 salary increase for support staff.
The amendment would have made it more difficult for lawmakers to create new tax-break programs by requiring a two-thirds vote of the Legislature rather than a simple majority. New property tax exemptions would have needed a three-fourths vote.
Seniors age 65 and older would have been eligible to double their standard income tax deduction.
A constitutional cap on the state individual income tax rate will not decrease from 4.75% to 3.75%, nor will a constitutional limit be placed on how much state government can increase spending from one year to the next.
Proponents said Amendment 2 would streamline government and allow legislators to change economic development policies that are holding back the state. Opponents argued the policy changes would hurt the average individual taxpayer, and voters couldn’t truly understand the policy implications of the complicated amendment.
Amendment 3
This proposed amendment would have allowed state lawmakers to expand the list of crimes for which juveniles age 16 and younger could be treated as adults in the criminal court system.
Currently, juveniles can only be charged as adults for 16 specific felonies listed in the constitution, most of which are violent offenses like murder and rape. Amendment 3 would have thrown out that list and allowed lawmakers to choose to have juveniles charged as adults for any felony offense.
Proponents said the change would help legislators respond more effectively to the state’s crime problems and make communities safer. Opponents said sending more young people to adult prisons is not an effective crime prevention strategy.
Amendment 4
This amendment would have changed the timeline for elections for vacant and newly created judicial seats.
Under the amendment, elections for these seats would have been held during a gubernatorial or congressional election happening within 12 months, or “on the election date first available pursuant to applicable law” passed by the Legislature.
Currently, the constitution says they must be held within 12 months of a vacancy.
Proponents said the change would potentially reduce the number of elections the state must hold as well as election administration costs. Some opponents said changes to election timelines should be made in statute rather than the constitution.
Louisiana
National Guard deployment in New Orleans extended for six months
NEW ORLEANS — The Louisiana National Guard announced Monday that 120 troops will remain deployed in New Orleans through August.
The six-month extension comes after 350 Guard members deployed to New Orleans in late December, in the run-up to New Year’s and other high-profile events like the Sugar Bowl. The troops, which had mainly clustered in the city’s historic French Quarter, had been scheduled to depart in the aftermath of Mardi Gras.
New Orleans is one of several Democrat-run cities, such as Washington and Memphis, Tennessee, where the federal government deployed armed troops under the administration of President Donald Trump. Hundreds of federal agents also converged on Louisiana in December as part of a separate immigration crackdown in and around New Orleans.
During his State of the Union address last week, Trump touted the deployment in New Orleans as a “big success.” In January, Trump credited the troops with reducing the city’s violent crime within a week of their deployment. City police data shows violent crime rates have significantly declined over the past three years in parallel with national trends.
According to a press statement from the Louisiana National Guard, the remaining guard members will serve as a “visible presence to deter criminal activity in New Orleans.”
New Orleans Mayor Helena Moreno, a Democrat who initially opposed the deployment, said that the troops would benefit the city in the coming weeks. She pointed out that National Guard troops had assisted the city during last year’s Mardi Gras in the aftermath of a vehicle-ramming attack in the French Quarter that killed 14 people on New Year’s Day.
“I continue to support the partnership with the LA National Guard to assist in our major events and there are several coming up in the next few weeks,” Moreno said in a statement.
While Moreno did not address which events she referred to, visitors flock to New Orleans in the spring for events like the New Orleans Jazz and Heritage Festival.
Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry, a Republican and staunch Trump ally, requested the deployment of the National Guard last September, citing rising violent crime rates in New Orleans despite the data showing crime was down.
“This continued deployment will help us combat violence in New Orleans and other parts of Louisiana,” Landry wrote on the social platform X on Monday, noting Louisiana had also sent National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., last year.
Kate Kelly, a spokesperson for Landry, said the federal government would cover the cost of the extended deployment. She did not respond to a question about whether Guard members would be deployed outside New Orleans.
Maj. Gen. Thomas Friloux, adjutant general of the Louisiana National Guard, said in a statement the troops had already worked closely with other city, state and federal agencies to improve public safety during a stretch of high-profile events in the city, including the flood of visitors over Mardi Gras and the city’s carnival season.
“We remain committed to those partnerships as we continue supporting efforts to keep the City of New Orleans safe for residents and visitors,” Friloux said.
Louisiana
Jury selection begins Monday in one of Louisiana’s largest auto insurance fraud cases
NEW ORLEANS (WVUE) – Jury selection begins Monday in what prosecutors describe as one of the largest auto insurance fraud cases in Louisiana history, with two local attorneys set to stand trial on charges that include fraud and obstruction of justice.
Attorneys Vanessa Motta and Jason Giles are accused in an alleged scheme in which drivers — referred to as “slammers” — were paid to intentionally crash into 18-wheelers, file injury lawsuits and allow attorneys to collect the settlements. Both have pleaded not guilty.
63 people have been charged in the case. Many have already pleaded guilty. Motta and Giles are being tried together.
Criminal defense attorney Craig Mordock, who is not directly involved in the case but has been following it closely, said the scope of the litigation is significant.
“You have 10 years of personal injury cases and almost… almost a billion dollars in recovery. That’s all at issue,” Mordock said. “So yeah, this could go two to three weeks.”
Motta’s defense team has advanced a narrative that she was manipulated by a co-defendant.
“There is a compelling narrative that’s been advanced by Vanessa Motta’s lawyer in terms of her being manipulated by one of the co-defendants… about being manipulated by him and him having a prior federal conviction for fraud,” Mordock said.
Motta’s team originally claimed she did not know the crashes were staged. In 2024, her team told FOX 8 she is the victim.
Mordock said Giles faces a more difficult defense.
“I don’t see a favorable juror for one of the other lawyer defendants, Jason Giles. There’s not a clear theory of innocence. This is basically a standard white-collar prosecution where knowledge and intent are going to be the issue,” Mordock said.
The case carries what Mordock described as a shadow. In September 2020, key witness Cornelious Garrison was killed in New Orleans four days after his name appeared in an indictment. Garrison’s admitted killer, Ryan Harris, is expected to testify.
The judge in the case is also allowing the slain witness’s recorded descriptions of the alleged scheme to be admitted at trial.
Mordock said Louisiana drivers have a direct stake in the outcome.
“As your average Louisianan, the idea would be you would save… because the people committing this fraud have been wrapped up. The insurance companies are going to know how to look for this,” Mordock said.
See a spelling or grammar error in our story? Click Here to report it. Please include the headline.
Subscribe to the Fox 8 YouTube channel.
Copyright 2026 WVUE. All rights reserved.
Louisiana
Pervy mayor’s kids told cops that they caught her romping with teen boy at boozy pool party
The children of a disgraced Louisiana mayor told cops that they both caught their mom fooling around with a 16-year-old boy at a boozy pool party, according to video played at her rape trial.
Misty Roberts, the 43-year-old former head of DeRidder, Louisiana — population 9,8000 — faces a charge of third-degree rape over the 2024 incident.
Roberts’ son told investigators in an interview played for jurors that he saw his mom having sex with his pal through a crack in a window.
But, when asked about his recollection, he demurred — telling the court he wasn’t exactly sure what he saw that night, according to KPLC.
The jury also reviewed pictures from the party, which showed kids holding drinks as well as a photograph of Roberts and the victim that prosecutors described as “lewd.”
That picture showed Roberts at the party in her bikini, with the teen victim looking up at her smiling.
Roberts’ son texted his mom that night, incredulous about what was happening, and told her that his sister was crying, according to messages presented by prosecutors.
“He is seventeen,” the son texted Roberts.
The boy was later confirmed to be 16 years old, according to KPLC.
Roberts’ daughter also took the stand while prosecutors played her interview with detectives, in which she said she saw her mom and the boy “on top of each other” that night.
The former mayor’s nephew also admitted he tried to sneak a peek — using his phone to try and get a peek at what was going on in the room. He testified that he wasn’t sure if he hit “record” — but if he did said he never sent it to anybody.
None of the three witnesses who testified said they saw the “private parts” of Roberts and the victim. The teen boy, they noted though, was shirtless.
After the alleged tryst, the victim’s mother texted Roberts to ensure that she was not pregnant, to which she replied she was on birth control. Roberts shared a screenshot of that message to a group chat with her friends, who urged her to take Plan B.
A DoorDash driver testified that he delivered an emergency contraceptive to Roberts’ house, which he recognized from trick-or-treating with his children there.
In other texts shown in court, Roberts asked her son what kind of alcohol her son and other kids wanted for the party.
Days after police launched their investigation into the alleged crime, Roberts resigned as mayor of DeRidder, a city of just under 10,000 people about 20 miles east of the Texas border.
Roberts was charged with third-degree rape and contributing to the delinquency of juveniles.
-
World5 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts5 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Denver, CO5 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Louisiana1 week agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Technology1 week agoYouTube TV billing scam emails are hitting inboxes
-
Politics1 week agoOpenAI didn’t contact police despite employees flagging mass shooter’s concerning chatbot interactions: REPORT
-
Technology1 week agoStellantis is in a crisis of its own making
-
News1 week agoWorld reacts as US top court limits Trump’s tariff powers
