Connect with us

Georgia

Georgia's alleged role in Ukraine-Russia conflict

Published

on

Georgia's alleged role in Ukraine-Russia conflict


Ever pondered the enigmatic notion of a “second front”? Far from a relic of history, it represents a strategic maneuver echoing through contemporary geopolitics. Picture it as a geopolitical chess game where the concept aims to divert attention and resources, dropping hints of potential global instability. This isn’t just a strategic ploy; it’s a narrative that resonates in the corridors of power, shaping perceptions and policies alike.

In the expansive realm of global narratives, some stories quietly shape our perceptions and beliefs, transcending mere headlines. The year 2008 marked a pivotal moment in the history of the Caucasus region, as the simmering tensions between Georgia, Abkhazia, and South Ossetia erupted into a full-blown conflict. The scars of the Abkhazia-South Ossetia-Georgia conflict serve as a somber backdrop to the intricate geopolitical dance that continues to unfold in the region.

In the occupied territories of Abkhazia and South Ossetia (referred to locally as the Tskhinvali region) now under Russian control, the air is thick with propagandistic narratives, their contours shifting notably in the wake of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. As the echoes of geopolitical upheaval reverberate across the region, the narratives emanating from these occupied lands take on new dimensions, reflecting evolving power dynamics and strategic maneuvers. It’s a fascinating study of the fluidity of information and the intersection of geopolitics with the everyday lives of those caught in its tumultuous currents.

As we peer beneath the surface, a compelling storyline emerges—the narrative of a Georgia-Ukraine alliance. This narrative suggests that Georgia is being nudged by Ukraine to confront Russia, emphasizing territorial liberation and a proactive military stance. What unfolds is more than a tale of alliances; it’s a meticulously crafted narrative designed to heighten tensions and position nations as potential threats—a modern geopolitical chess game in motion.

Advertisement

Yet, the story doesn’t end there. Historical events are strategically framed as starting points for broader global conflicts, painting Georgia as an aggressor and justifying present and future actions. This intertwining of historical conflicts with current situations fuels patriotic fervor, contributing to a sense of urgency and purpose—a key element in the grand chessboard of geopolitical maneuvering.

The narratives also suggest an absence of pro-Russian power in Georgia, portraying all forces as pro-Western. Accusations of external pressure, particularly from the US and its allies, create an atmosphere of imminent confrontation. Fear, accusations, and the portrayal of the West as an instigator all serve to sow discord and weaken the unity of target nations—a classic move in the strategic playbook.

Amidst these complexities lies the backdrop of the 2008 Abkhazia-South Ossetia-Georgia conflict, a defining moment in the region’s history. The conflict, rooted in historical grievances and territorial disputes, serves as a stark reminder of the fragility of peace and the enduring scars of conflict. Its legacy looms large, shaping perceptions and narratives in the region to this day.

Yet, beneath the surface lies a deeper narrative—one of collaboration and cultural exchange. Abkhazians, Ossetians, and Russians are portrayed as collaborators in a multifaceted approach that includes education, cultural enrichment, and security initiatives. This blend of soft power and strategic cooperation underscores the complexities of modern geopolitics, where influence is wielded through a variety of means.

The analysis of the “second front” strategy and the strategic soft power approach in South Ossetia and Abkhazia reveals complex webs of geopolitical maneuvers, narratives, and initiatives. These stories, rooted in historical context and implemented in various ways, reflect the complexity of contemporary global politics.

Advertisement

As we navigate this intricate landscape, the murder of Tamaz Ginturi emerges as a poignant subplot, highlighting the tensions and complexities inherent in the Georgian narrative. A tragedy struck on November 6, 2023, at the Georgian-South Ossetian border as Tamaz Ginturi lost his life and Levan Dotiashvili faced Russian Border Service detention.

The incident, just ahead of a critical European Commission report on Georgia’s EU candidacy, reignited tensions from the 2008 conflict, prompting global concern over regional stability. Georgia stands unified in pursuit of peace and justice, as the memory of lives lost serves as a poignant reminder of the region’s fragility and the urgent need for progress.

The articles surrounding his death paint a picture of a potential threat or provocateur, justifying actions taken to maintain regional stability. Through selective framing and emotive language, the narrative unfolds, revealing the intricacies of power dynamics and security concerns in the region.

From the perspective of South Ossetia, Ginturi is portrayed as a villain, with his military background and actions at the border crossing serving as evidence of his potential threat. Political connections and national security concerns further deepen the narrative, illustrating the broader implications of individual actions in the context of geopolitical tensions.

Yet, amidst the complexities of global narratives, there exists a glimmer of hope—a recognition of the shared cultural heritage and common aspirations that bind the people of Georgia and its neighboring regions. Education, language, and cultural exchange initiatives serve as bridges, fostering understanding and cooperation in a landscape fraught with tension and uncertainty.

Advertisement

In tracing the development of these narratives, understanding the interconnectedness of military, intelligence, and cultural initiatives is critical to comprehending the depth and implications of geopolitical maneuvers in the modern world. Georgia, as a central player in these narratives, holds a key role in the intricate dance of global influence.

This article was written by Tamara Obgaidze. Tamara is a Georgian activist based in Tbilisi. She is a writing fellow with Young Voices Europe, and she works with Transparency International Georgia.



Source link

Georgia

Georgia Senate set to question Fani Willis over Trump prosecution – WTOP News

Published

on

Georgia Senate set to question Fani Willis over Trump prosecution – WTOP News


ATLANTA (AP) — After more than a year of legal maneuvering, Fani Willis will face questions Wednesday from a Georgia…

ATLANTA (AP) — After more than a year of legal maneuvering, Fani Willis will face questions Wednesday from a Georgia state Senate committee over her prosecution of Donald Trump.

The question is whether Fulton County’s Democratic district attorney will answer any of them.

The Republican-dominated state Senate in January 2024 created the Special Committee on Investigation to examine allegations of misconduct against Willis concerning her case seeking criminal convictions for efforts to overturn Trump’s 2020 election loss in Georgia. Even before Trump embarked on a retribution campaign against his enemies, Republicans on the Georgia committee were eager to bring Willis in for questioning.

Advertisement

When Willis announced the indictment against Trump and 18 others in August 2023, she used the state’s anti-racketeering law to allege a conspiracy to try to illegally overturn Trump’s narrow loss to Democrat Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election in Georgia.

Republicans didn’t like that, but the committee has focused on Willis’ hiring of special prosecutor Nathan Wade to lead the election interference case. The resolution creating the committee said a romantic relationship between the two amounted to a “clear conflict of interest and a fraud upon the taxpayers.” But now the case is defunct after Willis was removed and another prosecutor dismissed it. Thus far, the committee has turned up few new facts regarding Willis’ activities. And she may choose to be guarded after Trump called Willis a “criminal” who should be “prosecuted” and “put in jail.”

Democrats have decried the panel as a partisan time-waster driven by political ambition. Four Republicans on the committee are running for statewide office in 2026. Chairman Bill Cowsert of Athens is running for attorney general, while Sens. Greg Dolezal of Cumming, Blake Tillery of Vidalia and Steve Gooch of Dahlonega are each seeking the Republican nomination for lieutenant governor. Another Republican who had been on the committee, John Kennedy of Macon, resigned from the Senate last week to pursue his own bid for lieutenant governor.

Amid a court battle over the committee’s power to order her to appear, Willis didn’t show up last year when subpoenaed. A judge agreed that Willis couldn’t ignore the subpoena, and her lawyers worked out an agreement for Willis to appear when the subpoena was reissued this year.

But Roy Barnes, the former Democratic Georgia governor representing Willis, told state Supreme Court justices last week in a hearing over the validity of an earlier subpoena that there may be limits to what Willis will answer.

Advertisement

“You can’t just pick somebody out and say, ‘We’re going to embarrass you; we’re going to try you; we’re going to harass you,’” Barnes told justices. “So we’ll make an appropriate objection at the time. I’m not a potted plant.”

Willis’ prosecution began to fall apart in January 2024, when a defense attorney in the case alleged that Willis was involved in an improper romantic relationship with Wade.

In an extraordinary hearing, both Willis and Wade testified about the intimate details of their relationship. They both vehemently denied allegations that it constituted a conflict of interest.

The trial judge chided Willis for a “tremendous lapse in judgment,” ultimately ruling that Willis could remain on the case if Wade resigned, which he did hours later.

But after defense attorneys appealed, the Georgia Court of Appeals cited an “appearance of impropriety” and removed Willis from the case. The state Supreme Court in September declined to hear Willis’ appeal.

Advertisement

Copyright
© 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, written or redistributed.



Source link

Continue Reading

Georgia

Backup QB Aaron Philo’s future at Georgia Tech in flux

Published

on

Backup QB Aaron Philo’s future at Georgia Tech in flux


Georgia Tech

‘Everybody’s gotta make their own decisions, everybody’s gotta do what’s right for them,’ coach Brent Key says.

Aaron Philo, Georgia Tech’s backup quarterback and presumed starter for the 2026 season, played in three games this past season for the Yellow Jackets. (David Zalubowski/AP)

Georgia Tech’s long-term future at the quarterback position is in a state of flux.

Advertisement

Tech coach Brent Key indicated Tuesday that Aaron Philo, the team’s backup and presumed starter for the 2026 season, might not be with the team for its bowl game against BYU on Dec. 27 in Orlando, Florida.

ev’I“ I“ uoy rehtehw s’tahw tahw ew stnaw yrev esu ot ot emit sthguoht esoht ”,sgniht .meht meht rieht eht eht eht eht eht eht klat .dias thgir secruoser edivorp ytilibissop s’elpoep nwo ruo ruo rehto ro ro seitinutroppo ylnepo no fo fo .ton ym ekam gnol denrael boj si snoitnetni ll’eh evah syug attog attog evig emag rof rof dleif gnihtyreve s’ydobyreve od enimreted ,snoisiced lortnoc t’nac t’nac lwob tseb tseb tseb tseb eb ta .era dna dna dna dna oga tuoba ”.ytiliba a eW ,hceT ,oS yeK aigroeG s’ydobyrevE

sdray htiw saw nwodhcuot werht eerht siht eht detrats .seires nosaes detneserper ,)sdnuop deyalp tsap .gnissap gninepo no no evisneffo fo puhctam detpecretni ni ni semag rof rof yb ta dna dna dna osla a a wolleY trebloT s’hceT ,tnelaT muidatS .tpeS olihP olihP .stekcaJ thgieH eH bbeW-rendraG ddoD ESC nodnarB ybboB ybboB 373 62 022 82-fo-12 ,2-toof-6(

.refsnart ot ot siht eht gnitrats kcabretrauq evisneffo evisneffo ,htnom tfel sdnetni eh raey-tsrif rotanidrooc rotanidrooc hcaoc emoceb ta decnuonna edisgnola hceT .llarmuS yadnoM yawgaL noJ srotaG adirolF adirolF renkluaF reilraE JD retsuB

gnorts .rats ecnis loohcs pihsnoitaler hgih evah dah syad sa dna a a s’olihP olihP renkluaF

Advertisement

refsnart ot eht detroper .latrop si detcepxe retne ,noonretfa yadseuT olihP 3nO nO

I“ retsuB“ nehw tahw erew saw saw saw saw tespu dootsrednu ytniatrecnu dlot ot ot ot ot yeht ereht eht eht eht s’taht taht taht erus .dekcohs suoires moor yllaer ytterp ytterp fo fo edam ybbol tel wonk wonk dnik ni ni woh .mih mih eh eh morf ,rehtaf mrod .did dettimmoc dettimmoc llac dna tuoba a ehT .rebmetpeS boR s’olihP ,olihP ”,atosenniM atosenniM noitutitsnoC-lanruoJ m’I renkluaF renkluaF tuB retsuB retsuB atnaltA noraA noraA noraA )yllanigiro( )hceT(

I“ uoy lliw esoht siht kniht ,ereht ereht ereht eht eht taht taht drows s’ffats laer no ,nosaesffo .dnim gnol tsuj si ni namuh sih syug yug tog annog eniuneg rof neve tbuod t’nod eid ”.laed egnahc ,erac s’gnieb sa era yna dna .ni-lla a .hceT I I eH aigroeG sA

elor deyalp ni ni ,etaudarg ,namhserf elbigile lwob gib gnimoceb sa a a hceT loohcS ecnirP ,olihP naitsirhC eunevA A .4202

sdray htiw htiw .niw niw werht eht eht taht gnitrats spans redluohs sdnoces nur nar kcabretrauq deyalp revo evisneffo tfel ,yrujni gnidulcni ni evag rof rof gnilaed ta dna na a a htiW etatS .muidatS olihP olihP htroN gniK stekcaJ senyaH ddoD aniloraC ybboB ,45 35 92-03 462 22 dray-81

Advertisement

sdray sdray htiw owt owt snwodhcuot ot nworht eerht .spans snosaes ,erocs nar evisneffo deggol snoitpecretni ni sih sah sah og rof rof ta dna dna dna osla gnola a .hceT olihP eH 59 839 381

sdray nwodhcuot ot werht )roines gnissap sessap no .redael sih rof gnirud detcennoc .reerac emoceb sa emit-lla a ecnirP olihP olihP s’aigroeG ,naitsirhC eunevA tA 951 229,31 65(

owt ot ot gnihctiws shtnom retal ni ni dellorne dettimmoc erofeb dna secnaigella hceT atosenniM hcraM yraunaJ eH .4202 3202

ot ot ot rieht eht deludehcs nruter eraperp ecitcarp .gninrom gninrom ,elihwnaem emag rof deunitnoc era dna dna yadsendeW yadseuT yeK ,stekcaJ ht31

s’tI“ I“ s’tahw s’tahw er’ew yeht yeht meht meht meht rieht rieht eht eht eht eht eht naht naht naht ,sreyalp sreyalp sreyalp rehto ytinutroppo seitinutroppo on on on gnikool ti attog attog teg rof rof rof rof .seilimaf ”,seilimaf t’nod od od ”.snoitcartsid snoitcartsid tnereffid tnereffid redisnoc .sehcaoc tseb tseb tseb ta sa dna dna dna dna dna .lla .stluda ,stluda .dedda eW s’erehT yeK syuG s’ydobyrevE

Advertisement
Chad Bishop

Chad Bishop is a Georgia Tech sports reporter for The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.



Source link

Continue Reading

Georgia

Execution set for this week in Georgia put on hold for now

Published

on

Execution set for this week in Georgia put on hold for now


ATLANTA — Georgia’s parole board on Monday put an execution scheduled for Wednesday on hold, but it was not clear how long that would last.

The order suspending the execution of Stacey Humphreys, signed by State Board of Pardons and Paroles Chair Joyette Holmes, does not provide any reason for the decision. The board also issued a notice saying a clemency hearing for Humphreys scheduled for Tuesday morning is “postponed until further notice.”

Humphreys, 52, was set to receive a lethal injection Wednesday evening at the state prison near Jackson. He was convicted of malice murder and other crimes in the 2003 killings of 33-year-old Cyndi Williams and 21-year-old Lori Brown.

Humphreys’ lawyers last week filed a petition asking a judge to order two members of the parole board to recuse themselves from considering his clemency petition, saying they had conflicts of interest.

Advertisement

They also asked the judge to order the parole board to halt the clemency proceedings for 90 days to give the governor time to appoint replacement board members and to order the governor to make those appointments. And they asked the judge to keep the parole board from hearing Humphreys’ clemency petition until the two board members have been replaced.

During a hearing Monday afternoon on that petition, a lawyer for the parole board said she did not know how long the suspension would last. The death warrant is valid through noon on Dec. 24, meaning that if the execution doesn’t happen by then the state will have to seek a new warrant.

Kimberly McCoy, one of the board members whose recusal Humphreys’ lawyers is seeking, was a victim advocate with the Cobb County district attorney’s office at the time of Humphreys’ trial and was assigned to work with the victims in the case. The other, Wayne Bennett, was the sheriff in Glynn County, where the trial was moved because of pretrial publicity, and Humphreys’ lawyers argue he oversaw security for the jurors and Humphreys himself during the case.

Guards stand at the front of Georgia Diagnostic Prison, Wednesday, Sept. 21, 2011, in Jackson, Ga. Credit: AP/John Spink

During the court hearing, it was established that McCoy had agreed Sunday night to abstain from voting on the matter of Humphreys’ clemency application. But it was not clear what that means, particularly whether or not she would be present and would participate during the discussion of the case.

Advertisement

When Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney asked what McCoy understands it to mean if she abstains, McCoy told the judge she would do whatever the court directs her to do. A lawyer for the board said her understanding of abstention is that McCoy could be present during the clemency hearing and could ask questions but would not vote.

Under questioning in court, Bennett testified that he did not believe his connection to Humphreys’ trial would have any bearing on his treatment of the case, that he would consider the evidence and take the appropriate actions. Generally, Bennett said, he was not directly involved in the day to day responsibilities of security for a trial or for the sequestered jurors, and that those duties fell to his staff.

Three members of the parole board must vote for clemency for it to be granted. Lawyers for Humphreys argue that he has a right to have his clemency application heard and voted on by a five-member parole board with no members who have conflicts.

Guards stand at the front of Georgia Diagnostic Prison, Wednesday,...

Guards stand at the front of Georgia Diagnostic Prison, Wednesday, Sept. 21, 2011, in Jackson, Ga. Credit: AP/John Spink

Tina Piper, a lawyer for the state, argued that Humphreys has the right to have his application voted on by a quorum of three, not by five members. She also argued that the state Constitution says the parole board shall be made up of five members, so the governor can’t appoint a temporary member because then there would be six.

Noting that the parole board could lift the suspension at any time, Humphreys’ lawyers urged the judge to issue an order keeping the state from executing him until the judge has a chance to make a decision on the recusal of the parole board members and whether a member who isn’t voting should be temporarily replaced.

Advertisement

Williams and Brown worked as real estate agents in a sales office in a model home for a new subdivision in Powder Springs, a suburb about 20 miles (32 kilometers) northwest of Atlanta. Humphreys entered the sales office around midday on Nov. 3, 2003, and forced them to strip naked and give him their bank PINs before fatally shooting them, according to evidence presented at trial.

Humphreys withdrew more than $3,000 from the women’s bank accounts, according to court filings. He told police after his arrest that he had recently taken out some high-interest payday loans and needed money for a payment on his truck.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending