Connect with us

Georgia

Georgia Elections Board dismisses “ballot harvesting” claims promoted in new “2000 Mules” documentary – Atlanta Civic Circle

Published

on

Georgia Elections Board dismisses “ballot harvesting” claims promoted in new “2000 Mules” documentary – Atlanta Civic Circle


The State Elections Board on Tuesday voted unanimously to dismiss three ballot-fraud claims introduced by right-wing activists–judging their allegation to be false that fraudulent actors illegally stuffed massive batches of absentee ballots in drop packing containers throughout the 2020 presidential election.

A kind of dismissed allegations is featured in a documentary, “2000 Mules,” directed by conservative pundit Dinesh D’Souza set to be launched Could 20. The movie falsely claims unnamed nonprofits linked to the Democratic Social gathering paid individuals, whom it calls “mules,” to illegally acquire and deposit absentee ballots in drop packing containers in 5 swing states the place Biden gained–Georgia, Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. 

Poll “harvesting” or assortment, is when somebody aside from the voter delivers their absentee poll to a dropbox. In Georgia, it’s solely authorized for relations or disabled voters’ caregivers to do that for them.

The film options surveillance footage of a person in a white SUV depositing 5 absentee ballots right into a Gwinnett County dropbox. The Georgia Bureau of Investigation decided in an investigation final fall that the person was legally delivering ballots solid by himself, his spouse and kids.

Advertisement

State Elections Board chair Matt Mashburn stated on the board’s assembly Tuesday that the “2000 Mules” allegation that 92,000 absentee ballots had been illegally collected in Georgia was false. “They had been saying there have been 92,000 illegitimately manufactured votes in Georgia,” stated Mashburn, a Republican. “Possibly I misunderstood the purpose they had been making, however that was the purpose I heard. That isn’t true.”

The opposite two claims that the State Elections Board dismissed had been over comparable surveillance movies. 

“Banana republic”

One Duluth resident on the assembly, David Cross, blasted the board and the Georgia Secretary of State’s workplace for not sufficiently investigating his wide-ranging complaints of poll improprieties. Cross accused the elections board of ignoring his allegations of “poll trafficking,” under-investigated surveillance movies, and unsigned tabular tapes, that are the paper tapes of vote totals that county elections places of work ship to the board. 

Cross began a Twitter account final June known as @GAballots, which says within the bio: “My crew finds errors within the Georgia votes -we’ve spent hundreds of hours on this.” Up to now, it’s amassed 3,686 followers. 

Advertisement

In one other Twitter account, @5xStock, Cross calls himself an “funding fanatic.” When he began a monetary planning agency, U.S. Asset Administration, in 2016, the Gwinnett Chamber of Commerce hosted a grand opening attended by then-U.S. Rep. Rob Woodall and then-Gwinnett County Chairwoman Charlotte Nash, in line with the Gwinnett Each day Publish. 

Cross stated he contacted Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger a dozen occasions over the past 12 months about his considerations, however solely heard from Raffensperger when he known as looking for a marketing campaign donation.

“Nobody has been held accountable. I’m embarrassed to be a Georgian,”  Cross instructed the board. ”Is that this the best way we run elections within the best nation on Earth–like some third-rate banana republic? Our leaders–the governor and the secretary of state–want to satisfy their constitutional duties to the residents.” 

“Put in your massive boy pants,” he added. “Roll up your sleeves and get to work. Everybody right here desires a safe vote. Election integrity is paramount.”

“2000 Mules” relies on data from Reality The Vote, a conservative vote-monitoring group in Houston, which gathered drop-box surveillance video in Georgia and different swing states. In April, the State Elections Board subpoenaed paperwork, recordings, and names of the individuals who allegedly harvested the Georgia ballots from Reality the Vote, however the group has not complied.

Advertisement

In accordance with the Secretary of State’s normal counsel, Ryan Germany, the group has confidentiality considerations for somebody it claims has details about the so-called poll harvesting. 

Germany instructed the board that his workplace is in discussions with Reality the Vote’s attorneys about acquiring the subpoenaed data “Reality The Vote does have some real considerations in regards to the confidentiality of data. So we’re attempting to work with them to resolve these considerations,” he stated. 

The board approved the Georgia Lawyer Basic’s workplace to petition a decide to implement the subpoenas and defend witnesses’ confidentiality.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Georgia

Las Vegas Raiders Chose Georgia’s Brock Bowers Over Alabama’s Terrion Arnold

Published

on

Las Vegas Raiders Chose Georgia’s Brock Bowers Over Alabama’s Terrion Arnold


The Las Vegas Raiders elected to draft Georgia tight end Brock Bowers over Terrion Arnold per the former Alabama player.

During the NFL draft, organizations are faced with making tough decisions throughout the entire draft process, and the biggest decisions they make come down to choosing which players they want to draft over others. The Las Vegas Raiders had the 13th overall pick in the 2024 draft and ultimately elected to select tight end Brock Bowers over a former Alabama defensive player.

Defensive back Terrion Arnold spoke with The Next Round podcast and said the Raiders called him after the draft to let him know they came down to a decision between him and Bowers. Arnold said it came down to a coin flip between him and the former Georgia tight end, and it landed on Bowers, which led to his name being called before Arnold’s.

The thought of an NFL organization sitting in a draft room and flipping a coin to decide which player they wanted to take in the first round seems a little silly, but considering Arnold and Bowers were both viewed as top players at their position, one could see how the debate could result to a coin toss. Arnold also mentioned that the Raiders tried trading up for him later in the first round, but couldn’t make it happen.

Bowers spent three seasons at Georgia and they are some of the more statistically gaudy stat lines at the position that we’ve seen.

Other Georgia News:

Join the Community:

Follow Jonathan Williams on Twitter: @Dr_JWill

Subscribe to our YouTube Page HERE.

Advertisement

You can follow us for future coverage by clicking “Follow” on the top right-hand corner of the page. Also, be sure to like us on Facebook @BulldogMaven & follow us on Twitter at @DawgsDaily





Source link

Continue Reading

Georgia

Quick picks on 2024 Georgia football betting lines vs. key SEC and non-conference opponents

Published

on

Quick picks on 2024 Georgia football betting lines vs. key SEC and non-conference opponents


ATHENS — Georgia football is the clear-cut SEC favorite this season, and the DraftKings preseason odds indicate why.

Odds have been released for seven of the Bulldogs’ more high-profile games, including the opener against Clemson on Aug. 31 at Mercedes-Benz Stadium.

Here are the opening lines, and a thought on each game:

Georgia – 13.5 Clemson

Georgia beat the Tigers in the teams’ most recent meeting in the 2021 season opener, 10-3, in Charlotte, N.C.

Advertisement

This season’s game isn’t expected to be as close, but it’s worth noting Clemson finished last year on a five-game win streak, including a 38-35 bowl win over Kentucky.

Quick pick: Georgia wins, Clemson covers

Georgia -4.5 Alabama

The Bulldogs haven’t won in Tuscaloosa since 2007, when Matthew Stafford was QB and Nick Saban was a first-year head coach for the Tide.

Carson Beck is the most talented UGA QB since Stafford, and Alabama has a first-year head coach.

Advertisement

Quick pick: Georgia wins, Georgia covers

Georgia -24 Auburn

It’s a home game for the Bulldogs against an Auburn program it has beaten seven times in a row.

But it’s also a game that falls a week after what promises to be an emotional contest in Tuscaloosa, and the Bulldogs don’t always cover as a big home favorite.

Quick pick: Georgia wins, Auburn covers

Georgia -1.5 Texas

Some have pointed to this showdown in Austin as perhaps having the greatest impact on the College Football Playoffs.

Advertisement

The game also features a battle of the two preseason Heisman Trophy favorites.

Quick pick: Georgia wins, Georgia covers

Georgia -22 Florida

The Bulldogs most recent regular-season loss came to Florida in 2020, but a lot has changed since then.

Georgia is an overwhelming favorite over the Gators this season, and there’s a chance Billy Napier might not still be Florida’s head coach.

Quick pick: Georgia wins, Florida covers

Advertisement

Georgia -7 Ole Miss

The Bulldogs blew out the Rebels in Sanford Stadium last season in what many expected to be a close game.

Vaught-Hemingway Stadium figures to present more of a challenge.

Quick pick: Georgia wins, Georgia covers

Georgia -17.5 Tennessee

The Vols have a new starting quarterback they are excited about, dual-threat signal caller Nico Iamaleava.

The last time Tennessee beat Georgia, in 2016, it took a mobile QB and a Hail Mary in a shootout. These Bulldogs won’t engage in that fashion, but they will pound the ball over the Vols on the ground.

Advertisement

Quick pick: Georgia wins, Tennessee covers



Source link

Continue Reading

Georgia

Georgia: ‘Foreign Influence’ Bill Threatens Rights

Published

on

Georgia: ‘Foreign Influence’ Bill Threatens Rights


(Berlin, May 9, 2024) – The Georgian parliament’s introduction of a bill obliging certain nongovernmental groups and media outlets to register as “organizations serving the interests of a foreign power” threatens fundamental rights in the country, Human Rights Watch said today. 

The bill, under debate since mid-April 2024, prompted harsh criticism from Georgia’s bilateral and international partners and led to some of the largest peaceful protests in the country in recent decades. There have been multiple, credible reports of unjustified police use of violence to disperse them. The bill has passed two readings and is scheduled for its final adoption the week of May 13. 

“Georgian parliamentarians and government officials formally defend the bill as providing transparency, but they make no secret of its intended purpose,” said Hugh Williamson, Europe and Central Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “By labeling independent groups and media as serving foreign interests, they intend to marginalize and stifle critical voices in the country that are fundamental for any functioning democracy.”

Parliament should reject the bill at its final reading. The government should ensure respect for fundamental rights to freedom of assembly and expression and effective investigations of all allegations of excessive use of police force.

Advertisement

The bill, the Law on Transparency of Foreign Influence, is nearly identical to a draft law the Georgian parliament tried to adopt in 2023 but withdrew following mass protests. In the new version, the ruling party, Georgian Dream, substituted the term “agents of foreign influence” with “organizations serving the interests of a foreign power.” 

The bill requires nongovernmental groups and print, online, and broadcast media that receive 20 percent or more of their annual revenue – either financial support or in-kind contributions – from a “foreign power” to register with the Ministry of Justice as “organizations serving the interest of a foreign power.” 

If adopted, the bill will impose additional onerous, duplicative reporting requirements, inspections, and administrative liability, including the equivalent of up to US$9,300 in fines for violations.

Georgian legislation already requires nongovernmental organizations to register grants with the tax authorities, including the amounts and duration of the projects, to benefit from certain tax exemptions. They also file monthly financial reports that include information on the number of employees and service contracts and income tax paid. Media outlets also file monthly reports on their income and expenses to the Communications Regulatory Commission. All information that the nongovernmental groups and media outlets file is public and anyone could request a copy. 

The bill’s initiators and the ruling party leaders have made clear in public statements that they intend the law to be used against groups and media that criticize the government, advocate for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights, or engage in other work that irritates the authorities.

Advertisement

Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze justified the need for the bill by pointing to initiatives that criticize the authorities or challenge government policies, claiming that some civic groups tried to “organize a revolution” in 2020 and 2022, “engage in LGBT propaganda,” and “discredit the police, judiciary, and the Georgian Orthodox Church.” 

Georgian Dream introduced the bill amid other efforts to restrict rights as the country heads toward parliamentary elections, scheduled for October. In late March, the ruling party introduced another bill that would restrict the rights of LGBT people and ban, among other things, “gatherings aimed at popularizing same-sex family or intimate relationships… and non-use of gender-specific terminology.” 

Bidzina Ivanishvili, the Georgian Dream founder and leader, in a rare public speech on April 29, said that by introducing the “transparency law” now, the ruling party aimed to exhaust the political opposition in advance of parliamentary elections. He also vowed to punish the National Movement, the opposition party that ruled Georgia under Mikhael Saakishvili from 2003 until 2012. Ivanishvili also attacked Georgia’s political opposition and civic groups, painting the latter in one broad stroke as “having no homeland” and accusing foreigners of plotting to bring the political opposition to power through “non-transparent NGO funding.” 

The bill’s supporters falsely allege that the bill is similar to the United States Foreign Agent Registration Act. But the US law does not equate receiving foreign funding, in part or in whole, with being under the direction and control of a foreign principal. It primarily regulates lobbyists and does not serve as a mechanism for weakening civil society organizations and media. Russia also uses this false equivalence argument to justify its draconian and abusive legislation. 

Tens of thousands of people have protested the bill continuously in recent weeks, in Tbilisi and several other cities. On multiple occasions during especially large demonstrations in front of the parliament building in Tbilisi, police used tear gas, water cannons, and pepper spray to disperse mainly nonviolent protesters, including on the night of April 30, the eve of bill’s second reading. There were credible reports of police using rubber bullets at least once on the night of May 1.

Advertisement

Human Rights Watch spoke with three people, including a 17-year-old high school student, who were all beaten viciously by police in separate incidents the night of April 30 to May 1. They each said that multiple police officers at the protest grabbed them unprovoked, then kicked them to the ground, beat them for several minutes, and then detained them. The authorities charged them with misdemeanor disobedience or petty hooliganism and released them. If the charges are not dropped, the three will face trial. 

Ted Jonas, a 62-year-old lawyer who has been living in Georgia for 30 years, had numerous bruises, including a black eye, abrasions, and a bloody nose. Forty-nine-year-old Vakhtang Kobaladze had multiple bruises on his back, chest, hand, legs, and jaw. The 17-year-old said that five police officers dragged him to the ground and beat and kicked him repeatedly, leaving him with head trauma, a broken lip, and bruises on his left eye and all over his chest, shoulders, back, and hands.

The Georgian Special Investigation Service reported receiving 80 calls to its hotline from protesters and journalists alleging police violence. It said it had initiated a criminal investigation. 

The bill, police violence, and detentions triggered statements of concern and criticism within Georgia and from multilateral organizations and Georgia’s international partners. In a public statement, Georgia’s human rights ombudsperson said there were no grounds for the police to use pepper spray to disperse protesters at the entrance to parliament and that police used water cannons and tear gas without adequate warning or reason, as “the rally had a peaceful character and there was no reason to terminate it….” A statement by 10 Georgian civic organizations called on Georgian authorities to investigate “cases of disproportionate use of force by law enforcement officers” that night. 

In a May 2 statement, the United Nations high commissioner for human rights, Volker Turk, urged Georgian authorities to “conduct prompt and transparent investigations into all allegations of ill-treatment” and urged Georgian authorities to withdraw the bill, [which] “… poses serious threats to the rights to freedom of expression and association.”  

Advertisement

On April 16, Joseph Borrell, the European Union’s foreign policy chief, and Olivér Várhelyi, its commissioner for EU enlargement, jointly urged authorities to withdraw the bill, which if adopted, they said would “negatively impact” Georgia’s EU candidacy. On May 1, Borrell condemned the violence against protesters. 

In a letter to the chair of Georgia’s parliament, the Council of Europe human rights commissioner, Michael O’Flaherty, asked parliament to refrain from adopting the draft law because, if adopted, it would “likely result in the stigmatization and discreditation of the civil society organizations.” 

The draft law is incompatible with legal obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which Georgia is a party. While certain limitations on the rights to freedom of expression and association are permissible under international law, the proposed bill far exceeds any legitimate interference with these rights, Human Rights Watch said. 

In 2022, the European Court of Human Rights found Russia’s “foreign agents” law, which is similar to the Georgian bill, in violation of article 11 of the European Convention, protecting the right to association. The court ruled that creating a special status and legal regime for organizations that receive funding from international or foreign sources was not justified, and that such restrictions interfered with their legitimate functions. The right to seek, receive and utilize resources from national, international, and foreign sources is an inherent part of the right to freedom of association.

“The foreign influence bill tramples on fundamental rights and Georgian authorities should drop it,” Williamson said. “They should also promptly and effectively investigate the allegations of police violence and safeguard the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and expression.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending