Connect with us

Delaware

Why Delaware is one of the few states that doesn’t compensate wrongfully incarcerated

Published

on

Why Delaware is one of the few states that doesn’t compensate wrongfully incarcerated


play

When Elmer Daniels left Delaware prison 39 years after a court ruled in 2018 that he was wrongfully convicted, he was turned out into the world in the middle of winter with little more than the shirt on his back, according to his attorney.

Advertisement

That’s because Delaware is one of about a dozen states that has no mechanism to compensate individuals who wrongfully spent portions of their lives locked behind bars. These are people who spent years, or in some cases, decades making no real money in prison as the world and their connections on the outside have moved on without them.

Once again this year, some Delaware lawmakers want to create a compensation program to acknowledge the unfairness of being wrongfully locked up. Senate Bill 169 is the latest effort to do that.

The bill has passed a Senate committee. It’s main sponsor, Kyra Hoffner, a Smyrna Democrat, said she is revising the bill and hopes it will be up for a vote in the Senate in the coming weeks.

How would it work?

The proposed program has been revised multiple times, but Hoffner explained how the program would work.

The bill would set up a compensation fund for individuals whose convictions were overturned and either dismissed, dropped or retried resulting in an acquittal. These situations most commonly occur when people locked up work for years to present to the court flaws in their original conviction and in some cases, new evidence pointing to their innocence.

Advertisement

In some cases, like the situation faced by Mark Purnell in recent years, the courts can overturn someone’s conviction, and prosecutors, who often have the choice of whether to retry or drop the case, will dangle freedom in front of the individual if they plea to a lesser crime.

So people who also plead no-contest after their conviction is overturned and remanded for further proceedings are also eligible to apply for compensation. Purnell’s case was ultimately dropped by prosecutors. He spent 16 years wrongfully locked up.

Released: Mark Purnell, who spent 16 years in prison due to unjust trial, suddenly released

The legislation includes protections to disqualify people convicted of other crimes tied to the overturned conviction or people who purposefully take the blame for someone else in a criminal case. People who have a conviction the court has not deemed illegitimate and who are simply pardoned would not be eligible, Hoffner said.

Advertisement

Those who qualify would be allowed to file a court petition seeking compensation. It would be up to them to make a showing to the court of their innocence, Hoffner said. This showing would be judged by what’s called a “preponderance of the evidence,” a lower standard than the ”beyond-reasonable-doubt” standard used to convict people, she said.

Prosecutors in the Delaware Department of Justice would have the opportunity to refute and present evidence in opposition to the person’s claim.

James Moreno is the executive director of the Delaware Innocence Project, a nonprofit that investigates and pursues claims of wrongful incarceration. He emphasized that it’s only fair for the state to help people when they’ve taken away their time and freedom unfairly.

“Nobody is saying let’s hand out a pot of money; there is a standard that must be met and it is about fairness,” Moreno said.  

Advertisement

How much money are we talking about?

Individuals who clear the court hurdle will be eligible to receive compensation based on their years spent wrongfully behind bars and a few other factors.

Those who served time on death row are eligible for $100,000 for each year wrongfully locked up. Those who served time off death row, which is most people who would qualify, would be eligible for $75,000 per year.

Those wrongfully put on probation or those paroled after a wrongful conviction or people wrongfully made to register as sex offenders would be eligible for $50,000 for each year in the system, Hoffner said.

The bill also includes provisions to help cover attorneys fees, reimbursement of restitution a person was wrongfully ordered to pay as well as reimbursement for “reintegrative services” like mental and physical health care costs incurred between the person’s release and their grant of compensation, Hoffner said.

Advertisement

The bill includes provisions that would tie the compensation award in the future to changes in inflation as well as timing the disbursement of payments to those who qualify. The fund would be managed by the state treasurer.

How often does this happen?

It is rare for people to have their cases overturned in Delaware. People in prison typically don’t have money so it’s not an incentivized area for private attorneys to work in. That’s the gap that the Delaware Innocence Project, a relatively new organization compared with counterparts in other states, seeks to help fill.

According to the National Registry of Exonerations, four people in Delaware have successfully overturned their convictions in the past 35 years. Those include Daniels, Isaiah McCoy, Mark Purnell and James Dollard.

Hoffner said Daniels, Purnell and Dollard would qualify under the bill’s current format.

‘Left to fend’ for themselves

When a person is imprisoned, they make little to no money, their marketable skills diminish, they fall behind current technology and lose personal connections and family foundations.

Advertisement

Then, when their conviction is overturned, they are released into a world with new technology, high basic prices to survive and, in the eyes of many potential employers, a black mark of having just recently been released from lockup.

Hoffner added that incarceration also exacerbates one’s health problems. She said the money can’t give someone back their time, but will make their life a bit easier.

“Everyone thinks life goes back to normal,” Hoffner said. “But it is a big struggle.”

Emeka Igwe, Daniels’ attorney, emphasized the difficulty of reintegrating into society after being released for so long.

“There was nothing from the state at all,” Igwe said. “He was basically left to fend for himself.”

Advertisement

Daniels released: Flawed testimony led to his conviction 39 years ago. Now, prosecutors say he can go free

The office of Delaware Attorney General Kathy Jennings did not comment on the proposed legislation when asked. Leadership in Delaware’s judiciary declined to comment.

The legislation is not a new push in Delaware. In 2019, a similar bill was introduced, passed through a House committee and died without House Democratic leadership bringing it up for a vote.

Lawsuits often fruitless

Supporters say another common misconception is that civil courts allow wrongfully convicted people to seek damages. Daniels’ case is an example of how that often isn’t the case.

The courts provide broad civil immunity to police and prosecutors carrying out their work administering justice.

Advertisement

Daniels sought compensation via a civil lawsuit. His rape conviction was overturned because some of the basic evidence underpinning his case was based on science that society now regards as unreliable as well as other evidence that undercut his original prosecution. After his case was remanded, prosecutors said they couldn’t label him “innocent,” but dropped the case. He was 57 when he was released from prison.

Earlier this year, a judge dismissed his lawsuit against Wilmington police after he failed to meet the high legal bar that officers knowing or willfully violated his constitutional rights.

“Courts cannot right all wrongs” was the opening line in Judge Stephanos Bibas’s opinion dismissing the lawsuit.

Igwe, Daniels’ attorney, said he is appealing the ruling. He said Daniels has acclimated to life and work outside, but is owed a debt by those that took 39 years from him.

Advertisement

“He was incarcerated in the name of the state,” Igwe said. “He should be compensated by the state.”

Jon Eldan is the founder and executive director of After Innocence, a California-based nonprofit that, among other things, advocates for such compensation programs. He said Daniels’ situation is common to people released after a wrongful conviction: The law in America often provides no route for compensation through civil courts.

“There have been several thousand cases overturned throughout the country,” Eldan said. “The majority of people don’t have a lawsuit.”

Contact Xerxes Wilson at (302) 324-2787 or xwilson@delawareonline.com.



Source link

Advertisement

Delaware

Delaware Supreme Court upholds reforms to curb ‘DExit’ concerns

Published

on

Delaware Supreme Court upholds reforms to curb ‘DExit’ concerns


This story was produced by Spotlight Delaware as part of a partnership with Delaware Online/The News Journal. For more about Spotlight Delaware, visit www.spotlightdelaware.org.

A Delaware law passed last year in the wake of escalating assaults on the state’s corporate brand shielded powerful company leaders from facing certain lawsuits brought by smaller investors. 

What it didn’t do was violate the Delaware Constitution, the state Supreme Court ruled on Friday, Feb. 27. 

Advertisement

More than three months after hearing arguments, the justices ruled that the corporate law reform – known as Senate Bill 21 – did not strip Delaware’s prominent Court of Chancery of its constitutional authority to decide when a business deal is fair.

“The General Assembly’s enactment of SB 21 falls within the ‘broad and ample sweep’ of its legislative power,” the justices stated.

The ruling ends a bruising fight in Delaware over when the state’s business court should allow small-time investors to interrogate insider deals struck within companies by founders or other business leaders.

The ruling also averts what could have been an embarrassment for the state’s legal and political establishment had the high court overturned the law. 

Advertisement

More than a year ago, Tesla CEO Elon Musk — the world’s richest person — was calling on business leaders to move their companies’ legal homes out of Delaware. Musk had launched the campaign, which became known as “DExit,” after a Delaware Chancery Court judge ruled that he could not accept a multibillion-dollar pay package from Tesla.  

Just as the campaign appeared to be gaining a foothold, Gov. Matt Meyer, legislative leaders, and Delaware attorneys who represent corporations threw their collective heft behind SB 21.

They argued then that the legislation amounted to a “course correction” that would bring the state’s business courts back into alignment with rulings from a decade ago. Many also said the bill was needed to pacify executives who were considering following Musk’s calls to move their companies’ legal homes out of Delaware.

In response, a cadre of critics — which included national law professors, pension fund attorneys, and a handful of progressives within the Delaware legislature — derided SB 21 as a “billionaires bill.” 

Advertisement

Some also argued that the legislation was the latest in a string of recent changes to Delaware corporate law that have shifted the state away from protecting shareholder rights and toward giving greater deference to powerful executives.

Meyer and others SB 21 supporters rejected those characterizations last year. And on Friday, he celebrated the Supreme Court’s ruling.

In a statement, he said the decision affirms that “Delaware is the gold standard locale for global companies to do business.” He also stated that the number of companies that maintain their legal home in Delaware had increased throughout 2025 despite the DExit campaign.

“In short, SB 21 is working, and I’m glad it will continue to be the law,” Meyer said.  

The legal arguments for SB 21

When arguing against SB 21 in front of the Supreme Court last fall, one attorney asserted that the new law removed the Chancery Court’s time-honored and constitutional duty to say what is fair – or equitable – in a business dispute.  

Advertisement

The attorney, Gregory Varallo, argued that by removing a shareholders’ ability to sue their company, the law reduced what he described as the immutable power of the Court of Chancery to oversee a “complete system of equity.”

During his arguments, Varallo also offered the justices an unusual acknowledgement, stating that he knew that his stance was unpopular — and that he understood “well the pressures on this court.”

The comments were a likely reference to the consensus of big business groups and the state’s political establishment that believed SB 21 was necessary for Delaware to remain the world’s preeminent corporate domicile. 

Following Varallo, Washington, D.C.-based attorney Jonathan C. Bond defended SB 21, in part, by characterizing his opponents arguments as unprecedented. If adopted, he said they would imperil several existing Delaware laws that go back decades. 

He also argued that changing the rules of corporate law – as SB 21 did – “is the same as wiping out jurisdiction merely because it makes some plaintiff’s claims harder.”

Advertisement

Also arguing in favor of SB 21 during the hearing was William Savitt, an attorney with the  Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz – among the most prominent corporate law firms in the country.

Last spring, Meyer hired Savitt’s firm to represent the state in the legal defense of SB 21 for a budget rate of $100,000. By comparison, Wachtell Lipton charged Twitter $90 million in 2022 to ferry that company through its arduous, four-month-long acquisition by Elon Musk.

Wachtell’s client list also includes Mark Zuckerberg and other Meta executives and board members, who last summer settled a seven-year-long, multibillion-dollar shareholder lawsuit in the Delaware Chancery Court.

During his arguments on SB 21, Savitt said equity as determined by judges must follow the statutes created by the legislature, and “not displace the law.” 

“No natural reading of the words (of the Delaware Constitution) support plaintiff’s position,” he said. 

Advertisement

Get stories like this delivered to your email inbox by signing up for the free newsletter at spotlightdelaware.org/subscribe.



Source link

Continue Reading

Delaware

Police identify victim of Wilmington motorcycle crash

Published

on

Police identify victim of Wilmington motorcycle crash


play

State police identified 29-year-old Brian Silva of New Castle as the victim of a fatal motorcycle crash in Wilmington.

Silva was riding a Harley-Davidson northbound on Dupont Highway approaching Millside Drive in Wilmington around 3:30 p.m. on Feb. 27 when it collided with the rear of a stopped Lexus at that intersection, police said. Silva was ejected from the motorcycle. He was taken to the hospital, where he died.

Advertisement

Delaware State Police are still investigating this incident, and anyone with information is encouraged to reach out to them or to Delaware Crime Stoppers.



Source link

Continue Reading

Delaware

When will Delaware warm up? After snow, ice Tuesday, temps will rise

Published

on

When will Delaware warm up? After snow, ice Tuesday, temps will rise


play

Meteorological winter has ended and we’ve entered spring.

However, there’s still a last winter blast hitting Delaware early this week before a spring warm up hits at the end of the week.

Advertisement

Here’s a look at the Delaware forecast.

Will Delaware see more snow?

After a brisk Monday, March 2 with sunny skies and highs only reaching 35 degrees, there’s a chance of snow after 1 a.m. Tuesday, March 3 with freezing rain after 4 a.m. in New Castle County. Snow and freezing rain are expected before noon Tuesday, March 3. The county may receive less than a half inch of accumulation.

In Kent County and Sussex County, there’s a chance of snow and freezing rain after 1 a.m. Tuesday, March 3.

When will it warm up in Delaware?

It will start feeling like spring as warmer air moves into the First State on Tuesday evening, March 3, but wet weather is coming as well.

Advertisement

Rain is predicted from Tuesday, March 3 through Friday, March 5, but spring-like temperatures will make it bearable. In New Castle County temperatures will range from the mid-50s on Wednesday, March 3 to the 60s on Thursday, March 4 and Friday, March 5. Kent County should see temperatures in the 60s and Sussex County will see 70s during the mid- to later part of the week

What’s the weekend forecast?

Remember when you were daydreaming about warm weather during the polar vortex or blizzard? Well, it is coming next weekend.

The forecast is calling for sunny to partly sunny skies throughout Delaware on Saturday, March 7 and Sunday, March 8. Highs will reach the upper 60s in the north to the low 70s in the south.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending