Connect with us

Austin, TX

TxDOT to hold meetings on I-35 study from Austin to SA

Published

on

TxDOT to hold meetings on I-35 study from Austin to SA


Interstate 35 is congested. Nobody needs a study to understand that. The real question is what should be done about it. With as many as 140,000 vehicles traveling on I-35 each day between Austin and San Antonio, the Texas Department of Transportation says that the current traffic volumes exceeds the existing design configuration of the highway.

A new project study will identify safety and mobility improvements along 45 miles of I-35 through Travis, Hays, Comal and Guadalupe counties. As part of the project, the TxDOT will hold a virtual open house meeting with in-person options in three locations, including one in San Marcos, next week to share study information and get input from the community on the I-35 Austin to San Antonio Link Study.

The in-person and virtual open house meetings will provide an opportunity for the community to provide input on transportation alternatives to address the growing safety, mobility and connectivity needs along the corridor due to the project population and employment growth in the region. All comments must be received on or before March 8 to be included in the official meeting record.

The Planning and Environmental Linkage study is evaluating potential improvements along I-35 from SH 45 Southeast to CR 382/Cibolo Valley Drive. It will focus on how to best connect the I-35 Capital Express South project in Travis County to the I-35 Northeast Expansion project (NEX) in Guadalupe County and identify projects that can be developed in the future.

Advertisement

The I-35 Capital Express South project proposes to add two non-tolled high-occupancy vehicle managed lanes in each direction along I-35 from SH 71/Ben White Boulevard to SH 45 Southeast in Austin. The I-35 Northeast Expansion project consists of approximately four miles of non-tolled improvements along I-35 from I-410 South to I-410 North in San Antonio. The I-35 Austin to San Antonio Link Study is evaluating potential future projects between the two with a stated purpose of improving safety and mobility.

The study will explore a variety of alternatives aimed at addressing transportation challenges within the region. Among the options to be considered are strategies falling under Transportation System Management. These would be low-cost operational approaches aim to enhance safety, alleviate congestion and enhance traffic flow. Examples include the synchronization of traffic signals, implementation of changeable message signs and incident management protocols.

Additionally, the study will assess Transportation Demand Management strategies designed to either manage or decrease the demand for automobile- related travel. This encompasses initiatives such as promoting transit usage, encouraging carpooling, establishing high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, fostering bicycling, supporting telecommuting and implementing parking management measures.

The proposal also includes the exploration of two options that would add lanes to I-35. The first option involves the addition of one freeway lane in each direction, with the specific lane type yet to be determined, whether for vehicles, freight, rail, etc. The second option contemplates two additional freeway lanes in each direction, also with lane types to be determined.

The study will also examine what it would look like if there was no new improvements to the existing infrastructure, called a No-Build Alternative This would maintain the ongoing operation of the current roadway and serve as a baseline for the comparative analysis of the proposed alternatives.

Advertisement

The virtual open house will consist of a pre-recorded video presentation and will include both audio and visual components. The virtual open house will be posted online on Tuesday, Feb. 20 by 5 p.m. To review materials and make comments, visit www.txdot. gov and search for “I35 Link Study.”

The in-person open house meetings will be held on the following consecutive days at three locations within the study area:

• Tuesday, Feb. 20, 2024, from 5 to 7 p.m., at the New Braunfels Civic and Convention Center, located at 375 S Castell Avenue, New Braunfels, TX 78130

• Wednesday, Feb. 21, 2024, from 5 to 7 p.m., at Sunfield Station, located at 2610 Main Street #100, Buda, TX 78610

• Thursday, Feb. 22, 2024, from 5 to 7 p.m., at the San Marcos Activity Center, located at 501 E Hopkins Street, San Marcos, TX 78666

Advertisement





Source link

Austin, TX

New Texas law tightens rules for autonomous vehicle companies, including Waymo

Published

on

New Texas law tightens rules for autonomous vehicle companies, including Waymo


Self-driving cars have become a common sight on Austin streets, but a new Texas law is adding tougher requirements for the companies behind the wheelless vehicles.

Senate Bill 2807 imposes stricter rules on autonomous vehicle companies operating in the state, including state authorization, emergency response plans for law enforcement, and a public portal where residents can verify operators and file safety complaints.

The changes come as Austin continues to track incidents involving autonomous vehicles. The city’s autonomous vehicle dashboard shows 75 incidents in 2026, including a collision, eight near misses, and seven incidents of ignoring police direction.

Attorney Drew Gibbs, a partner at Slingshot Law, said one crash involved a Waymo vehicle.

Advertisement

“There was a T-bone collision. A pretty serious T-bone collision where a Waymo just crashed into the side of my client’s vehicle,” Gibbs said.

ALSO| Waymo files voluntary software recall over flooded-lane risks on high-speed roads

KEYE

Advertisement

One of the incidents of ignoring police direction happened during the mass shooting on West Sixth Street back in March, when three people died, and 15 others were injured.

Austin Police Association President Michael Bullock said autonomous vehicles can struggle in unusual situations.

“It didn’t impede on anything in the moment, but it’s not necessarily uncommon where these vehicles don’t quite know how to deal with these one-off scenarios,” Bullock said.

The new law requires autonomous vehicle companies to be authorized by the state, to provide an emergency response plan for law enforcement, and to participate in a public-facing portal that allows the public to verify operators and submit safety complaints.

Kara Kockelman, a professor of transportation and engineering at the University of Texas at Austin, welcomed the added oversight.

Advertisement

“I’m glad that the state is taking this a bit more seriously now,” she said. “It’s important not to just let others slip in without kind of meeting those basic minimums.”

Bullock said the emergency planning requirement may not make a major difference in fast-moving situations. Asked how impactful it is to have a fully laid out emergency response plan, Bullock said, “These plans are great, but it takes time to work through all of those versus the immediacy of having someone behind the wheel.”

The four autonomous vehicle companies operating in Austin — Waymo, Zoox, AV-Ride, and Tesla — are all state-authorized.

The Texas DMV said an autonomous vehicle company can lose its authorization to operate in Texas if the agency deems the vehicles are operating in a way that endangers public safety.

Waymo was contacted for comment, but had not responded.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Jane Nelson, Texas’ top election official, stepping down as Secretary of State

Published

on

Jane Nelson, Texas’ top election official, stepping down as Secretary of State


Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson said Tuesday she will leave the post next month.

What we know:

Advertisement

In a statement, Nelson said her resignation will be effective July 17 but did not provide a reason for the departure.

“It has been an honor to serve the people of Texas in this role,” Nelson said. “My time as Secretary came at an important moment for Texas, and I am proud of what we have been able to accomplish as an agency in under four years.”

Nelson has served in the role since 2023.

Advertisement

Among other things, the Secretary of State oversees elections and business filings in the state and serves as the chief diplomat of Texas.

View of Texas State Senator Jane Nelson, during the 80th Texas Legislature, on the floor of the Senate at the Texas State Capitol, Austin, Texas, January 22, 2007. (John Anderson/The Austin Chronicle / Getty Images)

Advertisement

What they’re saying:

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott described Nelson as extraordinary.

“I am deeply grateful for her long and loyal service and outstanding leadership. She has represented our state with grace and honor across the globe, and Texas is better because of it,” Abbott said. “Cecilia and I wish her all the best in the next chapter of her distinguished career.”

Advertisement

Dig deeper:

According to the Secretary of State’s office, Nelson has presided over seven statewide elections during her tenure with a cumulative 27 million ballots cast and broke a record with more than 3 million active business filers.

Advertisement

Nelson also served three decades in the Texas Senate, where she remains the longest-serving Republican in state history.

The Source: Information in this story came from the Texas Secretary of State’s office.

TexasElectionPoliticsTexas Politics2026 ElectionsAustinGreg Abbott
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Austin OKs $2.35 billion of revenue bonds, eyes GO bond election

Published

on

Austin OKs .35 billion of revenue bonds, eyes GO bond election


Austin Mayor Kirk Watson wants the city council to hold off on a bond measure this year to set up a better proposal in 2028.

Michael Dorman

Austin, Texas, is revving up to sell $2.35 billion of debt for a convention center and a wastewater treatment plant, while a legal battle continues over bonds to help finance a light rail system. 

Processing Content

Advertisement

The bond boom comes as the city council voted on Thursday to pursue the development of a $390 million baseline general obligation bond package for the November ballot despite a call by Mayor Kirk Watson to wait until 2028.

“I believe we can and we should bring forward significant investments in the future,” he said. “In fact, if we restore compliance with our financial policies and we maintain the discipline we actually will have greater future capacity to do more for this community in 2028.”

A bond election would follow the rejection of a maintenance and operations property tax hike by 63% of city voters in November. In the wake of the defeat, Austin officials took steps to better manage its finances, including pursuing a citywide performance and efficiency audit of city operations.

The city, which last held a successful GO bond election in 2022 for $350 million of debt for affordable housing, had $1.03 billion of unissued voter-approved GO bond authorization as of the Sept. 30 end of fiscal 2025. Last year, Austin sold $796 million of GO bonds and certificates of obligation in a deal rated triple-A with stable outlooks by S&P Global Ratings and Fitch Ratings.

On Thursday, the city council signed off on a $34.5 million wrongful prosecution and conviction settlement with four individuals to be financed through the sale of non-voter-approved GO bonds. 

Advertisement

The council approved up to $1.35 billion of special tax revenue bonds on May 21 for a $1.6 billion project to replace the city’s now-demolished convention center with a facility that will increase rentable event space to 620,000 square feet from 365,000 square feet.

Construction site for Austin convention center project
Construction site for Austin’s convention center project, shown in March. The city council approved up to $1.35 billion of special tax revenue bonds for a bigger convention center.

Rich Saskal

The bonds are backed with revenue from certain city hotel occupancy taxes and incremental state tax revenue generated within a project finance zone the city established in 2024. Amounts and timings for issuing the debt are being determined, according to the city, which filed a petition with a Travis County District Court for an expedited validation of the bonds. 

An ordinance approved in October to issue up to an initial $650 million of bonds for the project was rescinded by the council.

The city also plans to refund hotel occupancy tax-backed debt issued for the prior convention center in order to pledge a 4.5% hotel tax for the upcoming bonds. 

Advertisement

“The refunding bonds are a separate, but related item to the expansion bonds and will only be secured by 2% venue HOT,” city documents said. “The 2% venue HOT will not be pledged to the expansion bonds and will cease to be collected upon final maturity or early payoff of (the refunding bonds).” 

A petition drive that would have delayed the project fell 494 signatures short of a requirement for 20,000 valid signatures of registered voters, Austin City Clerk Erika Brady determined in November.

Petition backers are appealing a district court’s refusal to force validation in state appellate court after the Texas Supreme Court dismissed their petition for a writ of mandamus, according to attorneys.

The petition drive by Austin United PAC and others sought a ballot measure to stop the demolition and reconstruction of the convention center for seven years — or until the project was approved by voters — and prioritize city funding for local live music, arts, cultural, and outdoor tourism. 

The Austin City Council also approved as much as $1 billion of water and wastewater system revenue bonds last month for the Walnut Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant expansion and enhancement project. The bonds will be used to obtain a direct low-interest loan from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act program. 

Advertisement

Other financing sources for the $1.5 billion project are $59 million from the Texas Water Development Board Clean Water State Revolving Fund program and funding from Austin Water.

A groundbreaking for the project, which is aimed at improving treatment processes and protecting the Colorado River, was held in April.

The plant, which serves more than 50% of Austin and operates at a treatment capacity of 75 million gallons per day, will have its capacity increased to 100 MGD, helping meet future demand and requirements set by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality for Austin’s projected growth of 1.5 million by 2040, according to a city statement.

A legal logjam over a light rail system eased May 22 when the Texas Supreme Court finally ruled on a procedural issue related to an initial $150 million of bonds for the project. The high court ordered a Travis County Court judge to decide whether the bonds’ issuer, the Austin Transit Partnership, a nonprofit corporation created by the city and Capital Metro Transportation Authority, has standing to seek court validation for the debt.

City taxpayers who filed a lawsuit in 2023, along with the Texas Attorney General’s Office have been challenging the legality of the bonds, which would be paid off with a portion of Austin’s operation and maintenance property taxes voters approved in November 2020 for what was then billed as a 27-mile, 31-station light-rail project estimated to cost $7.1 billion.

Advertisement

Escalating costs led ATP to downsize Project Connect to an initial less than 10-mile, 15-station system with a similar price tag. The completion of a federal environmental review in January allowed the project to continue a process to seek billions of dollars in federal grants and loans.

ATP said Project Connect is moving forward with construction scheduled to begin next year.  

“We are confident in our case and look forward to our day in court,” ATP said in a statement. “The pending litigation has not slowed our progress advancing Austin light rail, which has hit major milestones in the federal funding process, design, and pre-construction work this year.” 

Bill Aleshire, an attorney who filed the taxpayers’ lawsuit, cautioned that several issues remain before the court, including the legality of the downsized project and the ability to pay off bonds with property tax revenue that is supposed to be used for operations. 

“Their federal funding is uncertain, their ability to issue bonds is uncertain, and they just stubbornly will not listen to us and say it’s time to pause Project Connect and rethink it, that maybe rail isn’t the best way to go at this time and maybe we can’t afford it at this time,” he said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending